|
|
|
Effect of Shading During Grain Filling on the Physicochemical Properties of Fresh Waxy Maize |
LU Da-lei, SUN Xu-li, WANG Xin, YAN Fa-bao , LU Wei-ping |
Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Cultivation in Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtse River, Ministry of Agriculture/College of Agriculture, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, P.R.China |
|
|
摘要 Grain physicochemical properties determine the table quality of fresh waxy maize. Two waxy maize varieties, Suyunuo 5 (shading tolerant) and FHN003 (shading sensitive), were used to estimate the effect of shading (plants received 30% less radiation than control) during grain filling (from 0 d to 23 d after pollination) on physicochemical properties of fresh waxy maize grain. Shading decreased the grain fresh weight of Suyunuo 5 and FHN003 by 8.4 and 19.1%, respectively. Shading increased the grain water content of FHN003, whereas that of Suyunuo 5 was not affected. In both varieties for shading treatment, soluble sugar, starch and protein contents were decreased, whereas zein content was increased. The changes in globulin, albumin and glutenin contents under shading were variety dependent. In both varieties, shading decreased λmax, iodine binding capacity and the percentage of large starch granules (diameter >17 μm) but increased crystallinity. The results of rapid visco analysis showed that the viscosity characteristics (except for pasting temperature) of both varieties were decreased by shading; however, FHN003 was more severely affected than Suyunuo 5. Under shading, ΔHret and %R were decreased in both varieties, whereas the changes in ΔHgel and transition temperatures were variety dependent. Hardness, cohesiveness and chewiness were decreased in both varieties. Significant differences in physicochemical characteristics were observed between the two varieties.
Abstract Grain physicochemical properties determine the table quality of fresh waxy maize. Two waxy maize varieties, Suyunuo 5 (shading tolerant) and FHN003 (shading sensitive), were used to estimate the effect of shading (plants received 30% less radiation than control) during grain filling (from 0 d to 23 d after pollination) on physicochemical properties of fresh waxy maize grain. Shading decreased the grain fresh weight of Suyunuo 5 and FHN003 by 8.4 and 19.1%, respectively. Shading increased the grain water content of FHN003, whereas that of Suyunuo 5 was not affected. In both varieties for shading treatment, soluble sugar, starch and protein contents were decreased, whereas zein content was increased. The changes in globulin, albumin and glutenin contents under shading were variety dependent. In both varieties, shading decreased λmax, iodine binding capacity and the percentage of large starch granules (diameter >17 μm) but increased crystallinity. The results of rapid visco analysis showed that the viscosity characteristics (except for pasting temperature) of both varieties were decreased by shading; however, FHN003 was more severely affected than Suyunuo 5. Under shading, ΔHret and %R were decreased in both varieties, whereas the changes in ΔHgel and transition temperatures were variety dependent. Hardness, cohesiveness and chewiness were decreased in both varieties. Significant differences in physicochemical characteristics were observed between the two varieties.
|
Received: 30 July 2012
Accepted:
|
Fund: The study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30971731, 31000684 and 31271640) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, China. |
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence LU Wei-ping, Tel: +86-514-87979377, Fax: +86-514-87976817, E-mail: wplu@yzu.edu.cn
E-mail: wplu@yzu.edu.cn
|
About author: LU Da-lei, E-mail: dllu@yzu.edu.cn; |
Cite this article:
LU Da-lei, SUN Xu-li, WANG Xin, YAN Fa-bao , LU Wei-ping.
2013.
Effect of Shading During Grain Filling on the Physicochemical Properties of Fresh Waxy Maize. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(9): 1560-1567.
