几种施肥模式对红壤氮素形态转化和pH的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.14.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】为合理施用氮肥减缓红壤酸化，研究不同施肥措施下红壤酸度与氮矿化的关系。【方法】采用室内恒温培养试验研究不同施氮模式（不施肥（CK），20 mgN•kg-1（25%N），40 mgN•kg-1（50%N），80 mgN•kg-1（100%N，尿素，常规施氮量），160 mgN•kg-1（200%N），100%N加化学磷肥（100%N+P），100%N+P加化学钾肥（100%N+PK），100%N+PK加玉米秸秆（100%N+PKS），70%N+PK配施30%有机氮（70%N+PK+30%M），50%N+PK配施50%有机氮（50%N+PK+50%M），30%N+PK配施70%有机氮（30%N+PK+70%M）和100%有机氮（100%M，猪粪））下红壤中NH4+-N、NO3--N和pH的动态变化，并分析相关关系。【结果】与CK相比，各施肥处理均提高了土壤NO3--N、硝化潜势（Np），且尿素氮施用量越大其增幅越大，随有机氮替代尿素氮比例增加其增幅减小。Np最大的是200%N处理（335.62 mg•kg-1）；其次为100%N（152.48 mg•kg-1）、100%N+P（153.36 mg•kg-1）、100%N+PK（148.17 mg•kg-1）和100%N+PKS（148.62 mg•kg-1）处理；而100%N+PKS处理硝化速率k（0.039 d-1）显著低于100%N、100%N+P和100%N+PK处理（k分别为0.051、0.051和0.054 d-1）。各施肥处理土壤NH4+-N和pH均呈先增加，后逐渐下降趋于稳定的变化趋势。培养结束后，与CK相比，土壤pH随尿素氮施用量的增加而显著降低，200%N处理降幅最大,下降了0.92个pH单位；而有机氮替代尿素氮能缓解红壤pH降低。土壤pH与NH4+-N含量呈极显著正相关，而与NO3--N含量和Np之间存在极显著负相关。【结论】施用尿素氮能促进红壤（pH 5.7）硝化作用，加速土壤pH降低，施氮量是影响红壤酸化的主要原因之一；配施玉米秸秆能降低红壤硝化速率，减小NO3--N累积；有机氮替代尿素氮能降低硝化潜势，从而减小红壤酸化的风险。

关键词: 红壤, 不同施肥, pH, 尿素氮, 硝化潜势

Abstract: 【Objective】 In order to prevent red soil acidification by regulating nitrogen fertilization, the changes of several forms of soil nitrogen and soil pH, and the correlations among them were studied under different fertilization.【Method】 Incubation experiments were conducted at the temperature of (30±1)℃. The dynamics of NH4+-N, NO3--N and pH after urea application at different rates or combined with other fertilizers (Control (CK), 20 mgN•kg-1 (25%N), 40 mgN•kg-1 (50%N), 80 mgN•kg-1 (100%N, urea, conventional N application rate), 160 mgN•kg-1 (200%N), 100%N plus chemical phosphorus fertilizer (100%N+P), 100%N+P plus chemical potassium fertilizer (100%N+PK), 100%N+PK plus maize straw (100%N+PKS), 70%N+PK combined with 30% organic N (70%N+PK+30%M), 50%N+PK combined with 50% organic N (50%N+PK+50%M), 30%N+PK combined with 70% organic N (30%N+PK+70%M) and 100% organic N (100%M, pig manure)) were measured. 【Result】 Compared with the control treatment, NO3--N, nitrification potential increased and soil pH decreased in all fertilizer treatments, and difference increased with the urea N application rates and decreased with organic nitrogen application rates. The greatest nitrification potential (335.62 mg•kg-1) was observed in the 200%N treatment and second were 100%N (152.48 mg•kg-1), 100%N+P (153.36 mg•kg-1) 100%N+PK (148.17 mg•kg-1) and 100%N+PKS (148.62 mg•kg-1) treatments. However, k in the treatment 100%N+PKS was 0.039 d-1 and significant lower than 100%N, 100%N+P and 100%N+PK treatments, 0.051, 0.051 and 0.054 d-1, respectively. NH4+-N and soil pH reached their maximum values between the 3rd and 7th day of incubation after application of fertilizers or no fertilizer, respectively, decreased thereafter, and tended to be stable. Compared with the control treatment, soil pH decreased with the urea N application rates, and the greatest decrease of 0.92 units of soil pH in the 200%N treatment. Combination of organic nitrogen with urea-N slowed down the reduction in soil pH. Soil pH was positively correlated with NH4+-N, while negatively correlated with NO3--N and nitrification potential.【Conclusion】 Urea application could increase nitrification of red soil (pH5.7) and decrease soil pH, and the nitrogen application rate is one of the main factors accelerating acidification of red soil. Urea-N combined with corn straw could decrease nitrification rate, and partial urea-N substitution by organic fertilizer nitrogen can decrease nitrification potential, so decreasing NO3--N accumulation and minimizing acidification risk of red soil.

