小麦新品种川麦104的遗传构成分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.12.001

中国农业科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (12): 2281-2291.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.12.001

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 下一篇

小麦新品种川麦104的遗传构成分析

李俊1, 2, 万洪深2, 杨武云2, 王琴2, 朱欣果2, 胡晓蓉2, 魏会廷3, 汤永禄2, 李朝苏2, 彭正松4, 周永红1

1、四川农业大学小麦研究所，四川温江 611130；
2、四川省农业科学院作物研究所/农业部西南地区小麦生物学与遗传育种重点实验室，成都 610066；
3、四川省农业科学院植物保护研究所，成都 610066；
4、西华师范大学生命科学院，四川南充 637002

收稿日期:2013-12-16 出版日期:2014-06-15 发布日期:2014-03-24
通讯作者: 周永红，E-mail：zhouyh@sicau.edu.cn;彭正松，E-mail：PZS8833@163.com
作者简介:李俊，E-mail：lijunchd@126.com
基金资助:
国家“973”科技支撑计划（2011CB100100）、国家小麦产业技术体系（CARS-3-2-41）、四川省科技计划（2010HH0052，2011NZ0098-16）

Dissection of Genetic Components in the New High-Yielding Wheat Cultivar Chuanmai 104

LI Jun-1, 2 , WAN Hong-Shen-2, YANG Wu-Yun-2, WANG Qin-2, ZHU Xin-Guo-2, HU Xiao-Rong-2, WEI Hui-Ting-3, TANG Yong-Lu-2, LI Chao-Su-2, PENG Zheng-Song-4, ZHOU Yong-Hong-1

1、Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang 611130, Sichuan;
2、Crop Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Breeding in Wheat (Southwest), Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu 610066;
3、Plant Protection Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066;
4、College of Life Science,China West Normal University, Nanchong 637002, Sichuan

Received:2013-12-16 Online:2014-06-15 Published:2014-03-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】解析突破性高产小麦新品种川麦104的遗传构成，探讨双亲川麦42和川农16对其高产特性的贡献。【方法】利用已构建的遗传连锁图谱上的176个SSR和683个DArT标记对川麦104及其亲本进行分析，了解川麦104的遗传构成；根据已定位到的产量性状QTL，分析来源于双亲的染色体区段对川麦104产量相关性状的贡献。【结果】在川麦104的双亲具有差异的859个多态位点中（22个位点缺失），有522个位点上的等位基因来源于川麦42，315个位点上的等位基因来源于川农16；川麦104更多地继承了川麦42的遗传成分（60.8%）；川麦104中来源于双亲的遗传位点在A、B和D基因组分布不同，来源于川麦42的等位位点在A、B和D基因组所占比例分别为55.00%、60.20%和67.27%；川麦104中来源于双亲的等位位点在21条染色体上的分布也不同，来源于川麦42的等位位点主要分布于3A、5A、7A、1B、5B、7B、3D、4D、5D和7D染色体上，来源于川农16的等位位点主要分布于4A、3B、4B、6B、1D、2D和6D染色体上。川麦104来源于双亲的染色体区段（遗传距离大于5 cM）共68个，总长度为3 089.6 cM；来源于川麦42和川农16的染色体区段分别为36和32个，来源于川麦42的染色体区段主要分布在3D、5D、7A、7B和7D染色体上，来源于川农16的染色体区段主要分布在3B、4B和6D染色体上；在A和D基因组川麦104来源于川麦42的染色体区段比川农16的多，B基因组中来源于川农16的染色体区段比川麦42的多。在1B、1D、2B、4A、4D、5A、5B、5D和7A染色体上，9个来源于川麦42的染色体区段以及5个来源于川农16的染色体区段富集了与产量性状相关的QTL，其中，在1BS和4A染色体上来源于川麦42的染色体区段携带增加穗粒数的QTL等位位点；在1D、2B和4A染色体上来源于川农16的染色体区段携带增加单位面积穗数的QTL等位位点；5B染色体上来源于川麦42的染色体区段和4A、4D染色体上来源于川农16的染色体区段均携带增加千粒重的QTL等位位点，这些QTL的聚合对川麦104的产量三因素有增效作用。【结论】小麦新品种川麦104的高穗粒数特性来源于川麦42，多穗数特性来源于川农16，其千粒重特性双亲均有贡献，表明双亲的正效产量性状QTL重组是川麦104的高产遗传基础。

