玉米不同基因型双列杂交后代抽丝后氮素代谢特性

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.01.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】阐明保绿型玉米和非保绿型玉米双列杂交后代抽丝后氮素代谢特征。【方法】选育氮高效品种是实现玉米高产高效生产的根本途径。为明确不同基因型玉米双列杂交后代的氮代谢和利用特征，筛选出保绿型玉米氮高效品种，采用大田试验的方法，选择保绿型（SG, stay-green）玉米自交系Q319、CZ01、VA91和非保绿型（NSG, non-stay-green）玉米自交系BM、B73、MO17，以此组配6×6完全双列杂交，以双列杂交后代为材料，系统研究不同玉米品种主要生育时期叶片、茎鞘、籽粒氮含量和粗蛋白质含量的变化，抽丝前后氮素积累、分配和氮收获指数，叶片氮代谢关键酶硝酸还原酶(NR)、谷氨酰胺合成酶（GS）、谷氨酸合成酶（GOGAT）活性等的影响，并对叶片氮代谢酶活性与保绿性的相关性进行了分析。【结果】不同基因型双列杂交后代抽丝后叶片氮含量呈倒“V”型变化特性，高峰期在灌浆期前后。茎鞘和籽粒氮含量均随生育期推进呈逐渐降低的变化趋势。保绿型（SG）玉米叶片、茎鞘、籽粒氮含量均显著高于非保绿型（NSG）玉米。抽丝前保绿型玉米自交后代氮积累、抽丝后氮积累、氮积累总量分别比NSG高20.00%、82.30%和45.23%；其转移量、转移率和氮素收获指数则分别比NSG低51.28%、66.59%和14.32%，抽丝后保绿型玉米的氮积累量约占50%，而非保绿型玉米仅为40%左右。保绿型玉米自交后代叶片和茎鞘粗蛋白质含量分别比非保绿型高108.23%和33.63%。抽丝至成熟期叶片硝酸还原酶活性的变化呈单峰曲线，高峰期在灌浆期前后，不同基因型玉米间变化趋势一致。抽丝后叶片GS活性、GOGAT活性和可溶性蛋白含量变化均呈单峰曲线，高峰期在抽丝后15 d左右。保绿型玉米NR活性、GS活性、GOGAT活性和可溶性蛋白含量在各时期均高于非保绿型。相关分析表明，叶片保绿度与叶片氮含量、可溶性蛋白含量、GOGAT活性呈极显著的正相关，与GS活性呈显著正相关，与NR呈正相关，但不显著。叶片氮含量与可溶性蛋白、GOGAT活性、GS活性呈极显著的正相关。氮素的同化与相关的酶活性关系极为密切。【结论】较高的氮代谢水平是叶片保绿的营养生理基础之一，保绿型玉米有较高的氮代谢酶活性，在后期有较强的氮素吸收和同化能力，保绿性可作为筛选氮高效玉米品种的一个重要农艺性状。

关键词: 玉米 , 基因型 , 保绿性 , 氮代谢

Abstract: 【Objective】 This study aimed to explore the characteristic of nitrogen metabolic in diallel cross generation of different maize genotypes after silking.【Method】Selection high nitrogen use efficiency hybrid maize plays an important role in high yield and high efficiency production of maize A full diallel cross was made with three stay-green inbred lines (Q319, CZ01, VA91) and three non-stay-green inbred lines (BM, B73, MO17) in field. The physiological traits of nitrogen metabolic in diallel cross generation were analyzed.【Result】Content of nitrogen in leaf graphed as inverted “V”-shapes after silking stage in different maize genotypes. The peak of nitrogen content in leaf occurred in filling stage. Content of nitrogen in stem-sheaf and sheath reduced with the extension of the growth duration. Content of nitrogen in leaf, stem-sheaf and sheath of stay-green (SG) inbred lines were much higher than those in non-green-stay (NSG) ones. Nitrogen accumulation before silking stage (NABS), nitrogen accumulation after silking stage (NAAS) and total nitrogen accumulation (TNA) in SG self cross were 20.00%, 82.30% and 45.23%, respectively, higher than those in NSG ones. However nitrogen translocation, nitrogen translocation rate and nitrogen harvest index in SG were 51.28%, 66.59% and 14.32% , which was significantly lower than those in NSG ones. TNA of SG was about 50% and TNA of NSG was only 40% after silking stage. Crude protein content in leaf and stem-sheaf of SG were 108.23% and 33.63%, higher than those in NSG ones. The straws were still higher valuable after harvesting. Some key enzymes to nitrogen metabolic activity such as nitrate reductase (NR) activity, glutamate synthetase (GOGAT) and glutamine synthetase (GS) in leaf of stay-green type were significantly higher than those in non-green-stay types. NR activity in leaf increased firstly and the peak occurred in filling stage after silking stage in different maize genotypes. GS activity, GOGAT activity and soluble protein content in leaf increased firstly, and the peak occurred 15 days after silking. Correlation analysis between stay-green degree, content of nitrogen, soluble protein content, GS activity, GOGAT activity and NR activity indicated that there existed significantly or highly significant positive correlations. Activities of those key enzymes on nitrogen metabolism were significantly important for nitrogen assimilation. 【Conclusion】 High nitrogen metabolism level is one of the nutrition physiological basis which makes leaves keep green for long time. Compared with the non-stay-green types, stay-green genotypes behave higher activities of key enzymes to nitrogen metabolic and higher nitrogen asorption and assimilation at late growth stage. In conclusion, character of stay-green could be used as an important agronomic trait in selecting high nitrogen efficient genotypes and inbred line.

