中国农业科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (23): 4514-4521.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.23.010
许海峰(),杨官显,张静,邹琦,王意程,曲常志,姜生辉,王楠,陈学森
收稿日期:
2018-05-25
接受日期:
2018-07-26
出版日期:
2018-12-01
发布日期:
2018-12-12
基金资助:
XU HaiFeng(),YANG GuanXian,ZHANG Jing,ZOU Qi,WANG YiCheng,QU ChangZhi,JIANG ShengHui,WANG Nan,CHEN XueSen
Received:
2018-05-25
Accepted:
2018-07-26
Online:
2018-12-01
Published:
2018-12-12
摘要:
【目的】研究苹果WRKY转录因子MdWRKY18和MdWRKY40蛋白结构、表达水平及在盐胁迫中的功能,为进一步完善盐胁迫分子机理的研究提供参考。【方法】以‘红脆2号’苹果为试材,克隆MdWRKY18和MdWRKY40,对其蛋白结构进行分析;采用qRT-PCR测定该基因在盐胁迫条件下的表达水平,并通过GUS染色分析它们启动子活性,利用酵母双杂分析其互作关系,并通过转基因验证其功能。【结果】蛋白结构分析表明MdWRKY18和MdWRKY40均含有一个WRKY、Cx5C以及HxH结构域;MdWRKY18和MdWRKY40表达水平和启动子活性受150 mmol·L -1 NaCl诱导,酵母双杂交试验表明,MdWRKY18和MdWRKY40能够和自身互作形成同源二聚体,且MdWRKY18也能和MdWRKY40互作形成异源二聚体;在‘王林’愈伤中分别过表达MdWRKY18和MdWRKY40时,能够促进MdSOS1和MdNHX1的表达,并提高‘王林’愈伤在盐胁迫处理下的生长量,在‘王林’愈伤中共表达MdWRKY18和MdWRKY40时,同样能够促进MdSOS1和MdNHX1的表达,但对提高‘王林’愈伤的生长量要高于分别过表达MdWRKY18和MdWRKY40。【结论】苹果MdWRKY18和MdWRKY40受盐胁迫的诱导,可以形成同源或异源二聚体,并增强‘王林’愈伤对盐胁迫的耐性。
许海峰,杨官显,张静,邹琦,王意程,曲常志,姜生辉,王楠,陈学森. 苹果MdWRKY18和MdWRKY40参与盐胁迫途径分子机理研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(23): 4514-4521.
XU HaiFeng,YANG GuanXian,ZHANG Jing,ZOU Qi,WANG YiCheng,QU ChangZhi,JIANG ShengHui,WANG Nan,CHEN XueSen. Molecular Mechanism of Apple MdWRKY18 and MdWRKY40 Participating in Salt Stress[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(23): 4514-4521.
[1] |
MAHAJAN S, TUTEJA N . Cold, salinity and drought stresses: An overview. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2005,444:139-158.
doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2005.10.018 pmid: 16309626 |
[2] |
TUTEJA N . Mechanisms of high salinity tolerance in plants. Methods in Enzymology, 2007,428:419-438.
doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)28024-3 |
[3] |
DONG D, ZHANG L F, HANG W, LIU Z J, ZHANG Z X, ZHENG Y L . Differential expression of miRNAs in response to salt stress in maize roots. Annals of Botany, 2009,103:29-38.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn205 pmid: 18952624 |
[4] | OHTA M, HAYASHI Y, NAKASHIMA A, HAMADA A, TANAKA A, NAKAMURA T, HAYAKAWA T . Introduction of a Na +/H + antiporter gene from Atriplex gmelini confers salt tolerance to rice. FEBS Letters, 2002,532:279-282. |
[5] |
NING Z, CHENG S, LIU X, HAO D, DAI M, ZHOU D X, YANG W, YU Z . The R2R3-type MYB gene OsMYB91 has a function in coordinating plant growth and salt stress tolerance in rice. Plant Science, 2015,236:146-156.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.03.023 pmid: 26025528 |
[6] |
XUE Z Y, ZHI D Y, XUE G P, ZHANG H, ZHAO Y X, XIA G M . Enhanced salt tolerance of transgenic wheat (Tritivum aestivum L.) expressing a vacuolar Na +/H + antiporter gene with improved grain yields in saline soils in the field and a reduced level of leaf Na +. Plant Science , 2004,167:849-859.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.05.034 |
[7] |
ÇIÇEK N, HÇ X . Effects of salt stress on some physiological and photosynthetic parameters at three different temperatures in six soya bean (Glycine max L. Merr.) Cultivars. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2008,194:34-46.
