中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (14): 2919-2928.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.14.015
收稿日期:
2019-12-19
接受日期:
2020-02-02
出版日期:
2020-07-16
发布日期:
2020-08-10
通讯作者:
徐坤
作者简介:
高松,E-mail:基金资助:
GAO Song(),LIU XueNa,LIU Ying,CAO BiLi,CHEN ZiJing,XU Kun(
)
Received:
2019-12-19
Accepted:
2020-02-02
Online:
2020-07-16
Published:
2020-08-10
Contact:
Kun XU
摘要:
【目的】研究人工气候室控制条件下青葱生长、产品品质及光合特性对不同光质的响应特性,优化青葱工厂化生产光环境调控参数,提高以鲜嫩绿叶为产品的青葱生产效率。【方法】在人工气候室LED控制光源条件下,以‘章丘’和‘天光’2个不同品种大葱为试验材料,将苗高15 cm左右、具2—3片真叶的穴盘中大葱幼苗,分别置于蓝光(B)、红光(R)、绿光(G)、黄光(Y)、白光(W)等5种不同光质条件下进行培养,光照强度均控制在(301.6±12.7)μmol·m-2·s-1,光照时间为12 h/d,昼/夜温度分别控制在25℃/18℃。分别在试验处理0、10、20、30和40 d时取样,测定不同光质处理的青葱叶片光合作用参数,以及培养40 d时青葱的生长量和产品品质。【结果】青葱的生长量、产品品质、叶片色素含量、净光合速率(Pn)、表观量子效率(AQY)和RuBP最大再生速率均以白光显著优于各单色光处理。培养40 d时,白光处理青葱单株鲜重为25.21 g,分别比蓝光、红光、绿光、黄光处理增加了7.83%、20.28%、35.68%和60.78%;其叶片Pn为7.63 μmol·m-2·s-1,分别比蓝光、红光、绿光和黄光处理提高了11.39%、24.07%和39.23%和59.62%;叶片光饱和光合速率(Pmax)达13.29 μmol·m-2·s-1,分别较蓝光、红光、绿光和黄光处理增加了5.39%、9.47%、15.57%和21.48%;光饱和点(LSP)除白光处理较高外,其他单色光处理间无显著差异;而光补偿点(LCP)则以黄光较高,绿光、红光次之,蓝光、白光较低。不同单色光处理间也存在显著差异,以蓝光处理青葱单株鲜重较高,黄光处理较低,分别达24.22和16.52 g,绿光、红光居中;蓝光处理青葱叶片Pn、AQY、光饱和光合速率(Pmax)、羧化效率(CE)以及RuBP最大再生速率也显著高于其他单色光处理。青葱假茎可溶性糖、粗纤维、丙酮酸、可溶性蛋白、游离氨基酸和干物质含量等品质指标均以白光处理显著高于各单色光处理,但各单色光处理之间则以蓝光处理较高,其他依次为红光、绿光、黄光。【结论】全光谱的白光处理最有利于青葱生长,表现为叶片光合效率较高,产品品质较优;各单色光处理则以蓝光效应较高,红光次之,黄光、绿光较差,反映青葱对白光、蓝光光能利用能力较强。
高松,刘学娜,刘颖,曹逼力,陈子敬,徐坤. 人工气候室控制条件下青葱对LED光质的响应特性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(14): 2919-2928.
GAO Song,LIU XueNa,LIU Ying,CAO BiLi,CHEN ZiJing,XU Kun. Response Characteristics of Green Onion (Allium fistulosum L.) to LED Light Quality Under Artificial Climate Chamber[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(14): 2919-2928.
