|
|
|
|
|
| Analysis of Differences in Productivity, Profitability and Soil Fertility Between Organic and Conventional Cropping Systems in the Tropics and Sub-tropics |
| Te Pas C M , Rees R M |
1、School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK
2、Carbon Management Centre, Scotland’s Rural College, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK |
|
|
|
摘要 Organic farming aims to stimulate soil fertility by avoiding the use of synthetic fertiliser inputs, relying instead on locally available natural resources. It is regarded by many as a sustainable alternative to conventional farming because it ensures higher biodiversity, restricts environmental pollution, prevents land degradation and is easy to apply for smallholder and subsistence farmers. Although widely practiced and studied in temperate regions, little is known about the potential overall benefits of organic farming in the tropics and subtropics. This paper addresses this gap by undertaking an analysis of the differences between organic and conventional agriculture in the tropics and sub-tropics based on an extensive literature review including 88 papers with 458 data pairs. The comparison is based on three main indicators: yield, gross margin and soil organic carbon (SOC). The differences between the organic and conventional systems for each of these main indicators is represented by the ratio of the value of the indicator in the organic system divided by the corresponding value in the conventional system. This was initially calculated for each data pair individually, and grouped by a variety of explanatory factors, such as precipitation, human development level, soil texture, crop type, organic input type, time after conversion and certification. The results demonstrate that under organic management, yields were on average 26% higher, gross margins 51% higher and soil organic carbon 53% higher than under conventional management. The highest yield increases in organic cropping systems were achieved in the least developed countries, in arid regions and on coarse soils. For gross margins, certification was the main reason for differences between organic and conventional systems. Certified farmers, mostly located in developed countries, receive significantly higher prices. Furthermore, organic farming in the driest regions results in higher profits than in other regions. Even though soil organic carbon was significantly higher overall under organic management, the results do not show significant differences when grouped by the explanatory factors. They do however suggest that the highest carbon sequestration potential occurs in systems that had a high level of inputs, in regions with 1 000-1 500 mm of rainfall and on clayey soils.
Abstract Organic farming aims to stimulate soil fertility by avoiding the use of synthetic fertiliser inputs, relying instead on locally available natural resources. It is regarded by many as a sustainable alternative to conventional farming because it ensures higher biodiversity, restricts environmental pollution, prevents land degradation and is easy to apply for smallholder and subsistence farmers. Although widely practiced and studied in temperate regions, little is known about the potential overall benefits of organic farming in the tropics and subtropics. This paper addresses this gap by undertaking an analysis of the differences between organic and conventional agriculture in the tropics and sub-tropics based on an extensive literature review including 88 papers with 458 data pairs. The comparison is based on three main indicators: yield, gross margin and soil organic carbon (SOC). The differences between the organic and conventional systems for each of these main indicators is represented by the ratio of the value of the indicator in the organic system divided by the corresponding value in the conventional system. This was initially calculated for each data pair individually, and grouped by a variety of explanatory factors, such as precipitation, human development level, soil texture, crop type, organic input type, time after conversion and certification. The results demonstrate that under organic management, yields were on average 26% higher, gross margins 51% higher and soil organic carbon 53% higher than under conventional management. The highest yield increases in organic cropping systems were achieved in the least developed countries, in arid regions and on coarse soils. For gross margins, certification was the main reason for differences between organic and conventional systems. Certified farmers, mostly located in developed countries, receive significantly higher prices. Furthermore, organic farming in the driest regions results in higher profits than in other regions. Even though soil organic carbon was significantly higher overall under organic management, the results do not show significant differences when grouped by the explanatory factors. They do however suggest that the highest carbon sequestration potential occurs in systems that had a high level of inputs, in regions with 1 000-1 500 mm of rainfall and on clayey soils.
|
|
Received: 06 January 2014
Accepted:
|
| Fund: The authors would like to thank researchers from FiBL (Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) in Frick, Switzerland, for their support, as well as the University of Edinburgh and the Scottish government for financial support. |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Te Pas C M, E-mail: caroline.tepas@gmail.com
E-mail: caroline.tepas@gmail.com
|
| About author: Te Pas C M, E-mail: caroline.tepas@gmail.com |
Cite this article:
Te Pas C M , Rees R M.
2014.
Analysis of Differences in Productivity, Profitability and Soil Fertility Between Organic and Conventional Cropping Systems in the Tropics and Sub-tropics. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(10): 2299-2310.
