Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2012, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 2375-2383.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.12.005

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY·AGRICULTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Screening of Environment-friendly Cropping Mode in the Northern Region of Erhai Lake

 TANG  Qiu-Xiang, LIU  Hong-Bin, LEI  Bao-Kun, DI  Li-Mei, HU  Wan-Li, LUO  Xin-Hua, ZHANG  Ji-Zong, REN  Tian-Zhi   

  1. 1.新疆农业大学农学院,乌鲁木齐 830052
    2.中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,北京100081
    3.云南省农业科学院农业环境资源研究所,昆明 650205
    4.云南省大理州环境监测站,云南下关671000
  • Received:2011-08-09 Online:2012-06-15 Published:2012-04-24

Abstract: 【Objective】Screening of intercropping patterns suitable for local planting was studied from the standpoint of economic benefit and environmental benefit.【Method】A field plot experiment was carried out on Luoshijiang edge of the northern region of Erhai Lake where Zhaoyi village of Shangguan town is situated; Nutrient balance, economic benefits, crop quality and soil nutrient residue status of intercropping patterns were analyzed after samples were tested in the laboratory. The four factors influencing economic and environmental benefits were identified as the index set in the intercropping by using methods of subjective weight and objective weight, and these factors are revenue, quilty of commodity, inorganic nitrogen in soil and rapidly available phosphorus in soil. Different intercropping patterns were evaluated by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. 【Result】The results showed that the score of Vicia fava and garlic intercropping mode with area of vicia fava and garlic ratio of 1﹕3 was the highest in the 14 intercropping modes, and it was an environment-friendly cultivation mode because both economic and environmental benefits were higher than other modes. Followed by the onion and garlic intercropping mode with area of onion and garlic ratio of 1﹕3, and its score was 0.624, its economic benefits was better than others, but the environmental effect slightly worse than others. Ryegrass and garlic intercropping mode with area of ryegrass and garlic ratio of 1﹕3, and it was ranked the third for the score was 0.609, optimum environmental benefits, but the input was lower. The lowest score of the rape and garlic intercropping mode with area of rape and garlic ratio of 1﹕1, and its score was 0.084, its economic and environmental benefits was lower because of the large differences in plant height.【Conclusion】In this study, the appropriate local environment-friendly planting mode was Vicia fava and garlic ratio of 1﹕3.

Key words: environment-friendly, planting patterns, environmental benefits, economic benefits, fuzzy mathematics

[1]刘巽浩. 耕作学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1994.

Liu X H. The Farming Systems. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1994. (in Chinese)

[2]李 隆. 间作作物种间促进与竞争作用研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 1999.

Li L. Interspecific facilitative and competitive interactions between intercropped species[D]. Beijing:  China Agricultural University, 1999. (in Chinese)

[3]刘广才. 不同间套作系统种间营养竞争的差异性及其机理研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2005.

Liu G C. Difference and its mechanism of interspecific nutrition competition in different intercropping systems[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2005. (in Chinese)

[4]Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, Li X L, Rengel Z, Yang S C. Wheat‖maize or wheat‖soybean strip intercropping.Ⅰ.Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crops Research, 2001, 71: 123-137 .

[5]Li W X, Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, Christie P. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers and intercropping on uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus by wheat, maize and faba bean. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2001, 26: 629-642 .

[6]Vandermeer J. The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989: 68-103.

[7]Francis C A. Multiple Cropping Systems. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1986.

[8]Vandermeer J H. The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

[9]Midore D J. Agronomic modification of resource use and intercrop productivity. Field Crop Research, 1993, 34: 357-380.

[10]Francis C A. Biological efficiencies in mixed multiple-cropping systems. Advanced in Agronomy, 1989, 42: 1-42.

[11]蒲国年. 大蒜间作玉米复种大白菜高效种植模式. 农技服务, 2007, 24(2): 18-34.

Pu G N. The efficient cropping patterns of planting cabbage after garlic and maize intercropping. Agricultural Services, 2007, 24(2):18-34. (in Chinese)

[12]杨恩贺, 王洪愿. 大蒜、冬菜、西瓜、棉花间作套种高效栽培技术. 现代农业科技, 2005(9): 18-19.

Yang E H, Wang H Y. The cultivation techniques and efficient preserved vegetables, garlic, watermelons, cotton intercropping. Xiandai Nongye Keji, 2005(9): 18-19. (in Chinese)

[13]谢德体, 魏朝富, 杨剑虹. 自然免耕下的稻田生态系统. 应用生态学报, 1994, 5(4): 415-421.

