|
|
|
Soil mulching can mitigate soil water deficiency impacts on rainfed maize production in semiarid environments |
ZHU Lin, LIU Jian-liang, LUO Sha-sha, BU Ling-duo, CHEN Xin-ping;LI Shi-qing |
1、State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100,
P.R.China
2、Center for Resources, Environment and Food Security, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, P.R. China
3、Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy
of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China |
|
|
摘要 Temporally irregular rainfall distribution and inefficient rainwater management create severe constraints on crop production in rainfed semiarid areas. Gravel and plastic film mulching are effective methods for improving agricultural productivity and water utilization. However, the effects of these mulching practices on soil water supply and plant water use associated with crop yield are not well understood. A 3-yr study was conducted to analyze the occurrence and distribution of dry spells in a semiarid region of Northwest China and to evaluate the effects of non-mulching (CK), gravel mulching (GM) and plastic film mulching (FM) on the soil water supply, plant water use and maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield. Rainfall analysis showed that dry spells of ≥5 days occurred frequently in each of 3 yr, accounting for 59.9–69.2% of the maize growing periods. The >15-d dry spells during the jointing stage would expose maize plants to particularly severe water stress. Compared with the CK treatment, both the GM and FM treatments markedly increased soil water storage during the early growing season. In general, the total evapotranspiration (ET) was not significantly different among the three treatments, but the mulched treatments significantly increased the ratio of pre- to post-silking ET, which was closely associated with yield improvement. As a result, the grain yield significantly increased by 17.1, 70.3 and 16.7% for the GM treatment and by 28.3, 87.6 and 38.2% for the FM treatment in 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively, compared with the CK treatment. It’s concluded that both GM and FM are effective strategies for mitigating the impacts of water deficit and improving maize production in semiarid areas. However, FM is more effective than GM.
Abstract Temporally irregular rainfall distribution and inefficient rainwater management create severe constraints on crop production in rainfed semiarid areas. Gravel and plastic film mulching are effective methods for improving agricultural productivity and water utilization. However, the effects of these mulching practices on soil water supply and plant water use associated with crop yield are not well understood. A 3-yr study was conducted to analyze the occurrence and distribution of dry spells in a semiarid region of Northwest China and to evaluate the effects of non-mulching (CK), gravel mulching (GM) and plastic film mulching (FM) on the soil water supply, plant water use and maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield. Rainfall analysis showed that dry spells of ≥5 days occurred frequently in each of 3 yr, accounting for 59.9–69.2% of the maize growing periods. The >15-d dry spells during the jointing stage would expose maize plants to particularly severe water stress. Compared with the CK treatment, both the GM and FM treatments markedly increased soil water storage during the early growing season. In general, the total evapotranspiration (ET) was not significantly different among the three treatments, but the mulched treatments significantly increased the ratio of pre- to post-silking ET, which was closely associated with yield improvement. As a result, the grain yield significantly increased by 17.1, 70.3 and 16.7% for the GM treatment and by 28.3, 87.6 and 38.2% for the FM treatment in 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively, compared with the CK treatment. It’s concluded that both GM and FM are effective strategies for mitigating the impacts of water deficit and improving maize production in semiarid areas. However, FM is more effective than GM.
|
Received: 20 February 2014
Accepted:
|
Fund: This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31270553), the National Basic Research Program of China (2009CB118604) and the Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest of China (201103003). |
Corresponding Authors:
LI Shi-qing, Tel/Fax: +86-29-87016171,E-mail: sqli@ms.iswc.ac.cn.
E-mail: sqli@ms.iswc.ac.cn.
|
About author: ZHU Lin, Mobile: 18291412091, E-mail: zhulinss@126.com;LIU Jian-liang, Mobile: 13992871014, E-mail: liujl0627@gmail.com; |
Cite this article:
ZHU Lin, LIU Jian-liang, LUO Sha-sha, BU Ling-duo, CHEN Xin-ping; LI Shi-qing.
2015.
