小麦PIN基因家族的鉴定及表达分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.12.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】PIN（puroindoline）是植物所特有的一类蛋白家族,对控制小麦籽粒硬度有重要功能。分析小麦PIN家族成员在全基因组的分布、结构及进化,研究其在不同组织的表达特异性以及在不同硬度种子的表达模式,为阐明小麦PIN基因家族的生物学功能奠定基础。【方法】根据已报道的小麦PIN基因和大麦HIN基因,利用BLASTP和HMM方法,在最新发布的小麦中国春参考序列中鉴定小麦PIN基因家族成员。利用UniProt、URGI、PFAM、CDD、expVIP等数据库,采用Clustal X、MEGA 7.0、ExPASy、MEME、GSDS、TB tools、GraphPad Prism5等软件进行生物信息学分析。采用qRT-PCR方法检测TaPIN基因家族在不同籽粒硬度小麦样品中的表达情况。【结果】共鉴定出19个小麦PIN基因,集中成簇分布于第1、5和7染色体同源群,编码148—327个氨基酸,编码蛋白相对分子量为16.39—37.19 kD,等电点为6.35—9.34。通过结构域和系统发育分析,可将19个TaPIN基因分为A和B两大类。大部分TaPINs基因仅有1个外显子,没有内含子,顺式作用元件分析发现其上游序列包含大量抗逆和种子发育相关的调控元件。转录组分析表明该基因家族在小麦籽粒中相对表达量很高,而在根茎叶等其他组织几乎不表达。实时荧光定量PCR表明,各基因间相对表达量差异显著,TaPIN9和TaPIN10表达量较高。随着小麦籽粒硬度降低,TaPIN9和TaPIN10表达上调,且表达比例增加,而TaPIN16和TaPIN6则呈现相反的趋势。【结论】小麦籽粒硬度的调节以Pina和Pinb为主,该基因家族其他成员也具有相同结构域,推测也具有相似功能,但受表达量低的限制,对籽粒硬度影响较小。从该基因的进化关系看,粗山羊草与小麦亲缘关系最近,其次是燕麦、黑麦和大麦。

关键词: 小麦, 籽粒硬度, PIN基因, 表达分析

Abstract:

【Objective】 The puroindoline (PIN) gene is a family specific to plants and plays an important role in controlling the grain hardness in wheat. In silico identification and expression analysis of PIN family genes in Triticum aestivum on whole genome level lay the foundation for elucidation the biological function of wheat PIN family. 【Method】 The known sequences of wheat PIN proteins and barley hordoindoline (HIN) proteins were used to query the newly released wheat peptides dataset of Chinese spring variety with HMM and BLASTP profiles. UniProt, URGI, PFAM, CDD, expVIP and other databases were used for bioinformatics analysis with Clustal X, MEGA 7.0, ExPASy, MEME, GSDS, TBtools, GraphPad Prism5 and other programs. The expression profiles of TaPIN genes in different wheat harness seeds were validated with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). 【Result】 A total of 19 TaPINs were identified in wheat genome, which were clustered in homologous groups of chromosome 1, 5 and 7. These TaPIN proteins contained 148 to 327 amino acids, as their relative molecular weight varied from 16.39 to 37.19 kD and the isoelectric points ranged from 6.35 to 9.34. Phylogenetic and conserved domain analyses showed that the 19 TaPIN proteins were divided into A and B categories, respectively. Most TaPIN genes harbored only one exon, and there were many cis-acting regulatory elements involved in stress responsiveness and seed-specific regulation. RNA-Seq showed that this gene family expressed largely in wheat grain and hardly expressed in other tissues. The qRT-PCR results indicated that the relative expression level among TaPIN genes were significantly changed. TaPIN9 and TaPIN10 were highly expressed. The expression levels of TaPIN9 and TaPIN10, as well as its expression ratio, were up-regulated with the decrease of wheat grain hardness, while TaPIN16 and TaPIN6 showed an opposite trend. 【Conclusion】 Pina and Pinb genes were the main factors regulating grain hardness in wheat. It is speculated that other members of this gene family have similar functions, but have little influence on grain hardness because of low expression level. According to the evolutionary relationship of this gene, Aegilops tauschii is most closely related to wheat, followed by oats, rye and barley.

