Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (12): 2493-2501.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.12.015

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCE·RESOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Estimating the Correction Coefficient of Days to 100 kg in Licha Black Pig and Its Intercross with Berkshire

ZHENG Hao1,TU JinMin2,XIONG XiuPing2,ZHANG ZeKai1,LI LongYun1,HUANG LiBin2,HUANG ZhiYong2,XIAO ShiJun1,GUO YuanMei1()   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045;
    2 Jiangxi Shanxia Investment Company Limited, Dingnan 341900, Jiangxi
  • Received:2019-08-09 Online:2020-06-16 Published:2020-06-25
  • Contact: YuanMei GUO E-mail:gyuanmei@hotmail.com

Abstract:

【Objective】 The aims of this study were to estimate the correction coefficients CF and A of days to 100 kg (D100) and to compare their correction powers to each other in Licha black pig and its intercross with Berkshire boars, so as to provide a reference of correction coefficients for estimating D100 in Licha black pig and other Chinese indigenous pig breeds. 【Method】 In this study, 554 Licha black pigs with pigs from its intercross with Berkshire boars, including 941 F1 pigs and 755 F2 pigs, were randomly selected, and their body weights and ages in days had been automatically collected everyday by Winland performance testing system during their fatting periods. The data quality control was carried out according to the criteria, such as age ≥60 days and body weight ≥25 kg at start testing. Only the data have been passed quality control, which were used to estimate CF and A. CF was the ratio of two slopes, namely, the numerator was the slope of the regression line of weight to age, and the denominator was the slope of the straight line through the end point of performance testing (age and body weight at the testing end) and the original point (both age and weight were 0). A was the intercept of the regression equation of body weight to age, which could be obtained directly by fitting a regression equation of body weight to age. After the correction coefficients were estimated, an analysis of variance was carried out to test whether gender and population had effects on them, and the estimated CF and A were substituted into their respective correction formulae to calculate D100 (D100CF and D100A). A t-test was used to test whether there was a significant difference between D100CF and D100A, and their correlation coefficient was also calculated. Then, the regression equation of body weight to age for each individual was established, and regressive D100 (D100reg) for each individual was estimated by its regression equation. The corrected accuracies of CF and A were compared to each other by the correlation coefficients of D100CF and D100A with D100reg, and the means and standard deviations of the differences of D100CF and D100A to D100reg. Finally, the correction coefficients estimated from other two populations were used to estimate D100 in a certain population, and the correlation coefficients of D100CF and D100A with D100reg were calculated to evaluate whether the correction coefficient estimated from one population could be used in other populations. 【Result】 Gender and population had significant effects on the correction coefficients, so it was necessary to estimate the correction coefficient for each gender in each population. CF of stags (gilts) in Licha black pig and the F1 and F2 of its intercross with Berkshire boars were 1.426 (1.346), 1.340 (1.389) and 1.372 (1.380), respectively, and A were 60.65 (54.15), 49.92 (57.00) and 54.25 (57.53), respectively. There was no significant difference between D100CF and D100A (P = 0.3071), and their correlation coefficient was 0.9998 (P <0.0001). The correlation coefficients of D100CF and D100A with D100reg were equal or greater than 0.9917 (P<0.0001), there was no significant (P>0.05) between the differences of D100CF and D100A to D100reg. The means of the differences were -0.1385 and -0.2741 days, and the standard deviations were 2.5532 and 2.5446 days, respectively. The correlation coefficients of D100reg with D100CF and D100A, which were adjusted using the correction coefficients estimated from other two populations, were equal or greater than 0.9793 (P < 0.0001). 【Conclusion】 The correction coefficients CF and A of D100 estimated in this study were quite different from their counterparts using in National Swine Industry Technology System. There was no significant difference between the correction powers of CF and A, and both CF and A had a very high correction power under an appropriate range of body weight at the end of performance testing. In the three populations, the correction coefficients from other two populations had a very high correction power to a certain population, which indicated that the correction coefficient of D100 from Licha black pig could be used as a reference to other Chinese indigenous pig breeds.

