Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2017, Vol. 16 Issue (06): 1312-1321    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61541-1
Physiology·Biochemistry·Cultivation·Tillage Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Relationship between population competitive intensity and yield in maize cultivars
ZHAI Li-chao1, 2*, XIE Rui-zhi1*, LI Shao-kun1, FAN Pan-pan1

1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, P.R.China

2 Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Development Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050021, P.R.China

Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Competition is a common phenomenon in agriculture production.  Research on the relationship between competitive ability and crop yield is extensive, but the results have been inconsistent.  Few studies have focused on the relationship between population competitive intensity and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars.  The main objective of this study was to determine if a consistent relationship exists between maize yield and competitive ability.  A two-year field experiment was conducted, employing a de Wit replacement series design.  When two maize cultivars were grown in a mixture, yield was reduced for the modern cultivar and increased for the older cultivar.  In each replacement series, per plant level yield of each cultivar, and population level yield of the mixture, decreased with increasing proportion of the older cultivar.  Competitive ratio (CR) reflected differences in competitive ability of the three maize cultivars.  In each replacement series, population competition pressure (PCP) increased with increasing proportion of the older cultivar, indicating that the older cultivar was a strong competitor.  Biomass yield, grain yield, harvest index, thousand-kernel weight, and kernel number per plant, were negatively correlated with PCP.  Our results demonstrated that inter-cultivar competition affects maize productivity, and increasing PCP will decrease translocation of assimilates to grain and, ultimately, reduce yield.  Therefore, there is a negative correlation between population competitive intensity and yield performance in maize, breeders should develop a communal ideotype that would not perform well in competition in future. 
Keywords:  maize      competition      competitive ability      population competitive pressure      yield  
Received: 20 July 2016   Accepted:
Fund: 

We thank the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2015CB150401), the National Maize Industry Technology Research and Development Center, Ministry of Agriculture, China, and the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for their supports. 

Corresponding Authors:  LI Shao-kun, Tel/Fax: +86-10-82108891, E-mail: lishaokun@caas.cn    

Cite this article: 

ZHAI Li-chao, XIE Rui-zhi, LI Shao-kun, FAN Pan-pan. 2017. Relationship between population competitive intensity and yield in maize cultivars. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(06): 1312-1321.

