板栗全生长季树干液流及蒸腾耗水特征

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.09.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】明确板栗（Castanea mollissima Bl.）蒸腾耗水特征，为板栗园制定科学合理的水分管理措施提供理论参考。【方法】采用热扩散探针法，对‘大板红’板栗植株全生长季树干液流速率进行连续监测，并同步观测7个相关环境因子：太阳辐射（solar radiation，SR）、水汽压亏缺（vapor pressure deficit，VPD）、空气温度（air temperature，AT）、空气相对湿度（air relative humidity，ARH）、风速（wind speed，WS）、土壤温度（soil temperature，ST）和土壤湿度（soil relative humidity，SRH），解析板栗树干液流规律和耗水特征及其与环境因子间的关联性。【结果】板栗树干明显液流启动于5月3日，结束于10月26日，前后历时176 d。板栗全生长季晴天树干液流速率日变化呈单峰“几”字形曲线，其在6、7、8月每日启动到达峰值时间早于5、9、10月，而下降时间晚于5、9、10月，致6、7、8月份液流速率峰值持续时间长于5、9、10月。板栗全生长季液流速率日均值、日均耗水量和月耗水量由高到低排序均为8月>7月>6月>9月>5月>10月，其中显著性检验表明7月和8月之间无显著差异，但显著高于其他月份。夜间液流量占比由高到低排序为10月>9月>5月>6月>7月>8月，其中显著性检验表明10月、9月和5月显著高于6月、7月和8月。板栗全生长季树干液流速率与太阳辐射、水汽压亏缺、空气温度和风速均呈极显著正相关，而与空气相对湿度均呈极显著负相关。分别建立了5—10月板栗树干液流速率与7个环境因子的6个回归模型。【结论】板栗树干有明显液流始于5月初、终于10月末；7—8月是板栗的关键需水期；建立的板栗植株液流速率与环境因子的回归模型，可用于通过环境因子估测不同月份及整个生长季的植株耗水量。

关键词: 板栗, 液流速率, 耗水量, 环境因子, 特征

Abstract:

【Objective】This study analyzed the characteristics of transpiration water consumption of chestnut (Castanea mollissima Bl.), so as to provide a theoretical reference for the formulation of scientific and reasonable water management measures in chestnut orchards.【Method】The thermal diffusion probe method was used to continuously monitor the stem flow rate of Dabanhong chestnut continuously during the whole growing season from March 1, 2022 to March 1, 2023, and seven related environmental factors (solar radiation, air relative humidity, air temperature, wind speed, vapor pressure deficit, soil temperature, and soil relative humidity) were observed simultaneously to analyze the stem flow rules and water consumption characteristics of chestnut trees and their correlation with environmental factors. 【Result】The obvious stem flow of chestnut trunk started on May 3 and ended on October 26, which lasted for 176 days. The diurnal variation of stem flow rate of chestnut showed a single-peak curve in sunny days during the whole growing season. The daily start and peak time of stem flow rate in June, July and August were earlier than those in May, September and October, while the decline time was later than those in May, September and October, so that the peak duration of stem flow rate in June, July and August was longer than that in May, September and October. The daily average stem flow rate, daily average water consumption and monthly water consumption in the whole growing season of chestnut were ranked from high to low as August>July>June>September>May>October, the significance test showed that there was no significant difference between July and August, but it was significantly higher than other months. The nocturnal sap flow percentage was ranked from high to low as October>September>May>June>July>August, and the significance test showed that October, September and May were significantly higher than June, July and August. The stem sap flow rate of chestnut during the whole growing season was significantly positively correlated with solar radiation, water vapor pressure deficit, air temperature and wind speed, and significantly negatively correlated with air relative humidity. Six regression models of stem flow rate from May to October and seven environmental factors were established.【Conclusion】The obvious stem flow of chestnut began at the beginning of May and ended at the end of October. The key water demand period of chestnut was July to August. Regression models of chestnut sap flow rate and environmental factors, which could be used to estimate the water requirement of plants in different months and the whole growing season through environmental factors.