Key words: Licha Black pig, days to 100 kg, correction coefficient CF, correction coefficient A

Table 1

Simple statistics of the correction coefficients"

群体
Population
系数
Coefficient
性别
Gender
样本数
n
平均数
Mean
标准差
Std.
最小值
Min.
最大值
Max.
里岔黑猪
Licha black pig
A 22 60.65 26.17 5.71 91.81
182 54.15 25.23 -32.12 138.26
CF 22 1.426 0.211 1.030 1.708
182 1.346 0.191 0.870 2.082
巴里1代
F1 of Berkshire × Licha black pig
A 31 49.92 21.43 -4.58 81.33
613 57.00 18.77 -42.72 112.61
CF 31 1.340 0.170 0.979 1.632
613 1.389 0.166 0.834 2.024
巴里2代
F2 of Berkshire × Licha black pig
A 64 54.25 19.07 -1.10 87.49
432 57.53 21.50 -32.12 138.26
CF 64 1.372 0.162 0.995 1.699
432 1.380 0.174 0.870 2.082

Fig. 1

Scatter plots between adjusted coefficients and ADG"

Table 2

Simple statistics of the regressive days to 100 kg"

群体 Population 性别 Gender 头数 No 平均数 Mean 标准差 sd. 最小值 Min. 最大值 Max.
里岔黑猪
Licha black pig
22 223.25 18.52 189.96 265.41
182 237.80 18.89 192.90 285.89
巴里1代
F1 of Berkshire × Licha black pig
31 200.32 12.45 179.95 230.12
613 209.37 15.77 171.17 268.98
巴里2代
F2 of Berkshire × Licha black pig
64 206.67 17.16 174.14 241.33
432 215.44 17.46 170.05 274.46

Fig. 2

Scatter plots between regressive and adjusted days to 100 kg"

Fig. 3

Scatter plots between body weight at the end of performance test and the difference of adjusted and regressive days to 100 kg"

Table 3

The transplantation of correction coefficients"

