Alberini A. 1995. Efficiency vs bias of willingness to pay estimates: Bivariate and interval-data models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 169–180.

Alberini A, Kanninen B, Carson R T. 1997. Modeling response incentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuation data. Land Economics, 73, 309–324.

Amigues J P, Boulatoff C, Desaigues B, Gauthier C, Keith J E. 2002. The benefits and costs of riparian analysis habitat preservation: A willingness to accept/willingness to pay contingent valuation approach. Ecological Economics, 1, 17–31.

Arrow K, Solow R, Portney P R, Leamer E E, Radner R, Schuman H. 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58, 4601–4614.

Beck M J, Fifer S, Rose M J. 2016. Can you ever be certain? Reducing hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments via respondent reported choice certainty. Transportation Research Part B (Methodological), 89, 149–167.

Bossio D A, Cook-Patton S C, Ellis P W, Fargione J, Sanderman J, Smith P, Wood S, Zomer R J, von Unger M, Emmer I M, Griscom B W. 2020. The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions. Nature Sustainability, 3, 391–398.

Boyle K J, Johnson F R, McCollum D W, Desvousges W H, Dunford R W, Hudson S P. 1996. Valuing public goods: Discrete versus continuous contingent-valuation responses. Land Economics, 72, 381–396.

Cameron T A, Quiggin J. 1994. Estimation using contingent valuation data from a “dichotomous choice with follow-up” questionnaire. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 3, 218–234.

Carson R T, Groves T. 2007. Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 181–210.

Chu X, Zhan J, Wang C, Hameeda S, Wang X. 2020. Households’ willingness to accept improved ecosystem services and influencing factors: Application of contingent valuation method in Bashang Plateau, Hebei Province, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 255, 109925.

Cummings R G, Taylor L O. 1999. Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. American Economic Review, 89, 649–665.

Felardo J, Hindsley P. 2021. Ex post consequentiality and willingness to accept: A case study of a payment for ecosystem services program. Journal of Forest Economics, 36, 265–288.

Frey U, Pirscher F. 2019. Distinguishing protest responses in contingent valuation: A conceptualization of motivations and attitudes behind them. PLoS One, 14, e0209872.

Hanemann M, Loomis J, Kanninen B. 1991. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 4, 1255–1263.

Herriges J A, Kling C, Liu C C, Tobias J. 2010. What are the consequences of consequentiality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59, 67–81.

Herriges J A, Shogren J F. 1996. Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1, 112–131.

Hoehn J P, Randall A. 1987. A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 3, 226–247.

Hu Y N, Huang J K, Hou L L. 2019. Impacts of the grassland ecological compensation policy on household livestock production in China: An empirical study in Inner Mongolia. Ecological Economics, 161, 248–256.

Jayalath T A, Grala R K, Grado S C, Evans D L. 2021. Increasing provision of ecosystem services through participation in a conservation program. Ecosystem Services, 50, 101303.

Johnston R J, Boyle K J, Adamowicz W, Bennett J, Brouwer R, Cameron T R, Hanemann W M, Hanley N, Ryan M, Scarpa R, Tourangeau R, Vossler C A. 2017. Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2, 319–405.

Kaczan D, Swallow B M, Adamowicz W L. 2013. Designing a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program to reduce deforestation in Tanzania: An assessment of payment approaches. Ecological Economics, 95, 20–30.

Kingsbury L, Boggess W G. 1999. An economic analysis of riparian landowners’ willingness to participate in Oregon’s conservation reserve enhancement program. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association Conferences. Nashville, Tenesee. pp. 1289–1290.

Lee M, Manning P, Rist J, Power S A, Marsh C. 2010. A global comparison of grassland biomass responses to CO2 and nitrogen enrichment. Philosophical Transactions (Biological Sciences), 365, 2047–2056.

Li M, Zhao P, Wu L, Chen K. 2021. Effects of value perception, environmental regulation and their interaction on the improvement of herdsmen’s grassland ecological policy satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6, 3078.

List J A, Gallet C A. 2001. What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? Environmental and Resource Economics, 20, 241–254.

Liu H F, Hou L L, Kang N N, Nan Z B, Huang J K. 2022. A meta-regression analysis of the economic value of grassland ecosystem services in China. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108793.

Liu P F, Swallow S K. 2016. Integrating cobenefits produced with water quality BMPs into credits markets: Conceptualization and experimental illustration for EPRI’s Ohio River Basin trading. Water Resources Research, 52, 3387–3407.

Liu P F, Tian X. 2021. Downward hypothetical bias in the willingness to accept measure for private goods: Evidence from a field experiment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 103, 1679–1699.

Luo Y C, Swallow B M, Adamowicz W L. 2022. Using willingness to pay and willingness to accept to value farmland preservation under ambiguous property rights and preference uncertainty. Land Economics, 98, 639–657.

Lv X X, Zhang M X, Li D Q. 2022. Eliciting herders’ willingness to accept grassland conservation: A choice experiment design in pastoral regions of China. Land, 11, 1463.

Min F, Li C. 2019. Spatial characteristics of land uses and ecological compensations based on payment for ecosystem services model from 2000 to 2015 in Sichuan Province, China. Ecological Informatics, 50, 162–183.