Key words: chestnut, sap flow rate, water consumption, environmental factors, feature

郭燕, 张树航, 张馨方, 李颖, 刘金雨, 范丽颖, 刘师源, 高倩, 王广鹏. 板栗全生长季树干液流及蒸腾耗水特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(9): 1794-1806.

GUO Yan, ZHANG ShuHang, ZHANG XinFang, LI Ying, LIU JinYu, FAN LiYing, LIU ShiYuan, GAO Qian, WANG GuangPeng. Stem Sap Flow and Water Consumption of Chestnut During Growth Season[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1794-1806.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.09.013

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2024/V57/I9/1794

图/表 14

表1

表2

表3

图1

图2

图3

表4

图4

图5

表5

表6

表7

表8

表9

参考文献 34

[1]	王广鹏. 北方板栗全产业链绿色轻简标准化生产技术. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2021.
	WANG G P. Green, Light And Standardized Production Technology of Chestnut in the Whole Industrial Chain of North China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2021. (in Chinese)
[2]	郭燕, 张树航, 李颖, 张馨方, 王广鹏. 中国板栗238份品种(系)叶片形态、解剖结构及其抗旱性评价. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(6): 1033-1046. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2019-0771
	GUO Y, ZHANG S H, LI Y, ZHANG X F, WANG G P. Studies on the leaf morphology, anatomical structure and drought resistance evaluation of 238 Chinese chestnut varieties (strains). Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(6): 1033-1046. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2019-0771
[3]	ISMANOV M, HENRY C, ESPINOZA L, FRANCIS P. Modeling of soybean plant sap flow. Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 13(5): 658-673. doi: 10.4236/as.2022.135043
[4]	张含含, 秦永旗, 王秀敏, 刘云洁, 马长明. 基于热扩散原理的树干液流测定误差性分析. 林业与生态科学, 2022, 37(1): 1-6, 20. doi: 10.13320/j.cnki.hjfor.2022.0001
	ZHANG H H, QIN Y Q, WANG X M, LIU Y J, MA C M. Error analysis of trunk sap flow measurement based on thermal technology. Forestry and Ecological Sciences, 2022, 37(1): 1-6, 20. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13320/j.cnki.hjfor.2022.0001
[5]	GRANIER A, HUC R, BARIGAH S T. Transpiration of natural rain forest and its dependence on climatic factors. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1996, 78(1/2): 19-29. doi: 10.1016/0168-1923(95)02252-X
[6]	WIESER G, GRUBER A, OBERHUBER W. Sap flow characteristics and whole-tree water use of Pinus cembra across the treeline ecotone of the central Tyrolean Alps. European Journal of Forest Research, 2014, 133(2): 287-295. doi: 10.1007/s10342-013-0760-8
[7]	王力, 王艳萍. 黄土塬区苹果树干液流特征. 农业机械学报, 2013, 44(10): 152-158.
	WANG L, WANG Y P. Characteristics of stem sap flow of apple trees in loess tableland. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2013, 44(10): 152-158. (in Chinese)
[8]	王升, 容莹, 闫妍, 黄玉清. 干热河谷地区芒果树干液流特征及其对环境因子的响应. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(6): 1286-1295.
	WANG S, RONG Y, YAN Y, HUANG Y Q. Characteristics of sap flow of mango trees and its response to environmental factors in the dry-hot river valley region. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 34(6): 1286-1295. (in Chinese)
[9]	夏桂敏, 孙媛媛, 王玮志, 吴奇, 迟道才. ‘寒富’苹果树茎流特征及其对环境因子的响应. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(4): 701-714. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.04.011.
	XIA G M, SUN Y Y, WANG W Z, WU Q, CHI D C. The characteristics of sap flow of Hanfu apple trees and its response to environmental factors. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(4): 701-714. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.04.011. (in Chinese)
[10]	林平, 李吉跃, 马达. 北京山区油松林蒸腾耗水特性研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(S1): 47-50.