来源群体Original population 校正系数Correction coefficient LC BL1 BL2
里岔黑猪
Licha black pig (LC)
A - 0.9793 0.9794
CF - 0.9800 0.9800
巴里1代
F1 of Berkshire × Licha black pig (BL1)
A 0.9904 - 0.9908
CF 0.9905 - 0.9907
巴里2代
F2 of Berkshire × Licha black pig (BL2)
A 0.9930 0.9935 -
CF 0.9932 0.9937 -
[1] WANG K, DEWU L, JULES H-S, JIE C, CHENGKUN L, ZHENFANG W, MEIYING F, NING L, JIAN-FENG L. Genome wide association analysis reveals new production trait genes in a male duroc population. Plos One, 2015,10(9):e0139207.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139207 pmid: 26418247
[2] 彭潇, 尹立林, 梅全顺, 王海燕, 刘小磊, 朱猛进, 李新云, 付亮亮, 赵书红. 猪主要经济性状的基因组选择研究. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019,50(02):215-221.
PENG X, YIN L L, MEI Q S, WANG H Y, LIU X L, ZHU M J, LI X Y, FU L L, ZHAO S H. A study of genome selection based on the porcine major economic traits. Acta Vetrinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2019,50(02):215-221. (in Chinese)
[3] 全国畜牧兽医总站. 全国种猪遗传评估方案(试行). 北京, 2000: 60.
National Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Service. National Pig Genetic Evaluate Scheme (test). Beijing, 2000: 60. (in Chinese)
[4] 刘望宏, 张勤, 胡军勇, 倪德斌, 熊远著. 瘦肉型种猪早期生长性状校正公式的制定及评估. 华中农业大学学报, 2010,29(4):469-474.
doi: 1000-2421(2010)04-0469-06
LIU W H, ZHANG Q, HU J Y, NI D B, XIONG Y Z. Desing and evaluation of adjusted equations for early growth performance of commercial breeding swines. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2010,29(4):469-474. (in Chinese)
doi: 1000-2421(2010)04-0469-06
[5] 陈斌. 瘦肉型猪的场内遗传评估及遗传分析研究[D]. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2005.
CHEN B. Studies on the on-farm genetic evaluation and genetic analysis of lean type swine[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2005. (in Chinese)
[6] 张哲, 张豪, 陈赞谋, 李加琪. 种猪育种性能测定校正公式研究. 中国畜牧杂志, 2015,51(16):49-54.
ZHANG Z, ZHANG H, CHEN Z M, LI J Q. Development of correction formula for prodcution traits in swine breeding. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2015,51(16):49-54. (in Chinese)
[7] 王林云, 蒙妙枝. 姜曲海猪断奶前后的体重校正方法. 中国畜牧杂志, 1982(2):12-13.
WANG L Y, MENG M Z. Methods to adjust bodyweight of Jiangquhai pig before and after weaning. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 1982(2):12-13. (in Chinese)
[8] 吕凤林, 黎继华. 内江仔猪体重校正方法的研究. 四川畜牧兽医, 1993(2):1-3.
LÜ F L, LI J H. A study of the method to adjust bodyweights of Neijiang pig. Sichuan Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 1993(2):1-3. (in Chinese)
[9] 杨岸奇, 吴买生, 向拥军, 陈斌, 李朝辉, 张善文, 刘伟, 吴攀峰. 沙子岭猪生长性状校正公式的制定. 猪业科学, 2015,32(2):132-134.
YANG A Q, WU M S, XIANG Y J, CHEN B, LI C H, ZHANG S W, LIU W, WU P F. Formulating the adjustment formula for growth trait of Shaziling pig. Swine Industry Science, 2015,32(2):132-134. (in Chinese)
[10] NY/T 822-2004. 中华人民共和国农业行业标准-种猪生产性能测定规程. 北京: 中华人民共和国农业部, 2004.
NY/T 822-2004. People's Republic of China agricultural industry standards - Rules for performance testing of breeding pig. Beijing: Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China, 2004. (in Chinese)
[11] 全国生猪遗传改良计划工作小组领导办公室. 关于调整种猪达100 kg体重日龄和达100 kg体重活体背膘厚校正公式的通知. 2016.
doi: 10.21873/invivo.11945 pmid: 32354962
Leading Group of Work Office of China Swine Genetic Improvement Program. Notice on adjusting the calibration formula of days to 100 kg and backfat thickness at 100 kg in vivo for breeding pigs. 2016. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.21873/invivo.11945 pmid: 32354962
[12] GIBSON J P, QUINTON V M, SIMEDREA P. Responses to selection for growth and backfat in closed nucleus herds of Hampshire and Duroc pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2001,81:17-23.
doi: 10.4141/A99-121
[13] HU B, MO D L, WANG X Y, LIU X H, CHEN Y S. Effects of back fat, growth rate, and age at first mating on Yorkshire and Landrace sow longevity in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016,15(12):2809-2818.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61381-3
[14] LI F E, LEI M G, ZHENG R, ZUO B, JIANG S W, DENG C Y, XIONG Y Z. The Effects of estrogen receptor locus on reproductive tracts components and performance traits in large white×Meishan F2 offspring. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2004,17(9):1223-1226.
doi: 10.5713/ajas.2004.1223
[15] WU P, WANG K, YANG Q, ZHOU J, CHEN D, LIU Y, MA J, TANG Q, JIN L, XIAO W, LOU P, JIANG A, JIANG Y, ZHU L, LI M, LI X, TANG G. Whole-genome re-sequencing association study for direct genetic effects and social genetic effects of six growth traits in Large White pigs. Scientific Reports, 2019,9(1):9667.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45919-0 pmid: 31273229
