Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2021, Vol. 20 Issue (4): 857-867    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63295-6
Section 1: Poverty governance and international experience Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Paths out of poverty: International experience
FAN Sheng-gen1, Emily EunYoung CHO2 
1 College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, P.R.China
2 International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C. 20005, USA
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  

全球可持续发展的第一目标 (SDGs) 是在2030年前终结一切形式的贫困。尽管全球贫困持续减少,但进展缓慢且地区间极不平衡 。为确保2030年在全球范围内根除贫困,研究脱贫路径至关重要,在此方面,总结国际经验、以农业发展为重点的减贫路径尤其受到广泛关注。本研究的发现在于,在土地稀缺国家,小农主导的农业增长往往对减贫影响最大。其次,一旦农业生产力达到一定水平,非农就业和城乡迁移必须随之而来。然而,过早退出农业可能造成更大的危害。第三,即使在通过部门和区域发展实现大规模减贫之前,也必须建立社会安全网,以覆盖那些没有从增长和发展中受益的人。在许多国家,生产性社会安全网已被证明具有极高的成本效益。当大量农村人口向城市转移时,城市贫困也应被社会保护计划所覆盖。研究指出,非洲农业增长在很大程度上受到土地扩张的推动,生产率低下,其减贫速度在所有地区中最为缓慢。南亚农业由小农农业的生产多样化所主导,对减贫影响很大,但其未来的减贫受到城乡移民且城市和非农产业缺乏正式就业机会的限制。许多拉丁美洲国家城市化程度高于其他发展中国家及地区,因而广泛采用社会保护计划。中国减贫的成功巨大,在很大程度上是由农业主导的改革及农村发展推动的。这些改革使农村居民的收入显著提高,贫困和饥饿人数大幅下降,且以可承受的价格进一步增加了粮食供应。同时, 对营养、保健、教育、清洁用水和良好卫生设施方面的投资也起了关键作用。




Abstract  
The global community has committed, as the first priority of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to end poverty in all its forms everywhere.  While the decline of global poverty continues, progress has slowed and remains uneven through different parts of the world.  To ensure that no one is left behind in China and beyond, research will be critical to inform paths out of poverty.  In this regard, it is valuable to take stock of international experiences and the various pathways out of poverty with a focus on agriculture.  Africa’s agricultural growth has been largely driven by land expansion and poverty reduction has been the slowest among all regions.  South Asia agriculture has been led by diversification of smallholder agriculture and its poverty reduction impact has been large, but its future poverty reduction is limited by rural–urban migration and lack of formal jobs in urban centers.  Social protection programs have been used by many Latin American countries as the region is more urbanized than any other developing regions.  China’s agricultural and economic success was driven by agriculture-led reforms and rural development.  These changes brought significantly higher incomes among rural residents, which accounted for highest initial levels of poverty and hunger, and in increased availability of food at affordable prices.  Investments in nutrition, health, education, clean water, and good sanitation also complemented progress.  The foremost lesson is that smallholder-led agriculture growth in land scarce countries often have the largest impact on poverty reduction.  Secondly, nonfarm employment and rural–urban migration must follow once agricultural productivity has reached a certain level.  However, premature exiting from agriculture can do more harm.  Thirdly, even before large scale poverty reduction through sectoral and regional development is exhausted, social safety nets must be established to cover those who have not benefited from growth and development.  Productive social safety nets have proven to be cost-effective in many countries.  Urban poverty should also be part of the protection scheme when large proportion of rural population moves to cities.
Keywords:  poverty        agriculture        food systems        sustainable development        agricultural transformation  
Received: 25 April 2020   Accepted:
Fund: The authors acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71661147001).
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence FAN Sheng-gen, Tel: +86-10-62738530, E-mail: s.fan@cau.edu.cn   

Cite this article: 

FAN Sheng-gen, Emily EunYoung CHO. 2021. Paths out of poverty: International experience. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(4): 857-867.

