Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2023, Vol. 22 Issue (4): 1035-1044    DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2022.08.028
Crop Science Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Root pruning is effective in alleviating the inhibition of soybean growth caused by anaerobic stress for a short period

Koji YAMANE, Miki MARIYAMA, Yoshihiro HIROOKA, Morio IIJIMA#

Graduate School of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara 631-8505, Japan

Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Soybean is an important upland crop, but its productivity is often limited by anaerobic stress caused by waterlogging.  The ability to adjust root growth under environmental constraints is an important physiological trait for adapting to an ever-changing environment, and root pruning is an artificial technique for regenerating the root system.  In the present study, we investigated whether root pruning in soybean can effectively alleviate the inhibitory effects of anaerobic stress.  Soybean plants were affected by anaerobic stress at the germination, vegetative stage 1 (V1), and reproductive stage 1 (R1) stages, and then the plants were treated with root pruning just after the stress treatment.  Soybean plants at the germination stage were treated with root cap and tip removals after hypoxia (N2 treatment).  Root cap removal was more effective in suppressing the inhibitory effects of hypoxia than root tip removal (5 mm from the tip).  The shoot dry weights of the soybean plants with and without root cap removal after hypoxia were 51.2 and 73.8% of the control, respectively, while the root dry weights of plants with and without root cap removal after hypoxia were 43.2 and 62.8% of the control, respectively.  As root cap removal effectively enhanced soybean growth after anaerobic stress, the root cap may be the candidate tissue for the stress memory mechanism.  When soybean plants at the V1 stage of growth were affected by anaerobic stress, the branch number, pod weight in the main stem, root length, and root surface area of the soybean plants treated with anaerobic stress at the R1 stage significantly decreased compared with those of the control.  In contrast, root pruning (2 mm from the tip) immediately after the stress treatment enhanced root growth, branch number, and pod weight.  The branch number, pod weight, root length, and root surface area of the plants treated with root pruning were 1.13, 1.14, 1.12, and 1.13 times higher than those of plants treated with anaerobic stress.  Plasmolysis was observed in the root meristem, columella, and cortical cells in soybean roots subjected to anaerobic conditions.  However, damage was not observed in the newly emerged roots after root pruning in plants treated with anaerobic stress.  These results suggested that root pruning is effective in enhancing soybean growth after anaerobic stress.  This effectiveness may be due to the regeneration and elongation of healthy lateral roots during the recovery period.  When soybean plants were affected by anaerobic stress at the R1 stage, root pruning just after the stress treatment was ineffective.  Thus, suppressing the growth reduction due to anaerobic stress at reproductive stages using only root pruning may be difficult.

Keywords:  crack fertilization       nodulation control       root cap removal       stress memory       waterlogging  
Received: 16 February 2022   Accepted: 24 April 2022
Fund: 

This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (JP20K06003 to M.I.).  

About author:  Koji Yamane, E-mail: k-yamane@nara.kindai.ac.jp; #Correspondence Morio Iijima, Tel: +81-742-43-7209, Fax: +81-742-42-5300, E-mail: iijimamorio@nara.kindai.ac.jp

Cite this article: 

Koji YAMANE, Miki MARIYAMA, Yoshihiro HIROOKA, Morio IIJIMA. 2023. Root pruning is effective in alleviating the inhibition of soybean growth caused by anaerobic stress for a short period. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 22(4): 1035-1044.

