Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2015, Vol. 14 Issue (8): 1561-1572    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61131-5
Special Focus: Systems Research Helping toMeet the Needs and Managing the Trade-offs of a Changing W Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Comparison of energy consumption and economic performance of organic and conventional soybean production - A case study from Jilin Province, China
 ZHANG Li-wei, Til Feike, Jirko Holst, Christa Hoffmann, Reiner Doluschitz
1、Institute of Farm Management (410c), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany
2、Institute for Strategies and Technology Assessment, Julius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants,Kleinmachnow 14532, Germany
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  Modern agriculture heavily depends on energy consumption, especially fossil energy, but intensive energy input increases the production cost for producers and results in environmental pollution. Organic agricultural production is considered a more sustainable system, but there is lack of scientific research on the energy consumption between organic and conventional systems in China. The analysis and comparison of energy use between the two systems would help decision-makers to establish economic, effective and efficient agricultural production. Thus, the objectives of the present study are to analyze energy inputs, outputs, energy efficiency, and economic benefits between organic and conventional soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) production. A total of 24 organic farmers and 24 conventional farmers in Jilin Province, China, were chosen for investigation in 2010 production year. Total energy input was 71.55 GJ ha–1 and total energy output was 96.18 GJ ha–1 in the organic system, resulting in an energy efficiency (output/input) of 1.34. Total energy input was 9.37 GJ ha–1 and total energy output was 113.4 GJ ha–1 in the conventional system, resulting in the energy efficiency of 12.1. The huge discrepancy in energy inputs and respective efficiencies lies in the several times higher nutrient inputs in the organic compared to the conventional production system. Finally, the production costs ha–1 were 33% higher, and the net income ha–1 25% lower in the organic compared to the conventional soybean production system. It is recommended to improve fertilizer management in organic production to improve its energetic and economic performance.

Abstract  Modern agriculture heavily depends on energy consumption, especially fossil energy, but intensive energy input increases the production cost for producers and results in environmental pollution. Organic agricultural production is considered a more sustainable system, but there is lack of scientific research on the energy consumption between organic and conventional systems in China. The analysis and comparison of energy use between the two systems would help decision-makers to establish economic, effective and efficient agricultural production. Thus, the objectives of the present study are to analyze energy inputs, outputs, energy efficiency, and economic benefits between organic and conventional soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) production. A total of 24 organic farmers and 24 conventional farmers in Jilin Province, China, were chosen for investigation in 2010 production year. Total energy input was 71.55 GJ ha–1 and total energy output was 96.18 GJ ha–1 in the organic system, resulting in an energy efficiency (output/input) of 1.34. Total energy input was 9.37 GJ ha–1 and total energy output was 113.4 GJ ha–1 in the conventional system, resulting in the energy efficiency of 12.1. The huge discrepancy in energy inputs and respective efficiencies lies in the several times higher nutrient inputs in the organic compared to the conventional production system. Finally, the production costs ha–1 were 33% higher, and the net income ha–1 25% lower in the organic compared to the conventional soybean production system. It is recommended to improve fertilizer management in organic production to improve its energetic and economic performance.
Keywords:  energy consumption       fossil energy       economic benefit       organic agriculture       soybean production       Jilin Province       China  
Received: 18 March 2015   Accepted:
Corresponding Authors:  Reiner Doluschitz, Tel: +49-711-45923347,Fax: +49-711-459-23481, E-mail: Reiner.Doluschitz@unihohenheim.de     E-mail:  Reiner.Doluschitz@unihohenheim.de
About author:  ZHANG Li-wei, E-mail: maius520@gmail.com;

Cite this article: 

ZHANG Li-wei, Til Feike, Jirko Holst, Christa Hoffmann, Reiner Doluschitz. 2015. Comparison of energy consumption and economic performance of organic and conventional soybean production - A case study from Jilin Province, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(8): 1561-1572.

Bank of China. 2011. The 2010 average currency exchangerate between Euro and Chinese Yuan (CNY); 1 Euro=8.97CNY. [2012-9-15]. http://srh.bankofchina.com/search/whpj/search.jsp

Barbera G, La Mantia T. 1995. Analisiagronomicaenergetica:RAISA-University of Palermo, Palermo (Italy).

