|
|
|
Increased plant density and reduced N rate lead to more grain yield and higher resource utilization in summer maize |
SHI De-yang*, LI Yan-hong*, ZHANG Ji-wang, LIU Peng, ZHAO Bin, DONG Shu-ting |
Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University/State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, P.R.China |
|
|
Abstract Planting at an optimum density and supplying adequate nitrogen (N) to achieve higher yields is a common practice in crop production, especially for maize (Zea mays L.); however, excessive N fertilizer supply in maize production results in reduced N use efficiency (NUE) and severe negative impacts on the environment. This research was conducted to determine the effects of increased plant density and reduced N rate on grain yield, total N uptake, NUE, leaf area index (LAI), intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (IPAR), and resource use efficiency in maize. Field experiments were conducted using a popular maize hybrid Zhengdan 958 (ZD958) under different combinations of plant densities and N rates to determine an effective approach for maize production with high yield and high resource use efficiency. Increasing plant density was clearly able to promote N absorption and LAI during the entire growth stage, which allowed high total N uptake and interception of radiation to achieve high dry matter accumulation (DMA), grain yield, NUE, and radiation use efficiency (RUE). However, with an increase in plant density, the demand of N increased along with grain yield. Increasing N rate can significantly increase the DMA, grain yield, LAI, IPAR, and RUE. However, this increase was non-linear and due to the input of too much N fertilizers, the efficiency of N use at NCK (320 kg ha–1) was low. An appropriate reduction in N rate can therefore lead to higher NUE despite a slight loss in grain production. Taking into account both the need for high grain yield and resource use efficiency, a 30% reduction in N supply, and an increase in plant density of 3 plants m–2, compared to LD (5.25 plants m–2), would lead to an optimal balance between yield and resource use efficiency.
|
Received: 13 November 2015
Accepted:
|
Fund: The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (3117 1497), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2011CB100105), the National Food Science and Technology of High Yield Program of China (2011BAD16B09), and the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China (201203096). |
Corresponding Authors:
DONG Shu-ting, Tel: +86-538-8245838,
E-mail: stdong@sdau.edu.cn
|
About author: SHI De-yang, E-mail: shideyang888@163.com; |
Cite this article:
SHI De-yang, LI Yan-hong, ZHANG Ji-wang, LIU Peng, ZHAO Bin, DONG Shu-ting.
2016.
Increased plant density and reduced N rate lead to more grain yield and higher resource utilization in summer maize. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(11): 2515-2528.
|
Al-Naggar A M, Reda A S, Mohamed M M A, Al-Khalil T H. 2015. Maize response to elevated plant density combined with lowered N-fertilizer rate is genotype-dependent. The Crop Journal, 3, 96–109.Andrade F H, Uhart S A, Cirilo A G. 1993. Temperature affects radiation use efficiency in maize. Field Crops Research, 32, 17–25.Banziger M, Edmeades G O, Lafitte H R. 1999. Selection for drought tolerance increases maize yields across a range of nitrogen levels. Crop Science, 39, 1035–1040.Below F E, Cazetta J O, Seebauer J R. 2000. Carbon/nitrogen interactions during ear and kernel development of maize. In: Westgate M, Boote K, Physiology and Modeling Kernel Set in Maize. 29th ed. CSSA-ASA. pp. 15–24.Boomsma C R, Santini J B, Tollenaar M, Vyn T J. 2009. Maize morphophysiological responses to intense crowding and low nitrogen availability: An analysis and review. Agronomy Journal, 101, 1426–1452.Borrás L, Westgate M E, Otegui M E. 2003. Control of kernel weight and kernel water relations by post-flowering source-sink ratio in maize. Annals of Botany, 91, 857–867.Bowman W D, Cleveland C C, Halada L, Hresko J, Baron J S. 2008. Negative impact of nitrogen deposition on soil buffering capacity. Nature Geoscience, 1, 767–770.Bremner J M. 1960. Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. Journal of Agricultural Science, 55, 11–33.Campbell G S. 1990. Derivation of an angle density function for canopies with ellipsoidal leaf angle distributions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 49, 173–176.Cassman K G, Dobermann A, Walters D T. 2002. Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management. Ambio - A Journal of the Human Environment, 31, 132–140.Cassman K G, Dobermann A, Walters D T, Yang H. 2003. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 315–358.Chen J, Huang Y, Tang Y H. 2011. Quantifying economically and ecologically optimum nitrogen rates for rice production in South-eastern China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 143, 195–204.Cheng Y, Zhao J, Liu Z X, Huo Z J, Liu P, Dong S T, Zhang J W, Zhao B. 2015. Modiifed fertilization management of summer maize (Zea mays L.) in northern China improves grain yield and efifciency of nitrogen use. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 8, 1644–1657.Ciampitti I A, Vyn T J. 2011. A comprehensive study of plant density consequences on nitrogen uptake dynamics of maize plants from vegetative to reproductive stages. Field Crops Research, 121, 2–18.Ciampitti I A, Vyn T J. 2012. Physiological perspectives of changes over time in maize yield dependency on nitrogen uptake and associated nitrogen efficiencies: A review. Field Crops Research, 133, 48–67.Duan M X. 2005. Some advice on corn breeding obtained from the elite varieties of Nongda 108 and Zhengdan 958. Journal of Maize Sciences, 13, 49–52. (in Chinese)Duncan W G, Williams W A, Loomis R S. 1967. Tassels and the productivity of maize. Crop Science, 7, 37–39.Edmeades G O, Daynard T B. 1979. The development of plant-to-plant variability in maize at different planting densities. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 59, 561–576.Erisman J W, Bleeker A, Galloway J, Sutton M S. 2007. Reduced nitrogen in ecology and the environment. Environment and Pollution, 150, 140–149.Gallagher J L, Biscoe P V. 1978. Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, 91, 47–60.Huang Y, Tang Y H. 2010. An estimate of greenhouse gas (N2O and CO2) mitigation potential under various scenarios of nitrogen use efficiency in China cropland. Global Change Biology, 16, 2958–2970.Jin L B, Cui H Y, Li B, Zhang J W, Dong S T, Liu P. 2012. Effects of integrated agronomic management practices on yield and nitrogen efficiency of summer maize in North China. Field Crops Research, 134, 30–35.Jones R J, Schreiber B M N, Roessler J A. 1996. Kernel sink capacity in maize: Genotypic and maternal regulation. Crop Science, 36, 301–306.Kiniry J R, Jones C A, O’toole J C, Blanchet R, Cabelguenne M, Spanel D A. 1989. Radiation-use efficiency in biomass accumulation prior to grain-filling for five grain-crop species. Field Crops Research, 20, 51–64.Kniep K R, Mason S C. 1989. Kernel breakage and density of normal and opaque-2 maize grain as influenced by irrigation and nitrogen. Crop Science, 29, 158–163.Konno Y. 2001. Feedback regulation of constant leaf standing crop in Sasa tsuboiana grasslands. Ecological Research, 16, 459–469.Lemcoff J, Loomis R S. 1994. Nitrogen and density influences on silk emergence, endosperm development, and grain yield in maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crops Research, 38, 63–72.Lemcoff J H, Loomis R S. 1986. Nitrogen influences on yield determination in maize. Crop Science, 26, 1017–1022.Lü P, Zhang J W, Liu W, Yang J S, Su K, Liu P, Dong S T, Li D H. 2011. Effects of nitrogen application on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize under super-high yield conditions. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 17, 852–860. (in Chinese)Maddonni G A, Cirilo A G, Otegui M E. 2006. Row width and maize grain yield. Agronomy Journal, 98, 1532–1543.Maddonni G A, Otegui M E. 2004 Intra-specific competition in maize: early establishment of hierarchies among plants affects final kernel set. Field Crops Research, 85, 1–13.Massignam A M, Chapman S C, Hammer G L, Fukai S. 2009. Physiological determinants of maize and sunflower grain yield as affected by nitrogen supply. Field Crops Research, 113, 256–267.Massignam A M, Chapman S C, Hammer G L, Fukai S. 2011. Effects of nitrogen supply on canopy development of maize and sunflower. Crop Pasture Science, 62, 1045–1055.McDonald G K. 1992. Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer on the growth, grain yield and grain protein concentration of wheat. Crop and Pasture Science, 43, 949–967.Monteith J L. 1977. Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Series B Biological Sciences), 281, 277–294.Muchow R C, Davis R. 1988. Effect of nitrogen supply on the comparative productivity of maize and sorghum in a semi-arid tropical environment. II. Radiation interception and biomass accumulation. Field Crops Research, 18, 17–30.Muchow R C. 1994. Effect of nitrogen on yield determination in irrigated maize in tropical and subtropical environments. Field Crops Research, 38, 1–13.Nan J Q. 2010. Study on the technologies of maize high-yield cultivation in Yellow Huai Hai. