中国农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 320-328.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.02.007
收稿日期:
2021-07-01
接受日期:
2021-08-18
出版日期:
2022-01-16
发布日期:
2022-01-26
通讯作者:
沙月霞
基金资助:
SHA YueXia(),HUANG ZeYang,MA Rui
Received:
2021-07-01
Accepted:
2021-08-18
Online:
2022-01-16
Published:
2022-01-26
Contact:
YueXia SHA
摘要:
【目的】明确水稻内生菌嗜碱假单胞菌(Pseudomonas alcaliphila)菌株Ej2对镰孢菌(Fusarium spp.)等病原菌的抑菌效果,重点研究对稻瘟病的防治作用及对水稻内源激素的影响,为稻瘟病菌(Magnaporthe oryzae)杀菌剂的研发提供新的生防菌资源。【方法】嗜碱假单胞菌菌株Ej2分离于水稻叶片,采用对峙培养法测试该菌株对稻瘟病菌以及对镰孢菌、草莓炭疽病菌(Colletotrichum gloeospoioides)、链格孢苹果专化型(Alternaria alternata f. sp. mali)BJ-A5和草莓黑斑病菌(A. alternata) BJ-ST24等病原真菌的抑菌效果,并检测其挥发性物质对稻瘟病菌的抑菌作用以及发酵液对水稻种子萌发的促进作用,盆栽法检测对水稻叶瘟的温室防治效果,通过小区试验验证对叶瘟和穗颈瘟的田间防治效果及对水稻的促生效果,采用基于MRM方法的靶向代谢组学技术检测发酵液喷施3次对胁迫激素、细胞分裂素等水稻内源激素的影响。【结果】嗜碱假单胞菌菌株Ej2及其挥发性物质对稻瘟病菌菌丝生长具有显著拮抗作用,对水稻叶瘟的温室防治效果为78.26%,与75%三环唑可湿性粉剂无显著差异;对叶瘟和穗颈瘟的田间防治效果分别为75.07%—83.67%和62.79%—75.09%,对叶瘟的田间防治效果与稻瘟酰胺有显著差异,对穗颈瘟的田间防治效果与稻瘟酰胺无显著差异。菌株Ej2对西瓜枯萎病菌(F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum)、茄镰孢(F. solani)、串珠镰孢(F. moniliforme)、草莓炭疽病菌、链格孢苹果专化型和草莓黑斑病菌5种植物病原真菌具有抑菌活性。与清水对照相比,Ej2发酵液显著增加水稻种子萌发率、株高和穗重;喷施3次后,植物胁迫激素中的乙烯(ETH)和脱落酸(ABA)含量显著增加,细胞分裂素中的玉米素核苷(czR)、反式玉米素核苷(tZR)和异戊烯基腺嘌呤核苷(iPR)激素含量显著下降,植物生长素(IAA)、茉莉酸(JA)、顺反茉莉酸类激素(cis-OPDA)、茉莉酸-异亮氨酸(JA-LIE)、顺式玉米素(cZ)、反式玉米素(tZ)、异戊烯基腺嘌呤(iP)、水杨酸(SA)等植物内源激素含量无显著变化。【结论】嗜碱假单胞菌菌株Ej2具有防病、促进作物生长及增强水稻植株抗逆性的作用,是一种可以防治稻瘟病等真菌病害的生防微生物。
沙月霞, 黄泽阳, 马瑞. 嗜碱假单胞菌Ej2对稻瘟病的防治效果及对水稻内源激素的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(2): 320-328.
SHA YueXia, HUANG ZeYang, MA Rui. Control Efficacy of Pseudomonas alcaliphila Strain Ej2 Against Rice Blast and Its Effect on Endogenous Hormones in Rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 320-328.