表1
不同光质对青葱生长量的影响"
处理 Treatment | 叶片数 Leaf number | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 假茎长 Cauloid length (cm) | 假茎粗 Cauloid diameter (mm) | 叶片鲜重 Leaf FW (g) | 假茎鲜重 Cauloid FW (g) | 根系鲜重 Root FW (g) | 单株鲜重 Per plant FW (g) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZQ | W | 6.40±0.55a | 47.24±1.44a | 9.90±0.65a | 9.88±0.38a | 14.70±0.70a | 9.34±0.52a | 1.61±0.07a | 25.64±1.14a |
B | 6.00±0.71ab | 45.20±0.91b | 10.00±0.61a | 9.25±0.28b | 14.10±0.53a | 8.52±0.68b | 1.33±0.06b | 23.95±1.03b | |
G | 5.00±0.71cd | 37.28±1.57d | 8.68±0.31b | 7.75±0.08c | 11.04±0.46c | 6.93±0.68c | 1.22±0.12b | 19.18±0.72d | |
Y | 4.60±0.55d | 33.84±1.16e | 7.98±0.31c | 7.37±0.32d | 9.54±0.43d | 5.33±0.55d | 1.05±0.08c | 15.92±0.33e | |
R | 5.40±0.55bc | 40.30±1.35c | 9.40±0.42a | 9.17±0.12b | 13.03±0.39b | 8.61±0.27b | 1.24±0.06b | 22.87±0.62c | |
TG | W | 5.60±0.55a | 47.10±1.24a | 9.76±0.43ab | 8.82±0.32a | 14.84±0.44a | 8.83±0.41a | 1.11±0.07a | 24.78±0.47a |
B | 5.40±0.55ab | 44.66±1.27b | 10.14±0.72a | 8.70±0.25a | 13.92±0.33b | 7.92±0.39b | 0.97±0.08b | 22.81±0.46b | |
G | 4.60±0.55cd | 39.70±0.76d | 9.30±0.45b | 8.20±0.20b | 11.47±0.69c | 5.78±0.44c | 0.73±0.03d | 17.98±0.52c | |
Y | 4.00±0.00d | 33.04±1.02e | 7.00±0.35d | 7.31±0.16c | 9.71±0.30d | 4.90±0.44d | 0.83±0.24cd | 15.43±0.71d | |
R | 4.80±0.45bc | 42.64±2.17c | 8.66±0.55c | 7.62±0.17c | 11.99±0.29c | 6.10±0.21c | 0.95±0.06bc | 19.04±0.36c |
表2
不同光质下青葱生长量的多重比较"
处理 Treatment | 叶片数 Leaf number (No.) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 假茎长 Cauloid length (cm) | 假茎粗 Cauloid diameter (mm) | 叶片鲜重 Leaf FW (g) | 假茎鲜重 Cauloid FW (g) | 根系鲜重 Root FW (g) | 单株鲜重 Per plant FW (g) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种 Variety | ZQ | 5.48±0.87a | 40.77±5.18a | 9.19±0.90a | 8.69±1.01a | 12.48±2.02a | 7.75±1.56a | 1.29±0.20a | 21.51±3.66a |
TG | 4.88±0.73b | 41.43±5.10a | 8.97±1.22a | 8.13±0.64b | 12.38±1.90a | 6.71±1.52b | 0.92±0.17b | 20.01±3.47b | |
光质 Light quality | W | 6.00±0.67a | 47.17±1.27a | 9.83±0.53a | 9.35±0.65a | 14.77±0.56a | 9.08±0.51a | 1.36±0.27a | 25.21±0.94a |
B | 5.70±0.67a | 44.93±1.08b | 10.07±0.64a | 8.98±0.38b | 14.01±0.43b | 8.22±0.61b | 1.15±0.20b | 23.38±0.96b | |
G | 4.80±0.63b | 38.49±1.72d | 8.99±0.49b | 7.97±0.27d | 11.25±0.60d | 6.35±0.81d | 0.97±0.27c | 18.58±0.87d | |
Y | 4.30±0.48c | 33.44±1.11e | 7.49±0.60c | 7.34±0.24e | 9.62±0.36e | 5.12±0.52e | 0.94±0.20c | 15.68±0.58e | |
R | 5.10±0.57b | 41.47±2.11c | 9.03±0.60b | 8.40±0.83c | 12.51±0.64c | 7.36±1.34c | 1.09±0.16b | 20.96±2.08c | |
P值 P-value | |||||||||
品种 Var. | 0.0004 | 0.0918 | 0.1275 | 0.0000 | 0.4799 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
光质 LQ | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
品种×光质Var.×LQ | 0.9541 | 0.0150 | 0.0060 | 0.0000 | 0.0136 | 0.0001 | 0.0155 | 0.0000 |
表3