Filiereatteallosviluppo di areecollinari e montane:IIcasodell’agricolturabiologica. p. 114. (in Italian)

Cervinka V. 1980. Fuel and energy efficiency. In: Pimentel D,ed., Handbook of Energy Utilization in Agriculture. CRCPress, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 15-21

Chen F. 2002. Agricultural Eecosystem. China AgriculturalUniversity Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)

CNCA (Certification and Accreditation Administration of China).2010. The Report of Exported Organic Food in 2009.[2012-09-10] http://www.cnca.gov.cn/ywzl/rz/spncp/tzgg/index_3.shtml

Dabbert S. 2000. The Environmental Impacts of OrganicFarming in Europe. University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart,Germany.

Dalgaard T, Halberg N, Porter J R. 2001. A model for fossilenergy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organicand conventional farming. Agriculture, Ecosystems andEnvironment, 87, 51-65

Dewes T, Schmitt L. 1995. Energiebilanzen für VerschiedeneKulturen bei Biologischer und KonventionellerBewirtschaftung. Christian Albrechts-Universität, Kiel. (inGerman)

Ding X, Zhang B, Zhang X, Yang X, Zhang X. 2011. Effectsof tillage and crop rotation on soil microbial residues in arainfed agroecosystem of northeast China. Soil and TillageResearch, 114, 43-49

Feng M. 2007. Energy use during fertilizer production in China.[2012-07-13]. http://www.whecs.gov.cn/html/nenyuanjishu/gongyejienen/20071220/601.html

FiBL. 2010. Activity report: Organic is best for the climate.[2012-07-13]. http://www.fibl.org

Flessa H, Ruser R, Dorsch P, Kamp T, Jimenez M A, Munch JC, Beese F. 2002. Integrated evaluation of GHG emissions(CO2, CH4, N2O) from two farming systems in southernGermany. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 9,175-189

GFDC (Green Food Development Center). 2011. Structure ofChina organic food. [2012-08-05]. http://www.greenfood.moa.gov.cn/zl/tjnb/2010/201201/t20120110_2453574.htm

Green M B. 1987. Energy in pesticide manufacture, distributionand use. In: Helsel Z R, ed., Energy in Plant Nutrition andPest Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 165-177

Haas G, Koepke U. 1994. Vergleich der klimarelevanzökologischer und konventioneller landbewirtschaftung.Studie (studie H) im auftrag der enquetekommission desdeutschen bundestages ”Schutz der erdatmosphäre”.EconomiaVerlag. (in German)

Helsel Z R. 1992. Energy and alternatives for fertilizer andpesticide use. In: Fluck R C, ed., Energy in Farm Production.Elsevier, New York.

Hu L L, Niu S W, Ma L, Qing J. 2011. The agricultural energyuse and economic benefits in China. Journal of Arid LandResources and Environment, 25, 1-6 (in Chinese)

IFOAM (International Federation of Organic AgricultureMovements). 2009. The principles of organic agriculture.[2012-09-05]. http://www.ifoam.org/about_ifoam/principles/index.htmlJinong. 2012. Internal Report of Jinong Jinfeng Farm AgriculturalProduction. Dunhua, China. (in Chinese)

Kavargiris S E, Mamolos A P, Tsatsarelis C A, Nikolaidou A E,Kalburtji K L. 2009. Energy resources’ utilization in organicand conventional vineyard: Energy flow, greenhouse gasemissions and biofuel production. Biomass Bioenergy, 33,1239-1250

Kythreotou N, Florides G, Tassou S A. 2012. A proposedmethodology for the calculation of direct consumption offossil fuels and electricity for livestock breeding and itsapplication to Cyprus. Energy, 40, 226-235

Li Z F. 2002. Nitrogen loss in soil of organic agriculture andits control procedure. Agro-Environmental Production, 21,90-92

 Liu X, Han X, Song C, Herbert S J, Xing B. 2003. Soil organiccarbon dynamics in black soils of China under differentagricultural management systems. Communications in SoilScience and Plant Analysis, 34, 973-984

Liu Y, Høgh-Jensen H, Egelyng H, Langer V. 2010a. Energyefficiency of organic pear production in greenhouses inChina. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 25,196-203

Liu Y, Langer V, Høgh-Jensen H, Egelyng H. 2010b. Energy usein organic, green and conventional pear producing systemscasesfrom China. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 34,630-646

Lu X, Qiao Y. 2005. Analysis economy of organic agriculture.Popular Science & Technology, 86, 190-191 (in Chinese)

Lu Z, Lin E, Du D. 2009. Energy, Environment and ClimateChange During China Rural Development (Annual Report).China Council for International Cooperation on Environmentand Development.

