|
|
|
|
|
| The identification of presence/absence variants associated with the apparent differences of growth period structures between cultivated and wild soybeans |
| LI Yan-fei, HONG Hui-long, LI Ying-hui, MA Yan-song, CHANG Ru-zhen, QIU Li-juan |
1、National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI)/Key Lab of Germplasm Utilization, Ministry of
Agriculture/Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
2、College of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P.R.China
3、Soybean Research Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 The cultivated soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) was distinguished from its wild progenitor Glycine soja Sieb. & Zucc. in growth period structure, by a shorter vegetative phase (V), a prolonged reproductive phase (R) and hence a larger R/V ratio. However, the genetic basis of the domestication of soybean from wild materials is unclear. Here, a panel of 123 cultivated and 97 wild accessions were genotyped using a set of 24 presence/absence variants (PAVs) while at the same time the materials were phenotyped with respect to flowering and maturity times at two trial sites located at very different latitudes. The major result of this study showed that variation at PAVs is informative for assessing patterns of genetic diversity in Glycine spp. The genotyping was largely consistent with the taxonomic status, although a few accessions were intermediate between the two major clades identified. Allelic diversity was much higher in the wild germplasm than in the cultivated materials. A significant domestication signal was detected at 11 of the PAVs at 0.01 level. In particular, this study has provided information for revealing the genetic basis of photoperiodism which was a prominent feature for the domestication of soybean. A significant marker-trait association with R/V ratio was detected at 14 of the PAVs, but stripping out population structure reduced this to three. These results will provide markers information for further finding of R/V related genes that can help to understand the domestication process and introgress novel genes in wild soybean to broaden the genetic base of modern soybean cultivars.
Abstract The cultivated soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) was distinguished from its wild progenitor Glycine soja Sieb. & Zucc. in growth period structure, by a shorter vegetative phase (V), a prolonged reproductive phase (R) and hence a larger R/V ratio. However, the genetic basis of the domestication of soybean from wild materials is unclear. Here, a panel of 123 cultivated and 97 wild accessions were genotyped using a set of 24 presence/absence variants (PAVs) while at the same time the materials were phenotyped with respect to flowering and maturity times at two trial sites located at very different latitudes. The major result of this study showed that variation at PAVs is informative for assessing patterns of genetic diversity in Glycine spp. The genotyping was largely consistent with the taxonomic status, although a few accessions were intermediate between the two major clades identified. Allelic diversity was much higher in the wild germplasm than in the cultivated materials. A significant domestication signal was detected at 11 of the PAVs at 0.01 level. In particular, this study has provided information for revealing the genetic basis of photoperiodism which was a prominent feature for the domestication of soybean. A significant marker-trait association with R/V ratio was detected at 14 of the PAVs, but stripping out population structure reduced this to three. These results will provide markers information for further finding of R/V related genes that can help to understand the domestication process and introgress novel genes in wild soybean to broaden the genetic base of modern soybean cultivars.
|
|
Received: 26 January 2015
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This research was supported by the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP) of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and the Platform of National Crop Germplasm Resources of China (nos. 2012-004 and 2013-004). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Ying-hui, Tel/Fax: +86-10-82105843,E-mail: liyinghui@caas.cn; QIU Li-juan, Tel/Fax: +86-10-82105843,E-mail: qiulijuan@caas.cn
E-mail: liyinghui@caas.cn; qiulijuan@caas.cn
|
| About author: These authors contributed equally to this study. |
Cite this article:
LI Yan-fei, HONG Hui-long, LI Ying-hui, MA Yan-song, CHANG Ru-zhen, QIU Li-juan.
2016.
The identification of presence/absence variants associated with the apparent differences of growth period structures between cultivated and wild soybeans. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(2): 262-270.
