Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (24): 4780-4789.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.24.002

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation on the Classification Characteristics of National Registered Cotton Varieties in the Yangtze River Valley Based on GGE Biplot

XU Nai-yin, LI Jian   

  1. Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014
  • Received:2014-05-19 Online:2014-12-16 Published:2014-12-16

Abstract: 【Objective】By using the GGE biplot method, the classification and characteristics analysis of national registered varieties over 30 years recommended from the candidate cotton lines in cotton regional trials in the Yangtze River Valley (YaRV) facilitated us a historical perspective of cotton variety improvement progress to explore the evolution trend of cotton varieties’ type and the corresponding characteristics, and thus to provide theoretical guidelines for current decision making of cotton breeding target characters and cotton evaluation and recommendation for the official registration before commercial release.【Method】In accordance with the cultivar scoring criteria of national cotton registration standard, the corresponding weights were allocated to certain characters of yield and fiber quality, disease resistance, earliness, etc., to build a universal cotton variety evaluation index based on multiple traits. The “genotype vs. trait” view of GGE biplot was adopted to analyze the interaction pattern of 53 national registered cotton varieties in cotton regional trials in YaRV during 1981-2012 and 15 major characters including seed cotton yield, lint cotton yield, boll weight, boll numbers, lint percentage, seed index, fiber length, fiber strength, micronaire value, Fusarirum wilt index, Verticillium wilt index, pro-frost yielding rate, plant height, fruit branch number and evaluation index, and also to implement the classification and feature comparison of registered cotton cultivars. And then the cultivar types and features were evaluated. According to the shift of check cultivars in cotton regional trials in the past, the cotton regional trial datasets since 1981 were divided into five periods. The dynamics of cultivar type’s proportion and the evaluation index scores were evaluated across the five periods. 【Result】The “genotype vs. trait” view of GGE biplot analysis showed that there existed complicated relationships among cotton breeding target traits, which made it necessary to construct evaluation indices for comprehensive evaluation of cotton varieties. On the basis of cotton recommending criteria in national variety registration standard, a variety evaluation index in common was built as: EI = 0.40×(lint cotton yield ) + 0.13×(fiber strength ) + 0.09×(fiber length + micronaire value +Verticillium wilt) + 0.11×(Fusarium wilt) + 0.10×(pre-frost yielding rate). According to the interaction pattern of varieties and characters and their spatial relationships among varieties, 53 national registered varieties were divided into four varietal types with significant special characteristics, respectively. TypeⅠcluster was constituted of certain cultivars with “high yield, more boll numbers and moderate fiber quality”; type Ⅱ was of “high yield, big boll and high micronaire value”; type Ⅲ was of “superior fiber quality, moderate yield and small boll”; while type Ⅳ was weak in major characters and was named as “weak cultivars”. The ordination of variety types sorted by evaluation index was listed as typeⅠ> typeⅡ> type Ⅲ> type Ⅳ. The dynamic of cultivar types shift indicated that type Ⅳ varieties only appeared in “Simian 3” period and the before; type Ⅲ varieties existed in “Simian 3” and “Xiangzamian 2” periods; typeⅠvarieties commenced in “Simian 3” period, and its proportion was on the rise until the decline in “Ezamian 10” period; type Ⅱ varieties were selected firstly in “Xiangzamian 2” period, and the proportion showed a continuous trend up till now.【Conclusion】On the basis of the variety evaluation index and GGE biplot analysis method, 53 national registered varieties were efficiently divided into four variety types with distinct characteristics and historical traces in each. The conclusion of cotton variety improvement effect and development trend in past 30 years in YaRV reminded as that more attention should be paid to the improvement and evaluation of micronaire trait, so as to guide the simultaneous development of high yielding and fiber quality in cotton breeding and registration procedure in YaRV.

