天津市中国荷斯坦奶牛乳成分变化规律及模型

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.23.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】为满足对奶牛饲养管理的季节性调控，探索乳成分的变化规律。【方法】基于中国北方荷斯坦泌乳奶牛牛群生乳DHI测定数据，按第1胎到第4胎对泌乳奶牛的乳成分（乳蛋白率、乳脂肪率)进行分组，将原始数据经过预处理后获得乳蛋白率观察数据6 114个，乳脂肪率观察数据5 871个；假设以自然月份、泌乳胎次及两者的互作作为影响乳蛋白率及乳脂肪率变化的因素，采用SAS软件的GLM过程，建立统计分析模型。【结果】①在不分胎次（仅对1—4胎）对牛群自然月份乳成分的Duncan多重比较显示，不同月份之间的乳成分数据总体呈现显著差异（P＜0.05）（尽管有些月份之间的数据差异不显著）；乳蛋白率在9月最高（3.187%），在7月最低（3.016%）；乳脂肪率在2月最高（4.137%），在7月最低（3.845%）；②在不分月份（1—12个月）对牛群不同胎次乳成分的Duncan多重比较显示，不同胎次之间乳成分数据也呈现显著差异（P＜0.05）（尽管有些胎次之间的数据差异不显著）；乳蛋白率在第2胎最高（3.114%），在第4胎最低（3.066%）；乳脂肪率在第2和第3胎分别达到最高（3.983%和3.973%），在第4胎最低（3.923%）；③利用wood模型，建立了不同胎次混合牛群的乳蛋白率（MPP，%）及乳脂肪率（MFP，%）与自然月份之间的关系方程，即MPP=3.094x-0.0464×e0.0117x和MFP=4.2116x-0.0344×e0.0276x（x代表月份）。【结论】自然月份、泌乳胎次及两者的互作均极显著影响乳蛋白率及乳脂肪率（P＜0.001），而且乳蛋白率及乳脂肪率分别与自然月份存在wood模式的变化规律。获得的研究结果为准确调控牛群的饲养管理和营养供给，保证在特定月份的生乳品质达到收购标准提供了决策依据。

关键词: 荷斯坦奶牛 , 乳成分 , 自然月份 , 泌乳胎次 , 模型

Abstract: 【Objective】 To fulfill the need of seasonal management modification of lactating cows. 【Method】 the effect of natural month, parity, and their interaction on milk components were analyzed in the present study. Data were collected from a DHI database of lactating Chinese Holstein cows in the north part of china. Original data were screened and group according to parity (1-4). A total of 6114 milk protein content records and 5871 milk fat content records were analyzed by GLM procedure of SAS. 【Result】The Duncan multiple comparison of natural months, regardless of parity (only parity 1 to 4), demonstrated that the milk compositions of different months showed significant difference (P＜0.05), although the data between some different months showed no significant difference. The milk protein percentage in September reached the highest (3.187%), and in July the lowest (3.016%). Milk fat percentage in February was the highest (4.137%), and in July the lowest (3.845%).The same multiple comparison of different parity, also regardless of different months (1-12 months), demonstrated that the milk composition data of different parities showed significant difference (P＜0.05), although the data between some parities showed no significant difference. The milk protein percentage reached the highest in parity 2 (3.114%), and the lowest in parity 4 (3.066%). The milk fat percentage reached highest in parity 2 (3.983%) and parity 3 (3.973%), respectively; and the lowest in parity 4 (3.923%). In addition, the relation equation between the milk protein percentage (MPP, %) or the milk fat percentage (MFP, %) of different parities and the natural months in mixed cow herd was built using Model Wood, i.e. MPP=3.094x-0.0464×e0.0117x, MFP=4.2116x-0.0344×e0.0276x, x as month. 【Conclusion】The natural months, milking parities and their interaction had significant affects on milk composition including milk protein percentage and milk fat percentage, and milk composition had wood pattern changing relationship with natural months respectively.

Key words: Holstein cows , milk compositions , natural months , lactation parity , model

熊本海, 马毅, 庞之洪, 杨露, 易渺, 杨琴. 天津市中国荷斯坦奶牛乳成分变化规律及模型[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(23): 4891-4897.

XIONG Ben-Hai, MA Yi, PANG Zhi-Hong, YANG Lu, YI Miao, YANG Qin. Study on Variation Characteristics of Raw Milk Composition and Curve Models of Chinese Holstein in the City of Tianjin[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(23): 4891-4897.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.23.016

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2012/V45/I23/4891

参考文献

[1]齐利枝, 闫素梅, 生冉, 敖长金. 奶牛乳腺中乳成分前体物对乳成分影响的研究进展. 动物营养学报, 2011, 23(12): 2077-2083.

Qi L Z, Yan S M, Sheng R, Ao C J. Effects of milk component precursors on milk composition synthesis in the mammary gland of dairy cows: a review. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2011, 23(12): 2077-2083. (in Chinese)

[2]http://www.foodjx.com/news/Detail/71745.html, 2011.