不同光质对青葱品质的影响"
处理 Treatment | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (%) | 粗纤维 Crude cellulose (mg?g-1) | 丙酮酸 Pyruvate (mg?g-1) | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein (mg?g-1) | 游离氨基酸 Free amino acid (mg?g-1) | 干物质 Dry matter (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZQ | W | 1.46±0.04a | 0.24±0.00a | 1.03±0.02a | 1.43±0.01a | 0.93±0.05a | 8.42±0.08a |
B | 1.36±0.12a | 0.19±0.00b | 0.95±0.02b | 1.16±0.02b | 0.90±0.04a | 8.22±0.10b | |
G | 0.93±0.03c | 0.11±0.01d | 0.48±0.03e | 1.00±0.02d | 0.78±0.04b | 7.60±0.17d | |
Y | 0.70±0.06d | 0.08±0.00e | 0.64±0.05d | 0.92±0.01e | 0.69±0.05c | 7.24±0.11e | |
R | 1.15±0.03b | 0.14±0.01c | 0.83±0.02c | 1.07±0.02c | 0.89±0.05a | 7.97±0.09c | |
TG | W | 2.14±0.10a | 0.14±0.00a | 1.04±0.02a | 1.51±0.04b | 0.89±0.04a | 7.96±0.09a |
B | 1.82±0.05b | 0.10±0.00b | 0.95±0.02b | 1.60±0.05a | 0.76±0.04b | 7.74±0.11b | |
G | 1.36±0.12d | 0.09±0.00c | 0.42±0.01e | 0.78±0.05d | 0.60±0.03c | 7.00±0.18d | |
Y | 0.80±0.05e | 0.06±0.01d | 0.52±0.02d | 0.67±0.02e | 0.59±0.04c | 6.83±0.18e | |
R | 1.58±0.03c | 0.10±0.01b | 0.83±0.03c | 1.00±0.02c | 0.70±0.04b | 7.43±0.13c |
表4
不同光质下青葱品质的多重比较"
处理 Treatment | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (%) | 粗纤维 Crude cellulose (mg?g-1) | 丙酮酸 Pyruvate (mg?g-1) | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein (mg?g-1) | 游离氨基酸 Free amino acid (mg?g-1) | 干物质 Dry matter (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种 Variety | ZQ | 1.12±0.29b | 0.15±0.06a | 0.79±0.21a | 1.11±0.18a | 0.84±0.10a | 7.89±0.44a |
TG | 1.54±0.47a | 0.10±0.03b | 0.75±0.25b | 1.11±0.39a | 0.71±0.12b | 7.39±0.46b | |
光质 Light quality | W | 1.80±0.38a | 0.19±0.06a | 1.04±0.02a | 1.47±0.05a | 0.91±0.05a | 8.19±0.25a |
B | 1.59±0.26b | 0.15±0.05b | 0.95±0.02b | 1.38±0.24b | 0.83±0.08b | 7.98±0.27b | |
G | 1.14±0.25d | 0.10±0.01d | 0.45±0.04e | 0.89±0.13d | 0.69±0.10c | 7.30±0.36d | |
Y | 0.75±0.07e | 0.07±0.01e | 0.58±0.07d | 0.79±0.13e | 0.64±0.07c | 7.03±0.26e | |
R | 1.36±0.24c | 0.12±0.02c | 0.83±0.02c | 1.03±0.04c | 0.80±0.11b | 7.70±0.31c | |
P值 P-value | |||||||
品种Var. 光质LQ 品种×光质Var.×LQ | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0031 | 0.8627 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0020 | 0.0000 | 0.0485 | 0.5240 |
表5
不同光质处理对青葱叶片光合生理特征参数的影响"
处理 Treatment | 表观光合 量子效率 AQY | 光饱和点 LSP (μmol·m-2·s-1) | 光饱和光合 速率 Pmax (μmol·m-2·s-1) | 光补偿点 LCP (μmol·m-2·s-1) | 羧化效率 CE | CO2饱和点CSP (μl·L-1) | CO2补偿点CCP (μl·L-1) | RuBP最大再生速率 Maximum RuBP regeneration rate (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种 Variety | ZQ | 0.0479a | 1157.59b | 12.54a | 56.25b | 0.0698a | 1376.92b | 71.05b | 36.64a |
TG | 0.0489a | 1303.91a | 11.65b | 71.97a | 0.0674b | 1418.73a | 75.69a | 35.56b | |
光质 Light quality | W | 0.0542a | 1297.13a | 13.29a | 45.61e | 0.0780a | 1386.15b | 57.35e | 38.98a |
