Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2020, Vol. 19 Issue (7): 1834-1841    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62784-X
Special Issue: 植物病理合辑Plant Protection—Plant Pathology 植物病毒合辑Plant Virus
Plant Protection Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
A sensitive SYBR Green RT-qPCR method for grapevine virus E and its application for virus detection in different grapevine sample types
REN Fang, ZHANG Zun-ping, FAN Xu-dong, HU Guo-jun, ZHANG Meng-yan, DONG Ya-feng
National Center for Eliminating Viruses from Deciduous Fruit Trees, Research Institute of Pomology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xingcheng 125100, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
To develop a rapid and high-sensitivity method for detection of grapevine virus E (GVE), a SYBR Green based real-time fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR method (RT-qPCR) was established.  This method could be used to detect GVE specifically, and the sensitivity was about 100 times greater than conventional RT-PCR.  An excellent linear correlation (R2=0.997) and a high amplification efficiency (E=97.5%) were obtained from the standard curve of this method.  Reproducibility tests revealed that the coefficients of variation in the intra- and inter-assay results were 0.31–1.03% and 0.82–2.62%, respectively, indicating a good reproducibility.  The RT-qPCR method could be used to detect GVE in a wide range of grapevine sample types.  The detection rates of RT-qPCR for nearly all sample types from different positions and seasons were higher than conventional RT-PCR.  The detection rates in spring, summer, autumn and winter increased gradually.  Samples in autumn and winter were best for detection, and the detection rates of most samples were 80–100%, which were 10 to 40% higher than conventional RT-PCR.  In general, old petioles and branches were the best tissues for GVE detection.  The detection rates of these samples in each season were all 100%, which were 20 to 40% higher than conventional RT-PCR.  The second highest rates were in the old leaf, with detection rates for RT-qPCR of 80–100% in all seasons, which were 20 to 40% higher than conventional RT-PCR.  GVE could be difficultly detected in young leaves by conventional RT-PCR, and the detection rates were only 0–50%, while by RT-qPCR the rates could increase to 0–80%.  A total of 33 out of 363 samples (belonging to 68 cultivars) from 20 regions in China were detected to be positive by RT-qPCR (9.1%), which was more than twice the rate of the conventional RT-PCR (3.9%). 
Keywords:  grapevine       grapevine virus E        detection        RT-qPCR        conventional RT-PCR  
Received: 29 April 2019   Accepted:
Fund: This research was supported by the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-29-bc-1).
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence DONG Ya-feng, Tel: +86-429-3598278, E-mail: yfdong@163.com    
About author:  REN Fang, Tel: +86-429-3598137, E-mail: renfang196302@163.com;

Cite this article: 

REN Fang, ZHANG Zun-ping, FAN Xu-dong, HU Guo-jun, ZHANG Meng-yan, DONG Ya-feng. 2020. A sensitive SYBR Green RT-qPCR method for grapevine virus E and its application for virus detection in different grapevine sample types. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(7): 1834-1841.

Abou-Ghanem N, Saldarelli P, Minafra A, Buzkan N, Castellano M A, Martelli G P. 1997. Properties of Grapevine virus D, a novel putative Trichovirus. Journal of Plant Pathology, 78, 15–25.
Alabi O J, Poojari S, Sarver K, Martin R R, Naidu R A. 2013. Complete genome sequence analysis of an American isolate of Grapevine virus E. Virus Genes, 46, 563–566.
Beuve M, Sempé L, Lemaire O. 2007. A sensitive one-step real-time RT-PCR method for detecting Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 variants in grapevine. Journal of Virological Methods, 141, 117–124.
Blouin A G, Chooi K M, Warren B, Napier K R, Barrero R A, MacDiarmid R M. 2018a. Grapevine virus I, a putative new vitivirus detected in co-infection with Grapevine virus G in New Zealand. Archives of Virology, 163, 1371–1374.