Ding Y, Fromm M, Avramova Z. 2012. Multiple exposures to drought ‘train’ transcriptional responses in Arabidopsis. Nature Communications, 3, 740.
Fehr W R, Caviness C E, Burmood D T, Pennington J S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Science, 11, 929–931. 
Gowda V R P, Henry A, Yamauchi A, Shashidhar H E, Serraj R. 2011. Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. Field Crops Research, 122, 1–13. 
Iijima M, Awala S K, Watanabe Y, Kawato Y, Fujioka Y, Yamane K, Wada K C. 2016. Mixed cropping has the potential to enhance flood tolerance of drought-adapted grain crops. Journal of Plant Physiology, 192, 21–25. 
Iijima M, Higuchi T, Barlow P W, Bengough A G. 2003. Root cap removal increases root penetration resistance in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, 2105–2109. 
Iijima M, Hirooka Y, Kawato Y, Watanabe Y, Wada K, Shinohara N, Nanhapo P, Wanga M, Yamane K. 2017. Short term evaluation of oxygen transfer from rice (Oryza sativa) to mixed planted drought-adapted upland crops under hydroponic culture. Plant Production Science, 20, 434–440. 
Iijima M, Honjo H, Izumi Y, Daimon H, Tani T, Hayashi M, Suzuki T. 2011. Control of soybean nodule formation by a crack fertilization technique. Plant Production Science, 14, 202–212. 
Iijima M, Morita S, Barlow P W. 2008. Structure and function of the root cap. Plant Production Science, 11, 17–27. 
Iijima M, Yamane K, Hirooka Y, Wada K, Okada Y, Mariyama M, Watanabe Y. 2020. Application of natural root grafting to annual crop species using a narrow-rooting passage instrument. Plant Production Science, 23, 220–225.
Iijima M, Yamane K, Izumi Y, Daimon H, Motonaga T. 2015. Continuous application of biochar inoculated with root nodule bacteria to subsoil enhances yield of soybean by the nodule control using crack fertilization technique. Plant Production Science, 18, 197–208. 
Kato Y, Henry A, Fujita D, Katsura K, Kobayashi N, Serraj R. 2011. Physiological characterization of introgression lines derived from an indica rice cultivar IR64, adapted to drought and water-saving irrigation. Field Crops Research, 123, 130–138. 
Malik A I, Colmer T D, Lambers H, Setter T L, Schortemeyer M. 2002. Short-term waterlogging has long-term effects on the growth and physiology of wheat. New Phytologist, 153, 225–236. 
Ma S C, Li F M, Xu B C, Huang Z B. 2009. Effects of root pruning on the growth and water use efficiency of winter wheat. Plant Growth Regulation, 57, 233–241. 
Niki T, Gladish D K. 2001. Changes in growth and structure of pea primary roots (Pisum sativum Alaska) as a result of sudden flooding. Plant Cell Physiology, 42, 694–702.
Patel P K, Singh A K, Tripathi N, Yadav D, Hemantaranjan A. 2014. Flooding: Abiotic constraint limiting vegetable productivity. Advances in Plants & Agriculture Research, 1, 96–103. 
Ploschuk R A, Miralles D J, Striker G G. 2022. A quantitative review of soybean responses to waterlogging: Agronomical, morpho-physiological and anatomical traits of tolerance. Plant and Soil, 475, 237–252.
Sakazono S, Nagata T, Matsuo R, Kajihara S, Watanabe M, Ishimoto M, Shimamura S, Harada K, Takahashi R, Mochizuki T. 2014. Variation in root development response to flooding among 92 soybean lines during early growth stages. Plant Production Science, 17, 228–236.
Suematsu K, Abiko T, Nguyen V L, Mochizuki T. 2017. Phenotypic variation in root development of 162 soybean accessions under hypoxia condition at the seedling stage. Plant Production Science, 20, 323–335. 
Tewari S, Arora N K. 2016. Soybean production under flooding stress and its mitigation using plant growth-promoting microbes. In: Miransari M, ed., Environmental Stresses in Soybean Production: Soybean Production. vol. 2. Academic Press, UK. pp. 23–40.
Tombesi S, Frioni T, Poni S, Palliotti A. 2018. Effect of water stress “memory” on plant behavior during subsequent drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 150, 106–114.
Wang Y, Travers S, Bertelsen M G, Thorup-Kristensen K, Petersen K K, Liu F. 2014. Effects of root pruning and irrigation regimes on pear tree: growth, yield and yield components. Horticultural Science, 41, 34–43.
Xu D, Miao J, Yumoto E, Yokota T, Asahina M, Watahiki M. 2017. YUCCA9-mediated auxin biosynthesis and polar auxin transport synergistically regulate regeneration of root systems following root cutting. Plant Cell Physiology, 58, 1710–1723. 
Yamane K, Fudano Y, Takao N, Sugiyama T, Izumi Y, Daimon H, Tsuji H, Murakami N, Iijima M. 2020. The crack fertilization technique effectively increases soybean production in upland fields converted from paddies. Plant Production Science, 23, 397–406. 
Yamane K, Iijima M. 2016. Nodulation control of crack fertilization technique reduced the growth inhibition of soybean caused by short-term waterlogging at early vegetative stage. Plant Production Science, 19, 438–448.
Yamauchi T, Shimamura S, Nakazono M, Mochizuki T. 2013. Aerenchyma formation in crop species: A review. Field Crops Research, 152, 8–16.

[1] DING Xiao-yu, XU Jin-song, HUANG He, QIAO Xing, SHEN Ming-zhen, CHENG Yong, ZHANG Xue-kun. Unraveling waterlogging tolerance-related traits with QTL analysis in reciprocal intervarietal introgression lines using genotyping by sequencing in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(8): 1974-1983.
[2] REN Bai-zhao, HU Juan, ZHANG Ji-wang, DONG Shu-ting, LIU Peng, ZHAO Bin. Effects of urea mixed with nitrapyrin on leaf photosynthetic and senescence characteristics of summer maize (Zea mays L.) waterlogged in the field[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(6): 1586-1595.
[3] WANG Xiao, LIU Fu-lai, JIANG Dong. Priming: A promising strategy for crop production in response to future climate[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(12): 2709-2716.
[4] ZOU Xi-ling, ZENG Liu, LU Guang-yuan, CHENG Yong, XU Jin-song, ZHANG Xue-kun. Comparison of transcriptomes undergoing waterlogging at the seedling stage between tolerant and sensitive varieties of Brassica napus L.[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(9): 1723-1734.
[5] XIAO Fei, LI Yuan-zheng, DU Yun, LING Feng, YAN Yi, FENG Qi , BAN Xuan. Monitoring Perennial Sub-Surface Waterlogged Croplands Based on MODIS in Jianghan Plain, Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(8): 1791-1801.
[6] YU Ma, MAO Shuang-lin, CHEN Guo-yue, LIU Ya-xi, LI Wei, WEI Yu-ming, LIU Chun-ji , ZHENG You-liang. QTLs for Waterlogging Tolerance at Germination and Seedling Stages in Population of Recombinant Inbred Lines Derived from a Cross Between Synthetic and Cultivated Wheat Genotypes[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(1): 31-39.
No Suggested Reading articles found!