|
[1]AACC. 1990. Approved Methods of the AmericanAssociation of Cereal Chemists. AACCI, St. Paul, MN,USA.Bao J S, Kong X L, Xie J K, Xu L J. 2004. Analysis ofgenotypic and environmental effects on rice starch. 1.Apparent amylose content, pasting viscosity, and geltexture. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry,52, 6010-6016[2]Cai R G, Yin Y P, Zhao F M, Zhang M, Zhang T B, Liang TB, Gu F, Dai Z M, Wang Z L. 2008. Size distribution ofstarch granules in strong-gluten wheat endospermunder low light environment. Scientia AgriculturaSinica, 41, 1308-1316[3](in Chinese)Chan W T, Mackenzie A F. 1972. Effects of shading andnitrogen on growth of corn (Zea mays L.) under fieldconditions. Plant and Soil, 36, 59-70[4]Chang Y H, Lin J H, Chang S Y. 2006. Physicochemicalproperties of waxy and normal corn starches treated indifferent anhydrous alcohols with hydrochloric acid.Food Hydrocolloids, 20, 332-339[5]Correia M J, Osorio M L, Osorio J, Barrote I, Martins M,David M M. 2006. Influence of transient shade periodson the effects of drought on photosynthesis, carbohydrateaccumulation and lipid peroxidation in sunflower leaves.Environmental and Experimental Botany, 58, 75-84[6]Doehlert D C, McMullen M S, Hammond J J. 2001. Genotypicand environmental effects on grain yield and quality ofoat grown in North Dakota. Crop Science, 41, 1066-1072[7]Earle F R. 1977. Protein and oil content in corn: variation bycrop years from 1907-1972[8]Cereal Chemistry, 54, 74-79[9]Early E B, McIlrath W O, Seif R D, Hageman R H. 1967.Effects of shade applied at different stages of plantdevelopment on corn (Zea mays L.) production. CropScience, 7, 151-156[10]Earley E B, Miller R J, Reichert G L, Hageman R H, Seif R D.1966. Effect of shade on maize production under fieldconditions. Crop Science, 6, 1-7[11]Fiedorowicz M, Rebilas K. 2002. Physicochemical propertiesof waxy corn starch and corn amylopectin illuminatedwith linearly polarized visible light. CarbohydratePolymers, 50, 315-319[12]Grashoff C, d’Antuono L F. 1997. Effect of shading andnitrogen application on yield, grain size distributionand contents of nitrogen and water soluble carbohydratesin malting spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). EuropeanJournal of Agronomy, 6, 275-293[13]Hayakawa K, Tanaka K, Nakamura T, Endo S, Hoshino T.1997. Quality characteristics of waxy hexaploid wheat(Triticum aestivum L.): properties of starch gelatinizationand retrogradation. Cereal Chemistry, 74, 576-580[14]ICC. 1994. Determination of Starch Content by HydrochloricAcid Dissolution ACC 123/1. The Association, Detmold,Germany.Ji Y, Wong K, Hasjim J, Pollak L M, Duvick S, Jane J, WhiteP J. 2003. Structure and function of starch from advancedgeneration of new corn lines. Carbohydrate Polymers,54, 305-319[15]Jia S F, Dong S T, Wang K J, Zhang J W, Li C F. 2007. Effectof shading on grain quality at different stages fromflowering to maturity in maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica,33, 1960-1967[16](in Chinese)Jia S F, Li C F, Dong S T, Zhang J W. 2011. Effects ofshading at different stages after anthesis on maize grainweight and quality at cytology level. AgricultureScience in China, 10, 58-69[17]Kiniry J R, Ritchie J T. 1985. Shade-sensitive interval ofkernel number of maize. Agronomy Journal, 77, 711-715[18]Li X, Cai J, Li H, Bo Y, Liu F, Jiang D, Dai T, Cao W. 2012. Effect of shading from jointing to maturity on highmolecular weight glutenin subunit accumulation andglutenin macropolymer concentration in grain of winterwheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 198,68-79[19]Lu D L, Lu W P. 2012. Effects of protein removal on thephysicochemical properties of waxy maize flour. Starch/Starke, 64, 874-881[20]Luthe D S. 1983. Storage protein accumulation in developingrice (Oryza sation L.) seeds. Plant Science Letter, 32,147-158[21]Min Y, Wang J, Hu X W, Fu S P, Guo J C, 2010. Effect ofshading on starch accumulation in cassave storageroots. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 31, 1057-1062 (in Chinese)[22]Sandhu K S, Singh N. 2007. Some properties of corn starchesII: physicochemical, gelatinization, retrogradation,pasting and gel textural properties. Food Chemistry,101, 1499-1507[23]Sandhu K S, Singh N, Malhi N S. 2005. Physicochemicaland thermal properties of starches separated from cornproduced from crosses of two germ pools. FoodChemistry, 89, 541-548[24]Setter T L, Flannigan B A, Melkonian J. 2001. Loss of kernelset due to water deficit and shade in maize: carbohydratesupplies, abscisic acid, and cytokinins. Crop Science,41, 1530-1540[25]Simla S, Lertrat K, Suriharn B. 2010. Carbohydrate charactersof six vegetable waxy corn varieties as affected byharvest time and storage duration. Asian Journal ofPlant Science, 9, 463-470[26]Singh N, Inouchi N, Nishinari K. 2006. Structure, thermaland viscoelastic characteristics of starches separatedfrom normal, sugary and waxy maize. Food Hydrocolloids,20, 923-935[27]Tang Q Y, Feng M G. 2007. DPS Data Processing System:Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and DataMining. Science Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)[28]Xu L J, Xie J K, Kong X L, Bao J S. 2004. Analysis ofgenotypic and environmental effects on rice starch. 2:thermal and retrogradation properties. Journal ofAgriculture and Food Chemistry, 52, 6017-6022[29]Zhang J W, Dong S T, Wang K J, Hu C H, Liu P. 2008.Effects of shading in field on key enzymes involved instarch synthesis of summer maize. Acta AgronomicaSinica, 34, 1470-1474. (in Chinese) |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|