Badiane O, Diao X, Jayne T. 2020. Africa’s unfolding agricultural transformation. In: Fan S, Otsuka K, eds., Agricultural Development: New Perspectives in a Changing World.Chapter 5. International Food Policy Research Institute,  Washington, D.C.
Birthal P S, Roy D, Negi D S. 2015. Agricultural Diversification and Poverty in India. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1446.  International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
de Brauw A, Giles J. 2018. Migrant labor markets and the welfare of rural households in the developing world: Evidence from China. The World Bank Economic Review, 32, 1–18.
Chen K, Wu G, He X, Bi J, Wang Z. 2018. From Rural to Rural Urban Integration in China: Identifying New Vision and Key Areas for Post-2020 Poverty Reduction Strategy. The Ford Foundation Project Report. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Christiaensen L, Demery L, Kuhl J. 2011. The (evolving) role of agriculture in poverty reduction - An empirical perspective. Journal of Development Economics, 96, 239–254.
Cunningham K. 2009. Connecting the milk grid: Smallholder dairy in India. In: Spielman D J, Pandya-Lorch R, eds., Millions Fed: Proven Successes in Agricultural Development. Chapter 17. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C. pp. 117–124.
Davis K F, Chhatre A, Rao N D, Singh D, Ghosh-Jerath S, Mridul A, Poblete-Cazenave M, Pradhan N, DeFries R. 2019. Assessing the sustainability of post-green revolution cereals in India. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 25034–25041.
Díaz-Bonilla E, Piñeiro V. 2020. Regional developments. In: 2020 Global Food Policy Report. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C. [2020-1-20]. https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896293670_07
Fan S, Hazell P B R, Thorat S. 1998. Government Spending, Growth and Poverty: An Analysis of Interlinkages in Rural India. Environment and Production Technology Division Discussion Paper 33. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Fan S, Otsuka K.  2020. Agricultural Development in a Changing World Agricultural Development: New Perspectives in a Changing World. Chapter 1. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Fan S, Zhang L, Zhang X. 2002. Growth, Inequality, and Poverty in Rural China: The Role of Public Investment. Research Report 125. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Fuglie K, Rada N. 2013. Resources, Policies, and Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa. USDA-ERS Economic Research Report No. 145. [2020-1-20]. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=45047
Gasparini L, Lustig N. 2011. The rise and fall of income inequality in Latin America. Working paper 0118, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Gentilini U, Laughton S, O’Brien C. 2018. Human (Itarian) capital? Lessons on better connecting humanitarian assistance and social protection (English). Social Protection and Jobs Discussion Paper. No. 1802. World Bank Group, Washington, D.C.
Golan J, Sicular T, Umapathi N. 2017. Unconditional cash transfers in China: Who benefits from the rural minimum living standard guarantee (Dibao) program? World Development, 93, 316–336.
Gollin D, Jedwab R, Vollrath D. 2016. Urbanization with and without industrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21, 35.
Ha W, Yi J, Yuan Y, Zhang J. 2016. The dynamic effect of rural-to-urban migration on inequality in source villages: System GMM estimates from rural China. China Economic Review, 37, 27–39.
Howell A. 2017. Impacts of migration and remittances on ethnic income inequality in rural China. World Development, 94, 200–211.
Kou J, Liu N. 2018. China’s rural reform and poverty alleviation: a crusade for prosperity. People’s Daily. [2018-6-14]. http://en.people.cn/n3/2018/0614/c90000-9471560.html
de Janvry A, Sadoulet E. 2010. Agricultural growth and poverty reduction: Additional evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 25, 1–20.
Jayne T S, Chamberlin J, Headey D. 2014. Land pressures, the evolution of farming systems, and development strategies in Africa: A synthesis. Food Policy, 48, 1–17.
Jayne T S, Chamberlin J, Muyanga M. 2012. Emerging land issues in African agriculture: Implications for food security and poverty reduction strategies. In: Paper Presented as Part of Stanford University’s Global Food Policy and Food Security Symposium Series. Sponsored by the Center for Food Security and the Environment and the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, January 12, 2012.  Stanford, California.
Ma X, Wang F, Chen J, Zhang Y. 2018. The income gap between urban and rural residents in China: Since 1978. Computational Economics, 52, 1153–1174.
Muzari W, Gatsi W, Muvhunzi S. 2012. The impacts of technology adoption on smallholder agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa: A review. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5, 69–77.
Nassif A. 2007. National Innovation System and Macroeconomic Policies: Brazil and India in Comparative Perspective. No. 184. Unctad Discussion Papers. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China). 2018. China Statistical Yearbook 2018. China Statistics Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China). 2019. China Statistical Yearbook 2019. China Statistics Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
Rashid S, Minot N, Lemma S. 2019. Welfare and poverty impacts of aquaculture growth. In: Rashid S, Zhang X,  eds., The Making of a Blue Revolution in Bangladesh: Enablers, Impacts, and the Path Ahead for Aquaculture. Chapter 5. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C. pp. 77–102.
Takeshima H, Kumar A, Ahmed A, Joshi P K. 2020. Agricultural development and modernization in South Asia. In: Fan S, Otsuka K, eds., Agricultural Development: New Perspectives in a Changing World. Chapter 4. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Thapa G, Kumar A, Joshi P. 2017. Agricultural Diversification in Nepal Status, Determinants, and its Impact on Rural Poverty. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01634, April 2017. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
United Nations. 2018. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. New York, United Nations.
World Bank. 2018. Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2018: Piecing Together the Poverty Puzzle. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
World Bank. 2019. World Development Indicators. [2020-4-10]. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
 