B | 0.0504b | 1193.44b | 12.61b | 48.30d | 0.0720b | 1388.97b | 66.21d | 37.23b | |
G | 0.0454d | 1216.30b | 11.50d | 77.12b | 0.0640d | 1401.43a | 80.28b | 34.89d | |
Y | 0.0439d | 1195.32b | 10.94e | 85.62a | 0.0607e | 1404.76a | 88.09a | 32.98e | |
R | 0.0481c | 1251.55ab | 12.14c | 63.90c | 0.0683c | 1407.81a | 74.90c | 36.41c | |
P值 P-value | |||||||||
品种Var. | 0.1426 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 | 0.0002 | 0.0000 | |
光质LQ | 0.0000 | 0.0135 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
品种×光Var.×LQ | 0.3187 | 0.0445 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0003 | 0.0416 | 0.0499 | 0.0000 |
[1] |
JIAO Y L, LAU O S, DENG X W. Light regulated transcriptional networks in higher plants. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2007,8(3):217-230.
doi: 10.1038/nrg2049 pmid: 17304247 |
[2] |
YAMAZAKI J. Is light quality involved in the regulation of the photosynthetic apparatus in attached rice leaves? Photosynthesis research, 2010,105(1):63-71.
pmid: 20532628 |
[3] | FAN Y G, ZHAO X X, WANG H Y, TIAN Y Y, XIANG Q Z, ZHANG L X. Effects of light intensity on metabolism of light-harvesting pigment and photosynthetic system in Camellia sinensis L. cultivar 'Huangjinya'. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2019,166:103796. |
[4] | WANG X X, FU X L, CHEN M, HUAN L, LIU W H, QI Y H, GAO Y G, XIAO W, CHEN X D, LI L, GAO D S. Ultraviolet B irradiation influences the fruit quality and sucrose metabolism of peach (Prunus persica L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2018,153:286-301. |
[5] | JOHKAN M, SHOJI K, GOTO F, HASHIDA S, YOSHIHARA T. Blue light-emitting diode light irradiation of seedlings improves seedling quality and growth after transplanting in red leaf lettuce. HortScience, 2010,45(12):1809-1814. |
[6] |
HOGEWONING SW, TROUWBORST G, MALJAARS H, POORTER H, VAN IEPEREN W, HARBINSON J. Blue light dose-responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010,61(11):3107-3117.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq132 pmid: 20504875 |
[7] |
JING X, WANG H, GONG B, LIU S Q, WEI M, AI X Z, LI Y, SHI Q H. Secondary and sucrose metabolism regulated by different light quality combinations involved in melon tolerance to powdery mildew. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2018,124:77-87.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.12.039 pmid: 29353685 |
[8] | 许莉, 刘世琦, 齐连东, 梁庆玲, 于文艳. 不同光质对叶用莴苣光合作用及叶绿素荧光的影响. 中国农学通报, 2007,23(1):96-100. |
XU L, LIU S Q, QI L D, LIANG Q L, YU W Y. Effect of light quality on leaf lettuce photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007,23(1):96-100. (in Chinese) | |
[9] |
李亚华, 陈龙, 高荣广, 杨凤娟, 王秀峰, 魏珉, 史庆华, 米庆华. LED光质对茄子果实品质及抗氧化能力的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015,26(9):2728-2734.