Key words: Triticum aestivum, grain hardness, PIN gene, gene expression

刘培勋,万洪深,郑建敏,罗江陶,蒲宗君. 小麦PIN基因家族的鉴定及表达分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(12): 2321-2330.

LIU PeiXun,WAN HongShen,ZHENG JianMin,LUO JiangTao,PU ZongJun. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of PIN Genes Family in Wheat[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(12): 2321-2330.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.12.001

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2020/V53/I12/2321

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 44

[1]	GREENWELL P, SCHOFIELD J D. A starch granule protein associated with endosperm softness in wheat. Cereal Chemistry, 1986,63:379.
[2]	JOLLY C J, RAHMAN S, KORTT A A, HIGGINS T J V. Characterisation of the wheat Mr 15000 "grain-softness protein" and analysis of the relationship between its accumulation in the whole seed and grain softness. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1993,86(5):589-597. doi: 10.1007/BF00838714 pmid: 24193708
[3]	GIROUX M J, MORRIS C F. Wheat grain hardness results from highly conserved mutations in the friabilin components puroindoline a and b. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998,95(11):6262-6266.
[4]	HEINZE K, KISZONAS A M, MURRAY J C, MORRIS C F, LULLIEN-PELLERIN V. Puroindoline genes introduced into durum wheat reduce milling energy and change milling behavior similar to soft common wheats. Journal of Cereal Science, 2016,71:183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2016.08.016
[5]	GASPARIS S, ORCZYK W, ZALEWSKI W, NADOLSKA-ORCZYK A. The RNA-mediated silencing of one of the Pin genes in allohexaploid wheat simultaneously decreases the expression of the other, and increases grain hardness. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011,62(11):4025-4036. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err103
[6]	WILEY P R, TOSI P, EVRARD A, LOVEGROVE A, JONES H D, SHEWRY P R. Promoter analysis and immunolocalisation show that puroindoline genes are exclusively expressed in starchy endosperm cells of wheat grain. Plant Molecular Biology, 2007,64(1/2):125-136. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9139-x
[7]	陈锋, 董中东, 程西永, 詹克慧, 许海霞, 崔党群. 小麦puroindoline及其相关基因分子遗传基础研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2010,43(6):1108-1116.
	CHEN F, DONG Z D, CHENG X Y, ZHAN K H, XU H X, CUI D Q. Advances in research of molecular genetics of puroindoline and its related genes in wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010,43(6):1108-1116. (in Chinese)
[8]	FEIZ L, MARTIN J M, GIROUX M J. Creation and functional analysis of new Puroindoline, alleles in Triticum aestivum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2009,118(2):247-257. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0893-1
[9]	WILKINSON M, WAN Y, TOSI P, LEVERINGTON M, SNAPE J, MITCHELL R A, SHEWRY P R. Identification and genetic mapping of variant forms of puroindoline b expressed in developing wheat grain. Journal of Cereal Science, 2008,48(3):722-728. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.03.007
[10]	ALI I, SARDAR Z, RASHEED A, MAHMOOD T. Molecular characterization of the puroindoline-a and b alleles in synthetic hexaploid wheats and in silico functional and structural insights into Pina-D1. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2015,376:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.04.001 pmid: 25865523
[11]	GOLLAN P, SMITH K, BHAVE M. Gsp-1 genes comprise a multigene family in wheat that exhibits a unique combination of sequence diversity yet conservation. Journal of Cereal Science, 2007,45(2):184-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2006.07.011
[12]	WILKINSON M, WAN Y, TOSI P, LEVERINGTON M, SNAPE J, MITCHELL R A, SHEWRY P R. Identification and genetic mapping of variant forms of puroindoline b expressed in developing wheat grain. Journal of Cereal Science, 2008,48(3):722-728. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.03.007
