中国农业科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (10): 1859-1871.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.10.003

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

全球气候变暖对中国种植制度可能影响Ⅻ. 气候变暖对黑龙江寒地水稻安全种植区域和冷害风险的影响

王晓煜1,杨晓光1,吕 硕1,陈 阜2   

  1. 1中国农业大学资源与环境学院,北京 100193
    2中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京 100193
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-12 出版日期:2016-05-16 发布日期:2016-05-16
  • 通讯作者: 杨晓光,E-mail:yangxg@cau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王晓煜,E-mail:cauwangxiaoyu@cau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(31471408)、国家“973”计划(2010CB951502)

The Possible Effects of Global Warming on Cropping Systems in China Ⅻ. The Possible Effects of Climate Warming on Geographical Shift in Safe Planting Area of Rice in Cold Areas and the Risk Analysis of Chilling Damage

WANG Xiao-yu1, YANG Xiao-guang1, LÜ Shuo1, CHEN Fu2   

  1. 1College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193
    2College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193
  • Received:2015-10-12 Online:2016-05-16 Published:2016-05-16

摘要: 【目的】以1981年为时间节点,将1961—2010年划分为2个时段,结合未来不同升温情景,定量分析历史和未来气候变暖对黑龙江寒地水稻安全种植区域影响以及由此带来的冷害风险。【方法】利用积温带划分标准和农业气候指标,结合ArcGIS方法,对比分析历史和未来黑龙江积温带及寒地水稻安全种植区界限的空间变化特征。基于气象行业标准中水稻冷害标准分析寒地水稻安全种植北界变化敏感区域的延迟型冷害及障碍型冷害变化特征,评估气候变暖背景下水稻种植北界敏感地区冷害风险特征,并预估未来不同升温情景下冷害风险演变趋势。【结果】与1961—1980年相比,研究区域内1981—2010年积温带发生了明显的北移东扩,平均北移1.19个纬度,位移最大的是第五积温带和第六积温带,面积增加最多的是第二积温带,几乎覆盖了整个松嫩平原。未来不同升温情景下各积温带北扩趋势明显,面积增加最多的是第一积温带。1981—2010年寒地水稻安全种植北界相对于1961—1980年北移121 km,水稻安全种植北界北移至嫩江中部-五大连池-逊克北部一线。未来升温1—3℃情景下,寒地水稻安全种植北界向北移动410.5—545 km,向北扩展至黑龙江省呼玛以北地区,温度升高3℃时,除漠河地区外都可种植寒地水稻。比较寒地水稻种植界限敏感区域和非敏感区冷害风险可见,敏感区域冷害风险明显高于非敏感区域,其中障碍型冷害风险高于延迟型冷害,寒地水稻种植区严重冷害出现频率最高,其次是轻度冷害,中度冷害最低。1981—2010年敏感区域严重和轻度延迟型冷害较非敏感区域显著增加,中度延迟型冷害风险在敏感区域和非敏感区域均较低,敏感区域的各级障碍型冷害较非敏感区域明显增加;未来升温情景下敏感区域的各级冷害均高于非敏感区域。【结论】气候变暖背景下黑龙江积温带及寒地水稻安全种植北界发生了明显北移,未来升温情景下仍呈北移趋势。寒地水稻种植敏感区域的冷害风险明显高于非敏感区域,随着未来温度升高,冷害有不同程度的减轻,但仍需进一步关注寒地水稻种植区北缘北扩后的冷害风险,采取改进栽培技术与选育抗寒早熟品种等低温冷害防御措施,同时避免水稻种植区域的盲目扩大和品种越区种植,加强冷害防御能力。

关键词: 气候变暖, 寒地水稻, 安全种植北界, 冷害风险, 黑龙江省

Abstract: 【Objective】The period from 1961 to 2010 was divided into two stages, i.e., 1961-1980 and 1981-2010, combined with the scenarios of different temperature increases, then the geographical shift of rice safe planting areas in Heilongjiang province and the possible risk of chilling damage after the shift influenced by historical and future climate warming were quantitatively analyzed. 【Method】 Using the standard of the accumulated temperature zone and some agro-meteorological indicators, combined with ArcGis method, the geographical shift of accumulated temperature zones and northern limit for rice in cold planting areas were compared and analyzed. Using the risk assessment standard of chilling damage, the change characteristics of delayed chilling damage and sterile chilling damage in sensitive area of rice in cold areas were analyzed. The chilling damage characteristics in sensitive region under the background of climate warming and the risk evolution trends under the scenarios of different temperature increases were also evaluated.【Result】Compared with the results during the period from 1961 to 1980, the accumulated temperature zones moved northward and eastward obviously during 1981-2010, the average of which was northward 1.19°. The regions of maximum geographical shift were the fifth accumulated temperature zone and the sixth accumulated temperature zone. The region of maximum area increasing was the second accumulated temperature zone, which nearly covered Songnen Plain. The accumulated temperature zones under the future climate warming scenarios moved northward obviously. The region of maximum area increasing was the first accumulated temperature zone. Compared with the period 1961-1980, the average geographical shift of safe northern limit for rice in cold areas was northward 121 km and the maximum spatial displacement was in central part of Nenjiang- Wudalianchi- northern part of Xunke. The safe northern limit of rice in cold areas under the scenarios of 1-3℃ temperature increasing moved northward 410.5-545 km and the maximum spatial displacement was in northern part of Huma, Heilongjiang province. Rice could be planted in the whole region except Mohe under the scenarios of 3℃ temperature increasing. Compared rice sensitive planting region with nonsensitive region, the chilling damage risk in the sensitive region was obviously higher than nonsensitive region and the risk of sterile chilling damage was higher than delayed chilling damage. In rice safe planting areas of Heilongjiang province, the frequency of severe chilling damage was the highest, followed by light chilling damage, the frequency of moderate chilling damage was the lowest. The severe and light delayed chilling damage in the sensitive region during 1981-2010 showed an obvious increase. The risk of moderate delayed chilling damage in both sensitive region and nonsensitive region was low. The different grades of sterile chilling damage in sensitive region were higher than that in nonsensitive region. The different grades of chilling damage in sensitive region would be higher than that in nonsensitive region under future temperature increasing scenarios.【Conclusion】Under the background of climate warming as well as scenarios of different temperature increases, the accumulated temperature zones and safe northern limit of rice in cold areas had shown an obvious northward moving. The risk of chilling damage in sensitive region was obviously higher than that in nonsensitive region. The risk of chilling damage would be decreased as temperature increasing, but the defensive measures in sensitive region should be strengthened, such as adopting improved cultivation techniques, planting early-maturing varieties, as well as avoiding blind area and varieties expansion in rice planting areas.

Key words: climate warming, rice in cold area, safe northern limits, risk of chilling damage, Heilongjiang Province