Bhatti I H, Ahmad R, Jabbar A, Nazir M S, Mahmood T. 2006. Competitive behaviour of component crops in different sesame-legume intercropping systems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 8, 165–167.
Callaway R M, Walker L R. 1997. Competition and facilition: A synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology, 78, 1958–1965.
Christian C S, Grey S G. 1941. Interplant competition in mixed wheat populations and its relation to single plant selection. Journal of Council for Science and Industrial Research, 14, 59–68.
Dhima K, Lithourgidis A, Vasilakoglou I, Dordas C. 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research, 100, 249–256.
Donald C M. 1968. The breeding of crop ideotype. Euphytica, 17, 385–403.
Donald C M. 1981. Competitive plants, communal plants, and yield in wheat crops. In: Evans L T, Peacock W J, eds., Wheat Science - Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 223–247.
Dong L L, Wei C H, Ma X J, Zhang R. 2007. The relationship between competitive ability and productive performance of spring wheat cultivars. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27, 4204–4208. (in Chinese)
Du J Q, Wei P P, Yuan Z Q, Ma Y J, Zhang R. 2011. Effects of water and fertilization on relationship between competitive ability and seed yield of modern and old spring wheat cultivars. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 2501–2508. (in Chinese)
Echarte L, Andrade F H. 2003. Harvest index stability of Argentinean maize hybrids released between 1965 and 1993. Field Crops Research, 82, 1–12.
Evans L T. 1981. Yield improvement in wheat: Empirical or analytical. In: Evans L T, Peacock W J, eds., Wheat Science - Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 203–222.
Fang Y, Liu L, Xu B C, Li F M. 2011. The relationship between competitive ability and yield stability in an older ad modern winter wheat cultivar. Plant and Soil, 347, 7–23.
Fasoula D A. 1990. Correlations between auto-, allo- and nilcompetitionand their implications in plant breeding. Euphytica, 50, 57–62.
Fischer A J, Ramirez H, Gibson K D, Pinheiro B D S. 2001. Competitiveness of semidwarf upland rice cultivars against palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha) and signalgrass (Brachiaria decumbens). Agronomy Journal, 93, 967–973.
Garrity D P, Movillon M, Moody K. 1992. Differential weed suppression ability in upland rice cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 84, 586–591.
Gibson K D, Fischer A J, Foin T C, Hill J E. 2003. Crop traits related to weed suppression in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Science, 51, 87–93.
Hucl P. 1998. Response to weed control by four spring wheat genotypes differing in competitive ability. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 78, 171–173.
Jordan N. 1993. Prospects for weed control through crop interference. Ecological Applications, 3, 84–91.
Keddy P A. 2012. Competition in plant communities. In: Gibson D, ed., Ecology. Oxford University Press, New York.
Lemerle D, Gill G S, Murphy C E, Walker S R, Cousens R D, Mokhtari S, Peltzer S J, Coleman R, Luckett D J. 2011. Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weeds. Australian Journal of Plant Science, 52, 527–548.
Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, Li X L, Yang S C, Rengel Z. 2001. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crops Research, 71, 123–137.
Lithourgidis A S, Vlachostergios D N, Dordas C A, Damalas C A. 2011. Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea-cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 34, 287–294.
Mariotti M, Masoni A, Ercoli L, Arduini L. 2009. Above- and below-ground competition between barely, wheat, lupin and vench in cereal and legume intercropping system. Grass and Forage Science, 64, 401–412.
Murphy K M, Dawson J C, Jones S S. 2008. Relationship among phenotypic growth traits, yield and weed suppression in spring wheat landraces and modern cultivars. Field Crops Research, 105, 107–115.
Ni H, Moody K, Robles R P, Paller E C, Lales J S. 2000. Oryza sativa plant traits conferring competitive ability against weeds. Weed Science, 48, 200–204.
Qin X L, Niklas K J, Qi L, Xiong Y C, Li F M. 2012. The effects of domestication on the scaling of below- vs. above-ground biomass in four selected wheat (Triticum, Poaceae) genotypes. American Journal of Botany, 99, 1112–1117.