Key words: red soil, different fertilization, pH, urea-N, nitrification potential

蔡泽江, 孙楠, 王伯仁, 徐明岗, 张会民, 张璐, 李冬初, 卢昌艾. 几种施肥模式对红壤氮素形态转化和pH的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(14): 2877-2885.

CAI Ze-Jiang, SUN Nan, WANG Bo-Ren, XU Ming-Gang, ZHANG Hui-Min, ZHANG Lu, LI Dong-Chu, LU Chang-Ai. Experimental Research on Effects of Different Fertilization on Nitrogen Transformation and pH of Red Soil[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(14): 2877-2885.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.14.010

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2012/V45/I14/2877

参考文献

[1]许中坚, 刘广深, 刘维屏. 人为因素诱导下的红壤酸化机制及其防治. 农业环境保护, 2002, 21(2): 175-178.

Xu Z J, Liu G S, Liu W P. Mechanism and control of red soil acidification induced by man-made factors. Agro-environmental Protection, 2002, 21(2): 175-178. (in Chinese)

[2]郭治兴, 王静, 柴敏, 陈泽鹏, 詹振寿, 郑武平, 魏秀国. 近30 年来广东省土壤pH 值的时空变化. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(2): 425-430.

Guo Z X, Wang J, Chai M, Chen Z P, Zhan Z S, Zheng W P, Wei X G. Spatiotemporal variation of soil pH in Guangdong Province of China in past 30 years. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(2): 425-430. (in Chinese)

[3]曾希柏. 红壤酸化及其防治. 土壤通报, 2000, 31(3): 111-113.

Zeng X B. Acidification of red soils and control methods. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2000, 31(3): 111-113. (in Chinese)

[4]Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y, Shen J L, Han W X, Zhang W F, Christie P, Goulding K W T, Vitousek P M, Zhang F S. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science, 2010, 327: 1008-1010.

[5]易杰祥, 吕亮雪, 刘国道. 土壤酸化和酸性土壤改良研究. 华南热带农业大学学报, 2006, 12(1): 23-28.

Yi J X, Lü L X, Liu G D. Research on soil acidification and acidic soil’s melioration. Journal of South China University of Tropical Agriculture, 2006, 12(1): 23-28. (in Chinese)

[6]许中坚, 刘广深, 俞佳栋. 氮循环的人为干扰与土壤酸化. 地质地球化学, 2002, 30(2): 74-78.

Xu Z J, Liu G S, Yu J D. Soil acidification and nitrogen cycle disturbed by man-made factors. Geology Geochemistry, 2002, 30(2): 74-78. (in Chinese)

[7]徐仁扣, Coventry D R. 某些农业措施对土壤酸化的影响. 农业环境保护, 2002, 21(5): 385-388.

Xu R K, Coventry D R. Soil acidification as influenced by some agricultural practices. Agro-environmental Protection, 2002, 21(5): 385-388. (in Chinese)

[8]Zhao W, Cai Z C, Xu Z H. Does ammonium-based N addition influence nitrification and acidification in humid subtropical soils of China? Plant and Soil, 2007, 297: 213-221.

[9]曾清如, 廖柏寒, 蒋朝辉, 周细红, 汤灿, 钟宁. 施用尿素引起红壤pH及铝活性的短期变化. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(2): 249-252.

Zeng Q R, Liao B H, Jiang C H, Zhou X H, Tang C, Zhong N. Short-term changes of pH value and Al activity in acid soils after urea fertilization. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(2): 249-252. (in Chinese)

[10]蔡泽江, 孙楠, 王伯仁, 徐明岗, 黄晶, 张会民. 长期施肥对红壤pH、作物产量及氮、磷、钾养分吸收的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(1): 71-78.

Cai Z J, Sun N, Wang B R, Xu M G, Huang J, Zhang H M. Effects of long-term fertilization on pH of red soil, crop yields and uptakes of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2011, 17(1): 71-78. (in Chinese)

[11]汪吉东, 张永春, 俞美香, 沈明星, 许仙菊. 不同有机无机肥配合施用对土壤活性有机质含量及pH值的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2007, 23(6): 573-578.

Wang J D, Zhang Y C, Yu M X, Shen M X, Xu X J. Effect of combined organic and inorganic fertilizer on labile organic matter and acidity of soil. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 23(6): 573-578. (in Chinese)

[12]练成燕, 张桃林, 王兴祥. 有机物料对红壤几种形态碳氮及酸度的影响. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(11): 3922-3932.

Lian C Y, Zhang T L, Wang X X. Effects of organic materials on several forms of soil carbon and nitrogen and soil acidity. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(11): 3922-3932. (in Chinese)

[13]张树兰. 陕西几种土壤中硫酸铵的硝化作用及其影响因素. 干旱地区农业研究, 1998, 16(1): 64-68.

Zhang S L. (NH4)2SO4 nitrification and its influence factors in Shaanxi. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 1998, 16(1): 64-68. (in Chinese)

[14]巨晓棠, 刘学军, 张福锁. 尿素配施有机物料时土壤不同氮素形态的动态及利用. 中国农业大学学报，2002, 7(3): 52-56.

