玉米穗下节间长的杂种优势位点解析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.06.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】穗下节间长决定着玉米的株高和穗位高2个重要的农艺性状，并与产量、抗倒性等性状密切相关。前期研究发现玉米穗下第7、8、9节间长对穗位高具有决定作用，并表现出较强的杂种优势。文章拟解析玉米穗下节间长，尤其是穗下第7、8、9节间长杂种优势的决定因子，为全面了解和应用杂种优势奠定基础。【方法】利用以lx9801为遗传背景的昌7-2染色体单片段代换系（single segment substitution lines, SSSL）为基础材料，分别与优良自交系郑58和浚9058构建了两套测交群体，通过两年两点试验对玉米第7、8、9节间长进行杂种优势位点分析。【结果】利用SSSL×郑58测交群体和SSSL×浚9058测交群体通过两年两点试验发现，2012年在浚县的第7、8、9节间长的中亲优势值分别为57.25%和78.16%、68.30%和75.04%、59.48%和62.85%；2012年在长葛的第7、8、9节间长的中亲优势值分别为48.27%和63.02%、43.36%和54.80%、37.26%和42.62%；2013年在浚县的第7、8、9节间长的中亲优势值分别为23.01%和37.00%、22.69%和35.65%、22.20%和34.74%；2013年在长葛的第7、8、9节间长的中亲优势值分别为21.86%和33.19%、20.99%和35.57%、27.55%和42.19%；共定位了18个和18个第7节间长杂种优势位点，20个和23个第8节间长杂种优势位点，17个和19个第9节间长杂种优势位点。2个测交群体第7、8、9节间长相同的HL分别有3个、3个和1个，共有7个HL相同，分别占2个总测交群体中HL数的12.7%和11.6%。【结论】在SSSL×郑58群体定位的第7、8、9节间长HL与SSSL×浚9058群体的定位结果相比仅有7个（6%）相同位点，说明不同群体之间的杂种优势位点差别较大，几乎没有相同的杂种优势位点，推测在不同遗传背景下控制同一性状的杂种优势位点并不相同，据此推论，在单基因水平上，杂种优势位点表现出杂交组合（遗传背景）特异的特征。

关键词: 玉米, 单片段代换系, 穗下第7、8、9节间长, 杂种优势

Abstract: 【Objective】The under-ear internode length determines maize seedling height and ear height, which are two agronomic traits associated with yield and lodging resistance. Heterosis, a wild-spread genetic phenomenon, is widely applied in crop yield and quality improvement. In a previous study, the lengths of the 7th, 8th and 9th internodes were found to have a decisive effect on ear height and showed a high degree of heterosis. The aim of this study is to resolve the molecular mechanism of heterosis for comprehensive understanding and utilization of heterosis.【Method】 In this study, the chromosome single segment substitution lines (Single segment substitution lines, SSSLs) derived from continually cross of lx9801 and Chang7-2 were used as the basic materials. Test-crossing populations were constructed by crossing the SSSLs with inbred lines Zheng58 and Xun9058, respectively. The HL(Heterosis loci) of the 7th, 8th, and 9th internode length were detected through two-year and two-point tests.【Result】By using the SSSL×Zheng58 test-cross group and SSSL× Xun9058 test-cross group, the heterosis loci (HL) of the 7th, 8th, and 9th internode length were detected through two-year and two-point tests. In 2012, the mid parent heterosis values of the 7th, 8th, and 9th internode length in Xunxian were 57.25% and 78.16%, 68.30% and 75.04%, 59.48% and 62.85%, respectively, and that in Changge were 48.27% and 63.02%, 43.36% and 54.80%, 37.26% and 42.62%, respectively. In 2013, the mid parent heterosis values of the 7th, 8th, and 9th internode length in Xunxian were 23.01% and 37%, 22.69% and 35.65%, 22.20% and 34.74%, respectively, and that in Changge were 21.86% and 33.19%, 20.99% and 35.57%, 27.55% and 42.19%, respectively. A total of 18 and 18 length heterosis loci were obtained from the 7th internode, 20 and 23 were obtained from the 8th internode, 17 and 19 were obtained from the 9th internode. Compared the same HL of the two test-crossing groups, there are 3, 3 and 1 same HL of 7th, 8th, 9th internode length, respectively. These same HL occupied 12.7% and 11.6% of the total HL numbers, respectively. 【Conclusion】There were only 7 (6%) same HL sites had same location between SSSL×Zheng58 group and SSSL×Xun9058 group of the 7th, 8th, and 9th internode length, which indicated that the heterotic loci among different groups may be different. It was speculated that under different genetic backgrounds there are different genes controlling the same heterosis traits. The performance of heterotic loci at single gene level should be crossing group (genetic background) specific.

Key words: maize, single segment substitution lines, the length of 7th, 8th and 9th internodes, heterosis

李慧敏，李卫华，郭海平，刘坤，张向歌，张晓祥，谢惠玲，汤继华，丁冬. 玉米穗下节间长的杂种优势位点解析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(6): 978-989.

