Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (16): 3084-3094.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.16.005

• PLANT PROTECTION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Calculation Methods for the Surface Free Energy of Pepper Leaf Surface

XU GuangChun, GU ZhongYan, XU DeJin, XU XiaoLong, XU Lu   

  1. Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014
  • Received:2018-03-14 Online:2018-08-16 Published:2018-08-16

Abstract: 【Objective】The efficiency of foliar-applied agrochemicals is closely related to the complexity of physicochemical properties of plant leaf surfaces. For better understanding the interfacial interaction between agrochemical spray liquids and plant leaf surfaces, the internal relation would be seek from the thermodynamic point based on pepper leaf surfaces. This will provide a basis for efficient use of pesticides on plants.【Method】Three test liquids were water (W), glycerol (G) and diiodomethane (DM). Their static contact angles of a single droplet on the pepper leaf surfaces of different varieties were determined by contact angle meter. Then the total surface free energy (SFE) and its components were evaluated by Harmonic mean (HM) method, Owens-Wendt-Rabel- Kaelble (OWRK) method, Van-Oss-Chaudhury-Good (OCG) method and ZDY method. Accordingly, solubility parameter (δ) of pepper leaf surfaces was calculated. 【Result】The leaves of Suzi-1 and GR pepper were wettable (θ90°) for W and Sujiao-13 pepper leaves were unwettable (θ>90°) for W. Among the 4 methods, more physical characteristic information was obtained by the OCG method with 3 test liquids (W-G-DM) and calculated percentages of non-polar components of the SFE of pepper leaf surfaces (>85%) were higher than the polar components (<15%). The HM and OWRK methods based on 2 test liquids. When the 2 test liquids were polar (i.e. W-G), the percentages of non-polar or polar component of the SFE of the pepper leaf surface varied greatly, or even the opposite to the percentage obtained in the OCG method. When the 2 test liquids were polar and non-polar combination (i.e. W-DM or G-DM), the deviation of the SFE values calculated by OWRK method was lower than that by HM method based on the OCG method. The SFE values calculated by ZDY method with 1 test liquid were much higher than that of the other three methods. Compared with OCG method, the deviation of the SFE of pepper leaf surfaces was >100%. Based on the deviation from the OCG method within 10% of the SFE, SFE of Suzi-1 leaf surface was 37.72-43.11 mJ·m-2 and solubility parameter was 18.89-22.77 mJ1/2·m-3/2. SFE of GR leaf surface was 37.53-40.95 mJ·m-2 and solubility parameter was 18.81-20.09 mJ1/2·m-3/2. SFE of Sujiao-13 leaf surface was 33.21-36.92 mJ·m-2 and solubility parameter was 17.17-18.58 mJ1/2·m-3/2.【ConclusionUsing water (W), glycerol (G) and diiodomethane (DM) as the test liquid, ZDY method is not suitable for calculating the SFE of pepper leaf surfaces and the rest methods (HM, OWRK, OCG) can be used to calculate the SFE. Among them, the HM or OWRK method should be paid more attention to the polarity of selecting test liquid combination. Meanwhile, the percentage of non-polar component of the SFE of 3 kinds of pepper is higher than that of the polar component.

Key words: pepper leaf surface, static contact angle, surface free energy, surface free energy components, solubility parameter