Soil mulching can mitigate soil water deficiency impacts on rainfed maize production in semiarid environments. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(1): 58-66.
|
Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, Smith M. 1998. CropEvapotranspiration-Guide-lines for Computing Crop WaterRequirements––FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. vol.300. FAO, Rome. p. 6541.Andrew R H, Schlough D A, Tenpas G H.1976. Somerelationships of a plastic mulch to sweet corn maturity.Agronomy Journal, 68, 422-425Anikwe M A N, Mbah C N, Ezeaku P I, Onyia V N. 2007.Tillage and plastic mulch effects on soil properties andgrowth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) on anultisol in southeastern Nigeria. Soil and Tillage Research,93, 264-272Barron J, Kwacha G. 2005. Run-off water harvesting for dryspell mitigation in maize (Zea mays L.): Results fromon-farm research in semi-arid Kenya. Agricultural WaterManagement, 74, 1-21Barron J, Rockström J, Gichuki F, Hatibu N. 2003. Dry spellanalysis and maize yields for two semi-arid locations in eastAfrica. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 117, 23-37Clarkson V A. 1960. Effect of black polyethylene mulch on soiland microclimate temperature and nitrate level. AgronomyJournal, 52, 307-309Deng X P, Shan L, Zhang H P, Turner N C. 2006. Improvingagricultural water use efficiency in arid and semiarid areasof China. Agricultural Water Management, 80, 23-40Gong Z T, Zhang G L, Chen Z C. 2007. Pedogenesis and SoilTaxonomy. Beijing Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)Groenevelt P H, Van Straaten P, Rasiah V, Simpson J. 1989.Modifications in evaporation parameters by rock mulches.Soil Technology, 2, 279-285Hatibu N, Mutabazi K, Senkondo E M, Msangi A S K. 2006.Economics of rainwater harvesting for crop enterprisesin semi-arid areas of East Africa. Agricultural WaterManagement, 80, 74-86Hatibu N, Young M D B, Gowing J W, Mahoo H F, Mzirai OB. 2003. Developing improved dryland cropping systems for maize in semi-arid Tanzania. Part 1: Experimentalevidence of the benefits of rainwater harvesting. Journal ofExperimental Botany, 39, 279-292Kahinda J M, Rockström J, Taigbenu A E, Dimes J. 2007.Rainwater harvesting to enhance water productivity ofrainfed agriculture in the semi-arid Zimbabwe. Physics andChemistry of the Earth, 32, 1068-1073Kang S Z, Shi W J, Zhang J H. 2000. An improved water-useefficiency for maize grown under regulated deficit irrigation.Field Crops Research, 67, 207-214Lemon E R. 1956. The potentialities for decreasing soil moistureevaporation loss. Soil Science Society of America Journal,20, 120-125Li S X. 2004. Chinese Dryland Agriculture. Chinese Press ofAgriculture, Beijing. (in Chinese)Li S X, Wang Z H, Li S Q, Gao Y J, Tian X H. 2013. Effect ofplastic sheet mulch, wheat straw mulch, and maize growthon water loss by evaporation in dryland areas of China.Agricultural Water Management, 116, 39-49Li X Y. 2003. Gravel-sand mulch for soil and water conservationin the semiarid loess region of northwest China. Catena,52, 105-127Li X Y, Gong J D, Gao Q Z, Li F R. 2001. Incorporation of ridgeand furrow method of rainfall harvesting with mulching forcrop production under semiarid conditions. AgriculturalWater Management, 50, 173-183Li X Y, Shi P J, Liu L Y, Gao S Y, Wang X S, Cheng L S. 2005.Influence of pebble size and cover on rainfall interceptionby gravel mulch. Journal of Hydrology, 312, 70-78Liu C A, Jin S L, Zhou L M, Jia Y, Li F M, Xiong Y C, Li X G.2009. Effects of plastic film mulch and tillage on maizeproductivity and soil parameters. European Journal ofAgronomy, 31, 241-249Liu Y, Li S Q, Chen F, Yang S J, Chen X P. 2010. Soil waterdynamics and water use efficiency in spring maize (Zeamays L.) fields subjected to different water managementpractices on the Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural WaterManagement, 97, 769-775Maurya P R, Lal R. 1981. Effects of different mulch materialson soil properties and on the root growth and yield of maize(Zea mays) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Field CropsResearch, 4, 33-45Modaihsh A S, Horton