中国农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (12): 2042-2055.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.003
申冠宇1,杨习文1,周苏玫1,梅晶晶1,陈旭1,彭宏扬1,蒋向2(),贺德先1(
)
收稿日期:
2019-01-10
接受日期:
2019-03-18
出版日期:
2019-06-16
发布日期:
2019-06-22
通讯作者:
蒋向,贺德先
作者简介:
申冠宇,E-mail: shenguanyu0@163.com。
基金资助:
SHEN GuanYu1,YANG XiWen1,ZHOU SuMei1,MEI JingJing1,CHEN Xu1,PENG HongYang1,JIANG Xiang2(),HE DeXian1(
)
Received:
2019-01-10
Accepted:
2019-03-18
Online:
2019-06-16
Published:
2019-06-22
Contact:
Xiang JIANG,DeXian HE
摘要:
【目的】 针对黄淮平原农作区一年两熟条件下玉米秸秆还田严重影响麦苗质量的突出问题,探索适宜的土壤耕作技术以提高小麦幼苗质量,最终提高产量。【方法】 2016—2018年连续2年,在河南省新郑市辛店镇黄岗村开展田间试验。采用随机区组设计,将翻耕、耙、镇压3个因素组合配套实施8个处理,分别为深翻耕+旋耕(DT+RT;DT:30 cm,RT:15 cm)、深翻耕+耙(DT+H)、深翻耕+旋耕+镇压(DT+RT+C)、深翻耕+耙+镇压(DT+H+C)、旋耕(RT)、旋耕+耙(RT+H)、旋耕+镇压(RT+C)、旋耕+耙+镇压(RT+H+C)。对小麦出苗率及幼苗质量进行调查,并在越冬期、返青期、拔节期、抽穗期、灌浆期、蜡熟期对根系进行调查分析,分别在灌浆期对小麦籽粒性状、收获后对小麦产量及其构成因素进行调查分析。【结果】 小麦播种后20 d,不同土壤耕作处理间幼苗质量差异显著。旋耕后出苗整齐度高于深翻耕,而深翻耕后出苗率、基本苗数和株高高于旋耕。相同耕、镇压因素处理下,耙后出苗率增幅为1.0%—5.7%,相同耕、耙因素处理下,镇压后出苗率增幅为0.06%—8.3%;同时深翻耕后,极少出现缺苗、断垄,RT处理缺苗、断垄的累计长度最高,两年平均为55 cm。从越冬期到蜡熟期,不同土壤耕作处理的根系活力均呈现“高-低-高-低”的变化趋势,DT+H+C处理最高;在越冬期和拔节期,镇压和耙处理后,与无镇压、耙处理相比,根系活力均提高。单株次生根数目在抽穗期达到最大,DT+H+C处理最高,两年最高值分别为45.2条与40.2条;与无耙处理相比,耙处理后,单株次生根数目最高增加14.8%,与无镇压处理相比,镇压处理后,单株次生根数目最高增加12.2%。花后5—10 d,DT+H+C和RT+H+C处理的籽粒灌浆速率增长幅度显著高于其他处理,开花后20 d达到峰值,其中DT+H+C处理籽粒灌浆速率比其他处理高1.0%—19.4%,达显著水平。灌浆期籽粒千粒重,在花后0—15 d,DT+H+C处理增长最快,DT+RT处理增长最慢,花后25—30 d,DT+H+C处理千粒重最高,较RT处理提高20.8%。从不同土壤耕作技术对籽粒产量及其构成因素的影响来看,DT+H+C处理的籽粒产量最高;耙和镇压处理的单位面积穗数、穗粒数和千粒重的变化并不规律,籽粒产量均有明显提升,幅度为1.4%—12.2%。经济效益方面,与当地以往耕作方式RT相比,RT+H、RT+H+C、RT+C、DT+H+C、DT+H处理所得效益均高于RT处理,其中DT+H+C处理产生经济效益最高,两年平均比RT处理高12.3%。【结论】 黄淮平原农作区当前一年两熟制条件下,不同土壤耕作技术影响幼苗质量,旋耕有利于出苗的整齐度提高,而深翻耕则有利于出苗率及幼苗均匀度提高,株高增高,为冬前形成壮苗奠定基础;深翻耕将耕层加深,利于根系下扎,促进次生根数目的增加以及耕层根系活力的提高,间接影响籽粒产量。综合考虑植株根系生长发育、生育后期籽粒灌浆速率、粒重形成和产量表现等,研究认为黄淮农作区DT+H+C处理土壤耕作技术是当前的最佳选择。
申冠宇, 杨习文, 周苏玫, 梅晶晶, 陈旭, 彭宏扬, 蒋向, 贺德先. 土壤耕作技术对小麦出苗质量、根系功能及粒重的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(12): 2042-2055.