|
| Ashfield T, Ong L E, Nobuta K, Schneider C M, Innes R W. 2004.Convergent evolution of disease resistance gene specificityin two flowering plant families. The Plant Cell, 16, 309-318Beaumont M A, Balding D J 2004. Identifying adaptive geneticdivergence among populations from genome scans.Molecular Ecology, 13, 969-980Chia J M, Song C, Bradbury P J, Costich D, de Leon N, DoebleyJ, Elshire R J, Gaut B, Geller L, Glaubitz J C. 2012. MaizeHapMap2 identifies extant variation from a genome in flux.Nature Genetics, 44, 803-807Cho S M, Kang B R, Kim Y C. 2013. Transcriptome analysisof induced systemic drought tolerance elicited byPseudomonas chlororaphis O6 in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant Pathology Journal, 29, 209.Cooper H D, Spillane C, Hodgkin T, Cooper H D. 2001.Broadening the Genetic Base of Crops: An Overview. CABIPublishing, New York.Fehr W R. 1987. Principles of Cultivar Development. MacmillanPublishing, London.Fernie A R, Tadmor Y, Zamir D. 2006. Natural genetic variationfor improving crop quality. Current Opinion in Plant Biology,9, 196-202Guan R, Qu Y, Guo Y, Yu L, Liu Y, Jiang J, Chen J, Ren Y, LiuG, Tian L. 2014. Salinity tolerance in soybean is modulatedby natural variation in GmSALT3. The Plant Journal, 80,937-950He Z, Zhai W, Wen H, Tang T, Wang Y, Lu X, Greenberg A J,Hudson R R, Wu C I, Shi S. 2011. Two evolutionary historiesin the genome of rice: The roles of domestication genes.PLoS Genetics, 7, e1002100.Henderson C R. 1975. Best linear unbiased estimationand prediction under a selection model. Biometrics, 31,423-447Huang X, Lu G, Zhao Q, Liu X, Han B. 2008. Genome-wideanalysis of transposon insertion polymorphisms revealsintraspecific variation in cultivated rice. Plant Physiology,148, 25-40Hufford M B, Xu X, van Heerwaarden J, Pyhäjärvi T, Chia J M,Cartwright R A, Elshire R J, Glaubitz J C, Guill K E, KaepplerS M, Lai J S, Morrell P L, Shannon L M, Song C, SpringerN M, Swanson-Wagner R A, Tiffin P, Wang J, Zhang G Y,Doebley J, et al. 2012. Comparative population genomicsof maize domestication and improvement. Nature Genetics,44, 808-811Hymowitz T. 2004. Speciation and cytogenetics. In: Boerma HR, Specht J E, eds., Soybeans: Improvement, Production and Uses. 3rd ed. ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison,Wisconsin, USA.Hyten D L, Song Q, Zhu Y, Choi I Y, Nelson R L, Costa J M,Specht J E, Shoemaker R C, Cregan P B. 2006. Impactsof genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of theUnited States of America, 103, 16666-16671Kachroo A, Venugopal S C, Lapchyk L, Falcone D, HildebrandD, Kachroo P. 2004. Oleic acid levels regulated byglycerolipid metabolism modulate defense gene expressionin Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 101, 5152-5157Kim M Y, Lee S, Van K, Kim T H, Jeong S C, Choi I Y, Kim D S,Lee Y S, Park D, Ma J. 2010. Whole-genome sequencingand intensive analysis of the undomesticated soybean(Glycine soja Sieb. and Zucc.) genome. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica, 107, 22032-22037Lai J, Li R, Xu X, Jin W, Xu M, Zhao H, Xiang Z, Song W,Ying K, Zhang M. 2010. Genome-wide patterns of geneticvariation among elite maize inbred lines. Nature Genetics,42, 1027-1030Lam H M, Xu X, Liu X, Chen W B, Yang G H, Wong F L, Li MW, He W M, Qin N, Wang B, Li J, Jian M, Wang J, Shao GH, Wang J, Sun S S M, Zhang G Y. 2010. Resequencing of31 wild and cultivated soybean genomes identifies patternsof genetic diversity and selection. Nature Genetics, 42,1053-1059Lee S J, Cho D I, Kang J Y, Kim M D, Kim S Y. 2010. AtNEK6interacts with ARIA and is involved in ABA response duringseed germination. Molecules and Cells, 29, 559-566Li Y H, Zhou G, Ma J, Jiang W, Jin L G, Zhang Z, Guo Y,Zhang J, Sui Y, Zheng L, Zhang S S, Zuo Q, Shi X H, LiY F, Zhang W K, Hu Y, Kong G, Hong H L, Tan B, SongJ, et al. 2014. De novo assembly of soybean wild relativesfor pan-genome analysis of diversity and agronomic traits.Nature Biotechnology, 32, 1045-1052Li Y H, Li W, Zhang C, Yang L, Chang R Z, Gaut B S, Qiu L J.2010. Genetic diversity in domesticated soybean (Glycinemax) and its wild progenitor (Glycine soja) for simplesequence repeat and single-nucleotide polymorphism loci.New Phytologist, 188, 242-253Li Y H, Zhao S C, Ma J X, Li D, Yan L, Li J, Qi X T, Guo XS, Zhang L, He W