	LIN P, LI J Y, MA D. Study on transpiration water consumption characteristics of Pinus tabulaeformis forest in Beijing mountainous area. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(S1): 47-50. (in Chinese)
[11]	林利. 板栗抗旱丰产关键栽培技术研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2006.
	LIN L. Studies on key cultivation technology of anti-drought and high-yielding of chestnut[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2006. (in Chinese)
[12]	陆欣. 土壤肥料学. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2002.
	LU X. Soil Fertilizer Science. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2002. (in Chinese)
[13]	任启文, 忻富宁, 李联地, 尤海舟, 毕君. 冀北山地华北落叶松全生长季树干液流及蒸腾耗水特征. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(5): 91-97.
	REN Q W, XIN F N, LI L D, YOU H Z, BI J. Stem sap flow and water consumption of Larix principis-rupprechtii during growth season in northern mountain areas of Hebei province. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2018, 38(5): 91-97. (in Chinese)
[14]	QIANG Y Q, XU X Y, ZHANG J C. Study on the dynamics of stem sap flow in Minqin wind and sand control Haloxylon ammodendron forest, China. Sustainability, 2022, 15(1): 609. doi: 10.3390/su15010609
[15]	聂立水, 李吉跃, 翟洪波. 油松、栓皮栎树干液流速率比较. 生态学报, 2005, 25(8): 1934-1940.
	NIE L S, LI J Y, ZHAI H B. Study of the rate of stem sap flow in Pinus tabulaeformis and Quercus variabilis by using the TDP method. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(8): 1934-1940. (in Chinese)
[16]	王媛, 魏江生, 周梅, 赵鹏武, 刘兵兵. 大兴安岭南段白桦树干液流对土壤水分的响应. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(4): 128-133.
	WANG Y, WEI J S, ZHOU M, ZHAO P W, LIU B B. Response of sap flow of Betula platyphylla to soil moisture in southern greater Xing’an Mountains. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(4): 128-133. (in Chinese)
[17]	赵付勇. 南疆滴灌核桃树茎流变化特征及需水规律的研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2016.
	ZHAO F Y. Study on stew flow characteristics and water consumption of in walnut teeees of southern Xinjiang under drip irrigation[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese)
[18]	王卓, 郭月峰, 祁伟, 姚云峰, 仲宸, 刘璐, 王佳坤. 不同灌水梯度下沙棘液流特征与环境因子的关系. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(4): 1018-1025.
	WANG Z, GUO Y F, QI W, YAO Y F, ZHONG C, LIU L, WANG J K. Relationship between the characteristics of Hippophae rhamnoides fluid flow and environmental factors under different irrigation gradients. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(4): 1018-1025. (in Chinese)
[19]	张小由, 龚家栋. 利用热脉冲技术对梭梭液流的研究. 西北植物学报, 2004, 24(12): 2250-2254.
	ZHANG X Y, GONG J D. Study on volume and velocity of stem sap flow of Haloxylon ammodendron by heat-pulse technique. Acta Botanica Boreali-occidentalia Sinica, 2004, 24(12): 2250-2254. (in Chinese)
[20]	朱永泰, 陈惠玲, 秦文华, 徐聪, 张扬, 朱高峰. 干旱绿洲区葡萄园蒸腾特征及其对环境因子的响应. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 58(5): 569-578, 587.
	ZHU Y T, CHEN H L, QIN W H, XU C, ZHANG Y, ZHU G F. The characteristics and main influencing factors of vineyard transpiration in the arid oasis areas. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2022, 58(5): 569-578, 587. (in Chinese)
[21]	徐先英, 孙保平, 丁国栋, 郭树江, 柴成武. 干旱荒漠区典型固沙灌木液流动态变化及其对环境因子的响应. 生态学报, 2008, 28(3): 895-905.
	XU X Y, SUN B P, DING G D, GUO S J, CHAI C W. Sap flow patterns of three main sand-fixing shrubs and their responses to environmental factors in desert areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(3): 895-905. (in Chinese)
[22]	南庆伟, 王全九, 苏李君. 极端干旱区滴灌条件下葡萄茎流变化规律研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(6): 60-67.
	NAN Q W, WANG Q J, SU L J. Experiments on variation of grape sap flow under drip irrigation in extremely arid areas. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2012, 30(6): 60-67. (in Chinese)