Ju X T, Liu X J, Zhang F S. Dynamics of various nitrogen forms in soil and nitrogen utilization under application urea and different organic materials. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2002, 7(3): 52-56. (in Chinese)

[15]Cheng W G, Tsuruta H, Chen G X, Kazuyuki Y N2O and NO production in various Chinese agricultural soils by nitrification. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2004, 36: 953-963.

[16]Mary B, Recous S, Robin D. A model for calculating nitrogen fluxes in soil using 15N tracing. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1998, 30: 1963-1979.

[17]De Vries W, Breeuwsma A. The relation between soil acidification and element cycling. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1987, 35: 293-310.

[18]艾娜, 周建斌, 段敏. 不同有机碳源对施入土壤中不同形态氮素固持的影响. 土壤通报, 2009, 40(6): 1337-1341.

Ai N, Zhou J B, Duan M. Effects of different organic carbons on nitrate and ammonium immobilization by soil microbial biomass in soil. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2009, 40(6): 1337-1341. (in Chinese)

[19]唐玉霞, 孟春香, 贾树龙, 王惠敏, 刘巧玲. 不同碳氮比肥料组合对肥料氮生物固定、释放及小麦生长的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2007, 15(2): 38-40.

Tang Y X, Meng C X, Jia S L, Wang H M, Liu Q L. Effects of different C/N combinations of fertilizers on biological fixation and release of nitrogen fertilizer and wheat growth. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2007, 15(2): 38-40. (in Chinese)

[20]刘杏认, 任建强, 刘建玲. 不同氮水平下有机肥碳氮比对土壤硝态氮残留量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2006, 24(4): 30-32.

Liu X R, Ren J Q, Liu J L. Effect of the manure with different C/N under different doses of N fertilizer on the content of soil NO-3. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2006, 24(4): 30-32. (in Chinese)

[21]赵鹏, 陈阜. 秸秆还田配施化学氮肥对冬小麦氮效率和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34(6): 1014-1018.

Zhao P, Chen F. Effects of straw mulching plus nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen efficiency and grain yield in winter wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(6): 1014-1018. (in Chinese)

[22]霍竹, 付晋锋, 王璞. 秸秆还田和氮肥施用对夏玉米氮肥利用率的影响. 土壤, 2005, 37(2): 202-204.

Huo Z, Fu J F, Wang P. Effects of application of N-fertilizer and crop residues. Soils, 2005, 37(2): 202-204. (in Chinese)

[23]朱大威, 黄耀, 卢燕宇. 有机肥氮素释放动态模型的初步研究. 南京农业大学学报, 2006, 29(3): 146-150.

Zhu D W, Huang Y, Lu Y Y. A primary study on modeling nitrogen release from organic manure. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2006, 29(3): 146-150. (in Chinese)

[24]杨蕊, 李裕元, 魏红安, 高茹, 石辉, 吴金水. 畜禽有机肥氮、磷在红壤中的矿化特征研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(3): 600-607.

Yang R, Li Y Y, Wei H A, Gao R, Shi H, Wu J S. Study on the nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization of livestock and chicken manure in red soil. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2011, 17(3): 600-607. (in Chinese)

[25]Barak P, Jobe B O, Krueger A R, Peterson L A, Laird D A. Effects of long-term soil acidification due to nitrogen fertilizer inputs in Wisconsin. Plant and Soil, 1997, 197: 61-69.

[26]Schroder J L, Zhang H L, Girma K, Raun W R, Penn C J, Payton M E. Soil acidification from long-term use of nitrogen fertilizers on winter wheat. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2011, 75(3): 957-964.

[27]文帮勇, 杨忠芳, 侯青叶, 杨晓燕, 尹国胜, 衷存堤. 江西鄱阳湖地区土壤酸化与人为源氮的关系. 现代地质, 2011, 25(3)：562-568.

Wen B Y, Yang Z F, Hou Q Y, Yang X Y, Yin G S, Zhong C D. The relationship between soil acidification and nitrogen inputs in the Poyang lake area, Jiangxi province, China. Geoscience, 2011, 25(3): 562-568. (in Chinese)

[28]Tong D L, Xu R K. Effects of urea and (NH4)2SO4 on nitrification and acidification of Ultisols from Southern China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2012, 24(4): 682-689.

[29]Wang N, Li J Y, Xu R K. Use of agricultural by-products to study the pH effects in an acid tea garden soil. Soil Use and Management, 2009, 25: 128-132.

[30]Tyson S C, Cabrera M L. Nitrogen mineralization in soils amended with composted and uncomposted poultry litter. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1993, 24: 2361-2374.

[31]Natscher L, Schwertmann U. Proton buffering in organic horizons of acid forest soils. Geoderma, 1991, 48: 93-106.

[32]Marschner B, Noble A D. Chemical and biological processes leading to the neutralization of acidity in soil incubated with litter materials. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2000, 32, 805-813.

[33]Hue N V. Correcting soil acidity of a highly weathered Ultison with chicken manure and sewage sludge. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1992, 23: 241-264.

[34]Yan F, Schubert S, Mengel K. Soil pH increase due to biological decarboxylation of organic anions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1996, 28: 617-624.