图1
嗜碱假单胞菌Ej2对稻瘟病菌菌丝生长的抑制效果 A:稻瘟病菌P131生长7 d 的菌落形态 The colony morphology of M. oryzae P131 grown for 7 d;B:菌株Ej2与稻瘟病菌P131对峙培养 The colony of M. oryzae P131 inhibited by strain Ej2;C:稻瘟病菌P131生长9 d的菌落形态 The colony morphology of M. oryzae P131 grown for 9 d;D:菌株Ej2挥发性物质抑制后的稻瘟病菌P131菌落形态 The colony morphology of M. oryzae P131 inhibited by volatile substances produced by strain Ej2"
表2
嗜碱假单胞菌Ej2防治稻瘟病的田间效果(灵武市)"
处理 Treatment | 叶瘟Leaf blast | 穗颈瘟Panicle blast | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
病情指数 Disease index | 防治效果 Control efficacy (%) | 病情指数 Disease index | 防治效果 Control efficacy (%) | |
嗜碱假单胞菌Ej2 P. alcaliphila Ej2 | 6.17±1.32b | 75.07±1.71a | 8.03±0.64bc | 75.09±1.62a |
稻瘟酰胺Fenoxanil | 7.22±1.19b | 64.05±1.00b | 8.72±0.51bc | 74.60±2.08a |
芽孢杆菌Bacillus | 6.44±1.74b | 78.04±0.98a | 9.11±0.87b | 72.76±1.02a |
清水对照Water control | 24.72±1.25a | / | 34.32±2.06a | / |
表3
嗜碱假单胞菌Ej2防治稻瘟病的田间效果(吴忠市)"
处理 Treatment | 叶瘟Leaf blast | 穗颈瘟Panicle blast | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
病情指数 Disease index | 防治效果 Control efficacy (%) | 病情指数 Disease index | 防治效果 Control efficacy (%) | |
嗜碱假单胞菌Ej2 P. alcaliphila Ej2 | 1.33±1.32b | 83.67±0.71a | 8.77±0.64b | 62.79±1.22a |
稻瘟酰胺Fenoxanil | 1.78±1.19b | 81.28±1.81a | 9.69±0.51b | 58.87±1.88ab |
芽孢杆菌Bacillus | 1.62±1.21b | 82.88±1.03a | 8.14±1.74b | 65.46±1.58a |
清水对照Water control | 9.78±1.25a | / | 23.56±1.76a | / |
表4
嗜碱假单胞菌Ej2对多种植物病原菌的拮抗作用"
病原菌 Target pathogen | 抑菌效果 Antagonist activity (%) |
---|---|
茄镰孢F. solani N18-1-2 | 43.42±1.51 |
串珠镰孢F. moniliforme N19-2-2 | 42.11±1.21 |
西瓜枯萎病菌F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum M8 | 55.74±2.10 |
草莓炭疽病菌C. gloeospoioides ZDP21 | 50.37±1.44 |
链格孢苹果专化型A. alternata f. sp. mali BJ-A5 | 54.18±1.72 |
草莓黑斑病菌A. alternata BJ-ST24 | 13.00±0.62 |
表5
嗜碱假单胞菌Ej2对水稻生长的促生效果"
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 穗长 Panicle length (cm) | 穗重 Panicle weight (g) | 千粒重 Thousand kernel weight (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
嗜碱假单胞菌Ej2 P. alcaliphila Ej2 | 90.88±2.03a | 18.18±1.05a | 3.32±1.01a | 25.85±0.93ab |
芽孢杆菌Bacillus | 90.82±0.70a | 18.82±1.95a | 3.56±0.78a | 26.56±0.46a |
稻瘟酰胺Fenoxanil | 86.72±1.72b | 18.12±1.08a | 2.77±1.34b | 26.01±0.03ab |
清水对照Water control | 86.20±1.72b | 18.10±2.57a | 2.86±1.15b | 24.63±1.31b |
表6
嗜碱假单胞菌Ej2对水稻内源激素的影响"
激素名称 Phytohormone name | Ej2发酵液Ej2 fermentation broth (ng·g-1) | 对照Control (ng·g-1) |
---|---|---|
脱落酸Abscisic acid (ABA) | 80.21±7.58a | 33.76±14.44b |
乙烯Ethylene (ETH) | 58.20±2.33a | 41.29±4.91b |
玉米素核苷Zeatin riboside (czR) | 10.28±1.63b | 17.33±1.19a |
异戊烯基腺嘌呤核苷 N6-isopentenyladenine riboside (iPR) | 0.30±0.66b | 0.97±0.33a |
反式玉米素核苷Trans-zeatin riboside (tZR) | 0.73±0.01b | 0.83±0.10a |
顺式玉米素Cis-zeatin (cZ) | 2.52±0.28a | 3.16±0.57a |
反式玉米素Trans-zeatin (tZ) | 0.60±0.15a | 0.64±0.18a |
异戊烯基腺嘌呤N6-Isopentenyladenine (iP) | 0.42±0.21a | 0.45±0.25a |
水杨酸Salicylic acid (SA) | 2196.54±218.65a | 2297.48±120.29a |
植物生长素IAA | 17.27±3.35a | 18.92±3.28a |
茉莉酸-异亮氨酸Jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine (JA-LIE) | 156.65±11.09a | 162.10±25.13a |
茉莉酸Jasmonic acid (JA) | 564.61±39.72a | 580.54±59.12a |
顺反茉莉酸类激素Cis-OPDA | 1729.51±91.79a | 2456.80±846.88a |