关键词: 川麦104 , SSR , DArT标记 , 遗传构成

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of the study is to dissect the genetic components of the new high-yielding wheat cultivar Chuanmai 104 developed by crossing wheat cultivars Chuanmai 42 with Chuannong 16 and detect the parental contribution to it. 【Method】Chuanmai 104 and its parents were genotyped using all the involved markers covering the whole genome to dissect the genetic components of Chuanmai 104. The parental contributions to the yield-related function of the genomic regions of Chuanmai 104 from each parent were also analyzed according to the authors’ previous-identified QTLs.【Result】Among the 859 polymorphic genetic loci (22 were missing in Chuanmai 104), the alleles at 522 loci in Chuanmai 104 were from the parent Chuanmai 42, while the alleles at the other 315 loci were from the other parent Chuannong 16. Therefore, Chuanmai 104 inherited more alleles from the parent Chuanmai 42 (60.8%). Parental contributions to Chuanmai 104 differed among A, B and D genomes and chromosomes. The frequencies of the alleles from Chuanmai 42 at the investigated loci of A, B and D genomes were 55.00%, 60.20% and 67.27%, respectively. These loci from Chuanmai 42 were broadly distributed on chromosomes 3A, 5A, 7A, 1B, 5B, 7B, 3D, 4D, 5D and 7D, and the other loci from Chuannong 16 were located on chromosomes 4A, 3B, 4B, 6B, 1D, 2D and 6D. A total of 68 genomic regions with the genetic distance larger than 5 cM were detected in Chuanmai 104, which were inherited from its parents and the total genetic length was 3,089.6 cM all over the whole map. Among these genomic regions, the parents Chuanmai 42 and Chuannong 16 contributed about 36 and 32 genomic regions to Chuanmai 104, respectively. The genomic regions inherited from Chuanmai 42 were distributed on chromosomes 3D, 5D, 7A, 7B and 7D, and the other regions from Chuannong 16 were located on chromosomes 3B, 4B and 6D. Chuanmai 104 inherited more genomic regions from Chuanmai 42 in A and D genomes and the genomic regions inherited from Chuannong 16 were more than those from Chuanmai 42 in B genome. In these detected genomic regions on chromosomes 1B, 1D, 2B, 4A, 4D, 5A, 5B, 5D and 7A, about nine genomic regions with Chuanmai 42-type haplotype and five genomic regions with Chuannong 16-type haplotype were significantly associated with yield-related traits by QTL mapping using the Chuanmai 42×Chuannong 16 RILs, respectively. In the yield-related genomic regions, the QTL alleles increasing the spike number per square meter on 1D, 2B and 4A chromosomes were provided by the parent Chuannong 16, while QTL alleles associated with more grain number per spike on 1BS chromosome arm and 4A chromosome were from the other parent Chuanmai 42. Moreover, Chuanmai 104 inherited the QTL alleles with higher thousand-kernel weight from both parents on 5B, 4A and 4D chromosomes, respectively. The pyramiding of these additive QTL alleles from each parent enhanced yield-related traits, which led directly to the character of high yield potential of Chuanmai 104. 【Conclusion】The parental contributions of Chuanmai 42 and Chuannong 16 to their offspring Chuanmai 104 in a whole genome scale was confirmed. Chuanmai 104 inherited the desirable properties of higher grain number per spike from Chuanmai 42, spike number per square meter from Chuannong 16, and thousand-kernel weight combined from both parents by phenotypic and QTL analysis. These characteristics are the genetic basis contributed to the high yield potential of Chuanmai 104.