Key words: cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), GGE biplot, cultivar type classification, the Yangtze River Valley (YaRV), crop regional trial

[1]    黄滋康. 中国棉花品种及其系谱. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007: 3-13.
Huang Z K. Cotton Varieties and Their Genealogy in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007: 3-13. (in Chinese)
[2]    唐淑荣, 彭振, 褚平, 侯爱玲, 孟俊婷, 冯翠萍, 魏守军. 2012年我国生产领域棉花纤维品质抽检结果分析. 中国棉花, 2013, 40(7): 9-13.
Tang S R, Peng Z, Chu P, Hou A L, Meng J T, Feng C P, Wei S J. Evaluation of fiber quality of major cotton cultivars in China during 2012. China Cotton, 2013, 40(7): 9-13. (in Chinese)
[3]    Gauch H G, Zobel R W. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Science, 1997, 37(2): 311-326.
[4]    Cooper M, Woodruff D R, Eisemann R L, Brennan P S, Delacy I H. A selection strategy to accommodate genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield of wheat: managed-environments for selection among genotypes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1995, 90(3): 492-502.
[5]    Anandaraj M, Prasath D, Kandiannan K, Zachariah T J, Srinivasan V, Jha A K, Singh B K, Singh A K, Pandey V P, Singh S P, Shoba N, Jana J C, Kumar K R, Maheswari K U. Genotype by environment interaction effects on yield and curcumin in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Industrial Crops and Products, 2014, 53: 358-364.
[6]    Ramburan S. A multivariate illustration and interpretation of non-repeatable genotype × environment interactions in sugarcane. Field Crops Research, 2014, 157: 57-64.
[7]    何旭平, 纪从亮. 现代中国棉花育种与栽培概论. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2007: 88-138.
He X P, Ji C L. An Introduction to Modern Chinese Cotton Breeding and Cultivation. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2007: 88-138. (in Chinese)
[8]    Baxevanos D, Goulas C, Rossi J, Braojos E. Separation of cotton cultivar testing sites based on representativeness and discriminating ability using GGE biplots. Agronomy Journal, 2008, 100(5): 1230-1236.
[9]    Blanche S B, Myers G O. Identifying discriminating locations for cultivar selection in Louisiana. Crop Science, 2006, 46(2): 946-949.
[10]   马育华. 植物育种的数量遗传学基础. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1982: 334-375.
Ma Y H. Quantitative Genetics Basis of Plant Breeding. Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press, 1982: 334-375. (in Chinese)
[11]   中国农业科学院棉花研究所. 中国棉花栽培学. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2013: 238-254.
Institute of Cotton Research, CAAS. Chinese Cotton Cultivation. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2013: 238-254. (in Chinese)
[12]   李秀, 徐坤, 巩彪, 曹逼力, 王忠宾. 生姜农艺性状与产量形成关系的多重分析. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(12): 2431-2437.
Li X, Xu K, Gong B, Cao B L, Wang Z B. Multiple analysis of relationship of agronomic traits and yield formation in ginger. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(12): 2431-2437. (in Chinese)
[13]   Adugna W, Labuschagne M T. Cluster and canonical variate analyses in multilocation trials of linseed. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2003, 140(3): 297-304.
[14]   Cornelius P L, Van Sanford D A, Seyedsadr M S. Clustering cultivars into groups without rank-change interactions. Crop Science, 1993, 33: 1193-1200.
[15]   冀建华, 刘光荣, 李祖章, 刘益仁, 侯红乾, 刘秀梅, 李絮花, 罗奇祥. 基于AMMI模型评价长期定位施肥对双季稻总产量稳定性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(4) : 685-696.
Ji J H, Liu G R, Li Z Z, Liu Y R, Hou H Q, Liu X M, Li X H, Luo Q X. Effects of long-term fertilization on stability of double cropping rice yield based on AMMI model. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(4): 685-696. (in Chinese)
[16]   李艳艳, 丰震, 赵兰勇. AMMI模型分析玫瑰品种产花量的稳定性. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(6) : 1761-1766.
Li Y Y, Feng Z, Zhao L Y. The analysis of AMMI model on fresh flower yield in rugosa rose. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(6): 1761-1766. (in Chinese)
[17]   Nouar H, Bouzerzour H, Haddad L, Menad A, Hazmoune T, Zerargui H. Genotype× environment interaction assessment in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) using AMMI and GGE models. Advances in Environmental Biology, 2012, 6(11): 3007-3015.