SHEN GuanYu, YANG XiWen, ZHOU SuMei, MEI JingJing, CHEN Xu, PENG HongYang, JIANG Xiang, HE DeXian. Impacts of Soil Tillage Techniques on Seedling Quality, Root Function and Grain Weight in Wheat[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(12): 2042-2055.
表1
不同土壤耕作技术对小麦出苗的影响"
处理 Treatment | 2016-2017 | 2017-2018 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
缺苗处 Seedling missing | 断垄处 Dis- continuous row | 累计长度 Total length of missing seedlings and discontinuous row (cm) | 出苗率Emergence rate (%) | 缺苗处 Seedling missing | 断垄处 Dis- continuous row | 累计长度 Total length of missing seedlings and discontinuous row (cm) | 出苗率Emergence rate (%) | ||
RT+H | 1 | 0 | 15 | 77.7 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 87.2 | |
RT+H+C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 78.7 | 1 | 0 | 35 | 94.0 | |
RT+C | 1 | 0 | 16 | 77.7 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 85.7 | |
RT | 2 | 2 | 78 | 77.0 | 0 | 1 | 32 | 86.3 | |
DT+RT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79.1 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 90.7 | |
DT+RT+C | 1 | 0 | 14 | 78.2 | 1 | 1 | 42 | 89.9 | |
DT+H+C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95.5 | |
DT+H | 2 | 1 | 53 | 81.2 | 1 | 2 | 65 | 88.1 |
表2
不同土壤耕作技术下小麦基本苗数的变化"
处理 Treatment | 2016-2017 | 2017-2018 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基本苗数 Number of seedling (×104·hm-2) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 CV (%) | 基本苗数 Number of seedling (×104·hm-2) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 CV (%) | ||
RT+H | 307.52ab | 4.93 | 4.46 | 438.91b | 0.82 | 0.52 | |
RT+H+C | 311.13ab | 7.21 | 6.44 | 472.25a | 7.04 | 4.13 | |
RT+C | 307.52ab | 11.15 | 10.08 | 430.58b | 1.25 | 0.8 | |
RT | 304.74b | 4.51 | 4.11 | 433.36b | 5.31 | 3.4 | |
DT+RT | 321.41ab | 8.14 | 7.04 | 455.58ab | 4.03 | 2.45 | |
DT+RT+C | 309.18ab | 5.51 | 4.95 | 452.80ab | 3.74 | 2.3 | |
DT+H+C | 347.24a | 9.54 | 7.63 | 480.58a | 2.16 | 1.25 | |
DT+H | 313.07ab | 8.02 | 7.12 | 444.47b | 6.85 | 4.29 |
表3
不同土壤耕作技术下小麦出苗株高的变化"
处理 Treatment | 2016-2017 | 2017-2018 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Seedling height (cm) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 CV (%) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 CV (%) | ||
RT+H | 11.46b | 0.50 | 4.33 | 10.18bcd | 0.55 | 5.43 | |
RT+H+C | 10.64c | 0.52 | 4.89 | 10.58b | 0.44 | 4.12 | |
RT+C | 10.66c | 0.45 | 4.18 | 11.52a | 0.61 | 5.31 | |
RT | 11.50b | 0.37 | 3.25 | 9.44d | 0.52 | 5.51 | |
DT+RT | 11.56b | 0.34 | 2.98 | 9.96bcd | 0.55 | 5.48 | |
DT+RT+C | 11.88b | 0.50 | 4.24 | 11.44a | 0.26 | 2.25 | |
DT+H+C | 12.12b | 0.44 | 3.67 | 9.74cd | 0.30 | 3.09 | |
DT+H | 12.84a | 0.36 | 2.81 | 10.26bc | 0.50 | 4.84 |
表4
不同土壤耕作技术对小麦产量及其构成因素的影响"
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 穗数 Spikes per unit soil area (×104·hm-2) | 穗粒数 Grains per spike | 千粒重 1000-grain weight (g) | 籽粒产量 Grain yield (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016-2017 | RT+H | 543.79a | 45.33abc | 37.97b | 7932.50bc |
RT+H+C | 533.42ab | 42.00c | 42.80a | 8003.00ab | |
RT+C | 580.85a | 42.33bc | 39.37ab | 7634.50d | |