Key words: Chuanmai 104 , SSR , DArT , genetic components

李俊1, 2, 万洪深2, 杨武云2, 王琴2, 朱欣果2, 胡晓蓉2, 魏会廷3, 汤永禄2, 李朝苏2, 彭正松4, 周永红1. 小麦新品种川麦104的遗传构成分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(12): 2281-2291.

LI Jun-1, 2 , WAN Hong-Shen-2, YANG Wu-Yun-2, WANG Qin-2, ZHU Xin-Guo-2, HU Xiao-Rong-2, WEI Hui-Ting-3, TANG Yong-Lu-2, LI Chao-Su-2, PENG Zheng-Song-4, ZHOU Yong-Hong-1. Dissection of Genetic Components in the New High-Yielding Wheat Cultivar Chuanmai 104[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(12): 2281-2291.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.12.001

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2014/V47/I12/2281

参考文献

[1]何中虎, 夏先春, 陈新民, 庄巧生. 中国小麦育种进展与展望. 作物学报, 2011, 37(2): 202-215.

He Z H, Xia X C, Chen X M, Zhuang Q S. Progress of wheat breeding in China and the future perspective. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(2): 202-215. ( in Chinese)

[2]庄巧生. 中国小麦品种改良及系谱分析, 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.

Zhuang Q S. Chinese Wheat Improvement and Pedigree Analysis. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2003. (in Chinese)

[3]盖红梅, 王兰芬, 游光霞, 郝晨阳, 董玉琛, 张学勇. 基于SSR标记的小麦骨干亲本育种重要性研究. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(5): 1503-1511.

Ge H M, Wang L F, You G X, Hao C Y, Dong Y C, Zhang X Y. Fundamental roles of cornerstone breeding lines in wheat reflected by SSR random scanning. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(5): 1503-1511. (in Chinese)

[4]司清林, 刘新伦, 刘智奎, 王长有, 吉万全. 阿夫及其衍生小麦品种(系)的SSR分析. 作物学报, 2009, 35(4): 615-619.

Si Q L, Liu X L, Liu Z K, Wang C Y, Ji W Q. SSR analysis of Funo wheat and its derivatives. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(4): 615-619. ( in Chinese)

[5]李小军, 徐鑫, 刘伟华, 李秀全, 李立会. 利用SSR 标记探讨骨干亲本欧柔在衍生品种的遗传. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(10): 3397-3404.

Li X J, Xu X, Liu W H, Li X Q, Li L H. Genetic diversity of the founder parent Orofen and its progenies revealed by SSR markers. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(10): 3397-3404. (in Chinese)

[6]韩俊, 张连松, 李静婷, 石丽娟, 解超杰, 尤明山, 杨作民, 刘广田, 孙其信, 刘志勇. 小麦骨干亲本“胜利麦/燕大1817”杂交组合后代衍生品种遗传构成解析. 作物学报, 2009, 35(8): 1395-1404.

Han J, Zhang L S, Li J T, Shi L J, Xie C J, You M S, Yang Z M, Liu G T, Sun Q X, Liu Z Y. Molecular dissection of core parental cross “Triumph/Yanda 1817” and its derivatives in wheat breeding program. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(8): 1395-1404. (in Chinese)

[7]袁园园, 王庆专, 崔法, 张景涛, 杜斌, 王洪刚. 小麦骨干亲本碧蚂4号的基因组特异位点及其在衍生后代中的传递. 作物学报, 2010, 36(1): 9-16.

Yuan Y Y, Wang Q Z, Cui F, Zhang J T, Du B, Wang H G. Specific loci in genome of wheat milestone parent Bima 4 and their transmission in derivatives. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(1): 9-16. (in Chinese)

[8]徐鑫, 李小军, 李秀全, 杨欣明, 刘伟华, 高爱农, 李立会. 小麦骨干亲本洛夫林10号1BL/1RS在衍生品种中的遗传分析. 麦类作物学报, 2010, 30(2): 221-226.