[13]	CHEN F, BEECHER B S, MORRIS C F. Physical mapping and a new variant of puroindoline b-2genes in wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2010,120(4):745-751. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1195-y
[14]	王月福, 于振文, 李尚霞, 余松烈. 施氮量对小麦籽粒蛋白质组分含量及加工品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2002,35(9):1071-1078.
	WANG Y F, YU Z W, LI S X, YU S L. Effects of nitrogen application amount on content of protein components and processing quality of wheat grain. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002,35(9):1071-1078. (in Chinese)
[15]	李友军, 熊瑛, 骆炳山. 氮、钾及其互作对两种质型小麦品质性状的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2006,24(2):43-47.
	LI Y J, XIONG Y, LUO B S. Effects of nitrogen, potassium and their interactions on quality characteristics of two different gluten wheat cultivars. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2006,24(2):43-47. (in Chinese)
[16]	UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Research, 2016,45(D1):D158-D169. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1099 pmid: 27899622
[17]	DAY L, BHANDARI D G, GREENWELL P, LEONARD S A, SCHOFIELD J D. Characterization of wheat puroindoline proteins. FEBS Journal, 2006,273(23):5358-5373. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05528.x pmid: 17076702
[18]	BEECHER B, BOWMAN J, MARTIN J M, BETTGE A D, MORRIS C F, BLAKE T K, GIROUX M J. Hordoindolines are associated with a major endosperm-texture QTL in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Genome, 2002,45(3):584-591. doi: 10.1139/g02-008 pmid: 12033628
[19]	ALAUX M, ROGERS J, LETELLIER T, FLORES R, ALFAMA F, POMMIER C, GUERCHE C. Linking the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium bread wheat reference genome sequence to wheat genetic and phenomic data. Genome Biology, 2018,19(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1491-4 pmid: 30115101
[20]	EDDY S R, PEARSON, WILLIAM R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Computational Biology, 2011,7(10):e1002195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 pmid: 22039361
[21]	FINN R D, CLEMENTS J, EDDY S R, FINN R D, CLEMENTS J, EDDY S R. HMMER web server: Interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Research, 2011,39(Web Server issue):29-37.
[22]	ALTSCHUL S F. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein detabase search programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 1997,25:3389-3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 pmid: 9254694
[23]	KUMAR S, STECHER G, TAMURA K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology & Evolution, 2016,33(7):1870. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054 pmid: 27004904
[24]	FINN R D, COGGILL P, EBERHARDT R Y, EDDY S R, MISTRY J, MITCHELL A L, SALAZAR G A. The Pfam protein families database: Towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Research, 2015,44(D1):D279-D285. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1344 pmid: 26673716
[25]	MARCHLER-BAUER A, BO Y, HAN L, HE J, LANCZYCKI C J, LU S, GWADZ M. CDD/SPARCLE: Functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Research, 2017,45(D1):D200-D203. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1129 pmid: 27899674
[26]	GASTEIGER E. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Research, 2003,31(13):3784-3788. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg563 pmid: 12824418
[27]	BROWN P, BAXTER L, HICKMAN R, BEYNON J, MOORE J D, OTT S. MEME-LaB: Motif analysis in clusters. Bioinformatics, 2013,29(13):1696-1697. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt248
[28]	HU B, JIN J, GUO A Y, ZHANG H, LUO J, GAO G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics, 2014,31(8):1296. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu817 pmid: 25504850
[29]	LESCOT M. Plant CARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 2002,30(1):325-327. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.325 pmid: 11752327
[30]	CHEN C, XIA R, CHEN H, HE Y. TBtools, a Toolkit for Biologists integrating various biological data handling tools with a user-friendly interface. BioRxiv, 2018: 289660.