RT | 468.75c | 46.00ab | 34.87b | 7295.00e | |
DT+RT | 492.84bc | 45.33abc | 36.93b | 7230.00e | |
DT+RT+C | 549.35a | 48.33a | 35.00b | 7719.50cd | |
DT+H+C | 544.36a | 47.33a | 36.83b | 8192.00a | |
DT+H | 546.57a | 46.67a | 36.87b | 7662.50d | |
2017-2018 | RT+H | 605.77ab | 40.53b | 36.46b | 6156.25bc |
RT+H+C | 652.62ab | 42.87b | 38.34b | 6257.20b | |
RT+C | 636.41ab | 41.07b | 34.60c | 6013.10cd | |
RT | 594.66b | 40.33b | 33.02c | 5487.15e | |
DT+RT | 600.03ab | 39.13b | 32.81c | 5960.10d | |
DT+RT+C | 627.62ab | 42.00b | 37.97b | 6052.35cd | |
DT+H+C | 678.37a | 47.60a | 44.23a | 6501.10a | |
DT+H | 606.51ab | 41.27b | 36.84b | 6042.15cd |
表5
不同土壤耕作技术对麦田经济效益的影响"
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 机械生产成本 Machinery cost | 产值 Output value | 经济效益 Economic benefits |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-2017 | RT+H | 975 | 18721bc | 17746bc |
RT+H+C | 1125 | 18887ab | 17762ab | |
RT+C | 960 | 18017d | 17057d | |
RT | 675 | 17216e | 16541e | |
DT+RT | 1425 | 17063e | 15638e | |
DT+RT+C | 1650 | 18218cd | 16568cd | |
DT+H+C | 1155 | 19333a | 18178a | |
DT+H | 975 | 18084d | 17109d | |
2017-2018 | RT+H | 975 | 14529bc | 13554bc |
RT+H+C | 1125 | 14767b | 13642b | |
RT+C | 960 | 14191cd | 13231cd | |
RT | 675 | 12950e | 12275e | |
DT+RT | 1425 | 14066d | 12641d | |
DT+RT+C | 1650 | 14284cd | 12634cd | |
DT+H+C | 1155 | 15343a | 14188a | |
DT+H | 975 | 14259cd | 13284cd |
[1] |
王红光, 于振文, 张永丽, 石玉, 王东 . 耕作方式对旱地小麦耗水特性和干物质积累的影响. 作物学报, 2012,38(4):675-682.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00675 |
WANG H G, YU Z W, ZHANG Y L, SHI Y, WANG D . Effects of tillage regimes on water consumption and dry matter accumulation in dryland wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012,38(4):675-682. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00675 |
|
[2] | 陈宇 . 保护性耕作对小麦玉米周年水分利用及生长发育的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2015. |
CHEN Y . Effects of conservation tillage on growth and water use of wheat-maize rotation[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2015. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 王绍中, 田云峰, 郭天财, 王志和 . 河南小麦栽培学. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2009: 188-189. |
WANG S Z, TIAN Y F, GUO T C, WANG Z H. Wheat Cultivation in Henan Province. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2009: 188-189. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | SISTI C P J, DOS SANTOS H P, KOHHANN R, ALVES B J R, URQUIAGE S, BODDEY R M . Change in carbon and nitrogen stocks in soil under 13 years of conventional or zero tillage in southern Brazil. Soil & Tillage Research, 2004,76(1):39-58. |
[5] | 罗珠珠, 黄高宝, 辛平, 张国盛 . 陇中旱地不同保护性耕作方式表层土壤结构和有机碳含量比较分析. 干旱地区农业研究, 2008,26(4):53-58. |
LUO Z Z, HUANG G B, XIN P, ZHANG G S . Effects of tillage measures on soil structure and organic carbon of surface soil in semi-arid | |
area of the western Loess Plateau. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2008,26(4):53-58. (in Chinese) | |
[6] | 赵洪利, 李军, 贾志宽, 王学春, 王蕾 . 不同耕作方式对黄土高原旱地麦田土壤物理性状的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009,27(3):17-21. |