[1] |
DAGDAS Y F, YOSHINO K, DAGDAS G, RYDER L S, BIELSKA E, STEINBERG G, TALBOT N J. Septin-mediated plant cell invasion by the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae. Science, 2012, 336(6088):1590-1595.
doi: 10.1126/science.1222934 |
[2] |
HUANG J, SI W, DENG Q, LI P, YANG S. Rapid evolution of avirulence genes in rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. BMC Genetics, 2014, 15:45.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-45 |
[3] |
PELLICCIARO M, LIONE G, GIORDANO L, GONTHIER P. Biocontrol potential of Pseudomonas protegens against Heterobasidion species attacking conifers in Europe. Biological Control, 2021, 157:104583.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104583 |
[4] | 张望月, 高健, 张超, 张友明, 胡胜标, 李岚岚, 孙运军, 丁学知, 夏立秋. 五种假单胞菌的分离鉴定及其生物活性. 微生物学报, 2013, 53(9):957-965. |
ZHANG W Y, GAO J, ZHANG C, ZHANG Y M, HU S B, LI L L, SUN Y J, DING X Z, XIA L Q. Isolation, identification and characterization of five Pseudomonas strains. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2013, 53(9):957-965. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 沙月霞, 张昂, 伍顺华, 李明洋. 假单胞菌对水稻防御酶的诱导及定殖能力. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(7):10-16. |
SHA Y X, ZHANG A, WU S H, LI M Y. Colonization ability of Pseudomonas S149 and induction of defense-related enzymes in rice. China Plant Protection, 2020, 40(7):10-16. (in Chinese) | |
[6] | GOPI R, AVASTHE R K, KALITA H, KAPOOR C. Management of rice blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae using botanicals, biocontrol agents and organically permitted fungicides. Indian Phytopathology, 2016, 69(1):10-15. |
[7] | 沙月霞, 张昂, 伍顺华, 沈瑞清. 防治稻瘟病假单胞菌的筛选及效果评价. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(2):249-257. |
SHA Y X, ZHANG A, WU S H, SHEN R Q. Screening and efficiency evaluation of Pseudomonas strain in the control of Magnaporthe oryzae. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2020, 36(2):249-257. (in Chinese) | |
[8] |
NG L C, SARIAH M, SARIAM O, RADZIAH O, ZAINAL ABIDIN M A. Bio-efficacy of microbial-fortified rice straw compost on rice blast disease severity, growth and yield of aerobic rice. Australasian Plant Pathology, 2012, 41:541-549.
doi: 10.1007/s13313-012-0145-3 |
[9] | 张亚, 苏品, 刘双清, 廖晓兰, 黄璜. 拮抗假单胞菌SU8对几种植物病原真菌的抑制作用. 农药, 2013, 52(12):917-920. |
ZHANG Y, SU P, LIU S Q, LIAO X L, HUANG H. Inhibition of antifungal Pseudomonas SU8 against several phytopathogenic fungi. Agrochemicals, 2013, 52(12):917-920. (in Chinese) | |
[10] |
ASHAJYOTHI M, KUMAR A, SHEORAN N, GANESAN P, GOGOI R, SUBBAIYAN G K, BHATTACHARYA R. Black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) associated endophytic Pseudomonas putida BP25 alters root phenotype and induces defense in rice (Oryza sativa L.) against blast disease incited by Magnaporthe oryzae. Biological Control, 2020, 143:104181.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104181 |
[11] |
JHA Y, SUBRAMANIAN R B. Endophytic Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes shows better response against the Magnaporthe oryzae than a rhizospheric Bacillus pumilus in Oryza sativa (rice). Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 2011, 44(6):592-604.