Qin X L, Weiner J, Qi L, Xiong Y C, Li F M. 2013. Allometric analysis of the effects of density on reproductive allocation and harvest index in 6 varieties of wheat (Triticum). Field Crops Research, 144, 162–166.
Reid T A, Navabi A, Cahill J C, Salmon D, Spaner D. 2009. A genetic analysis of weed competitive ability in spring wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 89, 591–599.
Reynolds M P, Acevedo E, Sayre K D, Fischer R A. 1994. Yield potential in modern wheat varieties: Its association with a less competitive ideotype. Field Crops Research, 37, 149–160.
Sahai K. 1955. Competition in plants and its relation to selection. Gold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 20, 137–157.
Snaydon R W. 1984. Plant demography in an agricultural context. In: Dirzo R, Sarukhan J, eds., Perspective on Plant Populatiin Ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. pp. 389–407.
Song L, Li F M, Fan X W, Xiong Y C, Wang W Q, Wu X B, Turner N C. 2009. Soil water availability and plant competition affect the yield of spring wheat. European Journal of Agronomy, 31, 51–60.
Song L, Zhang D W, Li F M, Fan X W, Ma Q, Turner N C. 2010. Soil water availability alters the inter- and intra-cultivar competition of three spring wheat cultivars bred in different eras. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 196, 323–335.
Treder K, Wanic M, Nowicki J. 2008. Competition between spring wheat and spring barley under conditions of diversified fertilisation. Part I. Influence on selected morphological characteristics of plants. Acta Agrophysica, 11, 767–780.
Vandeleur R K, Gill G S. 2004. The impact of plant breeding on the grain yield and competitive ability of wheat in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55, 855–861.
Wahla I H, Ahmad R, Ehsanullah A A, Jabbar A. 2009. Competitive functions of components crops in some barley based intercropping systems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11, 69–71. 
Weigelt A, Jolliffe P. 2003. Indices of plant competition. Journal of Ecology, 91, 707–720.
Willey R W, Rao M R. 1980. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture, 16, 117–125.
de Wit C T. 1960. On competition. Verslagen Landbouwkundige Onderzoekingen, 66, 1–82. (in Hollands)
Worthington M, Reberg-Horton C. 2013. Breeding cereal crops for enhanced weed suppression: Optimizing allelopathy and competitive ability. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 39, 213–231.
Zhai L C, Xie R Z, Ma D L, Liu G Z, Wang P, Li S K. 2015. Evaluation of individual competitiveness and the relationship between competitiveness and yield in maize. Crop Science, 55, 2307–2318.
Zhai L C, Xie R Z, Wang P, Liu G Z, Fan P P, Li S K. 2016. Impact of recent breeding history on the competitiveness of Chinese maize hybrids. Field Crops Research, 191, 75–82.
Zhang D Y, Sun G J, Jiang X H. 1999. Donald’s ideotype and growth redundancy: A game theoretical analysis. Field Crops Research, 61, 179–187.
Zhang G G, Yang Z B, Dong S T. 2011. Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system. Field Crops Research, 124, 66–73.
Zhang L, van der Werf W, Zhang S, Li B, Spiertz J H J. 2007. Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 103, 178–188.
Zhang R, Zhang D Y, Yuan B Z, Liu K, Wei H. 1999. A study on the relationship between competitive ability and productive performance of spring wheat in semiarid regions of Loess Plateau. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 23, 205–210. (in Chinese)
Zhao D L, Atlin G N, Bastiaans L, Spiertz J H J. 2006. Cultivar weed competitiveness in aerobic rice: Heritability, correlated traits, and the potential for indirect selection. Crop Science, 46, 372–380.
[1] Lichao Zhai, Shijia Song, Lihua Zhang, Jinan Huang, Lihua Lv, Zhiqiang Dong, Yongzeng Cui, Mengjing Zheng, Wanbin Hou, Jingting Zhang, Yanrong Yao, Yanhong Cui, Xiuling Jia. Subsoiling before winter wheat alleviates the kernel position effect of densely grown summer maize by delaying post-silking root–shoot senescence[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3384-3402.
[2] Ling Ai, Ju Qiu, Jiuguang Wang, Mengya Qian, Tingting Liu, Wan Cao, Fangyu Xing, Hameed Gul, Yingyi Zhang, Xiangling Gong, Jing Li, Hong Duan, Qianlin Xiao, Zhizhai Liu. A naturally occurring 31 bp deletion in TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 causes branched ears in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3322-3333.