ZHAO H L, LI J, JIA Z K, WANG X C, WANG L . Effect of different tillages on soil physical properties of dryland wheat field in the Loess Plateau. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2009,27(3):17-21. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 陈冬林 . 多熟复种稻田土壤耕作和秸秆还田的效应研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2009. |
CHEN D L . Studies on effect of soil tillage and straw returning to field in multi-cropping paddy field[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2009. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 卫荣 . 基于经营主体视角下的粮食生产适度规模研究——以黄淮海地区为例[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2016. |
WEI R . Study on the moderate scale operation of grain production based on the agricultural management entities __ Taking the Huang_huai_Hai Region as an Example[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2016. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 李向东, 郭天财, 高旺盛, 胡廷积 . 河南传统农业作物起源与耕作制度演变. 中国农学通报, 2006,22(8):574-579. |
LI X D, GUO T C, GAO W S, HU T J . The crop origin and farming system of traditional agriculture in Henan province. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006,22(8):574-579. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 胡艳 . 河南省小麦关键生产技术推广应用现状与对策分析[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2016. |
HU Y . Analysis on current situation of extension & application and countermeasures of key production techniques of wheat in Henan province[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 黄细喜 . 土壤紧实度及层次对小麦生长的影响. 土壤学报, 1988,25(1):59-65. |
HUANG X X . The wheat growth affected by the soil compaction and layers. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1988,25(1):59-65. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 陈金 . 耕作模式与施氮量对土壤质量及冬小麦产量的调控效应[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2017. |
CHEN J . The regulation of tillage practice and nitrogen rate for improving soil quality and grain yield of winter wheat[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2017. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 张军 . 分层旋耕对稻茬麦生长与土壤物理的影响研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2015. |
ZHANG J . The effect of stratified rotary tillage on post-paddy wheat and soil physics[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 冯宇鹏 . 耕作方式与施氮量对小麦玉米一年两熟农田土壤质量与生产力的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2014. |
FENG Y P . Effects of tillage and nitrogen rate on soil quality and crop productivity in wheat-cropping system[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 杨永辉, 武继承, 张洁梅, 潘晓莹, 王越, 何方 . 耕作方式对土壤水分入渗、有机碳含量及土壤结构的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2017,25(2):258-266. |
YANG Y H, WU J C, ZHANG J M, PAN X Y, WANG Y, HE F . Effect of tillage method on soil water infiltration, organic carbon content and structure. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017,25(2):258-266. (in Chinese) | |
[16] |
MRBET R . Differential response of wheat to tillage management systems in a semiarid area of Morocco. Field Crops Research, 2000,66(2):165-174.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00074-5 |
[17] | 董慧, 仲延龙, 齐龙昌, 汪和廷, 张玉琼, 宋贺, 董召荣 . 耕作方式对冬小麦内源激素含量及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2015,35(4):542-547. |
