Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 170-181.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.01.013

• FOOD SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Alcalase Hydrolysis on the Structure, Aggregation Behavior and Gelling Properties of Quinoa Protein Isolate

FENG Xiao(), WEI JianFeng(), FU LiXiao, WU ChaoSheng, YANG YuLing, TANG XiaoZhi*()   

  1. College of Food Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics/Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Grain Circulation and Safety of Jiangsu Province/Key Laboratory for Quality Safety Control and Deep Processing of Cereals and Oils, Nanjing 210023
  • Received:2024-05-06 Accepted:2024-11-27 Online:2025-01-01 Published:2025-01-07
  • Contact: TANG XiaoZhi

Abstract:

【Objective】This research studied the effects of alcalase hydrolysis on the structure, physicochemical properties and aggregation behavior of quinoa protein isolate (QPI), and explored its effects on the gelling properties of QPI. 【Method】QPI was extracted by alkaline extraction and acid precipitation method at 4 ℃. Alcalase with different enzyme-substrate ratios was added to the QPI solution to hydrolyze the protein. Thereafter, the changes of the composition, particle size, Zeta potential, solubility, and surface hydrophobicity (S0-ANS) of QPI were analyzed, and the correlation between these changes and the Th T fluorescence intensity and morphology of protein thermal aggregates were discussed. Furthermore, the concentration of QPI dispersion was elevated to form heat-induced QPI gels. The correlation among alcalase hydrolysis, aggregation behavior and gelling properties of QPI was discussed through the analysis of the microstructure, texture and protein secondary structure of QPI gels. Meanwhile, the reasons for the changes in the gelling properties of QPI induced by alcalase hydrolysis were revealed.【Result】With the increase of enzyme substrate ratio (E/S), the protein particle size of QPI dispersion (2%, w/v) gradually decreased, and its electronegativity increased first and then decreased. Meanwhile, the surface hydrophobicity of QPI gradually increased as the E/S increased. At the same time, the Th T fluorescence intensity of QPI aggregates showed an upward trend as E/S rose from 0 to 0.08%, and then declined when the E/S further increased to 0.14%. Through TEM observation, short fibrils (145-306 nm) and long fibrils (217-406 nm) were formed when E/S was 0.05% and 0.08%, respectively. However, with the further increase of E/S ratio, the length of fibrils became shorter, and more amorphous aggregates appeared. In addition, it was found that the aggregation behavior of QPI had a significant effect on its gelling properties (P<0.05). QPI gels showed enhanced hardness, higher storage modulus and a denser network structure, when fibrillar aggregation was dominant. Compared with short fibrils, long fibrils exerted a more significant effect to improve the gelling properties. Furthermore, alcalase showed a significant effect on the protein secondary structure of QPI gels, and the contents of β-sheet and random coil rose first and then decreased with the increase of E/S.【Conclusion】The limited alcalase hydrolysis promoted QPI to form ordered fibrillar aggregates, and further improved its gelling properties. When the E/S was 0.08%, QPI formed the longest fibrils, and QPI gels exhibited the highest hardness as well as the most favorable viscoelastic properties. Meanwhile, the protein secondary structure of QPI gels was ordered, and their microstructure was dense. However, the higher degree of hydrolysis was unfavorable to form fibrillar aggregates and failed to improve the gelling properties. Therefore, limited alcalase hydrolysis could significantly improve the weak gelling properties of QPI through fibrillation.

Key words: quinoa protein isolate (QPI), alcalase, limited hydrolysis, fibrillar aggregates, gel network, protein secondary structure

Fig. 1

The SDS-PAGE image of quinoa protein isolate under different enzyme-substrate ratio treatments M: Marker; 1-5 are Control group, enzyme-substrate ratio (E/S, w/w) is 0.05%, 0.08%, 0.11% and 0.14%, respectively"

Table 1

The protein composition of QPI under different enzyme-substrate ratio treatments"