|
| Badgley C, Moghtader J, Quintero E, Zakem E, ChappellM J, Avilés-Vázquez K, Samulon A, Perfecto I. 2007.Organic agriculture and the global food supply. RenewableAgriculture and Food Systems, 22, 86-108Bai Z G, Dent D L, Olsson L, Schaepman M E. 2008. GlobalAssessment of Land Degradation and Improvement.Identification by Remote Sensing. Wageningen, ISRICWorld Soil Information, Wageningen.Cobo J G, Dercon G, Cadisch G. 2010. Nutrient balancesin African land use systems across different spatialscales: A review of approaches, challenges and progress.Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 136, 1-15Connor D J. 2008. Organic agriculture cannot feed the world.Field Crops Research, 106, 187-190Crain C M, Halpern B S, Beck M W, Kappel C V. 2009.Understanding and managing human threats to the coastalmarine environment. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 1162, 39-62Donald P F, Green R E, Heath M F. 2001. Agriculturalintensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland birdpopulations. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 268, 25-29Driessen P M, Deckers J A, Spaargaren O C, Nachtergaele F O.2001. Lecture Notes on the Major Soils of the World. Foodand Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Erisman J W, Sutton M A, Galloway J, Klimont Z, WiniwarterW. 2008. How a century of ammonia synthesis changedthe world. Nature Geoscience, 1, 636-639FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1998. Evaluatingthe Potential Contribution of Organic Agriculture to Sustainability Goals. FAO’s Technical Contribution toIFOAM’s Scientific Conference. Food and AgriculturalOrganisation of the United Nations, Rome.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2001. GlobalEcological Zoning for the Global Forest ResourceAssessment 2000. Forestry Department of the Food andAgricultural Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), WFP (World FoodProgramme), IFAD (International Fund for AgriculturalDevelopment). 2012. The State of Food Insecurity in theWorld 2012. Food and Agriculture Organization of theUnited Nations, Rome.Freyer B. 2007. Traditional and ecological farming sytemsin (sub)tropical countries-history, interactions and futureperspectives. In: Hülsebush C, Wichern F, Hemann H,Wolff P, eds., Organic Agriculture in the Tropics andSubtropics - Current Status and Perspectives. KasselUniversity Press GmbH, Kassel. pp. 1-30Gerbens-Leenes W, Nonhebel S. 2005. Food and land use: Theinfluence of consumption patterns on the use of agriculturalresources. Appetite, 45, 24-31Gobat J M, Aragno M, Matthey W. 2004. The Living Soil:Fundamentals of Soil Science and Soil Biology. SciencePublishers, Enfield.Halberg N, Sulser T B, Høgh-Jensen H, Rosegrant M W,Knudsen M T. 2005. The impact of organic farming on foodsecurity in a regional and global perspective. In: HalbergN, Alrøe H F, Knudsen M T, Kristensen E S, eds., GlobalDevelopment of Organic Agriculture: Challenges andPromises. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. pp. 277-322Hartemink A E. 2003. Soil Fertility Decline in the Tropics;with Case Studies on Plantations. CABI Publishing,Wallingford.IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development).2010. Rural Poverty Report 2011. International Fund forAgricultural Development, Rome.IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change).2007a. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation andVulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II tothe Forth Assessment Report of the IntergovernmentalPanel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge.IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007b.Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution ofWorking Groups I, II and III to the Fourth AssessmentReport of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.IPCC, Geneva.IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2013.Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker T F, Qin D,Plattner G K, Tignor M, Allen S K, Boschung J, NauelsA, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley P M, eds., Climate Change2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution ofWorking Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge and New York.Kirchmann H, Bergström L. 2008. Organic Crop Production-Ambitions and Limitations. Springer Science & BusinessMedia BV, New York.Li H, Qiu J, Wang L, Tang H, Li C, van Ranst E. 2010.Modelling impacts of alternative farming managementpractices on greenhouse gas emissions from a winterwheat-maize rotation system in China. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment, 135, 24-33Lotter D W. 2003. Organic agriculture. Journal of SustainableAgriculture, 21, 59-128Mäder P, Fliessbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, NiggliU. 2002. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming.Science, 296, 1694-1697Mozumder P, Berrens R P. 2007. Inorganic fertilizer use andbiodiversity risk: An empirical investigation. EcologicalEconomics, 62, 538-543Oades J. 1988. The retention of organic matter in soils.Biogeochemistry, 5, 35-70Parry M L, Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, Livermore M, Fischer G.2004. Effects of climate change on global food productionunder SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios.Global Environmental Change, 14, 53-67Pimentel D, Harvey C, Resosudarmo P, Sinclair K, Kurz D,McNair M, Crist S, Shpritz L, Fitton L, Saffouri R, BlairR. 1995. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosionand conservation benefits. Science, 267, 1117-1123Pretty J N. 1995. Regenerating Agriculture. EarthscanPublications, London.Primavesi A. 2006. Soil system management in the humidand subhumid tropics. In: Uphoff N, Ball A S, Herren H,Husson O, Laing M, Palm C, Pretty J, Sanchez P, SangingaN, Thies J, eds., Biological Approaches to SustainableSoil Systems. Taylor & Francis Group, Florida. pp. 15-26Ransom B, Kim D, Kastner M, Wainwright S. 1998. Organicmatter preservation on continental slopes: Importance ofmineralogy and surface area. Geochimica et CosmochimicaActa, 62, 1329-1345Scialabba N E H, Müller-Lindenlauf M. 2010. Organicagriculture and climate change. Renewable Agricultureand Food Systems, 25, 158-169Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P,McCarl B, Ogle S, O’Mara F, Rice C, Scholes B, SirotenkoO, Howden M, McAllister T, Pan G, Romanenkov V,Schneider U, Towprayoon S, Wattenbach M, Smith J. 2008.Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. PhilosophicalTransactions of the Royal Society (B-Biological Sciences),363, 789-813UNCCD (United Nations Convention to CombatDesertification). 2009. Benefits of Sustainable LandManagement. United Nations Convention to CombatDesertification, Bern.UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2007. GlobalEnvironment Outlook 4. United Nations EnvironmentProgramme, Nairobi.Wheeler T, von Braun J. 2013. Climate change impacts onglobal food security. Science, 341, 508-513. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