DONG H, ZHONG Y L, QI L C, WANG H T, ZHANG Y Q, SONG H, DONG Z R . Effect of tillage methods on endogenous hormone content and yield of winter wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2015,35(4):542-547. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 赵竹, 乔玉强, 李玮, 陈欢, 杜世州, 张向前, 曹承富 . 自然降水条件下耕作方式对小麦生长、产量及土壤水分的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2014,34(9):1253-1259. |
ZHAO Z, QIAO Y Q, LI W, CHEN H, DU S Z, ZHANG X Q, CAO C F . Effects of Different Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield of Wheat and Soil Moisture under Natural Rainfall Condition Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2014,34(9):1253-1259. (in Chinese) | |
[19] | 王玉玲, 李军, 柏炜霞 . 轮耕体系对黄土台塬麦玉轮作土壤生产性能的影响. 农业工程学报, 2015,31(1):107-116. |
WANG Y L, LI J, BAI W X . Effects of rotational tillage systems on soil production performance in wheat-maize rotation field in Loess Platform region of China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015,31(1):107-116. (in Chinese) | |
[20] | 李少昆, 王克如, 冯聚凯, 谢瑞芝, 高世菊 . 玉米秸秆还田与不同耕作方式下影响小麦出苗的因素. 作物学报, 2006,32(3):463-465, 478. |
LI S K, WANG K R, FENG J K, XIE R Z, GAO S J . Factors affecting seeding emergence in winter wheat under different tillage patterns with maize stalk mulching returned to the field. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2006,32(3):463-465, 478. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | 贾春林, 郭洪海, 张勇, 孟庆升, 杨秋玲, 隋学艳 . 玉米秸秆全量还田下不同播种方式对土壤结构及小麦苗期生长的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(8):243-248. |
JIA C L, GUO H H, ZHANG Y, MENG Q S, YANG Q L, SUI X Y . Effects of different seeding manner on the soil structure and wheat seedling growth under maize stalk full returned to the field. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010,26(8):243-248. (in Chinese) | |
[22] |
祝飞华, 王益权, 石宗琳, 张润霞, 冉艳玲, 王亚城 . 轮耕对关中一年两熟区土壤物理性状和冬小麦根系生长的影响. 生态学报, 2015,35(22):7454-7463.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201404140716 |
ZHU F H, WANG Y Q, SHI Z L, ZHANG R X, RANG Y L, WANG Y C . Effects of rotational tillage on soil physical properties and winter wheat root growth on annual double cropping area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015,35(22):7454-7463. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.5846/stxb201404140716 |
|
[23] | 赵亚丽, 刘卫玲, 程思贤, 周亚男, 周金龙, 王秀玲, 张谋彪, 王群, 李潮海. (深松耕)方式对砂姜黑土耕层特性、作物产量和水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(13):2489-2503. |
ZHAO Y L, LIU W L, CHENG S X, ZHOU Y N, ZHOU J L, WANG X L, ZHANG M B, WANG Q, LI C H . Effects of pattern of deep tillage on topsoil features, yield and water use efficiency in lime concretion black soil. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(13):2489-2503. (in Chinese) | |
[24] |
蒋向, 贺德先, 任宏志 . 轮耕对麦田土壤容重和小麦根系发育的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2012,32(4):711-715.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2012.04.020 |
JIANG X, HE D X, REN H Z . Effects of different patterns of rotational tillage on soil bulk density in wheat field and wheat root development. Journal of Triticeac Crops, 2012,32(4):711-715. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2012.04.020 |