酶底比
Enzyme substrate ratio (%)
条带强度Band intensity (%)
非还原条件 Non-reducing condition 还原条件 Reducing condition
7S & 11S 2S 7S AS BS 2S
对照 Control 52.59 19.84 19.80 28.31 31.70 19.32
0.05 48.13 18.92 14.14 23.81 26.53 17.64
0.08 46.01 16.19 13.94 22.41 26.17 15.23
0.11 41.25 15.05 13.12 23.45 23.27 13.93
0.14 37.64 16.18 9.25 21.37 22.35 14.23

Table 2

Average particle size, PDI, and zeta potential of QPI"

酶底比
Enzyme substrate ratio (%)
粒径
Particle size (nm)
分散性指数
PDI
Zeta电位
Zeta potential (mV)
对照 Control 1163.60±305.39a 0.59±0.15a -11.87±0.35a
0.05 904.37±222.62ab 0.51±0.06a -13.17±0.37b
0.08 603.13±107.06b 0.39±0.11a -14.93±0.12d
0.11 571.27±40.81b 0.53±0.35a -14.73±0.67cd
0.14 545.60±82.69b 0.48±0.64a -13.83±0.81bc

Fig. 2

Effects of different enzyme-substrate ratios on the solubility and surface hydrophobicity of QPI E/S refers to the mass ratio of the enzyme to the substrate. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (P<0.05). The same as below"

Fig. 3

Effects of different enzyme-substrate ratios on the Th T fluorescence intensity (A) and morphology (B) of QPI aggregates"

Table 3

Effects of different enzyme-substrate ratios on the morphology of QPI fibrillar aggregates"

组别Group E/S 0.05% E/S 0.08% E/S 0.11% E/S 0.14%
长度 Length (nm) 225.98±80.44bc 312.20±94.24a 182.16±47.12c 247.82±87.34ab
直径 Diameter (nm) 10.13±2.27a 5.46±2.34c 7.87±1.50b 9.84±1.61ab

Fig. 4

Effect of different enzyme-substrate ratios on the appearance and microstructure of QPI gels Scale bar is 20 μm"

Fig. 5

Effects of different enzyme-substrate ratios on the texture of QPI gels"

Fig. 6

Effects of different enzyme-substrate ratios on the rheological properties of quinoa protein isolate"

Table 4

Effects of different enzyme-substrate ratios on the protein secondary structure of QPI gels"

酶底比
E/S (%)
α-螺旋
α-helix (%)
Β-折叠
β-sheet (%)
β-转角
β-turn (%)
无规则卷曲
Random coil (%)
对照 Control 13.74±2.59a 14.45±0.32cd 30.12±0.72a 37.45±0.67bc
0.05 12.39±0.50b 15.81±0.81b 26.95±1.84c 36.69±3.19c
0.08 13.04±0.26ab 16.85±1.39a 27.52±0.41c 39.17±0.45a
0.11 12.77±1.03ab 15.01±0.62c 28.81±1.08b 38.16±0.39ab
0.14 12.97±0.63ab 14.20±0.68d 28.93±0.84b 38.35±0.64ab

Fig. 7

Effects of different enzyme-substrate ratios on the protein secondary structure of QPI gels"

[1]
CEN K Y, YU X, GAO C C, YANG Y L, TANG X Z, FENG X. Effects of quinoa protein pickering emulsion on the properties, structure and intermolecular interactions of myofibrillar protein gel. Food Chemistry, 2022, 394: 133456.
[2]
胡一晨, 赵钢, 秦培友, 成颜芬, 曹亚楠, 邹亮, 任贵兴. 藜麦活性成分研究进展. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11): 1579-1591.

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01579
HU Y C, ZHAO G, QIN P Y, CHENG Y F, CAO Y N, ZOU L, REN G X. Research progress on bioactive components of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(11): 1579-1591. (in Chinese)
[3]
PEREIRA E, ENCINA-ZELADA C, BARROS L, GONZALES- BARRON U, CADAVEZ V, FERREIRA I C F R. Chemical and nutritional characterization of Chenopodium quinoa Willd (quinoa) grains: A good alternative to nutritious food. Food Chemistry, 2019, 280: 110-114.
[4]
AKHARUME F U, ALUKO R E, ADEDEJI A A. Modification of plant proteins for improved functionality: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2021, 20(1): 198-224.

doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12688 pmid: 33393195
[5]
FENG Y Y, LIANG X, ZHAO Z H, KONG B H, XIA X F, CAO C A, ZHANG H W, LIU Q, SUN F D. Mechanisms and effects of different crosslinking degrees on gelling properties and in vitro digestibility of heat-induced microbial transglutaminase-mediated myofibrillar protein gels with or without κ-carrageenan. Food Hydrocolloids, 2024, 152: 109964.
[6]
MENG Y, WEI Z H, XUE C H. Protein fibrils from different food sources: A review of fibrillation conditions, properties, applications and research trends. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2022, 121: 59-75.
[7]
JO Y J, HUANG W J, CHEN L Y. Fabrication and characterization of lentil protein gels from fibrillar aggregates and the gelling mechanism study. Food & Function, 2020, 11(11): 10114-10125.
[8]
YANG Z, DE CAMPO L, GILBERT E P, KNOTT R, CHENG L R, STORER B, LIN X L, LUO L, PATOLE S, HEMAR Y. Effect of NaCl and CaCl2 concentration on the rheological and structural characteristics of thermally-induced quinoa protein gels. Food Hydrocolloids, 2022, 124: 107350.
[9]
WANG X Y, CHENG L R, WANG H F, YANG Z. Limited Alcalase hydrolysis improves the thermally-induced gelation of quinoa protein isolate (QPI) dispersions. Current Research in Food Science, 2022, 5: 2061-2069.

doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.10.027 pmid: 36387599
[10]
ZHOU C, QI W, NEIL LEWIS E, CARPENTER J F. Concomitant Raman spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering for characterization of therapeutic proteins at high concentrations. Analytical Biochemistry, 2015, 472: 7-20.

doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2014.11.016 pmid: 25475399
[11]
WINTERS A L, MINCHIN F R. Modification of the Lowry assay to measure proteins and phenols in covalently bound complexes. Analytical Biochemistry, 2005, 346(1): 43-48.

pmid: 16197913
[12]
LIU Y Q, HUANG Y Y, DENG X Q, LI Z M, LIAN W T, ZHANG G, ZHU Y, ZHU X Q. Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis followed after extrusion pretreatment on the structure and emulsibility of soybean protein. Process Biochemistry, 2022, 116: 173-184.
[13]
HUYST A M R, DELEU L J, LUYCKX T, BUYST D, VAN CAMP J, DELCOUR J A, VAN DER MEEREN P. Colloidal stability of oil-in-water emulsions prepared from hen egg white submitted to dry and/or wet heating to induce amyloid-like fibril formation. Food Hydrocolloids, 2022, 125: 107450.
[14]
LV Y Q, XU L L, SU Y J, CHANG C H, GU L P, YANG Y J, LI J H. Effect of soybean protein isolate and egg white mixture on gelation of chicken myofibrillar proteins under salt /-free conditions. LWT, 2021, 149: 111871.
[15]
ZHANG X Y, ZHANG S, ZHONG M M, QI B K, LI Y. Soy and whey protein isolate mixture/calcium chloride thermally induced emulsion gels: Rheological properties and digestive characteristics. Food Chemistry, 2022, 380: 132212.
[16]
YAN S Z, XU J W, ZHANG S, LI Y. Effects of flexibility and surface hydrophobicity on emulsifying properties: Ultrasound-treated soybean protein isolate. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2021, 142: 110881.
[17]
BYLER D M, SUSI H. Examination of the secondary structure of proteins by deconvolved FTIR spectra. Biopolymers, 1986, 25(3): 469-487.

doi: 10.1002/bip.360250307 pmid: 3697478
[18]
LIU C, BHATTARAI M, MIKKONEN K S, HEINONEN M. Effects of enzymatic hydrolysis of fava bean protein isolate by alcalase on the physical and oxidative stability of oil-in-water emulsions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2019, 67(23): 6625-6632.

doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b00914 pmid: 31117491
[19]
MAHMOUD M I, MALONE W T, CORDLE C T. Enzymatic hydrolysis of casein: Effect of degree of hydrolysis on antigenicity and physical properties. Journal of Food Science, 1992, 57(5): 1223-1229.
[20]
PAULSON A T, TUNG M A. Solubility, hydrophobicity and net charge of succinylated canola protein isolate. Journal of Food Science, 1987, 52(6): 1557-1561.
[21]
KUMAR D, CHATLI M K, SINGH R, MEHTA N, KUMAR P. Enzymatic hydrolysis of camel milk casein and its antioxidant properties. Dairy Science & Technology, 2016, 96(3): 391-404.
[22]
JIANG L Z, WANG J, LI Y, WANG Z J, LIANG J, WANG R, CHEN Y, MA W J, QI B K, ZHANG M. Effects of ultrasound on the structure and physical properties of black bean protein isolates. Food Research International, 2014, 62: 595-601.
[23]
CUI C, ZHAO M M, YUAN B E, ZHANG Y H, REN J Y. Effect of pH and pepsin limited hydrolysis on the structure and functional properties of soybean protein hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science, 2013, 78(12): C1871-C1877.
[24]
GANESH S, NINGTYAS D W, PRAKASH S. Investigating the functionality of enzymatically (transglutaminase and alcalase) treated almond protein isolate. Food Bioscience, 2022, 49: 101914.
[25]
ADAMCIK J, JUNG J M, FLAKOWSKI J, DE LOS RIOS P, DIETLER G, MEZZENGA R. Understanding amyloid aggregation by statistical analysis of atomic force microscopy images. Nature Nanotechnology, 2010, 5(6): 423-428.

doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.59 pmid: 20383125
[26]
ADAMCIK J, MEZZENGA R. Adjustable twisting periodic pitch of amyloid fibrils. Soft Matter, 2011, 7(11): 5437-5443.
[27]
操义平, 方亚鹏. 淀粉样蛋白纤维作为食品配料的研究进展与思考. 中国食品添加剂, 2023, 34(1): 46-54.
CAO Y P, FANG Y P. Research progress on amyloid fibrils as food ingredients. China Food Additives, 2023, 34(1): 46-54. (in Chinese)
[28]
冯潇, 武朝升, 杨玉玲, 付丽霄, 陈龙薇, 汤晓智. 不同盐离子对藜麦蛋白凝胶特性及分子间作用力的影响. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(21): 4318-4329. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.21.014.
FENG X, WU C S, YANG Y L, FU L X, CHEN L W, TANG X Z. Effects of different salt ions on the gel properties and molecular interactions of quinoa protein. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(21): 4318-4329. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.21.014. (in Chinese)
[29]
KHALESI H, SUN C X, HE J, LU W, FANG Y P. The role of amyloid fibrils in the modification of whey protein isolate gels with the form of stranded and particulate microstructures. Food Research International, 2021, 140: 109856.
[30]
LUO L, ZHANG R J, PALMER J, HEMAR Y, YANG Z. Impact of high hydrostatic pressure on the gelation behavior and microstructure of quinoa protein isolate dispersions. ACS Food Science & Technology, 2021, 1(11): 2144-2151.
[31]
JO Y J, CHEN L Y. Gelation behavior of lentil protein aggregates induced by sequential combination of glucono-δ-lactone and transglutaminase. Food Structure, 2023, 36: 100312.
[32]
VOGELSANG-O′DWYER M, SAHIN A W, ARENDT E K, ZANNINI E. Enzymatic hydrolysis of pulse proteins as a tool to improve techno-functional properties. Foods, 2022, 11(9): 1307.
[33]
FU L X, FENG X, WU C S, WEI J F, CHEN L, YU X, LIU Q, TANG X Z. Bromelain hydrolysis and CaCl2 coordination promote the fibrillation of quinoa protein at pH 7. Food Hydrocolloids, 2025, 159: 110659.
[34]
ZHENG L, WANG Z J, KONG Y, MA Z L, WU C L, REGENSTEIN J M, TENG F, LI Y. Different commercial soy protein isolates and the characteristics of Chiba tofu. Food Hydrocolloids, 2021, 110: 106115.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!