doi: 10.1080/03235400903145400 |
[12] |
SPENCE C A, RAMAN V, DONOFRIO N M, BAIS H P. Global gene expression in rice blast pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae treated with a natural rice soil isolate. Planta, 2014, 239:171-185.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-1974-1 |
[13] |
OWNLEY B H, GWINN K D, VEGA F E. Endophytic fungal entomopathogens with activity against plant pathogens: Ecology and evolution. BioControl, 2010, 55(1):113-128.
doi: 10.1007/s10526-009-9241-x |
[14] |
LIU Y, BAI F R, LI N, WANG W P, CHENG C. Identification of endophytic bacterial strain RSE1 from seeds of super hybrid rice Shenliangyou 5814 (Oryza sativa L.) and evaluation of its antagonistic activity. Plant Growth Regulation, 2017, 82(3):403-408.
doi: 10.1007/s10725-017-0265-4 |
[15] | SHYLLA A, SHIVAPRAKASH M K, SHASHIDHAR H E, VISHWAKARMA P, SUDRADHAR M. Production of phytohormones by endophytic bacteria isolated from aerobic rice. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 2016, 10(3):2127-2133. |
[16] |
SHAHZAD R, WAQAS M, KHAN A L, AL-HOSNI K, KANG S M, SEO W C, LEE I J. Indoleacetic acid production and plant growth promoting potential of bacterial endophytes isolated from rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds. Acta Biologica Hungarica, 2017, 68(2):175-186.
doi: 10.1556/018.68.2017.2.5 |
[17] |
PHAM V T K, REDIERS H, GHEQUIRE M G K, NGUYEN H H, DE MOT R, VANDERLEYDEN J, SPAEPEN S. The plant growth- promoting effect of the nitrogen-fixing endophyte Pseudomonas stutzeri A15. Archives of Microbiology, 2017, 199(3):513-517.
doi: 10.1007/s00203-016-1332-3 |
[18] |
SHAHZAD R, KHAN A L, BILAL S, WAQAS M, KANG S M, LEE I J. Inoculation of abscisic acid-producing endophytic bacteria enhances salinity stress tolerance in Oryza sativa. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2017, 136:68-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.01.010 |
[19] |
杨波, 陈晏, 李霞, 任承钢, 戴传超. 植物内生菌促进宿主氮吸收与代谢研究进展. 生态学报, 2013, 33(9):2656-2664.
doi: 10.5846/stxb |
YANG B, CHEN Y, LI X, REN C G, DAI C C. Research progress on endophyte-promoted plant nitrogen assimilation and metabolism. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(9):2656-2664. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.5846/stxb |
|
[20] |
RANGJAROEN C, RERKASEM B, TEAUMROONG N, SUNGTHONG R, LUMYONG S. Comparative study of endophytic and endophytic diazotrophic bacterial communities across rice landraces grown in the highlands of northern Thailand. Archives of Microbiology, 2014, 196(1):35-49.
doi: 10.1007/s00203-013-0940-4 |
[21] | KLAYRAUNG S, NIAMSUP P, POONNOY P, TOPOONYANONT N. Diversity and control of bacterial contamination of plants propagated in temporary immersion bioreactor system. Acta Horticulturae, 2017, 1155:439-446. |
[22] |
DEFEZ R, ANDREOZZI A, BIANCO C. The overproduction of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in endophytes upregulates nitrogen fixation in both bacterial cultures and inoculated rice plants. Microbial Ecology, 2017, 74(2):441-452.
doi: 10.1007/s00248-017-0948-4 |
[23] |
XU T, LI Y, ZENG X D, YANG X L, YANG Y Z, YUAN S S, HU X C, ZENG J R, WANG Z Z, LIU Q, LIU Y Q, LIAO H D, TONG C Y, LIU X M, ZHU Y H. Isolation and evaluation of endophytic Streptomyces endus OsiSh-2 with potential application for biocontrol of rice blast disease. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2017, 97(4):1149-1157.