Meisterling K, Samaras C, Schweizer V. 2009. Decisions toreduce greenhouse gases from agriculture and producttransport: LCA case study of organic and conventionalwheat. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 222-230

Michos M C, Mamolos A P, Menexes G C, Tsatsarelis C A,Tsirakoglou V M, Kalburtji K L. 2012. Energy inputs, outputsand greenhouse gas emissions in organic, integrated andconventional peach orchards. Ecological Indicators, 13,22-28

Mohammadi A, Omid M. 2010. Economical analysis and relationbetween energy inputs for yield of greenhouse cucumberproduction in Iran. Applied Energy, 87, 191-196

Nassiri M S, Singh S. 2009. Study on energy use efficiencyfor paddy crop using data envelopment analysis (DEA)technique. Applied Energy, 86, 1320-1325

National Energy Policy Development Group. 2001. NationalEnergy Policy. US Government Printing Office. Washington,D.C.

Nguyen M L, Haynes R J. 1995. Energy and labor efficiency forthree pairs of conventional and alternative mixed cropping(pasture-arable) farms in Canterbury, New Zealand.Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 52, 163-172

Outlaw J L. 2005. Agriculture as a Producer and Consumer ofEnergy. Wallingford u.a.: CABI, UK.

Ozkan B, Akcaoz H, Fert C. 2004. Energy input-output analysisin Turkish agriculture. Renewable Energy, 29, 39-51

Pahlavan R, Omid M, Rafiee S, Mousavi-Avval S H. 2012.Optimization of energy consumption for rose production inIran. Energy for Sustainable Development, 16, 236-241

Pimentel D, Berardi G, Fast S. 1983. Energy efficiency offarming systems: Organic and conventional agriculture.Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 9, 359-372

Pimentel D, Patzek T W. 2005. Ethanol production usingcorn, switch-grass, and wood: Biodiesel production usingsoybean and sunflower. Natural Resources Research, 14,65-76

Pimentel D, Pimentel M. 1996. Food, Energy and Society.Colorado Press, Niwet.

Qi Y, Mao T, Yin L. 2010. Low-carbon agriculture developmentin limited fossil energy supply. Agricultural Technology andEconomy, (3), 106-115 (in Chinese)

Reitmayr T. 1995. Entwicklungen eines rechnergestütztenkennzahlensystems zur ökonomischen und ökologischenbeurteilung von agrarischen bewirtschaftungsformen -dargestellt an einem beispiel. Agrarwirtschaft Sonderheft.p. 147. (in German)

Sean C, Klonsky K, Livingston P, Temple S T. 1999. Cropyieldand economic comparisons of organic, low-input, andconventional farming systems in California’s Sacramentovalley. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 14,109-121

Seungdo K, Bruce E D. 2004. Cumulative energy and globalwarming impact from the production of biomass for biobasedproducts. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 7, 147-162

Shapouri H, Duffield J, Graboski M. 1995. Estimating the NetEnergy Balance of Corn Ethanol. No. Agricultural EconomicReport 721. USDA, Washington, D.C., USA.

Sheehan J, Camobreco V, Duffield J, Graboski M, ShapouriH. 1998. Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and PetroleumDiesel for Use in an Urban Bus. National Renewable EnergyLaboratorm, U.S. Department of Energy, USA.

Singh G, Shivakumar B G. 2010. The role of soybean inagriculture. In: Singh G, ed., The Soybean: Botany,Production and Uses. Wallingford u.a.: CABI, UK. pp.142-494

Smith G K. 2010. A matter of trust: The organic food marketin China. Bachelor thesis, Department of Chinese andIndonesian Studies, Institute of Arts and Social Sciences,The University of New South Wales.

Stephen R M. 2010. Energy efficiency in small-scale biointensiveorganic onion production in Pennsylvania, USA.Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 25, 181-188

Stout B A. 1990. Handbook of Energy for World Agriculture.London u.a.: Elsevier Applied Science, UK.