[18]   Mohamed N E M, Ahmed A A S. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and GGE-biplot analysis of genotype x environment interactions for grain yield in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2013, 8(42): 5197-5203.
[19]   Yan W K, Kang M S, Ma B L, Woods S, Cornelius P L. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science, 2007, 47(2): 643-655.
[20]   Yan W K. GGEbiplot-A windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal, 2001, 93(5): 1111-1118.
[21]   秦君, 杨春燕, 谷峰, 张耀斌, 冯燕, 唐晓东, 刘长友, 张孟臣. 黄淮海地区大豆产量及其稳定性评价. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(3): 451-462.
Qin J, Yang C Y, Gu F, Zhang Y B, Feng Y, Tang X D, Liu C Y, Zhang M C. Evaluation of productivity and stability of soybean cultivars in China’s Huang-Huai-Hai region. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(3): 451-462. (in Chinese)
[22]   Naroui R M R, Abdul K M, Rafii M Y, Jaafar H Z E, Naghavi M R, Ahmadi F. Genotype environment interaction by AMMI and GGE biplot analysis in three consecutive generations of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under normal and drought stress conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2013, 7(7): 956-961.
[23]   Noerwijati K, Nasrullah, Taryono, Prajitno D. Fresh tuber yield stability analysis of fifteen cassava genotypes across five environments in East Java (Indonesia) using GGE biplot. Energy Procedia, 2014, 47: 156-165.
[24]   Sánchez-Martín J, Rubiales D, Flores F, Emeran A A, Shtaya M J Y, Sillero J C, Allagui M B, Prats E. Adaptation of oat (Avena sativa) cultivars to autumn sowings in Mediterranean environments. Field Crops Research, 2014, 156: 111-122.
[25]   Badu-Apraku B, Oyekunle M, Menkir A, Obeng-Antwi K, Yallou C G, Usman I S, Alidu H. Comparative performance of early-maturing maize cultivars developed in three eras under drought stress and well-watered environments in West Africa. Crop Science, 2013, 53: 1298-1311.
[26]   Jamshidmoghaddam M, Pourdad S S. Genotype × environment interactions for seed yield in rainfed winter safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) multi-environment trials in Iran. Euphytica, 2013, 190(3): 357-369.
[27]   Yan W K. Biplot analysis of incomplete two-way data. Crop Science, 2013, 53: 48-57.
[28]   汤飞宇, 程锦, 黄文新, 莫旺成, 肖文俊. 陆地棉高品质系数量性状的遗传变异与选择指数. 棉花学报, 2009, 21(5): 361-365.
Tang F Y, Cheng J, Huang W X, Mo W C, Xiao W J. Genetic variation and selection indices of quantitative traits in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) lines with high fiber quality. Cotton Science, 2009, 21(5): 361-365. (in Chinese)
[29]   Reddy P S, Rathore A, Reddy B V S, Panwar S. Application GGE biplot and AMMI model to evaluate sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) hybrids for genotype x environment interaction and seasonal adaptation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 81(5): 438-444.
[30]   Sharma D, Sharma R C, Dhakal R, Dhami N B, Gurung D B, Katuwal R B, Koirala K B, Prasad R C, Sah S N, Upadhyay S R, Tiwari T P, Ortiz-Ferrara G. Performance stability of maize genotypes across diverse hill environments in Nepal. Euphytica, 2008, 164: 689-698.
[31]   中华人民共和国农业部. 农作物品种审定规范: 棉花. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.
Ministry Of Agriculture, China. Standards of Registration for Cotton Varieties. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007. (in Chinese)
[32]   Yan W K, Holland J B. A heritability-adjusted GGE biplot for test environment evaluation. Euphytica, 2010, 171(3): 355-369.
[33]   张德贵, 孔繁玲, 张群远, 刘文欣, 杨付新, 许乃银, 廖琴, 邹奎. 建国以来我国长江流域棉区棉花品种的遗传改良: Ⅰ. 产量及产量组分性状的改良. 作物学报, 2003, 29(2): 208-215.
Zhang D G, Kong F L, Zhang Q Y, Liu W X, Yang F X, Xu N Y, Liao Q, Zou K. Genetic improvement of cotton varieties in the Yangtse Valley in China since 1950s: Ⅰ. Improvement on yield and yield components. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2003, 29(2): 208-215. (in Chinese)
[34]   严威凯. 双标图分析在农作物品种多点试验中的应用.作物学报, 2010, 36(11): 1805-1819.
Yan W K. Optimal use of biplots in analysis of multi-location variety test data. Acta Agronomica Sinica,2010, 36(11): 1805-1819. ( in Chinese)
[35]   Yan W K. GGE Biplot vs. AMMI graphs for genotpe-by-environment data analysis. Journal of the Indian Scociety of Agricultural Statistics, 2011, 65(2): 181-193.
[36] Yan W K, Kang M S. GGE Biplot Analysis:A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington D C : CRC Press, 2003.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!