Morrison M, Brown T C. 2009. Testing the effectiveness of certainty scales, cheap talk, and dissonance-minimization in reducing hypothetical bias in contingent valuation studies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44, 307–326.

Motta R S, Ortiz R A. 2018. Costs and perceptions conditioning willingness to accept payments for ecosystem services in a Brazilian case. Ecological Economics, 147, 333–342.

Murphy J J, Allen P G, Stevens T H, Weatherhead D. 2005a. A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Environmental & Resource Economics, 30, 313–325.

Murphy J J, Stevens T H, Weatherhead D. 2005b. Is cheap talk effective at eliminating hypothetical bias in a provision point mechanism? Environmental & Resource Economics, 30, 327–343.

O’Mara F P. 2012. The role of grasslands in food security and climate change. Annals of Botany, 110, 1263–1270.

Peciña M, Ward R D, Bunce R, Sepp K, Kuusemets V, Luuk O. 2019. Country-scale mapping of ecosystem services provided by semi-natural grasslands. Science of the Total Environment, 661, 212–225.

Penn J M, Hu W. 2021. The extent of hypothetical bias in willingness to accept. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 103, 126–141.

Sala O E, Paruelo J M. 1997. Ecosystem services in grasslands. In: Daily G C, eds., Natures’ Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, D.C. pp. 237–251.

Schwarzinger M, Carrat F, Luchini S. 2009. “If you have the flu symptoms, your asymptomatic spouse may better answer the willingness-to-pay question”: Evidence from a double-bounded dichotomous choice model with heterogeneous anchoring. Journal of Health Economics, 28, 873–884.

Smith V K, Mansfield C. 1998. Buying time: Real and hypothetical offers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36, 209–224.

Sun S, Niu J, Wang Y, Yang H, Chen X. 2024. Exploring the heterogeneities in the impacts of China’s grassland ecological compensation program. Land, 13, 132.

Tang J, Xin M, Wang X. 2022. Herdsmen’s willingness to accept compensation for grazing ban compliance: Empirical evidence from pastoral China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 361, 132102.

Tao W, Lu Y, Li J D, Yue Y, Bing X, Rui Z. 2023. An empirical study of the design of an ecological damage compensation assessment framework for land reclamation from the sea. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 27, 21.

Tapsuwan S, Burton M, Perriam J. 2010. A multivariate probit analysis of willingness to pay for cave conservation: A case study of Yanchep National Park, Western Australia. Tourism Economics, 16, 1019–1035.

TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. UNEP/Earthprint, Landon and Washington.

Vedel S E, Jacobsen J B, Thorsen B J. 2015. Forest owners’ willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality. Ecological Economics, 113, 15–24.

Vossler C A, Doyon M, Rondeau D. 2012. Truth in consequentiality: Theory and field evidence on discrete choice experiments. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 4, 145–171.

Wang D, Huang J K. 2018. Impact of grassland ecological compensation policy on household’s off-farm livelihoods. Resources Science, 40, 1344–1353. (in Chinese)

Wang W, Zhou L, Yang G, Sun Y, Chen Y. 2019. Prohibited grazing policy satisfaction and life satisfaction in rural Northwest China - A case study in Yanchi County, Ningxia Hui autonomous region. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 4374.

Whitehead J C. 2002. Incentive incompatibility and starting-point bias in iterative valuation questions. Land Economics, 78, 285–297.

Xie B C, Zhao W, Yin Z L, Xie P. 2019. How much will the residents pay for clean energy? Empirical study using the double bound dichotomous choice method for Tianjin, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118208.

Xiong K, Zhang N, Kung C C, Kong F. 2019. Determinants of residents’ willingness to accept and their levels for ecological conservation in Ganjiang River Basin, China: An empirical analysis of survey data for 677 households. Sustainability, 11, 6138.

Yan H, Li W, Yang H, Guo X, Liu X, Jia W. 2021. Estimation of the rational range of ecological compensation to address land degradation in the poverty belt around Beijing and Tianjin, China. Land, 10, 1383.

Yang F, Xu J, Zhao X, Wang X, Xiong Y. 2022. Assessment of the grassland ecological compensation policy (GECP) in Qinghai, China. Agriculture, 12, 1479.

Yang G, Min Q, Li W, Liu L, Rong J, Wu X. 2006. Herdsmen’s willingness to accept (WTA) compensation for implement of prohibiting-graze policy in Xilinguole steppe. Ecology and Environment, 4, 747–751. (in Chinese)

Zhang J, Brown C, Qiao G, Zhang B. 2019. Effect of eco-compensation schemes on household income structures and herder satisfaction: Lessons from the grassland ecosystem subsidy and award scheme in Inner Mongolia. Ecological Economics, 159, 46–53.

Zhen L, Li F, Yan H M, Liu G H, Liu J Y, Zhang H Y, Du B Z, Wu R Z, Sun C Z, Wang C. 2014. Herders’ willingness to accept versus the public sector’s willingness to pay for grassland restoration in the Xilingol League of Inner Mongolia, China. Environmental Research Letters, 9, 045003.

Zuo A, Wang J, Huang Q. 2020. Willingness to accept compensation for land fallowing: Results from a survey of village representatives in Northern China. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 64, 845–866.