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2007.00288.x |
[8] | HUSAINI A M, ABDIN M Z . Development of transgenic strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) plants tolerant to salt stress. Plant Science, 2008,174:446-455. |
[9] | RASHEDY A . Response of two grape rootstocks to some salt tolerance treatments under saline water conditions. Journal of Horticultural Science & Ornamental Plants, 2010,2:93-106. |
[10] |
XUE H, ZHANG F, ZHANG Z H, FU JF, WANG F, ZHANG B, MA Y . Differences in salt tolerance between diploid and autotetraploid apple seedlings exposed to salt stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 2015,190:2430.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.04.009 |
[11] |
SAHI C, SINGH A, BLUMWALD E, GROVER A . Beyond osmolytes and transporters: Novel plant salt-stress tolerance-related genes from transcriptional profiling data. Physiologia Plantarum, 2006,127:1-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00610.x |
[12] |
HASEGAWA P M, BRESSAN R A, ZHU J K, BOHNERT H J . Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2000,51:463-499.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.463 |
[13] |
BLUMWALD E, POOLE R J . Na/H antiport in isolated tonoplast vesicles from storage tissue of beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 1985,78:163-167.
doi: 10.1104/pp.78.1.163 pmid: 16664191 |
[14] |
DING Z, LI S, AN X, LIU X, QIN H, WANG D . Transgenic expression of MYB15 confers enhanced sensitivity to abscisic acid and improved drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2009,36:17-29.
doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(09)60003-5 pmid: 19161942 |
[15] |
ABE H, URAO T, ITO T, SEKI M, SHINOZAKI K, YAMAGUCHISHINOZAKI K . Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. The Plant Cell, 2003,15:63-78.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.006130 pmid: 12509522 |
[16] |
YANG O, POPOVA O V, SÜTHOFF U, LÜKING I, DIETZ K J, GOLLDACK D . The Arabidopsis basic leucine zipper transcription factor AtbZIP24 regulates complex transcriptional networks involved in abiotic stress resistance. Gene, 2009,436:45-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2009.02.010 pmid: 19248824 |
[17] |
REN X, CHEN Z, LIU Y, ZHANG H, ZHANG M, LIU Q, HONG X, ZHU J K, GONG Z . ABO3, a WRKY transcription factor, mediates plant responses to abscisic acid and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 2010,63:417-429.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04248.x pmid: 20487379 |
[18] | JIANG Y, YANG B, DEYHOLOS M K . Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis bHLH92 transcription factor in abiotic stress. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2009,282:503-516. |
[19] |
WU X, SHIROTO Y, KISHITANI S, ITO Y, TORIYAMA K . Enhanced heat and drought tolerance in transgenic rice seedlings overexpressing OsWRKY11 under the control of HSP101 promoter. Plant Cell Reports, 2009,28:21-30.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-008-0614-x pmid: 2018818929 |
[20] |
JIANG Y J, LIANG G, YU D Q . Activated expression of WRKY57 confers drought tolerance inArabidopsis. Molecular Plant, 2012,5:1375-1388.
doi: 10.1093/mp/sss080 pmid: 22930734 |
[21] | JIANG Y, DEYHOLOS M . Functional characterization of Arabidopsis NaCl-inducible WRKY25 and WRKY33 transcription factors in abiotic stresses. Plant Molecular Biology, 2009,69:91-105. |
[22] |
XU H F, WANG N, LIU J X, QU C Z, WANG Y C, JIANG S H, LU N L, WANG D Y, ZHANG Z Y, CHEN X S . The molecular mechanism underlying anthocyanin metabolism in apple using the MdMYB16 and MdbHLH33 genes. Plant Molecular Biology, 2017,94:149-165.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-017-0601-0 pmid: 28286910 |
[23] |
KENNETH J L, THOMAS D S . Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 -△△CT method . Methods, 2001,25:402-408.
doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 |
[24] |
ZHANG Y, WANG L . The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: Its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2005,5(1):1-12.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-5-1 pmid: 15629062 |
[25] |
RUSHTON P J, SOMSSICH I E, RINGLER P, SHEN Q J . WRKY transcription factors. Trends in Plant Science, 2010,15:247-258.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.006 |
[26] | WU K L, GUO Z J, WANG H H, LI J . The WRKY family of transcription factors in rice and Arabidopsis and their origins. DNA Research, 2005,12:9-26. |
[27] |
GUO D, ZHANG J, WANG X, HAN X, WEI B, WANG J . The WRKY transcription factor WRKY71/EXB1 controls shoot branching by transcriptionally regulating RAX genes in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 2015,27:3112-3127.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00829 pmid: 26578700 |
[28] |
SCHLUTTENHOFER C, YUAN L . Regulation of specialized metabolism by WRKY transcription factors. Plant Physiology, 2015,167:295-306.
doi: 10.1104/pp.114.251769 pmid: 25501946 |
[29] |
ZHANG L, GU L, RINGLER P, SMITH S, RUSHTON P J, SHEN Q J . Three WRKY transcription factors additively repress abscisic acid and gibberellins signaling in aleurone cells. Plant Science, 2015,236:214-222.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.04.014 pmid: 26025535 |
[30] |
CHEN L, SONG Y, LI S, ZHANG L, ZOU C, YU D . The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant abiotic stresses. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2012,1819:120-128.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.09.002 pmid: 21964328 |
[31] |
BANERJEE A, ROYCHOUDHURY A . WRKY proteins: signaling and regulation of expression during abiotic stress responses. The Scientific World Journal, 2015,2015:3-24.
doi: 10.1155/2015/807560 pmid: 4387944 |
[32] |
ZHOU Q Y, TIAN A G, ZOU H F, XIE Z M, LEI G, HUANG J, WANG C M, WANG H W, ZHANG J S, CHEN SY . Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes, GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, confer differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2008,6:486-503.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00336.x pmid: 18384508 |
[33] |
JIANG Y, DEYHOLOS M K . Comprehensive transcriptional profiling of NaCl-stressed Arabidopsis roots reveals novel classes of responsive genes. BMC Plant Biology, 2006,6:25.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-6-25 pmid: 1621065 |
[34] |
BERRI S, ABBRUSCATO P, FAIVRE-RAMPANT O, BRASILEIRO A C, FUMASONI I, SATOH K, KIKUCHI S, MIZZI L, MORANDINI P, PÈ M E, PIFFANELLI P . Characterization of WRKY co-regulatory networks in rice and Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biology, 2009,9:120.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-120 pmid: 19772648 |
[35] |
NIU C F, WEI W, ZHOU Q Y, TIAN A G, HAO Y J, ZHANG W K, MA B, LIN Q, ZHANG Z B, ZHANG J S, CHEN S Y . Wheat WRKY genes TaWRKY2 and TaWRKY19 regulate abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell and Environment, 2012,35:1156-1170.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02480.x pmid: 22220579 |
[36] |
QIN Y, TIAN Y, LIU X . A wheat salinity-induced WRKY transcription factor TaWRKY93 confers multiple abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochemical And Biophysical Research Communications, 2015,464:428-433.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.06.128 pmid: 26106823 |
[37] | ZHOU L, WANG N N, GONG S Y, LU R, LI Y, LI X B . Overexpression of a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) WRKY gene, GhWRKY34, in Arabidopsis enhances salt-tolerance of the transgenic plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2015,96:311-320. |
[38] |
CHEN H, LAI Z B, SHI J W, XIAO Y, CHEN Z X, XU X P . Roles of Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40 and WRKY60 transcription factors in plant responses to abscisic acid and abiotic stress. BMC Plant Biology, 2010,10:281.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-281 pmid: 21167067 |
[39] |
WANG N, QU C Z, WANG Y C, XU H F, JIANG S H, FANG H C, LIU J X, ZHANG Z Y, CHEN X S . MdMYB4 enhances apple callus salt tolerance by increasing MdNHX1 expression levels. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2017,131:283-293.