Xu X, Li X J, Li X Q, Yang X M, Liu W H, Gao A N, Li L H. Inheritance of 1BL/ 1RS of founder parent Lovrin 10 in its progeny. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2010, 30(2): 221- 226. (in Chinese)

[9]肖永贵, 殷贵鸿, 李慧慧, 夏先春, 阎俊, 郑天存, 吉万全, 何中虎, 小麦骨干亲本周 8425B 及其衍生品种的遗传解析和抗条锈病基因定位, 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(19): 3919-3929.

Xiao Y G, Yin G H, Li H H, Xia X C, Yan J, Zheng T C, Ji W Q, He Z H. Genetic diversity and genome-wide association analysis of stripe rust resistance among the core wheat parent Zhou 8425B and its derivatives. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(19): 3919-3929. (in Chinese)

[10]于海霞, 肖静, 田纪春. 小麦骨干亲本矮孟牛及其衍生后代遗传解析, 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(2): 199-207.

Yu H X, Xiao J, Tian J C. Genetic dissection of milestone parent Aimengniu and its derivatives. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(2): 199-207. (in Chinese)

[11]盖红梅, 李玉刚, 王瑞英, 李振清, 王圣健, 高峻岭, 张学勇. 鲁麦14 对山东新选育小麦品种的遗传贡献. 作物学报, 2012, 38(6): 954-961.

Ge H M, Li Y G, Wang R Y, Li Z Q, Wang S J, Gao J L, Zhang X Y. Genetic contribution of Lumai 14 to novel wheat varieties developed in Shandong province. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(6): 954-961. (in Chinese)

[12]李小军, 胡铁柱, 李淦, 姜小苓, 冯素伟, 董娜, 张自阳, 茹振钢, 黄勇. 小麦品种百农AK58及其姊妹系的遗传构成分析. 作物学报, 2012, 38(3): 436-446.

Li X J, Hu T Z, Li G, Jiang X L, Feng S W, Dong N, Zhang Z Y, Ru Z G, Huang Y. Genetic analysis of broad-grown wheat cultivar Bainong AK58 and its Sib lines. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(3): 436-446. (in Chinese)

[13]Li X J, Xu X, Yang X M, Li X Q, Liu W H, Gao A N, Li L H. Genetic diversity among a founder parent and widely grown wheat cultivars derived from the same origin based on morphological traits and microsatellite markers. Crop Pasture Science, 2012, 63: 303-310.

[14]Ge H M, You G X, Wang L F, Hao C Y, Dong Y S, Li Z S, Zhang X Y. Genome selection sweep and association analysis shed light on future breeding by design in wheat. Crop Science, 2012, 52: 1218-1228.

[15]张学勇, 童依平, 游光霞, 郝晨阳, 盖红梅, 王兰芬, 李滨, 董玉琛, 李振声. 选择牵连效应分析: 发掘重要基因的新思路. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(8): 1526-1535.

Zhang X Y, Tong Y P, You G X, Hao C Y, Ge H M, Wang L F, Li B, Dong Y C, Li Z S. Hitchhiking effect mapping: A new approach for discovering agronomic important genes. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(8): 1526-1535. (in Chinese)

[16]Bernardo R, Murigneux A, Maisonneuve J P, Johnsson C, Karaman Z. RFLP-based estimates of parental contribution to F2- and BC1-derived maize inbreds. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1997, 94: 652-656.

[17]Bernardo R, Romero-Severson J, Ziegle J, Hauser J, Joe L, Hookstra G, Doerge R W. Parental contribution and coefficient of coancestry among maize inbreds: Pedigree, RFLP, and SSR data. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2000, 100: 552-556.

[18]Sjakste T G, Rashal I, Röder M S. Inheritance of microsatellite alleles in pedigrees of Latvian barley varieties and related European ancestors. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2003, 106: 539-549.