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2017.97.issue-4 |
[24] |
VIDHYASEKARAN P, RABINDARAN R, MUTHAMILAN M, NAYAR K, RAJAPPAN K, SUBRAMANIAN N, VASUMATHI K. Development of a powder formulation of Pseaudomonas fluorescens for control of rice blast. Plant Pathology, 1994, 46:291-297.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-27.x |
[25] | TIWARI P K, THRIMURTY V S. Efficacy of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates for plant growth promotion and disease management in rice. Annals of Plant Protection Science, 2009, 17(1):119-123. |
[26] | HUBBALLI M. Combined application of fungicide tolerant Pseudomonas fluorescens and reduced dosage of azoxystrobin for the management of rice blast. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, 2017, 47(2):127-152. |
[27] | 秦秀娟, 祁静静, 窦万福, 陈善春, 何永睿, 李强. 柑橘Rboh家族鉴定及其对激素和柑橘溃疡病的响应. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(20):4189-4203. |
QIN X J, QI J J, DOU W F, CHEN S C, HE Y R, LI Q. Identification of Rboh family and the response to hormone and citrus bacterial canker in citrus. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(20):4189-4203. (in Chinese) | |
[28] | 辛承松, 唐薇, 王洪征, 翟志席. 鲁棉14幼苗生长对氯化钠胁迫的反应及微量元素、激素处理的效应. 棉花学报, 2002, 14(2):108-112. |
XIN C S, TANG W, WANG H Z, ZHAI Z X. Responses of seedling growth of Lumian 14 to NaCl stress and effects of treatments with microelement and hormone. Cotton Science, 2002, 14(2):108-112. (in Chinese) | |
[29] |
RODRÍGUEZ H, FRAGA R. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnology Advances, 1999, 17(4/5):319-339.
doi: 10.1016/S0734-9750(99)00014-2 |
[30] | 李颖, 赵继浩, 李金融, 钱必长, 刘兆新, 高芳, 杨东清, 李向东. 外源6-BA对不同生育时期淹水花生根系生长和荚果产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(18):3665-3678. |
LI Y, ZHAO J H, LI J R, QIAN B C, LIU Z X, GAO F, YANG D Q, LI X D. Effects of exogenous 6-BA on root growth and pod yield of flooded peanut at different growth stages. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(18):3665-3678. (in Chinese) | |
[31] | 刘桂丰, 刘关君, 杨传平, 王慧梅. 盐逆境条件下树种的激素变化及抗盐性分析. 东北林业大学学报, 1998, 26(2):1-4. |
LIU G F, LIU G J, YANG C P, WANG H M. The analysis for hormonal change and salt-resistant ability of tree species under salt stress. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 1998, 26(2):1-4. (in Chinese) | |
[32] | 魏爱丽, 陈云昭. IAA对盐胁迫下大豆幼苗膜伤害及抗盐力的影响. 西北植物学报, 2000, 20(3):410-414. |
WEI A L, CHEN Y Z. Effect of IAA on soybean seedling’s membrane injury and salt resistance. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2000, 20(3):410-414. (in Chinese) | |
[33] | PANDEY G. Mechanism of Plant Hormone Signaling Under Stress. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, 2017. |
[34] |
DUNLAP J R, BINZEL M L. NaCl reduces indole-3-acetic acid levels in the roots of tomato plants independent of stress-induced abscisic acid. Plant Physiology, 1996, 112(1):379-384.