pmid: 26785555 |
LI Y H, CHEN L, GAO R G, YANG F J, WANG X F, WEI M, SHI Q H, MI Q H. Effects of LED qualities on quality and antioxidation capacity of eggplant fruits. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015,26(9):2728-2734. (in Chinese)
pmid: 26785555 |
|
[10] |
QIAN H M, LIU T Y, DENG M D, MIAO H Y, CAI C X, SHEN W S, WANG Q M. Effects of light quality on main health-promoting compounds and antioxidant capacity of Chinese kale sprouts. Food Chemistry, 2016,196:1232-1238.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.055 pmid: 26593611 |
[11] |
刘庆, 连海峰, 刘世琦, 孙亚丽, 于新会, 郭会平. 不同光质LED光源对草莓光合特性, 产量及品质的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015,26(6):1743-1750.
pmid: 26572027 |
LIU Q, LIAN H F, LIU S Q, SUN Y L, YU X H, GUO H P. Effects of different LED light qualities on photosynthetic characteristics, fruit production and quality of strawberry. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015,26(6):1743-1750. (in Chinese)
pmid: 26572027 |
|
[12] | SARTORY D P, GROBBELAAR J U. Extraction of chlorophyll a from freshwater phytoplankton for spectrophotometric analysis. Hydrobiologia, 1984,114(3):177-187. |
[13] | 赵世杰, 刘华山, 董新纯. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1998. |
ZHAO S J, LIU H S, DONG X C. Techniques of Plant Physiological Experiment. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1998. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. |
LI H S. The Principle and Technology of Plant physiology and Biochemistry Experiment. Beijing: High Education Press, 2000. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 文树基. 基础生物化学实验指导. 西安: 陕西科学技术出版社, 1994. |
WEN S J. Guide of Biochemistry Experiment. Xi'an: Shaanxi Science and Technology Press, 1994. (in Chinese) | |
[16] |
YE Z P, ROBAKOWSKI P, SUGGETT D J, KANG H J. A mechanistic model for the photosynthesis-light response based on the photosynthetic electron transport of photosystem II in C3 and C4 species. New Phytologist, 2013,199:110-120.
doi: 10.1111/nph.12242 pmid: 23521402 |
[17] |
ZUO Z C, MENG Y Y, YU X H, ZHANG Z L, FENG D S, SUN S F, LIU B, LIN C T. A study of the blue-light-dependent phosphorylation, degradation, and photobody formation of arabidopsis CRY2. Molecular Plant, 2012,5(3):726-733.
doi: 10.1093/mp/sss007 pmid: 22311776 |
[18] | YANG F, WANG X C, LIAO D P, LU F Z, GAO R C, LIU W G, YONG T W, WU X L, DU J B, LIU J, YANG W Y. Yield response to different planting geometries in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping systems. Agronomy Journal, 2014,107(1):296-304. |
[19] | SU N N, WU Q, SHEN Z G, XIA K, CUI J. Effects of light quality on the chloroplastic ultrastructure and photosynthetic characteristics of cucumber seedlings. Plant Growth Regulation, 2014,73:227-235. |
[20] |
WANG J, LU W, TONG Y X, YANG Q C. Leaf morphology, photosynthetic performance, chlorophyll fluorescence, stomatal development of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) exposed to different ratios of red light to blue light. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016,7:250.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00250 pmid: 27014285 |
[21] |
郑洁, 胡美君, 郭延平. 光质对植物光合作用的调控及其机理. 应用生态学报, 2008,19(7):1619-1624.
