中国农业科学 ›› 2009, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2747-2753 .doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.08.013

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同耕作方式麦田土壤温度及其对气温的响应特征——土壤温度特征及热特性

陈继康,张 宇,陈军胜,陈 阜,张海林

  

  1. (中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院/农业部农作制度重点开放实验室)
  • 收稿日期:2008-10-06 修回日期:2008-12-26 出版日期:2009-08-10 发布日期:2009-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 张海林

Characteristics of Soil Temperature and Its Response to Air Temperature Under Different Tillage Systems —— Characteristics of Soil Temperature and Thermal Properties

CHEN Ji-kang, ZHANG Yu, CHEN Jun-sheng, CHEN Fu, ZHANG Hai-lin
  

  1. (中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院/农业部农作制度重点开放实验室)
  • Received:2008-10-06 Revised:2008-12-26 Online:2009-08-10 Published:2009-08-10
  • Contact: ZHANG Hai-lin

摘要:

【目的】研究耕作方式对冬小麦田土壤温度和热特性的影响规律。【方法】于河北省栾城县设置翻耕、旋耕和秸秆覆盖免耕处理,采用热脉冲-时域反射技术监测2004-2005年冬小麦生育期土壤温度及热特性,探讨了不同耕作方式下的土壤温度效应。【结果】耕作方式对土壤温度主要集中在冬小麦拔节前。相对于其它处理,免耕在气温降低阶段表现“增温效应”,在升温阶段表现“降温效应”,且达到极显著水平;免耕在播种-分蘖期降低土壤日均温0.69~1.02℃,推迟了冬小麦出苗2 d、分蘖7 d,缩短了冬前分蘖时间7 d,分蘖活动积温减少54.12~55.55 ℃?d;免耕越冬期具有较高土壤平均温度0.02~0.09℃和耕层土壤负积温0.87~2.25℃?d,但在越冬期稳定通过0℃以上晚7 d,低温持续时间长2~3 d,并推迟返青2~6 d;免耕完成返青消耗了更多活动积温21.54~29.15℃,造成拔节推迟5 d;免耕在冬小麦营养生长阶段降低累积温差123.43~148.62℃和日平均温差1.17~1.42℃。旋耕相对于翻耕推迟了返青4 d,减少活动积温8.55℃,增加累积温差25.19℃。不同耕作方式农田土壤容积热容量、热导率和热扩散系数无明显差异。【结论】从冬小麦生育进程上来说,热量资源利用效率以翻耕最高、旋耕居中、免耕最低;免耕缩小温度变化幅度不利于冬小麦生长发育,但有利于冬小麦保苗。免耕表现增降温效应的主要原因是秸秆覆盖而不是土壤物理性质的变化。

关键词: 耕作方式, 土壤温度, 积温, 温差, 热特性

Abstract:

【Objective】 Field experiment was conducted to study the effects of tillage on soil temperature and soil thermal properties in winter wheat field. 【Method】 Conventional tillage (CT), rotary tillage (RT) and no tillage with stubble covering (NT) were used from 2004 to 2005 at Luancheng Station of Hebei Province. Soil temperature and thermal properties were measured by thermo-time domain reflectometry. Combining with the growth and development course of winter wheat, tillage effects were discussed. 【Result】 Results showed that the tillage effects on soil temperature were mainly occurred before jointing stage of winter wheat. Compared with CT and RT, NT showed a “higher temperature effect” when temperature was dropping and a “lower temperature effect” when temperature was warming up, significantly. Diurnal average soil temperature was 0.69-1.02 ℃ lower, the seedling and tillering was delayed by 2 and 7 d, tillering time before over-wintering was decreased by 9 d, and the active accumulated temperature was decreased by 54.12-55.55℃?d under NT. During over-wintering stage, NT showed a higher average soil temperature (0.02-0.09℃) and negative accumulated temperature 0.87-2.25℃?d, but the day steadily pass 0℃ was delayed by 7 d, low temperature duration was 2-3 d longer and the revival stage was delayed by 2-6 d. Winter wheat under NT needed more active accumulated temperature 21.54-29.15℃ to complete revival and the jointing stage was delayed by 5 d. The accumulated and diurnal mean temperature difference was decreased by 123.43-148.62℃ and 1.17-1.42℃ under NT, respectively. Compared with CT, the revival was delayed by 4 d, the active accumulated temperature was decreased by 8.55 ℃, and the accumulated temperature difference was increased by 25.19℃. It showed no significant difference of ρc, λ, and α between different tillage systems. 【Conclusion】 In terms of the course of winter wheat, heat use efficiency was the highest under CT and the lowest under NT and the medium under RT. The lower temperature under NT was not beneficial to the growth and development of winter wheat, but beneficial to safe over-wintering. The temperature effects of NT were mainly controlled by stubble covering but not the soil thermal properties.

Key words: tillage, soil temperature, accumulated temperature, temperature difference, thermal properties