|
[25] | 陈信信, 丁启朔, 李毅念, 薛金林, 何瑞银 . 南方稻麦轮作系统下小麦根系的三维分形特征. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(3):451-460. |
CHEN X X, DING Q S, LI Y N, XUE J L, HE R Y . Three dimensional fractal characteristics of wheat root system for rice-wheat rotation in southern China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(3):451-460. (in Chinese) | |
[26] | 王法宏, 王旭清, 任德昌, 于振文, 余松烈 . 土壤深松对小麦根系活性的垂直分布及旗叶衰老的影响. 核农学报, 2003,17(1):56-61. |
WANG F H, WANG X Q, REN D C, YU Z W, YU S L . Effect of soil deep tillage on root activity and vertical distribution. Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica, 2003,17(1):56-61. (in Chinese) | |
[27] | 迟仁立, 左淑珍, 夏平, 刘宏, 刘喜财 . 不同程度压实对土壤理化性状及作物生育产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2001,17(6):39-43. |
CHI R L, ZUO S Z, XIA P, LIU H, LIU X C . Effects of different level compaction on the physicochemical characteristics of soil and crop growth. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2001,17(6):39-43. (in Chinese) | |
[28] | 何建宁, 于振文, 石玉, 赵俊晔, 张永丽 . 长期耕作方式对小麦光合特性和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017,28(4):1204-1210. |
HE J N, YU Z W, SHI Y, ZHAO J Y, ZHANG Y L . Effects of long-term tillage practices on photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of wheat. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017,28(4):1204-1210. (in Chinese) | |
[29] |
XIA L L, WANG S W, YAN X Y . Effects of long-term straw incorporation on the net global warming potential and the net economic benefit in a rice-wheat cropping system in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2014,197:118-127.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.08.001 |
[30] | 穆心愿 . 耕作方式与秸秆还田对黄淮潮土性质及小麦玉米生长的调控效应[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2016. |
MU X Y . Responses of soil properties, crop growth and yield to tillage and residue management in a wheat-maize cropping system on the North China Plain[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese) | |
[31] | 靳海洋, 谢迎新, 李梦达, 刘宇娟, 贺德先, 冯伟, 王晨阳, 郭天财 . 连续周年耕作对砂浆黑土农田蓄水保墒及作物产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(16):3239-3250. |
JIN H Y, XIE Y X, LI M D, LIU Y J, HE D X, FENG W, WANG C Y, GUO T C . Effects of annual continuous tillage on soil water conservation and crop yield in lime concretion black soil farmland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(16):3239-3250. (in Chinese) | |
[32] | 任爱霞, 孙敏, 王培如, 薛玲珠, 雷妙妙, 薛建福, 高志强 . 深松蓄水和施磷对旱地小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(19):3678-3689. |
REN A X, SUN M, WANG P R, XUE L Z, LEI M M, XUE J F, GAO Z Q . Effects of sub-soiling in fallow period and phosphorus fertilizer on yield and water use efficiency in dry-land wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(19):3678-3689. (in Chinese) | |
[33] | 黄明, 吴金芝, 李友军, 王贺正, 付国占, 陈明灿 , 李学来马俊利. 耕作方式和秸秆覆盖对旱地麦豆轮作下小麦籽粒产量、蛋白质含量和土壤硝态氮残留的影响. 草业学报, 2018,27(9):34-44. |
HUANG M, WU J Z, LI Y J, WANG H Z, FU G Z, CHEN M C, LI X L, MA J L . Effects of tillage method and straw mulching on grain yield and protein content in wheat and soil nitrate residue under a winter wheat and summer soybean crop rotation in drylands. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018,27(9):34-44. (in Chinese) | |