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 26, 106–110. (in Chinese)Nilson T. 1971. A theoretical analysis of the frequency of gaps in plant stands. Agricultural Meteorology, 8, 25–38.Oikeh S O, Kling J G, Okoruwa A E. 1998. Nitrogen fertilizer management effects on maize grain quality in the West African moist savanna. Crop Science, 38, 1056–1061.Olsen J, Weiner J. 2007. The influence of Triticum aestivum density, sowing pattern and nitrogen fertilization on leaf area index and its spatial variation. Basic & Applied Ecology, 8, 252–257.Papadopoulos A P, Pararajasingham S. 1997. The influence of plant spacing on light interception and use in greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.): A review. Scientia Horticulturae, 69, 1–29.Pepper G E, Pearce R B, Mock J J. 1977. Leaf orientation and yield of maize. Crop Science, 17, 883–886.Raun W R, Johnson G V. 1999. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agronomy Journal, 91, 357–363.Rosenthal W D, Arkin G F, Howell T A. 1985. Transmitted and absorbed photosynthetically active radiation in grain sorghum. Agronomy Journal, 77, 841–845.Rossini M A, Maddonni G A, Otegui M E. 2011. Inter-plant competition for resources in maize crops grown under contrasting nitrogen supply and density: Variability in plant and ear growth. Field Crops Research, 121, 423–429.Salvagiotti F, Castellarin J M, Miralles D J, Pedrol H M. 2009. Sulfur fertilization improves nitrogen use efficiency in wheat by increasing nitrogen uptake. Field Crops Research, 113, 170–177.Sangoi L, Gracietti M A, Rampazzo C, Bianchetti P, 2002. Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant density. Field Crops Research, 79, 39–51.Sinclair T R, Muchow R C. 1999. Advances in agronomy-radiation use efficiency. Academic Press, 65, 215–236.Snyder C S, Bruulsema T W, Jensen T L, Fixen P E. 2009. Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 133, 247–266.Suits G H. 1971. The calculation of the directional reflectance of a vegetative canopy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 71, 117–125.Tetio-Kagho F, Gardner F P. 1988. Response of maize to plant population density: II. Reproductive developments, yield, and yield adjustment. Agronomy Journal, 80, 935–940.Tetio-Kagho F, Gardner F P. 1988. Responses of maize to plant density. I. Canopy development, light relationships, and vegetative growth. Agronomy Journal, 80, 930–935.Thiraporn R, Feil B, Stamp P. 1992. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on grain yield and accumulation of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in the grains of tropical maize. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science, 169, 9–16.Thiraporn R, Geisler G, Stamp P. 1987. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on yield and yield components oftropical maize cultivars. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science, 159, 9–14.Timsina J, Singh U, Badaruddin M, Meisner C, Amin M R. 2001. Cultivar, nitrogen, and water effects on productivity, and nitrogen-use efficiency and balance for rice-wheat sequences of Bangladesh. Field Crops Research, 72, 143–161.Tokatlidis I S, Has V, Melidis V, Has I, Mylonas I. 2011. Maize hybrids less dependent on high plant densities improve resource-use efficiency in rain fed and irrigated conditions. Field Crops Research, 120, 345–351.Tokatlidis I S, Koutroubas S D. 2004. A review of maize hybrids’ dependence on high plant populations and its implications for crop yield stability. Field Crops Research, 88, 103–114.Tollenaar M, Wu J. 1999. Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Science, 39, 1597–1604.Uhart S A, Andrade F H. 1995. Nitrogen deficiency in maize: Effects on crop growth, development, dry matter partitioning, and kernel set. Crop Science, 35, 1376–1383.Wang W M, Li Z L, Su H B. 2007. Comparison of leaf angle distribution functions: Effects on extinction coefficient and fraction of sunlit foliage. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 143, 106–122.Westgate M A, Forcella F, Reicosky D C, Somson J. 1997. Rapid canopy closure for maize production in the northern US Corn Belt: Radiation-use efficiency and grain yield. Field Crops Research, 49, 249–258.Williams W A, Loomis R S, Duncan W G, Dovrat A, Nunez F A. 1968. Canopy architecture ant various population densities and the growth and grain yield of corn. Crop Science, 8, 303–308.Yang J S, Gao H Y, Liu P, Dong S T, Zhang J W, Wang J F. 2010. Effects of planting density and row spacing on canopy apparent photosynthesis of high-yield summer corn. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 36, 1226–1233. (in Chinese) Yuen S H, Pollard A G. 1953. Determination of nitrogen in soil and plant materials: Use of boric acid in the micro-Kjeldahl method. Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture, 4, 490–496.Zhang F S. 2008. Nitrogen use efficiences of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement. Acta Pendologica Sinica, 45, 915–924. (in Chinese) |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|