Tang H C. 2007. Energy input analysis in China agriculturalproduction. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou, (4), 52-54(in Chinese)

The National Agricultural Library. 2011. USDA national nutrientdatabase for standard reference, release 24. [2012-09-05].http://www.nal.usda.gov/

Uhlin H. 1998. Why energy productivity is increasing: An I-Oanalysis of Swedish agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystemsand Environment, 4, 443-465

Yin J, Gao Z, Zhang N, Li X Q. 1998. A study of the energyconversion system in farming. Journal of Shanxi AgriculturalUniversity, 18, 95-98 (in Chinese)

Zeijts H, Leneman H, Sleeswijk A W. 1999. Fitting fertilisationin LCA: Allocation to crops in a cropping plan. Journal ofCleaner Production, 7, 69-74

Zjj. 2012. City introduction in China - Dunhua. [2012-08-15]http://www.zjj1.com/provinces/guohuaxian.htm
[1] YU Wen-jia, LI Hai-gang, Peteh M. NKEBIWE, YANG Xue-yun, GUO Da-yong, LI Cui-lan, ZHU Yi-yong, XIAO Jing-xiu, LI Guo-hua, SUN Zhi, Torsten MÜLLER, SHEN Jian-bo. Combining rhizosphere and soil-based P management decreased the P fertilizer demand of China by more than half based on LePA model simulations[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2509-2520.
[2] LI Dong-qing, ZHANG Ming-xue, LÜ Xin-xin, HOU Ling-ling. Does nature-based solution sustain grassland quality? Evidence from rotational grazing practice in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2567-2576.
[3] YANG Rui, XU Hang. Water diversion and agricultural production: Evidence from China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 1244-1257.
[4] HOU Jing, ZHOU Li, Jennifer IFFT, YING Rui-yao. The role of time preferences in contract breach: Evidence from Chinese poultry farmers participating in contract farming[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 623-641.
[5] FENG Lu, CHI Bao-jie, DONG He-zhong. Cotton cultivation technology with Chinese characteristics has driven the 70-year development of cotton production in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(3): 597-609.
[6] CHU Zhen-dong, MING Bo LI Lu-lu, XUE Jun, ZHANG Wan-xu, HOU Liang-yu, XIE Rui-zhi, HOU Peng, WANG Ke-ru, LI Shao-kun . Dynamics of maize grain drying in the high latitude region of Northeast China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 365-374.
[7] ZHOU Yong, YAN Xiao-yuan, GONG Song-ling, LI Cheng-wei, ZHU Rong, ZHU Bo, LIU Zhang-yong, WANG Xiao-long, CAO Peng. Changes in paddy cropping system enhanced economic profit and ecological sustainability in central China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 566-577.
[8] LIU Ying-xia, Gerard B. M. HEUVELINK, Zhanguo BAI, HE Ping, JIANG Rong, HUANG Shao-hui, XU Xin-peng. Statistical analysis of nitrogen use efficiency in Northeast China using multiple linear regression and random forest[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(12): 3637-3657.
[9] Sheng-Han-Erin CHANG, YI Xiao-yan, Johannes SAUER, YIN Chang-bin, LI Fu-duo. Explaining farmers’ reluctance to adopt green manure cover crops planting for sustainable agriculture in Northwest China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3382-3394.
[10] MA Ji-liang, LI Fan, ZHANG Hui-jie, Khan NAWAB . Commercial cash crop production and households’ economic welfare: Evidence from the pulse farmers in rural China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3395-3407.
[11] PENG Yan-ling, Yanjun REN, LI Hou-jian. Do credit constraints affect households’ economic vulnerability? Empirical evidence from rural China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(9): 2552-2568.
[12] SHAO Rui-xin, YU Kang-ke, LI Hong-wei, JIA Shuang-jie, YANG Qing-hua, ZHAO Xia, ZHAO Ya-li, LIU Tian-xu. The effect of elevating temperature on the growth and development of reproductive organs and yield of summer maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(7): 1783-1795.
[13] QIAO Fang-bin, HUANG Ji-kun. Farmers’ risk preference and fertilizer use[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(7): 1987-1995.
[14] ZHU Wen-bo, CHEN Yong-fu, ZHAO Jing, WU Bei-bei. Impacts of household income on beef at-home consumption: Evidence from urban China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(6): 1701-1715.
[15] WANG Wen-xia, DU Jie, ZHOU Yan-zhi, ZENG Yong-jun, TAN Xue-ming, PAN Xiao-hua, SHI Qing-hua, WU Zi-ming, ZENG Yan-hua. Effects of different mechanical direct seeding methods on grain yield and lodging resistance of early indica rice in South China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(5): 1204-1215.
No Suggested Reading articles found!