doi: 10.1007/s11240-017-1283-7 |
[40] |
XU X, CHEN C, FAN B, CHEN Z . Physical and functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors. The Plant Cell, 2006,18:1310-1326.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.037523 pmid: 16603654 |
[41] |
CHEN Y F, LI L Q, XU Q, KONG Y H, WANG H, WU W H . The WRKY6 transcription factor modulates PHOSPHATE1 expression in response to low Pi stress in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 2009,21:3554-3566.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064980 pmid: 19934380 |
[42] | BESSEAU S, LI J, PALVA E T . WRKY54 and WRKY70 cooperate as negative regulators of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012,63:2667-2679. |
[1] | 董永鑫,卫其巍,洪浩,黄莹,赵延晓,冯明峰,窦道龙,徐毅,陶小荣. 在中国大豆品种上创建ALSV诱导的基因沉默体系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1710-1722. |
[2] | 陈学森, 伊华林, 王楠, 张敏, 姜生辉, 徐娟, 毛志泉, 张宗营, 王志刚, 姜召涛, 徐月华, 李建明. 芽变选种推动世界苹果和柑橘产业优质高效发展案例解读[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 755-768. |
[3] | 路翔, 高源, 王昆, 孙思邈, 李连文, 李海飞, 李青山, 冯建荣, 王大江. 苹果栽培品种不同族系香气特征分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(3): 543-557. |
[4] | 李雨泽,朱嘉伟,林蔚,蓝茉莹,夏黎明,张艺粒,罗聪,黄桂香,何新华. 香水柠檬RHF2A的克隆与互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(24): 4912-4926. |
[5] | 张洁,姜长岳,王跃进. 中国野生毛葡萄转录因子VqWRKY6与VqbZIP1互作调控抗白粉病功能分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(23): 4626-4639. |
[6] | 高小琴,聂继云,陈秋生,韩令喜,刘璐,程杨,刘明雨. 基于矿物元素指纹技术的‘富士’苹果产地溯源[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(21): 4252-4264. |
[7] | 储宝华,曹富国,卞宁宁,钱谦,李中兴,李雪薇,刘泽远,马锋旺,管清美. 84个苹果栽培品种对斑点落叶病的抗性评价和全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(18): 3613-3628. |
[8] | 胡亚丽,聂靖芝,吴霞,潘姣,曹珊,岳娇,罗登杰,王财金,李增强,张辉,吴启境,陈鹏. 水杨酸引发对红麻幼苗耐盐性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(14): 2696-2708. |
[9] | 朱春艳,宋佳伟,白天亮,王娜,马帅国,普正菲,董艳,吕建东,李杰,田蓉蓉,罗成科,张银霞,马天利,李培富,田蕾. NaCl胁迫对不同耐盐性粳稻种质幼苗叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2509-2525. |
[10] | 解斌,安秀红,陈艳辉,程存刚,康国栋,周江涛,赵德英,李壮,张艳珍,杨安. 不同苹果砧木对持续低磷的响应及适应性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2598-2612. |
[11] | 宋博文,杨龙,潘云飞,李海强,李浩,冯宏祖,陆宴辉. 农田景观格局对南疆苹果园梨小食心虫成虫种群动态的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(1): 85-95. |
[12] | 刘闯,高振,姚玉新,杜远鹏. 葡萄钾离子转运基因VviHKT1;7在盐胁迫下的功能鉴定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(9): 1952-1963. |
[13] | 张桂云,朱静雯,孙明法,严国红,刘凯,宛柏杰,代金英,朱国永. 盐胁迫条件下长白10号水稻籽粒中差异代谢物的分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(4): 675-683. |
[14] | 李天聪,朱行,魏宁,龙凤,武建颖,张燕,董金皋,申珅,郝志敏. 玉米大斑病菌SC35同源基因表达规律与互作分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(4): 733-743. |
[15] | 沙仁和,兰黎明,王三红,罗昌国. 苹果转录因子MdWRKY40b抗白粉病的机理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(24): 5220-5229. |
|