Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (9): 1826-1834.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.09.019

• RESEARCH NOTES • Previous Articles    

Effects of Grazing Intensity on the Community Structure and Diversity of Different Soil Fauna in Alpine Meadow

WU Qi, WU Peng-fei, WANG Qun, WEN Yong-li, GAO Yan-mei, ZHANG Rong-zhi, LONG Wei   

  1. College of Life Sciences and Technologies, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041
  • Received:2015-11-10 Online:2016-05-01 Published:2016-05-01

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study is to reveal the effects of grazing intensity on the community structure and diversity of different soil fauna in alpine meadow ecosystems.【Method】The investigations were conducted on the soil faunal communities and soil environment of alpine meadows under different grazing intensities (light grazing, LG, 15 sheep/hm2; medium grazing, MG, 22 sheep/hm2; heavy grazing, HG, 36 sheep/hm2; no grazing, NG) in September 2014 in Hongyuan county, northwest Sichuan. Epigeic arthropods were investigated using Vortis sinensis with sampling area 0.2 m2 and preserved in 75% alcohol. The soil cores were used to collect soil samples from 0-5, 5-10 and 10-15 cm layers. Two soil samples were collected from each layer. The Tullgren and Baermann methods were used to extract soil arthropods and soil nematodes, respectively, from soil samples. 【Result】 The principal component analysis (PCA) results showed that the community structure of the three kinds of soil fauna in no grazing treatment differed from those of grazing treatments, indicating that the community structure of soil fauna can be affected by grazing. Community structure of soil nematodes in the three grazing treatments were differed clearly from each other, the similar phenomenon was also found for epigeic and soil arthropods. The community densities of soil arthropods and nematodes in grazing treatments were greater than those in no grazing treatment (P<0.01). The minimum values of community density of epigeic arthropods were recorded in the light grazing treatment and the maximum values of community group number were observed in the heavy grazing treatment (P>0.05). Shannon index and Pielou index fluctuated among the treatments, and the maximum values of Shannon index and Pielou index were observed in the no grazing treatment, the minimum values in the light treatment (P<0.05). The Shannon index and group number of soil arthropods increased then reduced with increasing grazing intensity, and the values of Shannon index and group number were greater in light grazing treatments than in other grazing treatments (P<0.01), but Pielou index changed with no significance (P>0.05). The maximum values of soil nematode community group number were observed in the light grazing treatment, Shannon index of soil nematodes significantly reduced with increasing grazing intension with the maximum values observed in the no grazing treatment; Pielou index were lower before increase, and the maximum values of Pielou index were observed in the no grazing treatment. One-Way ANOVA results showed that diversity indexes of soil nematodes differed significantly between the four grazing treatments (P<0.05). The densities and Shannon index of epigeic and soil arthropods were significantly correlated to some soil chemical properties (P<0.05 or P<0.01), but the density and Shannon index of soil nematodes were significantly correlated to some soil chemical properties and grazing intensity. 【Conclusion】The results suggested that different groups of soil fauna respond differently to grazing intensity; The heavy, medium and light grazing benefit, respectively, the epigeic arthropods, soil arthropods and soil nematodes, indicating that selecting an appropriate kind of soil fauna is very important to evaluate the effects of grazing intensity on grassland ecosystems.

Key words: grazing intensity, alpine grassland, epigeic arthropods, soil arthropods, soil nematode