Blouin A G, Keenan S, Napier K R, Barrero R A, MacDiarmid R M. 2018b. Identification of a novel vitivirus from grapevines in New Zealand. Archives of Virology, 163, 281–284.
Boscia D, Digiaro M, Safi M, Garau R, Zhou Z, Minafra A, Abou Ghanem-Sabanadzovic N, Bottalico G, Potere O. 2001. Production of monoclonal antibodies to Grapevine virus D and contribution to the study of its etiological role in grapevine disease. Vitis, 40, 69–74.
Bruisson S, Lebel S, Walter B, Prevotat L, Seddas S, Schellenbaum P. 2017. Comparative detection of a large population of grapevine viruses by TaqMan® RT-qPCR and ELISA. Journal of Virological Methods, 240, 73–77.
Candresse T, Theil S, Faure C, Marais A. 2017. Determination of the complete genomic sequence of Grapevine virus H, a novel vitivirus infecting grapevine. Archives of Virology, 163, 277–280.
Coetzee B, Maree H H J, Stephan D, Freeborough M J, Burger J T. 2010. The first complete nucleotide sequence of a Grapevine virus E variant. Archives of Virology, 155, 1357–1360.
Diaz-Lara A, Golino D, Al Rwahnih M. 2018. Genomic characterization of Grapevine virus J, a novel virus identified in grapevine. Archives of Virology, 163, 1965–1967.
Fan X D, Dong Y F, Zhang Z P, Ren F, Hu G J, Zhu H J. 2013. First report of Grapevine virus E from grapevine in China. Journal of Plant Pathology, 95, 659–668.
Fan X D, Dong Y F, Zhang Z P, Ren F, Hu G J, Zhu H J. 2014. Molecular identification and gene sequence analysis of Grapevine virus E. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 44, 455–460. (in Chinese)
Fan X D, Hong N, Dong Y F, Ma Y X, Zhang Z P, Ren F, Hu G J, Zhou J, Wang G P. 2015. Genetic diversity and recombination analysis of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1 from China. Archives of Virology, 160, 1669–1678.
Jo Y, Song M K, Choi H, Park J S, Lee J W, Lian S, Lee B C, Cho W K. 2017. Genome sequence of Grapevine Virus K, a novel vitivirus infecting grapevine. Genome Announcements, 5, 1–2.
Komorowska B, Berniak H, Golis T. 2014. Detection of grapevine viruses in Poland. Journal of Phytopathology, 162, 326–331.
Krebelj A J, ?epin U, Ravnikar M, Novak M P. 2015. Spatio-temporal distribution of Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) in grapevine. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 142, 159–171.
MacKenzie D J, McLean M A, Mukerji S, Green M. 1997. Improved RNA extraction from woody plants for the detection of viral pathogens by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Plant Disease, 81, 222–226.
Martelli G P. 1993. Rugosewoodcomplex. In: Martelli G P, ed., Graft transmissible Diseases of Grapevines: Handbook for Detection and Diagnosis. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. pp. 45–54.
Martelli G P, Jelkmann W. 1998. Foveavirus, a new plant virus genus. Archives of Virology, 143, 1245–1249.
Martelli G P, Minafra A, Saldarelli P. 1997. Vitivirus, a new genus of plant viruses. Archives of Virology, 142, 1929–1932.
Martelli G P, Boudon-Padieu E. 2006. Directory of infectious diseases of grapevines and viroses and viruslike diseases of grapevine: Bibliographic report 1998–2004. Options Méditerranéennes. Série B, 55, Studies and Research. Bari, Italy. p. 279.
Meng B, Pang S Z, Forsline P L, McFerson J R, Gonsalves D. 1998. Nucleotide sequence and genome structure of grapevine Rupestris stem pitting associated virus-1 reveal similarities to Apple stem pitting virus. Journal of General Virology, 79, 2059–2069.