[16] GUO Y, QIU H, XIAO S, WU Z, YANG M, YANG J, REN J, HUANG L. A genome-wide association study identifies genomic loci associated with backfat thickness, carcass weight, and body weight in two commercial pig populations. Journal of Applied Genetics, 2017,58(4):499-508.
doi: 10.1007/s13353-017-0405-6 pmid: 28890999
[17] ABELL C E, MABRY J W, DEKKERS J C M, STALDER K J. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among reproductive and post- weaning traits from a commercial swine breeding company. Livestock Science, 2012,145(1-3):183-188.
doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.01.017
[18] KUHLERS D L, JUNGST S B. Correlated responses in reproductive and carcass traits to selection for 200-day weight in Landrace pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 1993,71(3):595-601.
doi: 10.2527/1993.713595x pmid: 8463145
[19] 于虹, 雷蕾, 崔超, 王涛. 里岔黑猪品种选育标准技术规范. 猪业科学, 2017,34(3):126-126.
YU H, LEI L, CUI C, WANG T. Standard technical specification for breeding of Licha black pig. Swine Industry Science, 2017,34(3):126-126. (in Chinese)
[20] 黑立新, 朱应民, 张淑二, 张敏, 刘展生. 里岔黑猪保种现状及研究进展. 养殖与饲料, 2018,5:17-20.
HEI L X, ZHU Y M, ZHANG S E, ZHANG M, LIU Z S. Current situation of breed conservation and research progress of Licha black pig. Animals Breeding and Feed, 2018,5:17-20. (in Chinese)
[21] 李龙云, 肖石军, 黄黎斌, 黄智勇, 涂金敏, 熊秀萍, 郭源梅, 黄路生. 巴克夏和里岔黑猪不同杂交组合生产性能的比较研究. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018,49(01):26-35.
LI L Y, XIAO S J, HUANG L B, HUANG Z Y, TU J M, XIONG X P, GUO Y M, HUANG L S. Comparative studies on the productive performances among different crosses of Berkshire and Licha black pig. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2018,49(01):26-35. (in Chinese)
[22] 刘艳花, 郭建华, 李书勋, 纪志和. 关于加快里岔黑猪新品种研究开发的思考. 山东畜牧兽医, 2017,38(06):20-21.
LIU Y H, GUO J H, LI S X, JI Z H. Thoughts on accelerating the research and development of new breed using Licha black pig. Shandong Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2017, 38(06):20-21. (in Chinese)
[23] 陈鹏, 杨在宾, 张庆, 姜淑贞. 里岔黑猪与“杜长大”三元猪生长性能和免疫性能的对比研究. 猪业科学, 2017,34(1):131-133.
CHEN P, YANG Z B, ZHANG Q, JIANG S Z. Comparative the growth and immunity performances of Licha black pig to Duroc× Landrace×Yorkshire pigs. Swine Industry Science, 2017,34(1):131-133. (in Chinese)
[24] GUO J F, WU Y, HU H M, WANG J Y. Studies on carcass performance and meat quality and its changes with body weight of finishing pigs. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2008,21(2):460-463.
[25] CHOI Y M, OH H K. Carcass performance, muscle fiber, meat quality, and sensory quality characteristics of crossbred pigs with different live weights. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 2016,36(3):389-396.
doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.3.389 pmid: 27433110
[26] PARK M J, HA D M, SHIN H W, LEE S H, KIM W K, HA S H, YANG H S, JEONG J Y, JOO S T, LEE C Y. Growth Efficiency, Carcass Quality Characteristics and Profitability of 'High'-Market Weight Pigs. Journal of Animal Science & Technology, 2007,49(4):459-470.
[27] KIM Y S, KIM S W, WEAVER M A, LEE C Y. Increasing the pig market weight: world trends, expected consequences and practical considerations. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2005,18(4):590-600.
doi: 10.5713/ajas.2005.590
[28] CORREA J A, FAUCITANO L, LAFOREST J P, RIVEST J, MARCOUX M. Effects of slaughter weight on carcass composition and meat quality in pigs of two different growth rates. Meat Science, 2006,72(1):91-99.
doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.06.006 pmid: 22061378
[29] PARK B C, LEE C Y. Feasibility of increasing the slaughter weight of finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science & Technology, 2011,53(3):211-222.
[30] NSIF. Guidelines for Uniform Swine Improvement Programs. Washington D. C. USA. 1996.
[31] YUN H C, MAHBOOB A, CHO C I, CHOI J G, CHOI I S, CHOI T J, CHO K H, PARK B H. Genetic parameters of pre-adjusted body weight growth and ultrasound measures of body tissue development in three seedstock pig breed populations in Korea. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2015,28(12):1696-1702.
doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0971 pmid: 26580436
[32] GUO Y, HUANG Y, HOU L, MA J, CHEN C, AI H, HUANG L, REN J. Genome-wide detection of genetic markers associated with growth and fatness in four pig populations using four approaches. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2017,49(1):21.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0295-4
[33] BOLLEN P J, MADSEN L W, MEYER O, RITSKES-HOITINGA J. Growth differences of male and female Gottingen minipigs during ad libitum feeding: a pilot study. Laboratory Animal, 2005,39(1):80-93.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!