农户测土配方施肥技术采纳行为研究——基于山东省枣庄市薛城区农户调研数据

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.23.025

Abstract

Abstract: 【Objective】 This research was conducted to study the technical results and affecting factors of sequential farmer’s adoption of soil testing for formulated fertilization.【Method】The student’s T test and Bivariate Probit model were employed on the survey data of the sampling area. 【Result】 There was a significant difference in technical results among no-, partial-, and full-adoption of the technology. The area of farmer’s land and technical guidance showed a positive correlation with the farmer’s partial-adoption. The age of farmers had a negative correlation with the farmer’s full-adoption, while the proportion of agricultural income , the area of farmers’ land, concept of fertilization, understanding of the technology, technical guidance, and technical availability card indicated a positive correlation with the farmer’s full-adoption. 【Conclusion】 The farmer’s adoption of soil testing for formulated fertilization had a significant income effect. The most important reasons for no-adoption included equal subdivision of farmer’s land and inconvenience to contact with agricultural technology manager. And the crucial factors in partial-adoption were due to the higher age of farmers, low proportion of agricultural income to personal earning, relatively small arable land, old-fashioned concept of fertilization, incomplete understanding the concept of this novel technology and missing fertilization guidance card.

Key words: soil testing for formula fertilization, technical results, affecting factors

HAN Hong-Yun, YANG Zeng-Xu. Analysis on Farmers’ Adoptive Behavior of Soil Testing for Formulated Fertilization: Empirical Evidence from the Xuecheng District of Zaozhuang City in Shandong Province[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(23): 4962-4970.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.23.025

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/Y2011/V44/I23/4962

References

[1]向东梅. 促进农户采用环境友好技术的制度安排与选择分析. 重庆大学学报: 社会科学版, 2011, 17(1): 42-47.

Xiang D M. Analysis on institutional arrangement and choices of how to promote farmers adopting EFT. Journal of Chongqing University: Social Science Edition, 2011, 17(1): 42-47. (in Chinese)

[2]孙钊. 测土配方施肥项目的发展与现状. 现代农业科技, 2009, 15: 290-291.

Sun Z. The development and status of formula fertilization by soil testing. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2009, 15: 290-291. (in Chinese)

[3]Shively G E. Poverty, consumption risk, and soil conservation. Journal of Development Economics, 2001, 65(2): 267-290.

[4]Mbaga-Semgalawea Z, Folmer H. Household adoption behaviour of improved soil conservation: the case of the North Pare and West Usambara Mountains of Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 2000, 17(4): 321-336.

[5]Mather D L, Bernsten R, Rosas J C, Viana Ruano A, Escoto D. The economic impact of bean disease resistance research in Honduras. Agricultural Economics, 2003, 29: 343-352.

[6]Byerlee D, De Polanco E H. Farmers’ stepwise adoption of technological packages: evidence from the Mexican altiplano. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1986, 68(3): 519-527.

[7]Smale M, Heisey P W, Leathers H D. Maize of the ancestors and modern varieties: the microeconomics of high-yielding variety adoption in Malawi. Economic Development Cultural Change, 1995, 43(2): 351-368.

[8]Khanna M. Sequential adoption of site-specific technologies and its implications for nitrogen productivity: a double selectivity model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001, 83(1): 35-51.

[9]Dimara E, Skuras D. Adoption of agricultural innovations as a two-stage partial observability process. Agricultural Economics, 2003(28): 187-196.

[10]方松海, 孔智祥. 农户禀赋对保护地生产技术采纳的影响分析——以陕西、四川和宁夏为例. 农业技术经济, 2005(3): 35-42.

Fang S H, Kong X Z. Analysis of the effect of household endowments on the agricultural product technology adoption decision-based on Shanxi, Sichuan and Ningxia. Agricultural Technology and Economics, 2005(3): 35-42. (in Chinese)

[11]何浩然, 张林秀, 李强. 农民施肥行为及农业面源污染研究. 农业技术经济, 2006(6): 2-10.

He H R, Zhang L X, Li Q. Analysis of farmer's fertilizer behavior and agricultural non-point pollution. Agricultural Technology and Economics, 2006(6): 2-10. (in Chinese)

[12]喻永红, 张巨勇. 农户采用水稻IPM技术的意愿及其影响因素——基于湖北省的调查数据. 中国农村经济, 2009(11): 77-86.

Yu Y H, Zhang J Y. Analysis of the effect and desire of farmer's rise IPM technology adoption decision-based on Hubei province survey. China rural Economics, 2009(11): 77-86. (in Chinese)

[13]葛继红, 周曙东, 朱红根, 殷广德. 农户采用环境友好型技术行为研究——以配方施肥技术为例. 农业技术经济, 2010(9): 57-63.