Nakaune R, Toda S, Mochizuki M, Nakano M. 2008. Identification and characterization of a new vitivirus from grapevine. Archives of Virology, 153, 1827–1832.
Osman F, Rowhani A. 2008. Real-time RT-PCR (TaqMan) assays for the detection of viruses associated with Rugose wood complex of grapevine. Journal of Virological Methods, 154, 69–75.
Pacifico D, Caciagli P, Palmano S, Mannini F, Marzachì C. 2011. Quantitation of grapevine leafroll associated virus-1 and -3, Grapevine virus A, Grapevinefanleaf virus and Grapevine fleck virus in field-collected Vitis vinifera L. ‘Nebbiolo’ by real-time reverse transcription-PCR. Journal of Virological Methods, 172, 1–7.
Ren F, Dong Y F, Zhang Z P, Fan X D, Hu G J. 2018a. Development and application of a quantitative RT-PCR approach for detection of Grapevine virus A. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 45, 2243–2253. (in Chinese)
Ren F, Zhang Z P, Fan X D, Hu G J, Zhang M Y, Dong Y F. 2018b. Effective detection of Grapevine virus B by real-time fluorescent quantitative RT-PCR. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 49, 569–576. (in Chinese)
Tsai C W, Daugherty M P, Almeida R P P. 2012. Seasonal dynamics and virus translocation of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 in grapevine cultivars. Plant Pathology, 61, 977–985.
Zhang Y P, Uyemoto J K, Golino D A, Rowhani A. 1998. Nucleotide sequence and RT-PCR detection of a virus associated with grapevine rupestris stem-pitting disease. Phytopathology, 88, 1211–1217.
Zhou J, Fan X D, Dong Y F, Zhang Z P, Hu G J, Ren F, Li  Z N. 2016. Development and application of a quantitative RT-PCR approach for quantification of Grapevine fanleaf virus. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 43, 538–548. (in Chinese)
[1] LIU Yan, WANG Rui, PAN Zhan-lei, ZHENG Xun-hua, WEI Huan-huan, ZHANG Hong-rui, MEI Bao-ling, QUAN Zhi, FANG Yun-ting, JU Xiao-tang. Quantifying in situ N2 fluxes from an intensively managed calcareous soil using the 15N gas-flux method[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2750-2766.
[2] YANG Zhen, ZHANG Lan, ZHAO Jin-fa, ZHANG Xing-kai, WANG Ying, LI Tai-sheng, ZHANG Wei, ZHOU Yan. New geographic distribution and molecular diversity of Citrus chlorotic dwarf-associated virus in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(1): 293-298.
[3] TIAN Yan-li, ZHAO Yu-qiang, CHEN Bao-hui, CHEN Shuo, ZENG Rong, HU Bai-shi, LI Xiang. Real-time PCR assay for detection of Dickeya fangzhongdai causing bleeding canker of pear disease in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(4): 898-905.
[4] XIANG Yong, YAN Ling, ZHENG Xiao-cui, LI Li-zhen, LIU Peng, CAO Wei-sheng. Rapid detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by cross priming amplification[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(10): 2523-2529.
[5] ZHENG Lu-ying, ZHANG Zhi-jun, ZHANG Jin-ming, LI Xiao-wei, HUANG Jun, LIN Wen-cai, LI Wei-di, LI Chuan-ren, LU Yao-bin. Selection of reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis of Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) sex-dimorphic development[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(4): 854-864.
[6] ZHANG Bai-zhong, LIU Jun-jie, YUAN Guo-hui, CHEN Xi-ling, GAO Xi-wu. Selection and evaluation of potential reference genes for gene expression analysis in greenbug (Schizaphis graminum Rondani)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(09): 2054-2065.
[7] LIANG Qiao-lan, WEI Lie-xin, XU Bing-liang, A. Calderón-Urrea, XIANG Dong. Study of viruses co-infecting white clover (Trifolium repens) in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(09): 1990-1998.
No Suggested Reading articles found!