R, Kirkham D. 1985. Soil waterevaporation suppression by sand mulches. Soil Science,139, 357-361Moser S B, Feil B, Jampatong S, Stamp P. 2006. Effects ofpre-anthesis drought, nitrogen fertilizer rate, and variety ongrain yield, yield components, and harvest index of tropicalmaize. Agricultural Water Management, 81, 41-58Musick J T, Jones O R, Stewart B A, Dusek D A. 1994. Wateryieldrelationships for irrigated and dryland wheat in the U.S.southern plains. Agronomy Journal, 86, 980-986Nachtergaele J, Poesen J, Van W B. 1998. Gravel mulchingin vineyards of southern Switzerland. Soil and TillageResearch, 46, 51-59Nyakudya I W, Stroosnijder L. 2011. Water management optionsbased on rainfall analysis for rainfed maize (Zea mays L.)production in Rushinga district, Zimbabwe. AgriculturalWater Management, 98, 1649-1659Rockström J, Barron J. 2007. Water productivity in rainfedsystems: overview of challenges and analysis ofopportunities in water scarcity prone savannahs. IrrigationScience, 25, 299-311Rockström J, Karlberg L, Wani S P, Barron J, Hatibu N, OweisT, Bruggeman A, Farahani J, Qiang Z. 2010. Managingwater in rainfed agriculture––the need for a paradigm shift.Agricultural Water Management, 97, 543-550Rockström J, Lannerstad M, Falkenmark M. 2007. Assessingthe water challenge of a new green revolution in developingcountries. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 104, 6253-6260Sharma P, Abrol V, Sharma R K. 2011. Impact of tillage andmulch management on economics, energy requirementand crop performance in maize-wheat rotation in rainfedsubhumid inceptisols, India. European Journal of Agronomy,34, 46-51Stern R D, Dennett M D, Dale I C. 1982. Analysing rainfallmeasurements to give agronomically useful results. II.Modelling approach. Experimental Agriculture, 18, 237-253Stroosnijder L. 2007. Rainfall and land degradation. In:Sivakumar M V K, Ndiang’ui N, eds., Climate and LandDegradation. Springer, Germany. pp. 167-195UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2007.Global Environment Outlook GEO-4: Environment forDevelopment United Nations Environment Programme,Nairobi.Vörösmarty C J, McIntyre P B, Gessner M O, Dudgeon D,Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn S E, Sullivan CA, Reidy Liermann C, Davies P M. 2010. Global threats tohuman water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467,555-561Wang Y J, Xie Z K, Malhi S S, Vera C L, Zhang Y B, Guo ZH 2011. Effects of gravel-sand mulch, plastic mulch andridge and furrow rainfall harvesting system combinationson water use efficiency, soil temperature and watermelonyield in a semi-arid Loess Plateau of northwestern China.Agricultural Water Management, 101, 88-92Xie Z K, Wang Y J, Wei X H, Zhang Z S. 2006. Impacts ofa gravel-sand mulch and supplemental drip irrigation onwatermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] Mats. & Nakai) rootdistribution and yield. Soil and Tillage Research, 89, 35-44Yamanaka T, Inoue M, Kaihotsu I. 2004. Effects of gravel mulchon water vapor transfer above and below the soil surface.Agricultural Water Management, 67, 145-155Zhang S L, Li P R, Yang X Y, Wang Z H, Chen X P. 2011. Effectsof tillage and plastic mulch on soil water, growth and yield ofspring-sown maize. Soil and Tillage Research, 112, 92-97Zhang S L, Sadras V, Chen X P, Zhang F S. 2013. Water useefficiency of dryland wheat in the Loess Plateau in responseto soil and crop management. Field Crops Research, 151,9-18 Zhang S L, Sadras V, Chen X P, Zhang F S. 2014. Water useefficiency of dryland maize in the Loess Plateau of Chinain response to crop management. Field Crops Research,163, 55-63Zhou L M, Jin S L, Liu C A, Xiong Y C, Si J T, Li X G, GanY T, Li F M. 2012. Ridge-furrow and plastic-mulchingtillage enhances maize-soil interactions: Opportunitiesand challenges in a semiarid agroecosystem. Field CropsResearch, 126, 181-188Zhou L M, Li F M, Jin S L, Song Y. 2009. How two ridges andthe furrow mulched with plastic film affect soil water, soiltemperature and yield of maize on the semiarid LoessPlateau of China. Field Crops Research, 113, 41-47 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|