LI HuiMin, LI WeiHua, GUO HaiPing, LIU Kun, ZHANG XiangGe, ZHANG XiaoXiang, XIE HuiLing, TANG JiHua, DING Dong. Heterosis Analysis of Internode Length Under Ear in Maize[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(6): 978-989.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.06.002

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2017/V50/I6/978

参考文献

[1] 赵鹏. 玉米穗下节间长杂种优势的组学分析[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2015.

ZHAO P. Omics analysis of heterosis for internode length under ear in maize [D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)

[2] Schnable P S, Springer N M. Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2013, 64: 71-88.

[3] WEI X, WANG B, PENG Q, WEI F, MAO K, ZHANG X, TANG J. Heterotic loci for various morphological traits of maize detected using a single segment substitution lines test-cross population. Molecular Breeding, 2015, 35(3): 1-13.

[4] Marcon C, Lamkemeyer T, Malik W A, Ungrue D, Piepho H P, Hochholdinger F. Heterosis-associated proteome analyses of maize (Zea mays L.) seminal roots by quantitative label-free LC–MS. Journal of Proteomics, 2013, 93: 295-302.

[5] SHANG L, WANG Y, CAI S, WANG X, LI Y, ABDUWELI A, HUA J. Partial dominance, overdominance, epistasis and QTL by environment interactions contribute to heterosis in two upland cotton hybrids. Genes Genomes Genetics, 2016, 6(3): 499-507.

[6] Reif J C, Hahn V, Melchinger A E. Genetic basis of heterosis and prediction of hybrid performance. Helia, 2012, 35(57): 1-8.

[7] SHEN G, ZHAN W, CHEN H, XING Y. Dominance and epistasis are the main contributors to heterosis for plant height in rice. Plant Science, 2014, 215: 11-18.

[8] DING H, QIN C, LUO X, LI L, CHEN Z, LIU H, L(U)BBERSTEDT T. Heterosis in early maize ear inflorescence development: a genome-wide transcription analysis for two maize inbred lines and their hybrid. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2014, 15(8): 13892-13915.

[9] Thiemann A, FU J, Seifert F, GRANT-DOENTON R T, SCHRAG T A, POSPISIL H, SCHOLTEN S. Genome-wide meta-analysis of maize heterosis reveals the potential role of additive gene expression at pericentromeric loci. BMC Plant Biology, 2014, 14(1): 88.

[10] ZHAO P, DING D, ZHANG F, ZHAO X, XUE Y, LI W, TANG J. Investigating the molecular genetic basis of heterosis for internode expansion in maize by microRNA transcriptomic deep sequencing. Functional & Integrative Genomics, 2015, 15(3): 261-270.

[11] CHEN Z J. Genomic and epigenetic insights into the molecular bases of heterosis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2013, 14(7): 471-482.

[12] Virmani S S. Heterosis and hybrid rice breeding. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.

[13] Sran R S, Pandey D P. Combining ability and heterosis for yield and its component traits in rice. ORYZA-an International Journal on Rice, 2015, 52(2): 105-110.

[14] Nayak P G, Sreedhar M, Vanisree S. Heterosis studies of aromatic lines for yield and grain quality traits in rice. 2015.

[15] Amiri-Oghan H, Fotokian M H, Javidfar F, Alizadeh B. Genetic analysis of grain yield, days to flowering and maturity in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) using diallel crosses. International Journal of Plant Production, 2012, 3(2): 19-26.

[16] Zou J, Zhu J, Huang S, Tian E, Xiao Y, Fu D, Meng J. Broadening the avenue of intersubgenomic heterosis in oilseed Brassica. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2010, 120(2): 283-290.

[17] TWUMASI-AFRIYIE S, Friesen D, Pixley K. Quality protein maize: Progress and prospects. Plant breeding reviews, 2011, 34: 83.

[18] Riedelsheimer C, Czedik-Eysenberg A, Grieder C, LISEC J, TECHNOW F, SULPICE R, MELCHINGER A E. Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex he terotic traits in hybrid maize. Nature genetics, 2012, 44(2): 217-220.

[19] Ko D K, Rohozinski D, SONG Q, TAYLOR S H, JUENGER T E, HARMON F G, CHEN Z J. Temporal shift of circadian-mediated gene expression and carbon fixation contributes to biomass heterosis in maize hybrids. PLoS Genetics, 2016, 12(7): e1006197.

[20] Pan T C F, Applebaum S L, Manahan D T. Genetically determined variation in developmental physiology of bivalve larvae (Crassostrea gigas). Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 2015, 88(2): 128-136.

[21] 王玉民, 席章营, 尚爱兰, 王帮太. 作物单片段代换系的构建及应用. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(3): 67-71.

WANG Y M, XI Z Y, SHANG A L, WANG B T. The building and application of single segment substitution system in crop.Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008, 24(3): 67-71. (in Chinese)

[22] 尚爱兰. 玉米单片段代换系的构建及产量性状杂种优势分析[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2009.