[19]Terzi V, Morcia C, Stanca A M, Kucera L, Fares C, Codianni P, Fonzo N D, Faccioli P. Assessment of genetic diversity in emmer (Triticum dicoccon Schrank) durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) derived lines and their parents using mapped and unmapped molecular markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2007, 54: 1613-1621.

[20]Zhang X Y, Li C W, Wang L F, Wang H M, You G X, Dong Y S. An estimation of the minimum number of SSR alleles needed to reveal genetic relationships in wheat varieties: I. Information from large-scale planted varieties and cornerstone breeding parents in Chinese wheat improvement and production. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2002, 106(1): 112-117.

[21]Groos C, Robert N, Bervas E, Charmet G. Genetic analysis of grain protein-content, grain yield and thousand-kernel weight in bread wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2003, 106: 1032-1040.

[22]Quarrie S A, Steed A, Calestani C, Semikhodskii A, Lebreton C, Chinoy C, Steele N, Pljevljakusic D, Waterman E, Weyen J, Schondelmaier J, Habash D Z, Farmer P, Saker L, Clarkson D T, Abugalieva A, Yessimbekova M, Turuspekov Y, Abugalieva S, Tuberosa R, Sanguineti M C, Hollington P A, Aragues R, Royo A, Dodig D. A high-density genetic map of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from the cross Chinese Spring × SQ1 and its use to compare QTLs for grain yield across a range of environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2005, 110: 865-880.

[23]Quarrie S A, Pekic Quarrie S, Radosevic R, Rancic D, Kaminska A, Barnes J D, Leverington M, Ceoloni C, Dodig D. Dissecting a wheat QTL for yield present in a range of environments: From the QTL to candidate genes. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2006, 57: 2627-2637.

[24]Su J Y, Xiao Y M, Li M, Liu Q Y, Li B, Tong Y P, Jia J Z, Li Z S. Mapping QTLs for phosphorus-deficiency tolerance at wheat seedling stage. Plant Soil, 2006, 281: 25-36.

[25]Kumar N, Kulwal P L, Balyan H S, Gupta P K. QTL mapping for yield and yield contributing traits in two mapping populations of bread wheat. Molecular Breeding, 2007, 19: 163-177.

[26]Janice L C, Daryl J S, Anita L B B, P Douglas B, Gary H C. Molecular mapping of quantitative trait loci for yield and yield components in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2008, 117: 595-608.

[27]Su J Y, Zheng Q, Li H W, Li B, Jing R L, Tong Y P, Li Z S. Detection of QTLs for phosphorus use efficiency in relation to agronomic performance of wheat grown under phosphorus sufficient and limited conditions. Plant Science, 2009, 176: 824-836.

[28]Wang R X, Hai L, Zhang X Y, You G X, Yan C S, Xiao S H. QTL mapping for grain filling rate and yield-related traits in RILs of the Chinese winter wheat population Heshangmai×Yu8679. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2009, 118: 313-325.

[29]Yao J, Wang L X, Liu L H, Zhao C P, Zheng Y L. Association mapping of agronomic traits on chromosome 2A of wheat. Genetica, 2009, 137: 67-75.

[30]McIntyre C L, Mathews K L, Rattey A, Chapman S C, Drenth J, Ghaderi M, Reynolds M, Shorter R. Molecular detection of genomic regions associated with grain yield and yield-related components in an elite bread wheat cross evaluated under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2010, 120: 527-541.

[31]Deng S M, Wu X R, Wu Y Y, Zhou R G, Wang H G, Jia J Z, Liu S B. Characterization and precise mapping of a QTL increasing spike number with pleiotropic effects in wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2011, 122: 281-289.

[32]Wang J S, Liu W H, Wang H, Li L H, Wu J, Yang X M, Li X Q, Gao A N. QTL mapping of yield-related traits in the wheat germplasm 3228. Euphytica, 2011, 177: 277-292.

[33]Jia H Y, Wan H S, Yang S H, Zhang Z Z, Kong Z X, Xue S L, Zhang L X, Ma Z Q. Genetic dissection of yield-related traits in a recombinant inbred line population created using a key breeding parent in China’s wheat breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2013, 126: 2123-2139.