Key words: maize (Zea mays L.) , genotype , stay-green trait , nitrogen metabolism

刘春晓1, 赵海军1, 董树亭2, 王庆成1, 李宗新1, 刘开昌1. 玉米不同基因型双列杂交后代抽丝后氮素代谢特性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(1): 33-42.

LIU Chun-Xiao-1, ZHAO Hai-Jun-1, DONG Shu-Ting-2, WANG Qing-Cheng-1, LI Zong-Xin-1, LIU Kai-Chang-1. Study on Characteristics of Nitrogen Metabolism in Diallel Cross Generation of Different Maize Genotypes After Silking[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(1): 33-42.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.01.004

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2014/V47/I1/33

参考文献

[1]汪黎明, 王庆成, 孟昭东. 中国玉米品种及其系谱. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2010: 18-22.

Wang L M, Wang Q C, Meng Z D. Maize Varieties and Their Genealogy in China. Shanghai: Technology Press of Shanghai. 2010: 18-22. (in Chinese)

[2]Xu W W, Rosenow D T, Nguyen H T. Stay-green trait in grain sorghum: relationship between visual rating and leaf chlorophyll concentration. Plant Breeding, 2000, 119: 365-367.

[3]Woodfin C A. Rosenow D T, Clark L E. Association between the stay-green trait and lodging resistance in sorghum. Agronomy Abstracts, ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998: 102.

[4]Borrell A K, Hammer G L. "Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought?” II. Dry matter production and yield. Crop Science, 2000, 40: 1037-1048.

[5]Subudhi P K, Rosenow D T, Nguyen H T. Quantitative trait loci for the stay•green trait in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.Moench): consistency across genetic backgrounds and environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2000, 101: 733-741.

[6]Bekavac G. Path analysis of stay-green trait in maize. Cereal Research Communications, 1998, 26(2): 161-167.

[7]Russell W A. Registration of B93 and B94 inbred lines of maize. Crop Science, 1991, 31(1): 247-248.

[8]米国华, 陈范骏, 春亮, 郭亚芬, 田秋英, 张福锁. 玉米氮高效品种的生物学特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(1): 155-159.

Mi G H, Chen F J, Chun L, Guo Y F, Tian Q Y, Zhang F S. Biological characteristics of nitrogen efficient maize genotypes. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007, 13(1): 155-159. (in Chinese)

[9]Borrell A K, Hammer G L, Henzell R G. Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought?Ⅱ.Dry matter production and yield. Crop Science, 2000, 40(4): 1037-1048.

[10]Willman M R, Below F E, Lambert R J, Howey A E, Mies D W. Plant traits related to productivity of maize: II. Development of multiple trait models. Crop Science, 1987, 27: 1122-1126.

[11]Harvey P H. Herdeitary variation in plant nutrition. Genetics, 1939, 24: 437-461.

[12]Cox M C, Qualset C O, Rains D W. Genetic variation for nitrogen assimilation and translocation in wheat I: Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation. Crop Science, 1985, 25: 430-435.

[13]殷春渊, 张庆, 魏海燕, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 马群, 杭杰, 张胜飞. 不同产量类型水稻基因型氮素吸收、利用效率的差异. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(1): 39-50.

Yin C Y, Zhang Q, Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Ma Q, Hang J, Zhang S F. Differences in nitrogen absorption and use efficiency in rice genotypes with different yield performance. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(1): 39-50. (in Chinese)

[14]刘景辉, 刘克礼. 春玉米需氮规律的研究. 内蒙古农牧学院学报, 1994, 15(3): 12-18.

Liu J H, Liu K L. A study on the regularity of nitrogen requirement in sprihg maize. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 1994, 15(3): 12- 18. (in Chinese)

[15]春亮, 陈范骏, 张福锁, 米国华. 不同氮效率玉米杂交种的根系生长、氮素吸收与产量形成. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(5): 615-619.

Chun L, Chen F J, Zhang F S, Mi G H. Root growth, nitrogen uptake and yield formation of hybrid maize with different N efficiency. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2005, 11(5): 615-619. (in Chinese)

[16]Ramachandra T V, Krishnamurthy K, Kailasam C. Functional crop and cob growth models of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 1992, 168: 208-221.