pmid: 18839928 |
ZHENG J, HU M J, GUO Y P. Regulation of photosynthesis by light quality and its mechanism in plants. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008,19(7):1619-1624. (in Chinese)
pmid: 18839928 |
|
[22] | 许大全, 高伟, 阮军. 光质对植物生长发育的影响. 植物生理学报, 2015,51(8):1217-1234. |
XU D Q, GAO W, RUAN J. Effects of light quality on plant growth and development. Plant Physiology Journal, 2015,51(8):1217-1234. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | TAIZ L, ZEIGER E. Plant Physiology. Third Edition.UNITED STATES American Society of Plant Biologists, 2002:112-119. |
[24] | 曹刚, 张国斌, 郁继华, 马彦霞. 不同光质LED光源对黄瓜苗期生长及叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(6):1297-1304. |
CAO G, ZHANG G B, YU J H, MA Y X. Effects of different LED light qualities on cucumber seedling growth and chlorophyll fuorescence parameters. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013,46(6):1297-1304. (in Chinese) | |
[25] |
巩彪, 靳志勇, 刘娜, 刘世琦, 王秀峰, 艾希珍, 魏珉, 史庆华. 光质对紫背天葵生长, 次生代谢和抗氧化胁迫的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(11):3577-3584.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201611.039 pmid: 29696855 |
GONG B, JIN Z Y, LIU N, LIU S Q, WANG X F, AI X Z, WEI M, SHI Q H. Effects of light quality on growth, secondary metabolites, and oxidative stress tolerance of Gynura bicolor. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(11):3577-3584. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201611.039 pmid: 29696855 |
|
[26] | 张瑞华, 徐坤, 董灿兴, 李莹莹, 吕杰. 光质对姜生长及光能利用特性的影响. 园艺学报, 2008,35(5):673-680. |
ZHANG R H, XU K, DONG C X, LI Y Y, LÜ J. Effects of light quality on growth and light utilization characteristics in ginger. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2008,35(5):673-680. (in Chinese) | |
[27] | WANG H, GU M, CUI J X, SHI K, ZHOU Y H, YU J Q. Effects of light quality on CO2 assimilation, chlorophyll fluorescence quenching, expression of Calvin cycle genes and carbohydrate accumulation in Cucumis sativus. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 2009,96:30-37. |
[28] | 张磊, 刘维正, 辛国胜, 韩俊杰, 商丽丽, 邱鹏飞, 林祖军. 3种专用型甘薯光合光响应曲线及其模型拟合研究. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(15):71-77. |
ZHANG L, LIU W Z, XIN G S, HAN J J, SHANG L L, QIU P F, LIN Z J. Photosynthesis light response curves of three sweet-potato varieties and model fitting. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015,31(15):71-77. (in Chinese) | |
[29] | LIN K H, HUANG M Y, HUANG W D, HSU M H, YANG Z W, YANG C M. The effects of red, blue, and white light-emitting diodes on the growth, development, and edible quality of hydroponically grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata). Scientia Horticulturae, 2013,150:86-91. |
[30] | 李岩, 王丽伟, 文莲莲, 魏珉, 史庆华, 杨凤娟, 王秀峰. 红蓝光质对转色期间番茄果实主要品质的影响. 园艺学报, 2017,44(12):2372-2382. |
LI Y, WANG L W, WEN L L, WEI M, SHI Q H, YANG F J, WANG X F. Effects of red and blue light qualities on main fruit quality of tomato during color-turning period. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017,44(12):2372-2382. (in Chinese) | |
[31] |
KODERA Y, SUZUKI A, IMADA O, KASUGA S, SUMIOKA I, KANEZAWA A, TARU N, FUJIKAWA M, NAGAE S, MASAMOTO K, MAESHIGE K, ONO K. Physical, chemical, and biological properties of S-allylcysteine, an amino acid derived from garlic. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2002,50:622-632.