[23]	FORD C R, GORANSON C E, MITCHELL R J, WILL R E, TESKEY R O. Diurnal and seasonal variability in the radial distribution of sap flow: Predicting total stem flow in Pinus taeda trees. Tree Physiology, 2004, 24(9): 951-960. doi: 10.1093/treephys/24.9.951
[24]	刘静, 孙旭, 布和. 河套灌区节水措施与黄河下游农业可持续发展. 生态农业研究, 2000, 8(4): 64-66.
	LIU J, SUN X, BU H. The water-saving measures in Hetao irrigated district and the sustainable agricultural development of the lower reaches of the Huanghe River. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2000, 8(4): 64-66. (in Chinese)
[25]	ZHAO X N, LI X M, HU W, LIU J Q, DI N, DUAN J, LI D D, LIU Y, GUO Y Z, WANG A Y, DENG T, XI B Y. Long-term variation of the sap flow to tree diameter relation in a temperate poplar forest. Journal of Hydrology, 2023, 618: 129189. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129189
[26]	ANTEZANA-VERA S A, MARENCO R A. Sap flow rates of Minquartia guianensis in central Amazonia during the prolonged dry season of 2015-2016. Journal of Forestry Research, 2021, 32(5): 2067-2076. doi: 10.1007/s11676-020-01193-9
[27]	CHEN D Y, WANG Y K, LIU S Y, WEI X G, WANG X. Response of relative sap flow to meteorological factors under different soil moisture conditions in rainfed jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) plantations in semiarid Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 2014, 136: 23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.01.001
[28]	贾国栋, 陈立欣, 李瀚之, 刘自强, 余新晓. 北方土石山区典型树种耗水特征及环境影响因子. 生态学报, 2018, 38(10): 3441-3452.
	JIA G D, CHEN L X, LI H Z, LIU Z Q, YU X X. The effect of environmental factors on plant water consumption characteristics in a northern rocky mountainous area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(10): 3441-3452. (in Chinese)
[29]	李宏, 刘帮, 李长城, 孙明森, 刁凯, 韩莹莹, 程平, 张志刚, 王真真, 武钰, 苗乾乾. 不同生育期幼龄枣树茎流特征及其与环境因子的关系. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(5): 54-61.
	LI H, LIU B, LI C C, SUN M S, DIAO K, HAN Y Y, CHENG P, ZHANG Z G, WANG Z Z, WU Y, MIAO Q Q. Characteristics of stem flow of young jujube tree at different reproductive periods and their relationship with environmental factors. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2016, 34(5): 54-61. (in Chinese)
[30]	耿兵. 山东丘陵区苹果园蒸腾耗水规律研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2013.
	GENG B. Law of transpiration and water consumption in apple orchard in Shandong hilly area[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[31]	曹文强, 韩海荣, 马钦彦, 康峰峰, 蔺琛. 山西太岳山辽东栎夏季树干液流通量研究. 林业科学, 2004, 40(2): 174-177.
	CAO W Q, HAN H R, MA Q Y, KANG F F, LIN C. Sap flow flux of Quercus liaotungensisin summer in deciduous broad-leaf forest of Taiyue Mountain in Shanxi Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2004, 40(2): 174-177. (in Chinese)
[32]	孟平, 张劲松, 王鹤松, 高峻, 褚建民. 苹果树蒸腾规律及其与冠层微气象要素的关系. 生态学报, 2005, 25(5): 1075-1081.
	MENG P, ZHANG J S, WANG H S, GAO J, CHU J M. Rule of apple trees transpiration and its relation to the micrometeorology on the canopy. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(5): 1075-1081. (in Chinese)
[33]	GRANIER A, CLAUSTRES J P. Water relations of a Norway spruce (Picea abies) tree growing in natural condition: Variation within the tree. Acta Oecol, 1989, 10(3): 295-310.
[34]	MOLINA A J, ARANDA X, LLORENS P, GALINDO A, BIEL C. Sap flow of a wild cherry tree plantation growing under Mediterranean conditions: assessing the role of environmental conditions on canopy conductance and the effect of branch pruning on water productivity. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 218: 222-233. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.019