[34] | 翟云龙, 魏燕华, 张海林, 陈阜 . 耕种方式对冬小麦籽粒灌浆特性及产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017,35(4):211-216. |
ZHAI Y L, WEI Y H, ZHANG H L, CHEN F . Effect of tillage and seeding methods on grain filling and yield of winter wheat. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017,35(4):211-216. (in Chinese) | |
[35] | ABU-HAMDEH N H, ISMAIL S M, AL-SOLAIMANI S G, HATAMLEH R I. Effect of tillage systems and polyacrylamide on soil physical properties and wheat grain yield in arid regions differing in fine soil particles.Archives of Agronomy And Soil Science, 2019, 65(2):182-196. |
[36] | 张向前, 赵秀玲, 王钰乔, 濮超 , 保尔江·马合木提, 陈阜, 张海林. 耕作方式对冬小麦灌浆期光合性能日变化和籽粒产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017,28(3):885-893. |
ZHANG X Q, ZHAO X L, WANG Y Q, PU C , BAOER JIANGM H M T, CHEN F, ZHANG H L. Effects of tillage practices on photosynthetic performance diurnal variation during filling stage and grain yield of winter wheat. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017,28(3):885-893. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 陈吉浩, 周界光, 曲翔汝, 王素容, 唐华苹, 蒋云, 唐力为, $\boxed{\hbox{兰秀锦}}$, 魏育明, 周景忠, 马建. 四倍体小麦胚大小性状QTL定位与分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 203-216. |
[2] | 严艳鸽, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 赵秉强, 袁亮. 葡聚糖改性尿素对冬小麦产量和肥料氮去向的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 287-299. |
[3] | 徐久凯, 袁亮, 温延臣, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 李海燕, 赵秉强. 畜禽有机肥氮在冬小麦季对化肥氮的相对替代当量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 300-313. |
[4] | 古丽旦,刘洋,李方向,成卫宁. 小麦吸浆虫小热激蛋白基因Hsp21.9的克隆及在滞育过程与温度胁迫下的表达特性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 79-89. |
[5] | 王浩琳,马悦,李永华,李超,赵明琴,苑爱静,邱炜红,何刚,石美,王朝辉. 基于小麦产量与籽粒锰含量的磷肥优化管理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810. |
[6] | 唐华苹,陈黄鑫,李聪,苟璐璐,谭翠,牟杨,唐力为,兰秀锦,魏育明,马建. 基于55K SNP芯片的普通小麦穗长非条件和条件QTL分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1492-1502. |
[7] | 马小艳,杨瑜,黄冬琳,王朝辉,高亚军,李永刚,吕辉. 小麦化肥减施与不同轮作方式的周年养分平衡及经济效益分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603. |
[8] | 刘硕,张慧,高志源,许吉利,田汇. 437个小麦品种钾收获指数的变异特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1284-1300. |
[9] | 王洋洋,刘万代,贺利,任德超,段剑钊,胡新,郭天财,王永华,冯伟. 基于多元统计分析的小麦低温冻害评价及水分效应差异研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318. |
[10] | 职蕾,者理,孙楠楠,杨阳,Dauren Serikbay,贾汉忠,胡银岗,陈亮. 小麦苗期铅耐受性的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1064-1081. |
[11] | 秦羽青,程宏波,柴雨葳,马建涛,李瑞,李亚伟,常磊,柴守玺. 中国北方地区小麦覆盖栽培增产效应的荟萃(Meta)分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1095-1109. |
[12] | 蔡苇荻,张羽,刘海燕,郑恒彪,程涛,田永超,朱艳,曹卫星,姚霞. 基于成像高光谱的小麦冠层白粉病早期监测方法[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1110-1126. |
[13] | 宗成, 吴金鑫, 朱九刚, 董志浩, 李君风, 邵涛, 刘秦华. 添加剂对农副产物和小麦秸秆混合青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 1037-1046. |
[14] | 马鸿翔, 王永刚, 高玉姣, 何漪, 姜朋, 吴磊, 张旭. 小麦抗赤霉病育种回顾与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 837-855. |
[15] | 冯子恒,宋莉,张少华,井宇航,段剑钊,贺利,尹飞,冯伟. 基于无人机多光谱和热红外影像信息融合的小麦白粉病监测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 890-906. |
|