SHANG A L. The construction of a single segment substitution lines and heterosis of yield characters analysis [D]. Zhengzhou: Henan agricultural university, 2009. (in Chinese)

[23] 贾桂平, 边大红, 蔡丽君, 杜雄, 牛海峰, 崔彦宏. 土壤耕作方式对夏玉米抗茎倒伏能力的影响. 华北农学报, 2013, 28(4): 163-168.

JIA G P, BIAN D H, CAI L J, DU X, NIU H F, CUI C H. Soil Tillage practices on maize stem Lodging resistance. North of Agronomy Journal, 2013, 28(4): 163-168. (in Chinese)

[24] TENG F, ZHAI L, LIU R, BAI W, WANG L, HUO D, ZHANG Z. ZmGA3ox2, a candidate gene for a major QTL, qPH3. 1, for plant height in maize. The Plant Journal, 2013, 73(3): 405-416.

[25] TANG Z, YANG Z, HU Z, ZHANG D, LU X, JIA B, XU C. Cytonuclear epistatic quantitative trait locus mapping for plant height and ear height in maize. Molecular Breeding, 2013, 31(1): 1-14.

[26] CAI H, CHU Q, GU R, YUAN L, LIU J, ZHANG X, ZHANG F. Identification of QTLs for plant height, ear height and grain yield in maize (Zea mays L.) in response to nitrogen and phosphorus supply. Plant Breeding, 2012, 131(4): 502-510.

[27] LI Z Q, ZHANG H M, WU X P, SUN Y, LIU X H. Quantitative trait locus analysis for ear height in maize based on a recombinant inbred line population. Genetics and Molecular Research, 2014, 13(1): 450.

[28] 张君, 库丽霞, 张伟强, 杨爽, 刘海英, 赵瑞芳, 陈彦惠. 玉米穗上节间距的QTL定位. 玉米科学, 2010, 18(4): 45-48.

ZHANG J, KU L X, ZHANG W Q, YANG S, LIU H Y, ZHAO R F, CHEN Y H. Internodes of QTL location on the ear of corn. Corn Science, 2010, 18(4): 45-48. (in Chinese)

[29] Meghji M R, Dudley J W, Lambert R J, SPRAGUE G F. Inbreeding depression, inbred and hybrid grain yields, and other traits of maize genotypes representing three eras. Crop Science, 1984, 24(3): 545-549.

[30] 赵芳明, 张桂权, 曾瑞珍, 杨正林, 凌英华, 桑贤春, 何光华. 利用单片段代换系研究水稻产量相关性状QTL加性及上位性效应. 作物学报, 2012, 38(11): 2007-2014.

ZHAO F M, ZHANG G Q, ZENG R Z, YANG Z L, LING Y H, SANG X C, HE G H. Using single segment substitution lines research yield related traits QTL additive and epistatic effect in rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(11): 2007-2014. (in Chinese)

[31] 王召辉. 玉米株型穗部性状的QTL定位及分析[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2011.

WANG Z H. QTL mapping and analysis plant type panicle traits in maize [D]. Chongqing: Southwest university, 2011. (in Chinese)

[32] 王铁固, 张怀胜, 马娟, 佘宁安, 陈士林. 玉米产量及相关性状的杂种优势分析. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(8): 88-90.

WANG T G, ZHANG H S, MA J, SHE N A, CHEN S L. Yield heterosis analysis and related traits in maize. Jiangsu agricultural science (in Chinese), 2012, 40(8): 88-90.

[33] 郭小蛟, 张涛, 蒋开锋, 杨莉, 曹应江, 杨乾华, 高磊. 水稻籼粳交F₈, F₂群体穗长QTL比较分析. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(23): 4849-4857.

GUO X J, ZHANG T, JIANG K F, YANG L, CAO Y J, YANG Q H, GAO L. Comparison of panicle length QTL based on F₂ and F₈ populations derived from rice subspecies cross. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(23): 4849-4857. (in Chinese)

[34] Wallace J G, Larsson S J, Buckler E S. Entering the second century of maize quantitative genetics. Heredity, 2014, 112(1): 30-38.

[35] Huffman R D, Edwards J W, Pollak L M, SCOTT M P. Interaction of genetic mechanisms regulating methionine concentration in maize grain. Crop Science, 2016, 56(5): 2379-2389.

[36] HE G M, LUO X J, TIAN F, LI K G, ZHU Z F, SU W, YANG J S. Haplotype variation in structure and expression of a gene cluster associated with a quantitative trait locus for improved yield in rice. Genome research, 2006, 16(5): 618-626.

[37] Pea G, Paulstephenraj P, Canè M A, SARDARO M L S, LANDI P, MORGANTE M, FRASCAROLI E. Recombinant near- isogenic lines: a resource for the mendelization of heterotic QTL in maize. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2009, 281(4): 447-457.

[38] Duvick D N. Theory, empiricism and intuition in professional plant breeding. Integrating knowledge and practice, 2002: 189-212.