样树 Sample tree	树高 Height (m)	干径（距地面50 cm） Trunk diameter (50 cm from the ground) (cm)	冠幅 Crown width (m×m)
1	3.18	12.73	3.82×4.05
2	3.21	13.15	3.85×3.90
3	3.23	11.99	3.81×3.95

	月份 Month
	5	6	7	8	9	10
降雨量 Rainfall (mm)	55.2	59	238	372.2	4.7	13.7
灌水次数 Irrigation frequency	2	2	1	1	2	1
灌水量 Irrigation rate (t)	4.68	4.47	2.18	1.96	3.75	1.93

		时间（月-日） Month (M-D)
		5-16	6-7	7-8	8-10	9-10	10-20
环境因子日均值 Environmental factor daily mean	太阳辐射 SR (W·m^-2)	299.71	246.17	279.67	268.21	181.88	137.29
	水汽压亏缺 VPD (kPa)	1.66	1.28	2.45	1.99	1.24	1.07
	空气温度 AT (℃)	17.28	21.45	28.27	24.28	21.94	12.86
	空气相对湿度 ARH (%)	47.63	76.85	77.89	78.44	79.47	68.10
	风速 WS (m·s^-1)	0.47	0.14	0.15	0.13	0.25	0.47
	土壤温度 ST (℃)	14.79	19.01	24.20	23.74	21.72	12.76
	土壤湿度 SRH (%)	22.40	28.03	25.69	22.19	23.13	26.93
启动时间 Start-up time		7:00	6:00	6:00	6:00	7:00	8:00
到达峰值时间 Peak time		11:00	11:00	10:00	10:00	11:00	12:00
峰值 Peak value (cm·h^-1)		11.69±0.66a	17.36±1.15b	20.77±1.28c	20.85±1.32c	16.07±0.94b	12.01±0.85a
迅速下降时间 Fall time		16:00	17:00	17:00	17:00	16:00	14:00
峰值持续时间 Duration of peak value (h)		5	6	7	7	5	2
平均液流速率 Mean sap flow rate (cm·h^-1)		5.41±0.34b	7.55±0.49c	9.16±0.62d	9.46±0.49d	6.13±0.44b	3.48±0.23a

日期（月-日） Date (M-D)	白昼 Day time	夜晚 Night time
5-16	6:00—18:00	19:00—5:00
6-7	6:00—18:00	19:00—5:00
7-8	6:00—18:00	19:00—5:00
8-10	6:00—18:00	19:00—5:00
9-10	7:00—17:00	18:00—6:00
10-20	7:00—16:00	17:00一6:00

日期（月-日） Date (M-D)	夜间主要气象因子均值与液流量 Nocturnal mean of main meteorological factors and sap flow			白天主要气象因子均值与液流量 Diurnal mean of main meteorological factors and sap flow			单日液流量 Sap flow (g·d^-1)	夜间液流量占比 Nocturnal sap flow percentage (%)	白天液流量占比 Diurnal sap flow percentage (%)
日期（月-日） Date (M-D)	空气温度 T (℃)	空气相对湿度 RH (%)	夜晚液流量 Sap flow (g·d^-1)	空气温度T (℃)	空气相对湿度 RH (%)	白天液流量 Sap flow (g·d^-1)	单日液流量 Sap flow (g·d^-1)	夜间液流量占比 Nocturnal sap flow percentage (%)	白天液流量占比 Diurnal sap flow percentage (%)
5-16	10.55	66.05	1470.93±95.61c	22.98	32.04	14899.51±864.17b	16497.44±973.35b	8.99±0.51c	91.01±0.51b
6-7	17.48	92.20	1379.19±97.92bc	24.81	63.86	21640.91±1471.58c	23020.10±1588.39c	5.99±0.33b	94.01±0.33c
7-8	23.76	91.47	1235.41±84.01b	32.08	66.40	26654.66±1466.01d	24805.81±1265.10cd	4.43±0.23a	95.57±0.23d
8-10	19.66	91.17	1069.03±66.27a	28.20	67.68	27723.06±1413.88d	25917.29±1373.62d	3.71±0.24a	96.29±0.24d
9-10	18.59	91.84	1741.80±106.24d	25.91	64.85	16930.396±981.96b	18303.89±933.49b	9.33±0.59c	90.67±0.59b
10-20	9.46	84.19	1494.82±97.16c	17.62	45.58	9102.32±564.34a	10597.14±625.23a	14.11±0.83d	85.89±0.83a