[34]Li G Q, Li Z F, Yang W Y, Zhang Y, He Z H, Xu S C, Singh R P, Qu Y Y, Xia X C. Molecular mapping of stripe rust resistance gene YrCH42 in Chinese wheat cultivar Chuanmai 42 and its allelism with Yr24 and Yr26. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006, 112: 1434-1440.

小麦新品种川麦104的遗传构成分析

Dissection of Genetic Components in the New High-Yielding Wheat Cultivar Chuanmai 104

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	朱延松,张亚飞,程莉,杨胜男,赵婉彤,江东. 利用Target SSR-seq技术鉴定60份柑橘种质资源[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(22): 4458-4472.
[2]	胡光明,张琼,韩飞,李大卫,李作洲,汪志,赵婷婷,田华,刘小莉,钟彩虹. 猕猴桃属植物通用型SSR分子标记引物的筛选及应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(17): 3411-3425.
[3]	杨程,龚桂芝,彭祝春,常珍珍,易璇,洪棋斌. 基于cpInDel标记和cpSSR标记的柑橘属及近缘属植物亲缘关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(16): 3210-3223.
[4]	王璐伟,沈志军,李贺欢,潘磊,牛良,崔国朝,曾文芳,王志强,鲁振华. 基于SSR荧光标记的79份桃种质遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 3002-3017.
[5]	陈旭,郝雅琼,聂兴华,杨海莹,刘松,王雪峰,曹庆芹,秦岭,邢宇. 板栗总苞和坚果主要性状与SSR标记的关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2613-2628.
[6]	聂兴华, 郑瑞杰, 赵永廉, 曹庆芹, 秦岭, 邢宇. 利用荧光SSR分子标记评估中国栗属植物遗传多样性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(8): 1739-1750.
[7]	胡冬梅,江东,李永平,彭磊,李冬云,朱延松,杨云光. 利用Target SSR-seq技术鉴定温州蜜柑芽变材料[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(23): 5083-5096.
[8]	王彦,范保杰,曹志敏,张志肖,苏秋竹,王珅,王学清,彭秀国,梅丽,武玉华,刘少兴,田胜民,徐俊杰,蒋春志,王伟娟,刘长友,田静. 基于新遗传连锁图谱的豇豆抗豆象QTL定位[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(22): 4740-4749.
[9]	陈雪,王瑞,井付钰,张胜森,贾乐东,段谋正,吴宇. 基于二代测序的甘蓝型油菜白花基因候选区间定位及连锁标记验证[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(6): 1108-1117.
[10]	徐志军,赵胜,徐磊,胡小文,安东升,刘洋. 基于RNA-seq数据的栽培种花生SSR位点鉴定和标记开发[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(4): 695-706.
[11]	陈小红,何杰丽,石甜甜,邵欢欢,王海岗,陈凌,高志军,王瑞云,乔治军. 基于转录组测序开发糜子SSR标记[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(10): 1940-1949.
[12]	寇淑君, 霍阿红, 付国庆, 纪军建, 王瑶, 左振兴, 刘敏轩, 陆平. 利用荧光SSR分析中国糜子的遗传多样性和群体遗传结构[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(9): 1475-1477.
[13]	常佳迎,刘树森,马红霞,石洁,郭宁,张海剑. 黄淮海地区夏玉米弯孢叶斑病菌遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(5): 822-836.
[14]	武炳超, 童磊, 杜昭昌, 胡家菱, 张欢, 陈燚, 刘伟, 张新全, 黄琳凯. ⁶⁰Co-γ射线对2种狼尾草属牧草的诱变效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(3): 414-427.
[15]	李剑峰,张博,全建章,王永芳,张小梅,赵渊,袁玺垒,贾小平,董志平. 基于SSR标记的谷子主要农艺性状关联位点检测及等位变异分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(24): 4453-4469.