Ge J H, Zhou S D, Zhu H G, Yin G D. Analysis of farmer’s behavior of environment-friend technology adoption decision. Agricultural Technology and Economics, 2010(9): 57-63. (in Chinese)

[14]张成玉. 测土配方施肥技术推广中农户行为实证研究. 技术经济, 2010, 29(8): 76-81.

Zhang C Y. Farmer’s behavior in testing soil for formulated fertilization extension. Technology Economics, 2010, 29(8): 76-81. (in Chinese)

[15]枣庄市统计局. 2010枣庄市统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2010

Zaozhuang City Bureau of Statistics. Zaozhuang City Statistics Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2010. (in Chinese)

[16]孙兆福. 南四湖水资源可持续利用研究. 水利发展研究, 2009(9): 24-29.

Sun Z F. Sustainable utilization of water resources of South Four Lakes. Water Resources Development Study, 2009(9): 24-29. (in Chinese)

[17]枣庄市农业局, 枣庄市土肥站. 枣庄市测土配方施肥技术问答. 2009

Zaozhuang City Bureau of Agriculture, Soil and Fertilizer Station of Zaozhuang. Question and Answer of Zaozhuang’s Soil Testing for Formulated Fertilization Technology. 2009. (in Chinese)

[18]Khanna M, Zilberman D. Incentives, precision technology and environmental protection. Ecological Economics, 1997(23): 25-43.

[19]Khanna M, Epouhe O F, Hornbaker R. Site-specific crop management: adoption patterns and incentives. Review of Agricultural Economics, 1999, 21(2): 455-472.

[20]彭畅, 朱平, 牛红红, 李强, 张玉龙. 农田氮磷流失与农业非点源污染及其防治. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(2): 508-512. (in Chinese)

Peng C, Zhu P, Niu H H, Li Q, Zhang Y L. Nitrogen and phosphorus loss of farmland agricultural non-point source pollution and its prevention. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010, 41(2): 508-512. (in Chinese)

[21]Amsalu A, De Graaff J. Determinants of adoption and continued use of stone terraces for soil and water conservation in an Ethiopian highland watershed. Ecological Economics, 2007(61): 294-302.

[22]孔祥智, 方松海, 庞晓鹏, 马九杰. 西部地区农户禀赋对农业技术采纳的影响分析. 经济研究, 2004(12): 85-95.

Kong X Z, Fang S H, Pang X P, Ma J J. Analysis of the effect of household endowments on the agricultural technology adoption decision in west China. Economic Research Journal, 2004(12): 85-95. (in Chinese)

[23]Bekele W, Drake L. Soil and water conservation decision behaviour of subsistence farmers in the Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia: a case study of the Hunde-Lafto area. Ecological Economics, 2003(46): 437-451.

[24]Deininger K. Collective agricultural production: a solution for transition economies? World Development, 1995, 23 (8): 1317-1334.

[25]Fuglie K O, Bosch D J. Economic and environmental implications of soil nitrogen testing: a switching-regression analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1995(77): 891-900.

[26]Croppenstedt A, Demeke M, Meschi M M. Technology adoption in the presence of constraints: the case of fertilizer demand in Ethiopia. Review of Development Economics, 2003, 7(1): 58-70.

[27]Jansen H G P, Pender J, Damon A, Schipper R. Land management decisions and agricultural productivity in the hillsides of Honduras//International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference. Gold Coast, Australia, 2006.

[28]万广华, 程恩江. 规模经济、土地细碎化与我国的粮食生产. 中国农村观察, 1996(3) : 31-36.

Wan G H, Cheng E J. Economies of scale, land fragmentation and crop production in China. China Rural Survey, 1996(3): 31-36. (in Chinese)

[29]刘洪伟, 李纪珍, 王彦. 技术学习成本及其影响因素分析. 科研管理, 2007, 28(5): 1-8.

Liu H W, Li J Z, Wang Y. An analysis on the cost of technological learning and its major determates. Science Research Management, 2007, 28(5): 1-8. (in Chinese)

[30]王济民, 刘春芳, 申秋红, 梁辛. 我国农业科技推广体系主要模式评价. 农业经济问题, 2009(2): 48-53.

Wang J M, Liu C F, Shen Q H, Liang X. Main mode of assessment of agriculture extension system in China. Issue of Agricultural Economic, 2009(2): 48-53. (in Chinese)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Analysis on Farmers’ Adoptive Behavior of Soil Testing for Formulated Fertilization: Empirical Evidence from the Xuecheng District of Zaozhuang City in Shandong Province

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 0

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0