doi: 10.1104/pp.112.1.379 |
[35] | 柯玉琴, 潘廷国. NaCl胁迫对甘薯苗期生长、IAA代谢的影响及其与耐盐性的关系. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(10):1303-1306. |
KE Y Q, PAN T G. Effects of NaCl stress on seedling growth and IAA metabolism of sweet potato and its relation to salt-tolerance. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(10):1303-1306. (in Chinese) | |
[36] |
TRAPET P, KULIK A, LAMOTTE O, JEANDROZ S, BOURQUE S, NICOLAS-FRANCÈS V, ROSNOBLET C, BESSON-BARD A, WENDEHENNE D. NNO signaling in plant immunity: A tale of messengers. Phytochemistry, 2015, 112:72-79.
doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.03.015 |
[37] | DE ZELICOURT A, COLCOMBET J, HIRT H. The role of MAPK modules and ABA during abiotic stress signaling. Trends in Plant Science, 2016, 21(8):677-685. |
[1] | 刘瑞, 赵羽涵, 付忠举, 顾欣怡, 王艳霞, 靳学慧, 杨莹, 吴伟怀, 张亚玲. 黑龙江省和海南省PWL基因家族在稻瘟病菌中的分布及变异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 264-274. |
[2] | 王炫栋, 宋振, 兰赫婷, 江樱姿, 齐文杰, 刘晓阳, 蒋冬花. 杨梅园土壤优势放线菌的分离及其防病促生功能[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 275-286. |
[3] | 汪文娟,苏菁,陈深,杨健源,陈凯玲,冯爱卿,汪聪颖,封金奇,陈炳,朱小源. 广东省侵染美香占2号的稻瘟病菌致病性及无毒基因变异分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1346-1358. |
[4] | 张亚玲, 高清, 赵羽涵, 刘瑞, 付忠举, 李雪, 孙宇佳, 靳学慧. 黑龙江省水稻种质稻瘟病抗性评价及抗瘟基因结构分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 625-640. |
[5] | 吴云雨,肖宁,余玲,蔡跃,潘存红,李育红,张小祥,黄年生,季红娟,戴正元,李爱宏. 长江下游粳稻稻瘟病广谱抗性基因组合模式分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(9): 1881-1893. |
[6] | 陈洋,赵红怡,闫俊杰,黄剑,高玉林. 马铃薯块茎蛾性信息素化学合成研究现状[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3): 556-572. |
[7] | 曹钰晗,李紫腾,张静怡,张静娜,胡同乐,王树桐,王亚南,曹克强. 我国苹果斑点落叶病菌携带dsRNA分析及一种dsRNA病毒的鉴定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(22): 4787-4799. |
[8] | 胡昌雄,范苇,张倩,陈国华,殷红慧,徐天养,杨进波,杨航,吴道慧,张晓明. 基于两性生命表和年龄-阶段捕食率的南方小花蝽对西花蓟马的控制作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(13): 2769-2780. |
[9] | 李扬凡,邵美琪,刘畅,郭庆港,王培培,陈秀叶,苏振贺,马平. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌HMB33604的抑菌物质及对马铃薯黑痣病的防治效果[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(12): 2559-2569. |
[10] | 李姝,王杰,黄宁兴,金振宇,王甦,张帆. 捕食性天敌储蓄植物系统研究进展与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(19): 3975-3987. |
[11] | 张磊,贾琦,巫蔚,赵路评,薛冰,刘欢欢,尚静,雍太文,李庆,杨文钰. 大豆高隆象致病球孢白僵菌菌株BEdy1的鉴定及毒力测定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(14): 2974-2982. |
[12] | 王芳权,陈智慧,许扬,王军,李文奇,范方军,陈丽琴,陶亚军,仲维功,杨杰. 水稻广谱抗稻瘟病基因PigmR功能标记的开发及应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(6): 955-967. |
[13] | 孟峰,张亚玲,靳学慧,张晓玉,姜军. 黑龙江省稻瘟病菌无毒基因AVR-Pib、AVR-Pik和AvrPiz-t的检测与分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(23): 4262-4273. |
[14] | 沙月霞,隋书婷,曾庆超,沈瑞清. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌E69预防稻瘟病等多种真菌病害的潜力[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(11): 1908-1917. |
[15] | 汪文娟,苏菁,杨健源,韦小燕,陈凯玲,陈珍,陈深,朱小源. 源于广8 A杂交稻组合的稻瘟病菌无毒基因型分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(24): 4633-4646. |
|