M, Chang R Z, Liang Q S, Guo Y, YeC, Wang X B, Tao Y, Guan R X, Wang J Y, Liu Y L, Jin LG, et al. 2013. Molecular footprints of domestication andimprovement in soybean revealed by whole genome resequencing.BMC Genomics, 14, 579.Liu B, Kanazawa A, Matsumura H, Takahashi R, Harada K, AbeJ. 2008. Genetic redundancy in soybean photoresponsesassociated with duplication of the phytochrome A gene.Genetics, 180, 995-1007Liu K, Muse S V. 2005. PowerMarker: An integrated analysisenvironment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics,21, 2128-2129Qiu L J, Chang R Z, Liu Z X, Guan R X, Li Y H. 2006. Descriptorsand Data Standard for Soybean (Glycine spp.). ChinaAgriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)Qiu L J, Xing L L, Guo Y, Wang J, Jackson S A, Chang RZ. 2013. A platform for soybean molecular breeding:The utilization of core collections for food security. PlantMolecular Biology, 83, 41-50Shu S Z, Li F S, Chang R Z. 1986. A preliminary study on theevolution of the main characteristics of soybeans. ActaAgronomica Sinic, 12, 255-260 (in Chinese)Swanson-Wagner R A, Eichten S R, Kumari S, Tiffin P,Stein J C, Ware D, Springer N M. 2010. Pervasive genecontent variation and copy number variation in maize andits undomesticated progenitor. Genome Research, 20,1689-1699Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecularevolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0.Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 1596-1599Tan S, Zhong Y, Hou H, Yang S, Tian D. 2012. Variation ofpresence/absence genes among Arabidopsis populations.BMC Evolutionary Biology, 12, 86.Wang Y, Cheng L, Leng J, Wu C, Shao G, Hou W, Han T. 2015.Genetic analysis and quantitative trait locus identification ofthe reproductive to vegetative growth period ratio in soybean(Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Euphytica, 201, 275-284Wang Y, Lu J, Chen S, Shu L, Palmer R G, Xing G, Li Y,Yang S, Yu D, Zhao T. 2014. Exploration of presence/absence variation and corresponding polymorphic markersin soybean genome. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology,56, 1009-1019Watanabe S, Hideshima R, Xia Z, Tsubokura Y, Sato S,Nakamoto Y, Yamanaka N, Takahashi R, Ishimoto M, AnaiT. 2009. Map-based cloning of the gene associated withthe soybean maturity locus E3. Genetics, 182, 1251-1262Watanabe S, Xia Z, Hideshima R, Tsubokura Y, Sato S,Yamanaka N, Takahashi R, Anai T, Tabata S, Kitamura K.2011. A map-based cloning strategy employing a residualheterozygous line reveals that the GIGANTEA gene isinvolved in soybean maturity and flowering. Genetics, 188,395-407Xia Z, Watanabe S, Yamada T, Tsubokura Y, Nakashima H,Zhai H, Anai T, Sato S, Yamazaki T, Lü S. 2012. Positionalcloning and characterization reveal the molecular basis forsoybean maturity locus E1 that regulates photoperiodicflowering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesof the United States of America, 109, E2155-E2164.Xu B, Lu Q H. 1988. Soybean Ecology III. Comparative studyon photoperiod-induction of wild (G. soja) and cultivated (G.max) soybeans. Soybean Science, 7, 269-275 (in Chinese)Xu X, Liu X, Ge S, Jensen J D, Hu F, Li X, Dong Y, GutenkunstR N, Fang L, Huang L. 2012. Resequencing 50 accessionsof cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifyingagronomically important genes. Nature Biotechnology, 30,105-111Zhang L M, Luo H, Liu Z Q, Zhao Y, Luo J C, Hao D Y, Jing H C. 2014. Genome-wide patterns of large-size presence/absence variants in sorghum. Journal of Integrative PlantBiology, 56, 24-37Zhang Q, Li H, Li R, Hu R, Fan C, Chen F, Wang Z, Liu X,Fu Y, Lin C. 2008. Association of the circadian rhythmicexpression of GmCRY1a with a latitudinal cline inphotoperiodic flowering of soybean. Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica, 105, 21028-21033Zhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai C Q, Todhunter R J, Tiwari H K, GoreM A, Bradbury P J, Yu J, Arnett D K, Ordovas J M. 2010.Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wideassociation studies. Nature Genetics, 42, 355-360Zhu B B, Sun S, Han T F, Wu C X. 2012. Comparison of growthperiod and its structure traits between wild and cultivatedsoybeans in China. Soybean Science, 31, 894-898 (inChinese) |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