[1]    Puente D W, Baur P. Wettability of soybean (Glycine max L.) leaves by foliar sprays with respect to developmental changes. Pest Management Science, 2011, 67(7): 798-806.
[2]    Taylor P. The wetting of leaf surface. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2011, 16(4): 326-334.
[3]    袁会珠, 杨代斌, 闫晓静, 张琳娜. 农药有效利用率与喷雾技术优化. 植物保护, 2011, 37(5): 14-20.
Yuan H Z, Yang D B, Yan X J, Zhang L N. Pesticide efficiency and the way to optimize the spray application. Plant Protection, 2011, 37(5): 14-20. (in Chinese)
[4]    MÜller C, Riederer M. Plant surface properties in chemical ecology. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2005, 31(11): 2621-2651.
[5]    Schreiber L. Transport barriers made of cutin, suberin and associated waxes. Trends in Plant Science, 2010, 15(10): 546-553.
[6]    Gaskin R E, Steele K D, Forster W A. Characterising plant surfaces for spray adhesion and retention. New Zealand Plant Protection, 2005, 58: 179-183.
[7]    Nairn J J, Forster W A. Methods for evaluating leaf surface free energy and polarity having accounted for surface roughness. Pest Management Science, 2017, 73(9): 1854-1865.
[8]    范仁俊, 张晓曦, 周璐, 曹冲, 杜凤沛. 利用OWRK法预测桃叶表面润湿性能的研究. 农药学学报, 2011, 13(1): 79-83.
Fan R J, Zhang X X, Zhou L, Cao C, Du F P. Research on the wettability of peach leaf surfaces by OWRK method. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2011, 13(1): 79-83. (in Chinese)
[9]    Wu S. Calculation of interfacial tension in polymer systems. Journal of Polymer Science Polymer Symposia, 1971, 34(1): 19-30.
[10]   Owens D K, Wendt R C. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1969, 13(8): 1741-1747.
[11]   Van Oss C J, Chaudhury M K, Good R J. Interfacial Lifshitz-van der Waals and polar interactions in macroscopic systems. Chemical Reviews, 1988, 88(6): 927-941.
[12]   朱定一, 戴品强, 罗晓斌, 张远超. 润湿性表征体系及液固界面张力计算的新方法 (Ⅰ). 科学技术与工程, 2007, 7(13): 3057-3062.
Zhu D Y, Dai P Q, Luo X B, Zhang Y C. Novel characterization of wetting properties and the calculation of liquid-solid interface tension (Ⅰ). Science Technology and Engineering, 2007, 7(13): 3057-3062. (in Chinese)
[13]   Fernández V, Khayet M. Evaluation of the surface free energy of plant surfaces: toward standardizing the procedure. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015, 6: 510.
[14]   Shalel-Levanon S, Marmur A. Validity and accuracy in evaluating surface tension of solids by additive approaches. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2003, 262(2): 489-499.
[15]   张晨辉, 赵欣, 雷津美, 马悦, 杜凤沛. 非离子表面活性剂Triton X-100溶液在不同生长期小麦叶片表面的润湿行为. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1846-1854.
Zhang C H, Zhao X, Lei J M, Ma Y, Du F P. Wettability of Triton X-100 on wheat (Triticum aestivum) leaf surfaces with respect to developmental changes. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2017, 33(9): 1846-1854. (in Chinese)
[16]   关明杰, 薛明慧. 化学处理对竹笋壳润湿性的影响. 农业工程学 报, 2016, 32(11): 309-314.
Guan M J, Xue M H. Wettability of bamboo shoot shell under chemical treatment. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(11): 309-314. (in Chinese)
[17]   Revilla P, Fernández V, Alvarez-Iglesias L, Medina E T, Cavero J. Leaf physico-chemical and physiological properties of maize (Zea mays L.) populations from different origins. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2016, 107: 319-325.
[18]   顾中言. 植物的亲水疏水特性与农药药液行为的分析. 江苏农业学报, 2009, 25(2): 276-281.
Gu Z Y. Analysis of the relationship between hydrophilic or hydrophobic property of plant and action of pesticides solution on plants leaves. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 25(2): 276-281. (in Chinese)
[19]   Khayet M, Fernández V. Estimation of the solubility parameters of model plant surfaces and agrochemicals: a valuable tool for understanding plant surface interactions. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 2012, 9: 45.
[20]   Jañczuk B, Bialopiotrowicz T, Zdziennicka A. Some remarks on the components of the liquid surface free energy. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1999, 211(1): 96-103.
[21]   Kolyva F, Stratakis E, Rhizopoulou S, Chimona C, Fotakis C. Leaf surface characteristics and wetting in Ceratonia siliqua L. Flora, 2012, 207(8): 551-556.
[22]   Zheng Q S, Lu C J. Size effects of surface roughness to superhydrophobicity. Procedia Iutam, 2014, 10: 462-475.
[23]   Zhu L, Ge J R, Qi Y Y, Chen Q, Hua R M, Luo F, Chen P R. Droplet impingement behavior analysis on the leaf surface of Shu-ChaZao under different pesticide formulations. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018, 144: 16-25.
[24]   Sikorska D, Papierowska E, Szaty?owiczJ, Sikorski P, Suprun K, Hopkins R J. Variation in leaf surface hydrophobicity of wetland plants: the role of plant traits in water retention. Wetlands, 2017, 37(5): 997-1002.
[25]   Domińczuk J, KrawczukA. Comparison of surface free energy calculation methods. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2015, 791: 259-265.
[26]   陈晓磊. 固体聚合物表面接触角的测量及表面能研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2012.
Chen X L. Surface free energy and contact angle measurement of solid polymer[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[27]   Fernández V, Sancho-Knapik D, Guzman P, Peguero- Pina J J, Gil L, Karabourniotis G, Khayet M, Fasseas C, Heredia-Guerrero J A, Heredia A, Gil-Pelegrin E. Wettability, polarity, and water absorption of holm oak leaves: effect of leaf side and age. Plant Physiology, 2014, 166(1): 168-180.
[28]   Bauer S, Schulte E, Thier H P. Composition of the surface waxes from bell pepper and eggplant. European Food Research and Technology, 2005, 220(1): 5-10.
[29]   徐广春, 顾中言, 徐德进, 许小龙. 稻叶表面特性及雾滴在倾角稻叶上的沉积行为. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(21): 4280-4290.
Xu G C, Gu Z Y, Xu D J, Xu X L. Characteristics of rice leaf surface and droplets deposition behavior on rice leaf surface with different inclination angles. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(21): 4280-4290. (in Chinese)
[30]   Gaskin R E, Pathan A K. Characterising plant surfaces and adjuvant interactions to improve pesticide spray retention and coverage on avocados. New Zealand Avocado Growers’ Association Annual Research Report, 2006, 6: 63-70.
[31]   顾中言, 徐德进, 徐广春. 田间药液用量影响农药单位剂量防治效果的原因分析. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(13): 2513-2523.
Gu Z Y, Xu D J, Xu G C. The cause of influence of spray volume on control effect of pesticide unit dose in rice fields. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(13): 2513-2523. (in Chinese)
[32]   徐广春, 顾中言, 徐德进, 许小龙, 董玉轩. 常用农药在水稻叶片上的润湿能力分析. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(9): 1731-1740.
Xu G C, Gu Z Y, Xu D J, Xu X L, Dong Y X. Wettablity analysis of pesticides on rice leaf. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(9): 1731-1740. (in Chinese)
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!