|
|
|
Antimicrobial ability and growth promoting effects of feed supplemented with probiotic bacterium isolated from gut microflora of Cirrhinus mrigala |
Anita Bhatnagar, Ritu Lamba |
Department of Zoology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra 136119, India |
|
|
摘要 The present studies were conducted to isolate, select, identify and characterize gut bacteria as antimicrobial and growth promoting agent for the feed of economically important fish Cirrhinus mrigala. Intestinal microflora were isolated, counted, and identified, and their in vitro antibacterial properties were determined. The results have revealed that occurrence of Gram-negative rods was around 75% and of Gram-positive rods was 25%. Among the isolates Gram-positive were maintained in nutrient agar slants at 4°C. Of these, eight strains were replica-plated on agar seeded with Aeromonas hydrophila and only one strain CM2 (C. mrigala 2) exhibited antibacterial properties in vitro showing inhibition against fish pathogen by well diffusion assay. This isolated strain was identified as Bacillus cereus. This bacterium was mass cultured and incorporated in the pelleted diet (40% protein and 18 kJ g–1 gross energy) of C. mrigala to investigate its effect on growth performance, digestibility, nutrient retention and activities of digestive enzymes. The results of feeding trial revealed significantly (P<0.05) high growth performance in terms of specific growth rate, growth percent gain in body weight (BD) (272.4±1.5)%, high apparent protein digestibility ((79.9±0.30)%) and low food conversion ratio in the group of fishes fed on diet containing B. cereus in comparison to the fishes fed on diet without probiotics. The carcass composition also revealed high accumulation of proteins ((15.28±0.15) g 100 g–1) in fishes fed on diet containing probiotics. Intestinal enzyme activities of protease, amylase and cellulase were also significantly (P<0.05) high in the group of fishes fed on diet supplemented with probiotics indicating the extracellular enzyme production by B. cereus. These results indicate that probiotics stimulate the digestion through the supply of digestive enzyme and certain essential nutrients to animals. Also significantly (P<0.05) low excretion of metabolites, i.e., ammonia excretion and phosphate production (mg kg–1 BW d–1) was observed in the fishes fed with probiotic based diets. Thus, B. cereus appears to be a promising candidate for ptobiotic applications which can enhance growth performance and nutrient retention in C. mrigala.
Abstract The present studies were conducted to isolate, select, identify and characterize gut bacteria as antimicrobial and growth promoting agent for the feed of economically important fish Cirrhinus mrigala. Intestinal microflora were isolated, counted, and identified, and their in vitro antibacterial properties were determined. The results have revealed that occurrence of Gram-negative rods was around 75% and of Gram-positive rods was 25%. Among the isolates Gram-positive were maintained in nutrient agar slants at 4°C. Of these, eight strains were replica-plated on agar seeded with Aeromonas hydrophila and only one strain CM2 (C. mrigala 2) exhibited antibacterial properties in vitro showing inhibition against fish pathogen by well diffusion assay. This isolated strain was identified as Bacillus cereus. This bacterium was mass cultured and incorporated in the pelleted diet (40% protein and 18 kJ g–1 gross energy) of C. mrigala to investigate its effect on growth performance, digestibility, nutrient retention and activities of digestive enzymes. The results of feeding trial revealed significantly (P<0.05) high growth performance in terms of specific growth rate, growth percent gain in body weight (BD) (272.4±1.5)%, high apparent protein digestibility ((79.9±0.30)%) and low food conversion ratio in the group of fishes fed on diet containing B. cereus in comparison to the fishes fed on diet without probiotics. The carcass composition also revealed high accumulation of proteins ((15.28±0.15) g 100 g–1) in fishes fed on diet containing probiotics. Intestinal enzyme activities of protease, amylase and cellulase were also significantly (P<0.05) high in the group of fishes fed on diet supplemented with probiotics indicating the extracellular enzyme production by B. cereus. These results indicate that probiotics stimulate the digestion through the supply of digestive enzyme and certain essential nutrients to animals. Also significantly (P<0.05) low excretion of metabolites, i.e., ammonia excretion and phosphate production (mg kg–1 BW d–1) was observed in the fishes fed with probiotic based diets. Thus, B. cereus appears to be a promising candidate for ptobiotic applications which can enhance growth performance and nutrient retention in C. mrigala.
|
Received: 15 October 2013
Accepted:
|
Fund: This work was supported by the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India in the form of Junior Research Fellowship to Ritu Lamba. |
About author: Anita Bhatnagar, Tel: +91-1744-238410-2497, Fax: +91-1744-238277, E-mail: anitabhatnagar@gmail.com |
Cite this article:
Anita Bhatnagar, Ritu Lamba.