[3]易渺, 熊本海. 从小型奶牛场生产情况看《生乳》新标准. 中国乳业, 2011(12): 14-16.

Yi M, Xiong B H. Some thinking on new standard of raw milk from a small dairy farm production. China Dairy, 2011(12): 14-16. (in Chinese )

[4]Heck J M L, van Valenberg H J F, Dijkstra J, van Hooijdonk A C M. Seasonal variation in the Dutch bovine raw milk composition. Journal of Dairy Science, 2012, 92(10): 4745-4755.

[5]Maurice-Van Eijndhoven M H T, Hiemstra S J, Calus M P L. Short communication: milk fat composition of 4 cattle breeds in the Netherlands. Journal of Dairy Science, 2011, 94(2): 1021-1025.

[6]Quist M A, LeBlanc S J, Hand K J, Lazenby D, Miglior F, Kelton D F. Milking-to-milking variability for milk yield, fat and protein percentage, and somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008, (91): 3412-3423.

[7]Giuseppe P, Anna N, Gianni B, Antonello C. Effects of nutrition on the contents of fat, protein, somatic cells, aromatic compounds, and undesirable substances in sheep milk. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2006, 131: 255-291.

[8]Martin O, Sauvant D. Metaanalysis of input/output kinetics in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2002, 85(12): 3363-3381.

[9]常玲玲, 杨章平, 陈仁金, 毛永江, 周里根, 王建勇, 尹兆华. 南方集约化饲养条件下荷斯坦奶牛乳脂肪率和乳蛋白率变化规律的初步研究. 中国畜牧杂志, 2010, 46(1): 23-27.

Chang L L, Yang Z P, Chen Y J, Mao Y J, Zhou L G, Wang J Y, Yin Z H. Study on variation features of milk fat percentage and milk protein percentage of Holstein Dairy cattle on intensive feeding method in the south of China. Journal of China Animal Husbandry, 2010, 46(1): 23-27. (in Chinese)

[10]白云峰, 谷子林, 霍贵成. 基于DHI模式奶牛生产管理专家系统. 畜牧与兽医, 2005, 37(11): 31-37.

Bai Y F, Gu Z L, He G C. A expert system of production management of dairy cattle based on DHI pattern. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2005, 37(11): 31-37. (in Chinese)

[11]王林波, 俞春华, 沈忠, 张静. DHI在湖北奶牛业中的应用. 湖北畜牧兽医, 2011(11): 8-10.

Wang L B, Yu C H, Shen Z, Zhang J. DHI application in the dairy of HuBei province. HuBei Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2011(11): 8-10. (in Chinese)

[12]熊本海, 马毅, 罗清尧, 庞之洪, 邓文. 中国荷斯坦奶牛第三泌乳期泌乳曲线模型的研究. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(2): 402-408.

Xiong B H, Ma Y, Luo Q Y, Pang Z H, Deng W. Study on lactation curve models of Chinese Holstein for the third parity. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(2): 402-408. (in Chinese)

[13]National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle: Seventh Revised Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001.

[14]中华人民共和国农业部. 奶牛饲养标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005.

Ministry of Agriculture of People’s Republic of China. Feeding Standard of Dairy Cattle. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005. (in Chinese)

[15]熊本海, 庞之洪, 罗清尧. 中国饲料成分及营养价值表. 第19版. 中国饲料, 2008(21): 32-38; (22): 31-40.

Xiong B H, Pang Z H, Luo Q Y. Tables of feed composition and nutritive values in China. Version 19. China Feed, 2008(21): 32-38; (22): 31-40. (in Chinese)

[16]SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. The SAS System for Windows. Version 8.01, 1999.

[17]Wood P D P. Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature, 1967, 216(10): 164-165.

[18]Dijkstra J, France J, Dhanoa M S, Maas J A, Hangan M D, Rook A J, Beever D E. A model to describe growth patterns of the mammary gland during pregnancy and lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 1997, 80(10): 2340-2354.

[19]中华人民共和国卫生部. 生乳(GB 19301-2010). 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.

Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Rawmilk (GB 19301-2010). Beijing: China Standard Press, 2010. (in Chinese)

[20]Michiru F, Hideharu T, Takami K, Akihisa Y. Effect of lactation stage, season and parity on milk cortisol concentration in Holstein cows. Livestock Science, 2008, 113(2/3): 280-284.

[21]Sevi A, Taibi L, Albenzio M, Muscio A, Annicchiarico G. Effect of parity on milk yield, composition, somatic cell count, renneting parameters and bacteria counts of Comisana ewes. Small Ruminant Research, 2000, 37(1/2): 99-107.

[22]Gil M M, Brandão T R S, Silva C L M. A modified Gompertz model to predict microbial inactivation under time-varying temperature conditions. Journal of Food Engineering, 2006, 76(1): 89-94.