Xie D T, Wei C F, Yang J H. Paddy ecosystems under naturally no-tillage. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1994, 5(4): 415-421. (in Chinese)

[14]Hansen J W, Jones J W. A system framework for characterizing farm sustainability. Agricultural Systems, 1996, 51: 185-201.

[15]王  芬, 吴建军, 卢剑波. 国外农业生态系统可持续发展的定量评价研究. 世界农业, 2002 , 238(11): 47-49.

Wang F, Wu J J, Lu J B. Foreign agricultural ecosystems quantitative evaluation of sustainable development. World Agriculture, 2002, 238(11): 47-49. (in Chinese)

[16]陈飞星, 张增杰. 生态农业评价综述. 中国生态农业学报, 2001, 9(4): 104-106.

Chen F X, Zhang Z J. Ecological agriculture evaluation summary of ecological agriculture in China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2001, 9(4): 104-106. (in Chinese)

[17]张均营, 吴炳奇, 刘亚民. 农林复合生态系统林网-梨农间作模式中间作作物的优化选择. 河北林业科技, 1996(3): 19-21.

Zhang J Y, Wu B Q, Liu Y M. A shelterbelt optimization agroforestry systems among pear and forest of crop intercropping. Journal of Hebei Forestry Science and Technology, 1996(3): 19-21. (in Chinese)

[18]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999.

Lu R K. Agricultural Chemical Analysis of Soil. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1999. (in Chinese)

[19]李翠萍, 续勇波, 李永梅, 郑  毅, 张维理, 刘宏斌. 滇池湖滨带设施蔬菜、花卉的农田养分平衡. 云南农业大学学报, 2005, 20(6): 804-809.

Li C P, Xu Y B, Li Y M, Zheng Y, Zhang W L, Liu H B. The nutrient balance of vegetable and flower with Dianchi Lake. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2005, 20(6): 804-809. (in Chinese)

[20]戴全厚, 刘国彬, 刘普灵, 梁银丽, 吴发启, 梁宗锁, 王继军. 黄土丘陵区中尺度生态经济系统健康诊断方法探索. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(5): 990-998.

Dai Q H, Liu G B, Liu P L, Liang Y L, Wu F Q, Liang Z S, Wang J J. Approach to health diagnoses of eco-economic system in mesoscale in Loess Hilly Area. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005, 38(5): 990-998. (in Chinese)

[21]Francisco E, Contreras G, Kenneth A A, Richard E M. Spring yield and silage characteristics of kura clover, winter wheat and in mixtures. Agronomy Journal, 2006, 98: 781-787.

[22]Daniel T B, Lammert B, Martin J K. Intercropping system optimization for yield, quality, and weed suppression combining mechanistic and descriptive models. Agronomy Journal, 2002, 94: 734-742.

[23]Daniel T B, Lammert B, Martin J K. Competition and crop performance in a leek-celery intercropping system. Crop Sciences, 2001, 56: 256-268.

[24]张淑莲, 陈志杰, 张  锋, 张美容. 麦椒套种对辣椒主要病虫的生态效应. 西北农业学报, 2002, 11(1): 44-49.

Zhang S L, Chen Z J, Zhang F, Zhang M R. The major ecological effects of diseases and insect pests in wheat and pepper intercropping. Acta Agricultural Boreali-occidentalia Sinica, 2002, 11(1): 44-49. (in Chinese)

[25]Ghaffarzadeh M, Prechac F G, Gruse R M. Grain yield response on corn, soybean and out grown in a strip intercropping system. American Journal of Agriculture, 1994, 9: 171-177.

[26]Yadav R S, Yadav O P. The performance of cultivars of pearlmillet and clusterbean under sole cropping and intercropping systems in arid zone conditions in India. Experiment Agriculture, 2001, 37: 231-240.

[27]Ghosh P, Growth K. Yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crop Research, 2004, 88: 227-237.

[28]Trydemanknudsen M, Hauggard-Nielsen H, Jornsgard B. Comparison of interspecific competition and N use in pea–barley, faba bean–barley and lupin–barley intercrops grown at two temperate locations. Journal of Agriculture Science, 2004, 142: 617-627.

[29]Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Gooding M, Ambus P. Pea-barley intercropping for efficient symbiotic N2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Field Crops Research, 2009, 113: 64-71.