[17]何萍, 金继运, 林葆. 氮肥用量对春玉米叶片衰老的影响及其机理研究. 中国农业科学, 1998, 31(3): 66-71.

He P, Jin J Y, Lin B. Effect of N application rates on leaf senescence and its mechanism in spring maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1998, 31(3): 66-71. (in Chinese)

[18]金继运, 何萍. 氮钾营养对春玉米后期碳氮代谢互作与粒重形成的影响. 中国农业科学, 1999, 32(4): 55-62.

Jin J Y, He P. Effect of N and K nutrition on post metabolism of carbon and nitrogen and grain weight formation in maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1999, 32(4): 55-62. (in Chinese)

[19]师素云, 薛启汉, 刘蔼民, 练兴明, 王学臣. 羧甲基壳聚糖对玉米籽粒氮代谢关键酶和种子贮藏蛋白含量的影响. 植物生理学报, 1999, 25(2): 187-192.

Shi S Y, Xue Q H, Liu A M, Lian X M, Wang X C. Effects of N carboxymethylchitosan on N metabolic key enzymes of grains and storage protein contents of seeds in maize. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 1999, 25(2): 187-192. (in Chinese)

[20]王宪泽, 张树芹. 不同蛋白质含量小麦品种叶片NRA与氮素积累关系的研究. 西北植物学报, 1999, 19(2): 122-126.

Wang X Z, Zhang S Q. Study on the relation of NRA and nitrogen accumulation in leaves of different protein content wheats. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 1999, 19(2): 122-126. (in Chinese)

[21]刘开昌, 董树亭, 赵海军, 王庆成, 李宗新, 刘霞, 张慧. 我国玉米自交系叶片保绿性及其与产量的关系. 作物学报, 2009, 35(9): 1662-1671.

Liu K C, Dong S T, Zhao H J, Wang Q C, Li Z X, Liu X, Zhang H. Leaf stay-green traits in Chinese maize inbred lines and their relationship with grain yield. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(9): 1662-1671. (in Chinese)

[22]鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 44-49

Bao S D. Agricultural Chemistry Analysis in Soil. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 44-49. (in Chinese).

[23]Read S M, Northcote D H. Minimization of variation in the response to different protein of the coomassic blue G dye dinding: assay for protein. Analytical Biochemistry, 1981, 116: 53-64.

[24]上海植物生理学会. 植物生理学实验手册. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1999: 115-150.

Shanghai Society for Plant Physiology. Experimental Manual on Plant Physiology. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 1999: 115-150. (in Chinese)

[25]O’neal D, Joy K W. Glutamine synthetase of pea leaves-divalent cation effects, substrate specificity, and other properties. Plant Physiology, 1974, 54: 773-779.

[26]Singh R D, Srivastava H S. Increase in glutamate synthase (NADH) activity in maize seedlings in response to nitrate and ammonium nitrogen. Physical Plant, 1986, 66: 413-416.

[27]Costa C, Frigon D, Dutilieul P. Sample size determination for chlorophyll meter readings on maize hybrids with a broad range of canopy types. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2003, 26(5): 1117-1130.

[28]米国华, 陈范骏, 春亮, 郭亚芬, 田秋英, 张福锁. 玉米氮高效品种的生物学特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(1): 155-159.

Mi G H, Chen F J, Chun L, Guo Y F, Tian Q Y, Zhang F S. Biological characteristics of nitrogen efficient maize genotypes. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007, 13(1): 155-159. (in Chinese)

[29]何萍, 金继运. 氮钾营养对春玉米叶片衰老过程中激素变化与活性氧代谢的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1999, 5(4): 289-296.

He P, Jin J Y. Effect of N and K nutrition on changes of endogenous hormone and metabolism of active oxygen during leaf senescence in spring maize. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 1999, 5(4): 289-296. (in Chinese)

[30]Ma B L, Dwyer L M. Nitrogen uptake and use of two contrasting maize hybrids differing in leaf senescence. Plant and Soil, 1998, 199: 283-291.

[31]Miflin B J, Habash D Z. The role of glutamine synthetase and glutamate dehydrogenase in nitrogen assimilation and possibilities for improvement in the nitrogen utilization of crops. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2002, 53: 979-987.

[32]Gonzalez-moro B, Mena-petite A, Lacuesta M, González-Murua C, Muñoz-Rueda A. Glutamine synthetase from mesophyll and bundle sheath maize cells: isoenzyme complements and different sensitivities to phosphinothricin. Plant Cell Reports, 2000, 19(11): 1127-1134.

[33]Craft-Brandner S J, Poneleit C G. Effect of ear removal on CO2 exchange and activities of ribulose bisphate earboxylase/oxygenase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase ofmaize hybrids and inbred lines. Plant Physiology, 1987, 84: 261-265.

[34]Gentinetta E, Ceppi D, Lepori C, Perico G, Motto M, Salamini F. A major gene for delayed senescence in maize. Plant Breeding, 1986, 97: 193-203.