[1]    蔡宝祥. 家畜传染病学. 中国农业出版社, 2001.
CAI B X. Veterinary Lemology. China Agriculture Press, 2001. (in Chinese)
[2]    SALHI I, BOIGEGRAIN R A, MACHOLD J, WEISE C, CLOECKAERT A, ROUOT B. Characterization of new members of the group 3 outer membrane protein family of Brucella spp. Infection and Immunity, 2003, 71(8): 4326-4332.
[3]    曾瑞霞, 苏玉虹. 布鲁氏杆菌各类检测方法的比较. 现代畜牧兽医, 2006(5): 65-70.
ZENG R X, SU Y H. Comparison of different diagnose method in Brucella. Modern Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, 2006 (5): 65-70. (in Chinese)
[4]    THEPSURIYANONT P, INTARAPUK A, CHANKET P, TUNYONG W, KALAMBAHETI T. ELISA for brucellosis detection based on three Brucella recombinant proteins. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine & Public Health, 2014, 45(1): 130-141.
[5]    CORBEL M J. Brucellosis in Humans and Animals. World Health Organization, 2006.
[6]    CARLSSON H, HURVELL B, LINDBERG A. Enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (elisa) for titration of antibodies against Brucella abortus and yersinia enterocolitica. Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica Section C Immunology, 1976, 84(3): 168-176.
[7]    CARDOSO P G, MACEDO G C, AZEVEDO V, OLIVEIRA S C. Brucella spp noncanonical LPS: structure, biosynthesis, and interaction with host immune system. Microbial Cell Factories, 2006, 5(1): 13.
[8]    MEEGAN J, DUNN J L, VENN-WATSON S K, SMITH C R, SIDOR I, JENSEN E D, VAN BONN W G, PUGH R, FICHT T, ADAMS L G. Serologic response in bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus infected with Brucella sp. using a dolphin-specific indirect ELISA. Dis Aquat Organ, 2012, 102: 73-85.
[9]    WANG X, YAN W, MA L, RAN Z, DE Y, YANG X, WANG C, WU Q. Development of an improved competitive ELISA based on a monoclonal antibody against lipopolysaccharide for the detection of bovine brucellosis. Bmc Veterinary Research, 2015, 11(1): 1-9.
[10]   王冲, 孙勇, 戚帅, 宋砚泽, 田武林, 崔敏, 薛雨霞, 张西臣, 闫广谋. 应用 VirB12 蛋白建立检测牛布鲁菌血清抗体的方法.中国兽医学报, 2013,33(003), 400-403.
WANG C, SUN Y, QI S, SONG Y Z, TIAN W L, CUI M, XUE Y X, ZHANG X C, YAN G M. Detecting sera antibody of bovine brucella by an ELISA method using VirB12 protein. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science, 2013,33(003), 400-403. (in Chinese)
[11]   WANG J Y, WU N, LIU W H, REN J J, TANG P, QIU Y H, WANG C Y, CHANG C D, LIU H J. A repA-based ELISA for discriminating cattle vaccinated with Brucella suis 2 from those naturally infected with Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 2014, 28: 251–254.
[12]   CHAUDHURI P, PRASAD R, KUMAR V, GANGAPLARA A. Recombinant OMP28 antigen-based indirect ELISA for serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 2010, 24(3): 142-145.
[13]   CLOECKAERT A, BAUCHERON S, VIZCAINO N, ZYGMUNT M S. Use of recombinant BP26 protein in serological diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection in sheep. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 2001, 8(4): 772–775.
[14]   LIM J J, KIM D H, LEE J J, KIM D G, MIN W, LEE H J, RHEE M H, CHANG H H, KIM S. Evaluation of recombinant 28 kDa outer membrane protein of Brucella abortus for the clinical diagnosis of bovine Brucellosis in Korea. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 2012, 74(6): 687-691.
[15]   THAVASELVAM D, KUMAR A, TIWARI S, MISHRA M, PRAKASH A. Cloning and expression of the immunoreactive Brucella melitensis 28 kDa outer-membrane protein (Omp28) encoding gene and evaluation of the potential of Omp28 for clinical diagnosis of brucellosis. Journal of medical microbiology, 2010, 59(4): 421-428.
[16]   左玉柱, 王增利, 路广计, 王振来, 郑丽丽. 牛布鲁氏菌 BP26 间接 ELISA 检测方法的建立. 中国预防兽医学报, 2014, 36(3): 223-226.
ZUO Y Z, WANG Z L, LU G J, WANG Z L, ZHENG L L. Development of indirect ELISA for Brucella abortus coating with BP26. Chinese Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2014, 36(3): 223-226. (in Chinese)
[17]   XIN T, YANG H, WANG N, WANG F, ZHAO P, WANG H, MAO K, ZHU H, DING J. Limitations of the BP26 protein-based indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of Brucellosis. Clinical & Vaccine Immunology, 2013, 20(9): 1410-1417.
[18]   王芳, 蒋卉, 朱良全, 王楠, 张阁, 鑫婷, 朱鸿飞, 丁家波. 检测OMP28抗体不能有效诊断羊布鲁氏菌病. 微生物学通报, 2015, 42(8): 1512−1519
WANG F, JIANG H, ZHU L Q, WANG N, ZHANG G, XIN T, ZHU H F, DING J B. Antibody against OMP28 is not a reliable diagnostic target for brucellosis infected in sheep and goats.Microbiology China, 2015, 42(8): 1512-1519. (in Chinese)
[19]   LUCERO N E, FOGLIA L, AYALA S M, GALL D, NIELSEN K. Competitive enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of human brucellosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1999, 37(10): 3245-3248.
[20]   JIAN H, CHU T P. A study of immunological cross-reaction between Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 and Brucella abortus. Developments in Biological Standardization, 1984, 56(4): 179-183.
[1] WANG Miao,ZHANG Yu,LI RuiQiang,XIN XiaoPing,ZHU XiaoYu,CAO Juan,ZHOU ZhongYi,YAN RuiRui. Effects of Grazing Disturbance on the Stoichiometry of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Plant Organs of Leymus chinensis Meadow Steppe [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1371-1384.
[2] ZHANG Yu, HOU LuLu, YAN RuiRui, XIN XiaoPing. Effects of Grazing Intensity on Plant Community Characteristics and Nutrient Quality of Herbage in a Meadow Steppe [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(13): 2550-2561.
[3] HOU LuLu,YAN RuiRui,ZHANG Yu,XIN XiaoPing. Effects of Grazing Intensity on Functional Traits of Leymus chinensis in Meadow Steppe [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(13): 2562-2572.
[4] BAO Xue-Lian, LI Qi, LIANG Wen-Ju, ZHU Jian-Guo. Effect of Elevated Atmospheric CO2 and N Fertilization on Soil Nematode Community in a Rice-Wheat Rotation System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(22): 4627-4635.
[5] ,,,,. A Study of the Effects of Different Grazing Intensities on Soil Physical Properties of Grassland and Forest Floor -- For Example Hilly and Gully Regions on the Loess Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(7): 1501-1506 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!