[3] Yuheng Wang, Furong Kang, Bo Yu, Quan Long, Huaye Xiong, Jiawei Xie, Dong Li, Xiaojun Shi, Prakash Lakshmanan, Yueqiang Zhang, Fusuo Zhang. Magnesium supply is vital for improving fruit yield, fruit quality and magnesium balance in citrus orchards with increasingly acidic soil[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3641-3655.
[4] Jinpeng Li, Siqi Wang, Zhongwei Li, Kaiyi Xing, Xuefeng Tao, Zhimin Wang, Yinghua Zhang, Chunsheng Yao, Jincai Li. Effects of micro-sprinkler irrigation and topsoil compaction on winter wheat grain yield and water use efficiency in the Huaibei Plain, China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2974-2988.
[5] Baohua Liu, Ganqiong Li, Yongen Zhang, Ling Zhang, Dianjun Lu, Peng Yan, Shanchao Yue, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Qingfeng Meng, Xinping Chen. Optimizing management strategies to enhance wheat productivity in the North China Plain under climate change[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2989-3003.
[6] Ziqiang Che, Shuting Bie, Rongrong Wang, Yilin Ma, Yaoyuan Zhang, Fangfang He, Guiying Jiang. Mild deficit irrigation delays flag leaf senescence and increases yield in drip-irrigated spring wheat by regulating endogenous hormones[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2954-2973.
[7] Dan Lü, Jianxin Li, Xuehai Zhang, Ran Zheng, Aoni Zhang, Jingyun Luo, Bo Tong, Hongbing Luo, Jianbing Yan, Min Deng. Genetic analysis of maize crude fat content by multi-locus genome-wide association study[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(7): 2475-2491.
[8] Zhongwei Tian, Yanyu Yin, Bowen Li, Kaitai Zhong, Xiaoxue Liu, Dong Jiang, Weixing Cao, Tingbo Dai. Optimizing planting density and nitrogen application to mitigate yield loss and improve grain quality of late-sown wheat under rice–wheat rotation[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(7): 2558-2574.
[9] Kuanyu Zhu, Yuemei Xu, Zhiwei Sun, Yajun Zhang, Weiyang Zhang, Yunji Xu, Junfei Gu, Hao Zhang, Zhiqin Wang, Lijun Liu, Jianhua Zhang, Jianchang Yang. Post-anthesis dry matter production and leaf nitrogen distribution are associated with root-derived cytokinins gradient in rice[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(6): 2106-2122.
[10] Chunxiang Li, Yongfeng Song, Yong Zhu, Mengna Cao, Xiao Han, Jinsheng Fan, Zhichao Lü, Yan Xu, Yu Zhou, Xing Zeng, Lin Zhang, Ling Dong, Dequan Sun, Zhenhua Wang, Hong Di. GWAS analysis reveals candidate genes associated with density tolerance (ear leaf structure) in maize (Zea mays L.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(6): 2046-2062.
[11] Lihua Xie, Lingling Li, Junhong Xie, Jinbin Wang, Zechariah Effah, Setor Kwami Fudjoe, Muhammad Zahid Mumtaz. A suitable organic fertilizer substitution ratio stabilizes rainfed maize yields and reduces gaseous nitrogen loss in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(6): 2138-2154.
[12] Xiaoqiang Liu, Mingqi Li, Dong Xue, Shuai He, Junliang Fan, Fucang Zhang, Feihu Yin. Optimal drip irrigation leaching amount and timing enhanced cotton fiber yield, quality and nitrogen uptake by regulating soil salinity and nitrate nitrogen in saline-alkaline fields[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(6): 2389-2409.
[13] Jiaying Ma, Jian Liu, Yue Wen, Zhanli Ma, Jinzhu Zhang, Feihu Yin, Tehseen Javed, Jihong Zhang, Zhenhua Wang. Enhancing the yield and water use efficiency of processing tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Miller) through optimal irrigation and salinity management under mulched drip irrigation[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(6): 2410-2424.
[14] Zhaowen Mo, Siren Cheng, Yong Ren, Longxin He, Shenggang Pan, Haidong Liu, Hua Tian, Umair Ashraf, Meiyang Duan, Xiangru Tang. Reduced tillage coupled with straw return improves the grain yield and 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline content in fragrant rice[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(5): 1718-1737.
[15] Liang Wang, Nijiang Ai, Zechang Zhang, Chenhui Zhou, Guoli Feng, Sheng Cai, Ningshan Wang, Liuchun Feng, Yu Chen, Min Xu, Yingying Wang, Haoran Yue, Mengfei Chen, Liangshuai Xing, Baoliang Zhou. Development of Gossypium hirsutumGossypium raimondii introgression lines and their use in QTL mapping of agricultural traits[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(5): 1688-1703.
No Suggested Reading articles found!