[31]	RAMÍREZ-GONZÁLEZ R H, BORRILL P, LANG D, HARRINGTON S A, BRINTON J, VENTURINI L, KHEDIKAR Y. The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat. Science, 2018, 361(6403): eaar6089. doi: 10.1126/science.aar6089 pmid: 30115782
[32]	BORRILL P, RAMIREZ-GONZALEZ R, UAUY C. expVIP: A customisable RNA-seq data analysis and visualisation platform. Plant Physiology, 2016,170(4):2172-2186. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01667 pmid: 26869702
[33]	ZHANG Y, HU X, ISLAM S, SHE M, PENG Y, YU Z, ZHANG J. New insights into the evolution of wheat avenin-like proteins in wild emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018,115(52):13312-13317. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812855115 pmid: 30530679
[34]	CHEN F, BEECHER B S, MORRIS C F. Physical mapping and a new variant of puroindoline b-2 genes in wheat. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 2010,120(4):745-751. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1195-y pmid: 19911160
[35]	CHANTRET N, SALSE J, SABOT F, RAHMAN S, BELLEC A, LAUBIN B, GAUTIER M F. Molecular basis of evolutionary events that shaped the hardness locus in diploid and polyploid wheat species (Triticum and Aegilops). The Plant Cell, 2005,17(4):1033-1045. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.029181 pmid: 15749759
[36]	GASPARIS S, ORCZYK W, NADOLSKA-ORCZYK A. Sina, and Sinb, genes in triticale do not determine grain hardness contrary to their orthologs Pina, and Pinb, in wheat. BMC Plant Biology, 2013,13(1):190. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-190
[37]	GAZZA L, TADDEI F, CONTI S, GAZZELLONI G, MUCCILLI V, JANNI M, OVIDIO R D, ALFIERI M, REDAELLI R, POGNA N E. Biochemical and molecular characterization of Avena indolines and their role in kernel texture. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2015,290(1):39-54. doi: 10.1007/s00438-014-0894-5 pmid: 25120168
[38]	KIM K H, FEIZ L, DYER A T, GREY W, HOGG A C, MARTIN J M, GIROUX M J. Puroindoline: Antimicrobial wheat endosperm specific protein. Journal of Phytopathology, 2011,7:903-906.
[39]	KIM K H, FEIZ L, DYER A T, GREY W, HOGG A C, MARTIN J M, GIROUX M J. Increased resistance to penicillium seed rot in transgenic wheat over‐expressing Puroindolines. Journal of Phytopathology, 2012,160(5):243-247. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2012.01881.x
[40]	HANEY E F, PETERSEN A P, LAU C K, JING W, STOREY D G, VOGEL H J. Mechanism of action of puroindoline derived tryptophan-rich antimicrobial peptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes, 2013,1828(8):1802-1813.
[41]	AYALA M, GUZMÁN C, PEÑA R J, ALVAREZ J B. Genetic diversity and molecular characterization of puroindoline genes (Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1) in bread wheat landraces from Andalusia (Southern Spain). Journal of Cereal Science, 2016,71:61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2016.07.017
[42]	NIRMAL R C, FURTADO A, WRIGLEY C, HENRY R J. Influence of gene expression on hardness in wheat. PLoS ONE, 2015,11(10):e0164746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164746 pmid: 27741295
[43]	CHEN M, WILKINSON M, TOSI P, HE G, SHEWRY P. Novel puroindoline and grain softness protein alleles in Aegilops species with the C, D, S, M and U genomes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2005,111(6):1159-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-0047-7
[44]	DARLINGTON H F, ROUSTER J, HOFFMANN L, HALFORD N G, SHEWRY P R, SIMPSON D J. Identification and molecular characterisation of hordoindolines from barley grain. Plant Molecular Biology, 2001,47(6):785-794. doi: 10.1023/A:1013691530675

基因名称 Gene name	正向引物序列 Forward primer sequence (5′-3′)	反向引物序列 Revers primer sequence (5′-3′)
TaPIN6	TATGCCGCTCTCTTGGGT	GATCGCCTTGGATTGATG
TaPIN7	AGCTATGCAAGCTCCCAC	CACAACTTCTCTTCCCCC
TaPIN8	TATGCCGCTCTCTTGGTT	GATCGCCTTGGATTGATG
TaPIN9	AGCTCCTTGGGGAGTGTT	CAGGTTCTTGGCTTCTTG
TaPIN14	GGCGGTGAAGGGTTTTTC	GCTATCGGGCGTAGTTGC
TaPIN15	AAGGATTATGTGATGGAG	GCTGGTAACACTGGTCTA
TaPIN16	AAAGAAGTGCCGATGTGAGG	GCTGAAAGCCAAAGACGC
TaPIN19	TGTGAACAAGAAGCCCTA	TGCTGAAAACCAAAGATG
TaPIN10	TGAGCATGAGGTTCGGGA	TTGCACTTTGAGGGGAGG
β-Actin	ATGTACCGTGGTGATGTT	CCTGGTGGCTGGTAGTTG