pmid: 11804540 |
[32] | RANDLE W M, KOPSELL D A, KOPSELL D E, SNYDER R L, TORRANCE R. Field sampling short-day onions for bulb pungency. HortTechnology, 1998,8:329-332. |
[33] | 孔灵君, 徐坤, 王磊, 何平, 张永征. 氮硫互作对越冬大葱生长及品质的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(5):1272-1278. |
KONG L J, XU K, WANG L, HE P, ZHANG Y Z. Influence of nitrogen and sulfur interaction on growth and quality of Chinese spring onion. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013,19(5):1272-1278. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 王彩香,袁文敏,刘娟娟,谢晓宇,马麒,巨吉生,陈炟,王宁,冯克云,宿俊吉. 西北内陆早熟陆地棉品种的综合评价及育种演化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 1-16. |
[2] | 冯向前,殷敏,王孟佳,马横宇,褚光,刘元辉,徐春梅,章秀福,张运波,王丹英,陈松. 南方稻区“早籼晚粳”栽培模式晚季灌浆期气象因子对晚粳稻品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 46-63. |
[3] | 李易玲,彭西红,陈平,杜青,任俊波,杨雪丽,雷鹿,雍太文,杨文钰. 减量施氮对套作玉米大豆叶片持绿、光合特性和系统产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762. |
[4] | 朱大伟,章林平,陈铭学,方长云,于永红,郑小龙,邵雅芳. 中国优质稻品种品质及食味感官评分值的特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1271-1283. |
[5] | 吕馨宁,王玥,贾润普,王胜男,姚玉新. 不同温度下褪黑素处理对‘阳光玫瑰'葡萄采后品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1411-1422. |
[6] | 彭雪,高月霞,张琳煊,高志强,任亚梅. 高能电子束辐照对马铃薯贮藏品质及芽眼细胞超微结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1423-1432. |
[7] | 宗成, 吴金鑫, 朱九刚, 董志浩, 李君风, 邵涛, 刘秦华. 添加剂对农副产物和小麦秸秆混合青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 1037-1046. |
[8] | 冯宣军, 潘立腾, 熊浩, 汪青军, 李静威, 张雪梅, 胡尔良, 林海建, 郑洪建, 卢艳丽. 南方地区120份甜、糯玉米自交系重要目标性状和育种潜力分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 856-873. |
[9] | 蒋晶晶,周天阳,韦陈华,邬佳宁,张耗,刘立军,王志琴,顾骏飞,杨建昌. 不同栽培措施对超级稻强、弱势粒品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 874-889. |
[10] | 卞能飞, 孙东雷, 巩佳莉, 王幸, 邢兴华, 金夏红, 王晓军. 花生烘烤食用品质评价及指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 641-652. |
[11] | 向妙莲, 吴帆, 李树成, 王印宝, 肖刘华, 彭文文, 陈金印, 陈明. 褪黑素处理对梨果实采后黑斑病及贮藏品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 785-795. |
[12] | 陈婷婷, 符卫蒙, 余景, 奉保华, 李光彦, 符冠富, 陶龙兴. 彩色稻叶片光合特征及其与抗氧化酶活性、花青素含量的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(3): 467-478. |
[13] | 车大璐,赵俐辰,程素彩,刘爱瑜,李晓宇,赵寿培,王健诚,王媛,高玉红,孙新胜. 垫料床对育肥羔羊生长性能和臭气排放的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(24): 4943-4956. |
[14] | 宋江涛,谌丹丹,公旭晨,商祥明,李春龙,蔡永喜,岳建平,王帅玲,张卜芬,谢宗周,刘继红. 人工疏果对‘爱媛28’橘橙果实糖酸含量及代谢基因表达的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(23): 4688-4701. |
[15] | 贾晓辉,张鑫楠,刘佰霖,马风丽,杜艳民,王文辉. 低O2/高CO2气调结合1-MCP对‘玉露香’梨贮藏品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(23): 4717-4727. |
|