[30]Cao Z H, Zhang H C. Phosphorus losses towater fromlowland rice fields under rice-wheat double cropping system in the Tai Lake region. Environment Geochemical Health, 2004, 26: 229-236.

[31]Zhu J G, Han Y, Liu G, Zhang L, Yan Y. Nitrogen in percolation water in paddy fields with a rice-wheat rotation. Nutrition Cycle Agroecosystem, 2000, 57: 75-82.

[32]Song X Z, Zhao C X, Wang X L, Li K, Lin S. Studyofnitrate leaching and nitrogen fateunder intensive vegetable production pattern in northern China. Competes Rends Biologist, 2009, 332(4): 385-392.

[33]Wei Y P, Chen D L, Kelin H. Policy incentives for reducing nitrate leaching from intensive agriculture in desert oases of Alxa, InnerMongolia, China. Agriculture Water Management, 2009, 96(7): 1114-1119.

[34]Riaz M, Mian I A, Malcolm S, Dumontet S, Bufo S A. Extent and causes of 3D spatialvariations inpotentialNmineralization and the risk of ammonium and nitrate leaching from an N-impacted permanent grasslandnear York, UK. Environment Pollution, 2008, 156(3): 1075-1082.

[35]焦念元, 宁堂原,  赵  春, 王  芸, 史忠强, 侯连涛, 付国占, 江晓东, 李增嘉. 玉米花生间作复合体系光合特性的研究. 作物学报, 2006, 32(6): 917-932.

Jiao N Y, Ning T Y, Zhao C, Wang Y, Shi Z Q, Hou L T, Fu G Z, Jiang X D, Li Z J. Characters of  photosynthesis in intercropping system of maize and peanut. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2006, 32(6): 917-923. (in Chinese)

[36]叶优良, 李  隆, 孙建好. 三种豆科作物与玉米间作对水分利用的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2008, 27(4): 33-36.

Ye Y L, Li L, Sun J H. The effect water use intercropped with maize crop in three species of Legumes. Irrigation and Drainage, 2008, 27(4): 33-36. (in Chinese)

[37]Odunze A C, Iwuafor E N O, Chude V O. Maize‖herbaceous legume inter-crops and soil properties in the northern guinea savanna zone, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2002, 20(1): 236-241.

[38]焦念元, 宁堂原, 赵  春, 侯连涛, 李增嘉, 李友军, 付国占, 韩  宾. 施氮量和玉米-花生间作模式对氮磷吸收与利用的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34(4): 706-712.

Jiao N Y, Ning T Y, Zhao C, Hou L T, Li Z J, Li Y J, Fu G Z, Han B. The effect on N and P absorption and utilization of crop under Nitrogen and corn-peanut intercropping system. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(4): 706-712. (in Chinese)

[39]Juskiw P E, Helm J H, Salmon D F. Forage yield and quality for monocrops and mixtures of small grain cereals. Crop Science, 2000, 40(1): 138-147.
[1] LI YongHua,WU XuePing,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui. Benefits of Yield, Environment and Economy from Substituting Fertilizer by Manure for Wheat Production of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4879-4890.
[2] YU ShuTing, ZHAO YaLi, WANG YuHong, LIU WeiLing, MENG ZhanYing, MU XinYuan, CHENG SiXian, LI ChaoHai. Improvement Effects of Rotational Tillage Patterns on Soil in the Winter Wheat-Summer Maize Double Cropping Area of Huang-Huai-Hai Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11): 2150-2165.
[3] WANG Qiong, XU BaoCai, YU Hai, LI Cong. Electronic Nose and Electronic Tongue Combined with Fuzzy Mathematics Sensory Evaluation to Optimize Bacon Smoking Procedure [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(1): 161-170.
[4] XU Min-1, 2 , MA Xu-Zhou-1, WANG Wu-1. Effects of Different Cultivation Patterns on Rice Yield and Crab in Rice-Crab Culture System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(9): 1828-1835.
[5] TANG Wen-guang, XIAO Xiao-ping, TANG Hai-ming, YANG Guang-li. Effects of Different Planting Patterns on Water Use of Soil and Crops Annual Productivity in Southern Hilly Dryland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(18): 3606-3617.
[6] CAI Jin-Yang, HU Rui-Fa, XIAO Chang-Kun, WANG Xiao-Bing. Impacts of Technology Training Programs in Farmer Field Schools on the Adoption of Environment-Friendly Technology: Empirical Evidences from the Tomato Production in Beijing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(5): 1023-1030.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!