[1] Eugenio DíAZ-BONILLA, Susana CONSTENLA-VILLOSLADA. Paths out of poverty: An eclectic and idiosyncratic review of analytical approaches[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 868-879.
[2] CHENG Xiao-yu, WANG Jian-ying, Kevin Z. CHEN. Elite capture, the “follow-up checks” policy, and the targeted poverty alleviation program: Evidence from rural western China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 880-890.
[3] LENG Gan-xiao, FENG Xiao-long, QIU Huan-guang . Income effects of poverty alleviation relocation program on rural farmers in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 891-904.
[4] WENG Yan-zhen, ZENG Ya-ting, LIN Wen-sheng. Do rural highways narrow Chinese farmers’ income gap among provinces?[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 905-914.
[5] LIU Ming-yue, FENG Xiao-long, WANG San-gui, ZHONG Yu. Does poverty-alleviation-based industry development improve farmers’ livelihood capital?[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 915-926.
[6] CHEN Si, LUO Er-ga, Lita ALITA, HAN Xiao, NIE Feng-ying. Impacts of formal credit on rural household income: Evidence from deprived areas in western China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 927-942.
[7] LI Shao-ping, DONG Yong-qing, ZHANG Lin-xiu, LIU Cheng-fang. Off-farm employment and poverty alleviation in rural China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 943-952.
[8] ZHANG Chuan-hong, Wandella Amos BENJAMIN, WANG Miao. The contribution of cooperative irrigation scheme to poverty reduction in Tanzania[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 953-963.
[9] Rob VOS, Andrea CATTANEO. Poverty reduction through the development of inclusive food value chains[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 964-978.
[10] Karine HAJI. E-commerce development in rural and remote areas of BRICS countries[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 979-997.
[11] PENG Chao, MA Biao, ZHANG Chen. Poverty alleviation through e-commerce: Village involvement and demonstration policies in rural China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 998-1011.
[12] WANG Er-peng, AN Ning, GENG Xian-hui, Zhifeng GAO, Emmanuel KIPROP. Consumers’ willingness to pay for ethical consumption initiatives on e-commerce platforms[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 1012-1020.
[13] Tsegaye Mulugeta HABTEWOLD. Impact of climate-smart agricultural technology on multidimensional poverty in rural Ethiopia[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 1021-1041.
[14] LEI Ming, YUAN Xuan-yu, YAO Xin-yan. Synthesize dual goals: A study on China’s ecological poverty alleviation system[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 1042-1059.
[15] YU Le-rong, LI Xiao-yun . The effects of social security expenditure on reducing income inequality and rural poverty in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 1060-1067.
No Suggested Reading articles found!