2015.
Antimicrobial ability and growth promoting effects of feed supplemented with probiotic bacterium isolated from gut microflora of Cirrhinus mrigala. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(3): 583-592.
|
Abdel-Aziz N A, Salem A Z M, El-Adawy M M, Camacho LM, Kholif A E, Elghandour M M Y, Borhami B E. 2015.Biological treatments as a mean to improve feed utilizationin agriculture animals-An overview. Journal of IntegrativeAgriculture, 14, 534-543Aly S M, Mohamed M F, John G. 2008. Effect of probioticson the survival, growth and challenge infection in Tilapianilotica (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture Research,39, 647-656AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 1995.Official Methods of Analysis. Association of OfficialAnalytical Chemists Incorporation, Arlington, USA. p. 684.APHA (American Public Health Association). 1998. StandardMethods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water.20th ed. American Public Health Association, New York.Bairagi A, Ghosh S K, Sen S K, Ray A K. 2004. Evaluation ofthe nutritive value of Leucaena leucocephala leaf meal,inoculated with fish intestinal bacteria Bacillus subtilis andBacillus circulans in formulated diets for rohu, Labeo rohita(Hamilton) fingerlings. Aquaculture Research, 35, 436-446Balcazar J L, Blas D, Zarzuela I R, Vendrell D, Girones O,Muzquiz J L. 2007. Sequencing of variable regions of the16S rRNA gene for identification of lactic acid bacteriaisolated from the intestinal microbiota of healthy salmonids.Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and InfectiousDiseases, 30, 111-118Bergey D H, John G H, Noel R K, Peter H A S. 1994. Bergey’sManual of Determinative Bacteriology. 9th ed. LippincottWilliams and Wilkins, Baltimore. pp. 615-618Berman P, Banerjee A, Bandyopadhyay P, Chandra KM, Mohapathra P K D. 2011. Isolation, identificationand molecular characterization of potential probioticbacterium, Bacillus subtilis PPP 13 from Penaeus monodon.Biotechnology, Bioinformatics, Bioengineering, 1, 473-482Bernard V H, Nurhidayu A, Ina-Salwany M Y, Abdelhadi Y. 2013.Bacillus cereus; JAQ04 strain as a potential probiotic forred tilapia; Oreochromis species. Asian Journal of Animaland Veterinary Advances, 8, 395-400Bernfeld P. 1955. Amylases. In: Colowick S P, Kaplan N O,eds., Methods of Enzymology. vol. 1. Academic Press,New York. p. 149.Bhatnagar A, Raparia S, Kumari S. 2012. Isolation and Influenceof Bacillus coagulans CC1 on growth performance anddigestive enzyme activites of Catla catla. Journal of NatureScience and Sustainable Technology, 6, 237-253Brett J R, Groves T T D. 1979. Physiological energetics. In:Hoar W S, Randall D J, Brett J R, eds., Fish Physiology.vol. 8. Academic Press, New York. pp. 280-352Cho C Y, Slinger S J, Bayley H S. 1982. Bioenergeticsof salmonids fishes: energy intake, expenditure andproductivity. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology,73, 25-41Chythanya R, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I. 2002. Inhibitionofshrimp pathogenic vibrios by a marine Pseudomonas I-2strain. Aquaculture, 208, 1-10Daniels C L, Meerifield D L, Boothroyd D P, Davies S J, FactorJ R, Arnold K E. 2010. Effect of dietary Bacillus spp. andmannan oligosaccharides (MOS) on European lobster(Homarus gammarus L.) larvae growth performance, gutmorphology and gut microbiota. Aquaculture, 304, 49-57Dong H, Fredrickson J K, Kennedy D W, Zachara J M,Kukkadapu R K, Onstott T C. 2000. Mineral transformationassociated with the microbial reduction of magnetite.Chemical Geology, 169, 299-318Dopazo C, Lemos M, Lodeiros C, Bolinches J, Barja J,Toranzo A. 1988. Inhibitory activity of