中国农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (18): 4076-4091.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.18.010

• 专题:面向农业害虫精准防控的机制解析、技术优化与决策支撑 • 上一篇    下一篇

地统计学在害虫生物防治中的应用与决策支持

李姝1(), 马驰1, 汪加佳1,2, 肖达1, 米莹莹1, 岳艳丽2, 王甦1()   

  1. 1 北京市农林科学院植物保护研究所/农业农村部天敌昆虫重点实验室/农业农村部北方果蔬有害生物绿色防控重点实验室(部省共建), 北京 100097
    2 四川农业大学农学院, 成都 611130
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-16 接受日期:2026-07-13 出版日期:2026-09-16 发布日期:2026-09-20
  • 通信作者:
    王甦,E-mail:
  • 联系方式: 李姝,E-mail:ls_baafs@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2023YFE0104800); 国家重点研发计划(2023YFD1400600); 青年北京学者项目; 四川省自然科学面上基金项目(2025ZNSFSC0172)

Application of Geostatistics in Insect Biological Control and Its Support for Precision Pest Management Decisions

LI Shu1(), MA Chi1, WANG JiaJia1,2, XIAO Da1, MI YingYing1, YUE YanLi2, WANG Su1()   

  1. 1 Institute of Plant Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Natural Enemy Insects, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Key Laboratory of Environment Friendly Management on Fruit and Vegetable Pests in North China (Co-Construction by Ministry and Province), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100097
    2 Sichuan Agricultural University, College of Agronomy, Chengdu 611130
  • Received:2026-04-16 Accepted:2026-07-13 Published:2026-09-16 Online:2026-09-20

摘要:

害虫与天敌种群的空间分布及其时空关系直接影响农业生态系统自然控害功能的发挥,是害虫绿色防控与精准防控研究的重要基础。经典研究遵循“数量监测-平均判断-统一干预”的分析范式,侧重害虫种群密度的时间动态变化,导致部分研究停留在空间格局描述层面,在空间异质性识别、害虫-天敌空间关系解析和管理决策支撑等方面仍难以为农药减量增效和绿色防控实践提供支撑。地统计学通过整合种群观测值与空间位置信息,能够有效刻画害虫与天敌种群的空间结构,识别害虫的高密度聚集中心与天敌的优势分布区,进一步定量诊断二者的空间重叠区、跟随关系与错位区,为突破传统方法的局限提供了新的分析路径。本文系统综述了地统计学在害虫生物防治中的研究进展与应用现状,重点分析了地统计学如何推动害虫-天敌研究从平均数量关系转向空间异质性认知,从单种群分布描述转向空间关系诊断,并进一步由空间格局的静态解析走向防控决策支持。总结归纳了地统计学在一年生大田作物系统与多年生园艺植物系统中“快”和“稳”的差异化应用模式,提出“数据获取-空间诊断-管理决策-反馈优化”的防控决策路径,将害虫热点、天敌覆盖及空间错位等证据系统转化为分区管理、靶向投放与效果评估等可执行的管理动作。未来应进一步加强多源空间数据融合、跨尺度动态建模、生态机制嵌入与智能决策平台构建,以提升地统计学在生物防控中的解释能力、决策能力和应用潜力。

关键词: 地统计学, 害虫-天敌关系, 空间异质性, 空间重叠, 精准防控, 生物防治

Abstract:

The spatial distribution of natural enemy populations as well as their spatio-temporal relationships with pests directly determines the performance of agricultural ecosystems’ natural pest suppression function, and acts as a critical foundation for research on green and precision pest management. Traditional research continues to follow the analytical paradigm of “population monitoring - average assessment - uniform intervention”, focusing on the temporal dynamics of pest density. This confines many studies to merely descriptive analysis of spatial patterns, leaving them unable to underpin practices of pesticide reduction & efficiency improvement and green pest control in terms of spatial heterogeneity identification, pest-natural enemy spatial relationship dissection, and management decision support. By integrating spatial location data and population observation values, geostatistics can effectively characterize the spatial structure of pest and natural enemy populations, identify pest high-density aggregation hotspots and natural enemy dominant distribution zones, and further quantitatively diagnose their spatial overlap zones, tracking relationships and spatial mismatch zones. It thus provides an innovative analytical approach to break through the limitations of traditional methods. We provide a systematic review of research progress and applications of geostatistics in biological pest control, focusing on how it has advanced from describing average pest populations to recognizing spatial heterogeneity, from describing the distribution of single populations to diagnosing natural enemy-pest relationships, and further from analyzing spatial patterns to supporting precision pest control decision-making. We summarize differentiated geostatistical application modes marked by “rapid response” and “stable persistence” in annual field crops and perennial horticultural systems. A pest control decision-making pathway of “data capture - spatial diagnosis - management decision - feedback optimization” is proposed, which systematically converts spatial evidence including pest hotspots, natural enemy coverage and spatial mismatches into implementable management measures such as zoned management, targeted natural enemy release and control efficacy evaluation. In the future, multi-source spatial data integration, cross-scale dynamic modeling, ecological mechanism embedding and intelligent decision-making platform construction should be further strengthened to elevate the interpretive capacity, decision-making ability and application potential of geostatistics in biological pest control.

Key words: geostatistics, pest-natural enemy interaction, spatial heterogeneity, spatial overlap, precision control, biological control