antibiotic-producingmarine bacteria against fish pathogens. Journal of AppliedBacteriology, 65, 97-101Elghandour M M Y, Salem A Z M, Martínez Castañeda J S,Camacho L M, Kholif A E, Vázquez Chagoyán J C. 2015.Direct-fed microbes: A tool for improving the utilization oflow quality roughages in ruminants. Journal of IntegrativeAgriculture, 14, 526-533Furukawa A, Tuskahara H. 1966. On the acid digestion methodfor determination chromic oxide as an indicator substancein the study of digestibility in fish. Bulletin of the JapaneseSociety for the Science of Fish, 32, 502-506Gatesoupe F J. 2007. Live yeasts in the gut: Naturaloccurrence, dietary introduce their effects on fish healthand development. Aquaculture, 267, 20-30Ghosh K, Sen S K, Ray A K. 2003. Supplementation of anisolated fish gut bacterium, Bacillus circulans, in formulateddiets for rohu, Labeo rohita, fingerlings. The Israeli Journalof Aquaculture-Bamidgeh, 55, 13-21Ghosh S, Sinha A, Sahu C. 2007. Isolation of putative probiontsfrom the intestine of Indian major carps. The Israeli Journalof Aquaculture-Barmidgeh, 59, 127-132Hatha A A M, Kuruvilla S, Cheriyan S. 2000. Bacterial flora ofthe intestine of farm raised freshwater fish Catla catla, Labeorohita and Ctenopharyngodon idella. Fish Technology, 37,59-62Henken A M, Lucas H, Tijseen P A T, Michiels M A M. 1986. Acomparison between methods used to determine the energycontent of feed, fish and faecal samples. Aquaculture, 58,195-201Hossain M M, Uddin M N, Islam M N, Chakraborty S C, KamalM. 1999. Study on the intestinal bacteria of Labeo rohita(Ham.). Bangladesh Journal of Fish Research, 3, 63-66Jana S N, Garg S K, Barman U K, Arasu A R T, Patra B C.2006. Effect of varying dietary protein levels on growth andproduction of Chanos chanos (Forsskal) in inland salinegroundwater: Laboratory and field studies. AquacultureInternational, 14, 479-498Korzybski T, Kowszyk-Gindifer Z, Kurylowicz W. 1978.Antibiotics isolated fromthe genus Bacillus (Bacillaceae).In: Antibiotics-Origin, Nature and Properties. vol. 3.American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C., USA.pp. 1529-1661Lenard L. 2009. Report on optimizing digestive health. LifeExtension Magazine. [2009-1]. http:// www.lef.org/.../jan2009_Optimize-Digestive-Health_01.htmLalloo R, Ramchuran S, Ramduth D, Görgens J, Gardiner N.2007. Isolation and selection of Bacillus spp. as potentialbiological agents for enhancement of water quality in cultureof ornamental fish. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 103,1471-1479Moreira de Souza D, Martins G B, Piedras S R N, Pouey J LO F, Robaldo R B, Liete F P L. 2012. Probiotic actions ofBacillus cereus var. toyoi and Saccharomyces boulardiiin silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen) larvae culture. RevistaBrasileria de Zootecnia, 41, 815-819Moriarty D J W. 1996. Microbial biotechnology: A key ingredientfor sustainable aquaculture. InfoFish International, 4, 29-33Moriarty D J W. 1998. Control of luminous Vibrio species inpenaeid aquaculture ponds. Aquaculture, 164, 351-358Nayak S K, Mukherjee S C. 2011. Screening of gastrointestinalbacteria of Indian major carps. Aquaculture Research, 42,1034-1041O’Sullivan D J. 2001. Screening of intestinal microflora foreffective probiotic bacteria. Journal of Agricultural and FoodChemistry, 49, 751-760Ozawa K, Yokota H, Kimura M. 1981. Effect of administrationof Bacillus subtilis strain BN on intestinal flora of weanlingpiglets. Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 43, 771-775 (inJapanese)Powedchagun P, Suzuki H, Rengpipat S. 2011. Characterizationof a probiotic Bacillus S11 bacterium of black tiger shrimpPenaeus monodon. Songklanakarin Journal of Science andTechnology, 33, 1-8Puniya A K, Salem A Z M, Kumar S, Dagar S S, Griffith G W,Puniya M, Ravella S R, Kumar N, Dhewa T, Kumar R. 2015.Role of live microbial feed supplements with reference toanaerobic fungi in ruminant productivity: A review. Journalof Integrative Agriculture, 14, 550-560Rengpipat S, Phianphak W, Piyatiratiti-Vorakul S. 1998.Effects of probiotic bacterium on black tigher shrimp,Penaeusmonodon. Aquaculture, 167, 301-313Sadasivam S, Manickam A. 1996. Biochemical Methods. NewAge International Publishers, New Delhi, India. pp. 126-128Salem A Z M, Robinson P H, Lopez S, Gohar Y M, Rojo R,Tinoco J L. 2010. Sensitivity of sheep intestinal lactic acidbacteria to secondary compounds extracted from Acaciasaligna leaves. Animal Feed Science and Technology,161, 85-93Sharma P, Sihag R C, Gahlawat R K. 2013. Relative efficacyof two probiotics in controlling the epizootic ulcerativesyndrome disease in Mrigal (Cirrhinus mrigala Ham.).Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 8, 305-322Shelby R, Lim C, Yildirm-Aksoy M, Delaney M. 2006. Effectsof probiotic diet supplements on disease resistance andimmune response of young Nile Tilapia, Oreochromisniloticus. Journal in Applied Aquaculture, 18, 22-34Snedecor G W, Cochran W G. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8thed. State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA. pp. 125-127Spanggaard B, Huber I, Nielsen J, Nielsen T, Appel K F,Gram L. 2000. The microflora of rainbow trout intestine:A comparison of traditional and molecular identification.Aquaculture, 182, 1-15Steffens W. 1989. Principles of Fish Nutrition. Chichester,Horwood, NY. pp. 54-62Sumagaysay-Chavoso N S. 2003. Nitrogen and phosphorusdigestibility and excretion of different-sized groups ofmilkfish (Chanos chanos Forsskal) fed formulated andnatural food-based diets. Aquaculture Research, 34,407-418Swain S K, Rangacharyulu P V, Sarkar S, Das K M. 1996. Effectof a probiotic supplementation on growth, nutrient utilizationand carcass composition in mrigal fry. Aquaculture, 4,29-35Verschuere L, Rombaut G, Sorgeloos P, Verstraete W. 2000.Probiotic bacteria as biological agents in aquaculture.Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 64, 655-671Vine N G, Leukes W D, Kaiser H, Daya S, Baxter J. 2004.Competition for attachment of aquaculture candidateprobiotic and pathogenic bacteria on fish intestinal mucus.Journal of Fish Disease, 27, 319-326Vine N G, LeukesW D, Kaiser H. 2006. Probiotics in marinelarviculture. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 30, 404-427Walter H E. 1984. Probionases: Methods with haemoglobin,casein and azocoll as substrates. In: Bergmeyer H U, ed., Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. vol. V. Verlag Chemic,Weinheim. pp. 270-277Wang Y B, Tian Z Q, Yao J T, Li W. 2008. Effect of probiotics,Enteroccus faecium, on tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)growth performance and immune response. Aquaculture,277, 203-207Wang Y B, Xu Z R, Xia M S. 2005. The effectiveness ofcommercial probiotics in Northern White shrimp (Penaeusvannamei L.) ponds. Fisheries Science, 71, 1034-1039Wang Y B, Xu Z R. 2006. Effect of probiotics for commoncarp (Cyprinus carpio) based on growth performance anddigestive enzyme activities. Animal Feed Science andTechnolgy, 127, 283-292Zimmerman S B, Schwartz C D, Monaghan R L, Pleak B A,Weissberger B, Gilfillan E C, Mochales S, Hernandez S,Currie S A, Tejera E, Stapley E O. 1987. Difficidin andoxydifficidin: Novel broadspectrum antibacterial antibioticsproduced by Bacillus subtilis. Journal of Antibiotics, 40,1677-1681 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|