Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2011, Vol. 10 Issue (10): 1525-1531    DOI: 10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60147-8
GENETICS & BREEDING · GERMPLASM RESOURCES · MOLECULAR GENETICS Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Analysis of Genetic Effects for Heterosis of Erucic Acid and Glucosinolate Contents in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)
ZHANG Hai-zhen, SHI Chun-hai , WU Jian-guo
1.Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University
2.Key Laboratory of Genetic and Breeding for Landscape Plant, Hangzhou Botanical Garden
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  The embryo, cytoplasmic, and maternal heterosis for erucic acid content (EAC) and glucosinolate content (GLS) of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) were studied by using the genetic models for quantitative traits of seeds in diploid crops. Eight parents were included in a diallel mating design in two years. It was found that the heterosis of EAC and GLS was simultaneously controlled by genetic main effects and genotype×environment (GE) interaction effects. The general heterosis of most crosses for EAC was significantly positive, while it was not for GLS. The general heterosis was more important for two quality traits of rapeseed because of the low GE interaction heterosis in both years, especially for GLS. Among different genetic systems, significant positive embryo general heterosis and the negative maternal general heterosis were found for EAC and GLS in most hybrid crosses. Some hybrids with significant negative interaction heterosis were detected for either of EAC or GLS. In general, maternal general and interaction heterosis was more important for reducing EAC and GLS of rapeseed.

Abstract  The embryo, cytoplasmic, and maternal heterosis for erucic acid content (EAC) and glucosinolate content (GLS) of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) were studied by using the genetic models for quantitative traits of seeds in diploid crops. Eight parents were included in a diallel mating design in two years. It was found that the heterosis of EAC and GLS was simultaneously controlled by genetic main effects and genotype×environment (GE) interaction effects. The general heterosis of most crosses for EAC was significantly positive, while it was not for GLS. The general heterosis was more important for two quality traits of rapeseed because of the low GE interaction heterosis in both years, especially for GLS. Among different genetic systems, significant positive embryo general heterosis and the negative maternal general heterosis were found for EAC and GLS in most hybrid crosses. Some hybrids with significant negative interaction heterosis were detected for either of EAC or GLS. In general, maternal general and interaction heterosis was more important for reducing EAC and GLS of rapeseed.
Keywords:  rapeseed      quality      general heterosis      GE interaction heterosis  
Received: 29 June 2010   Accepted:
Fund: 

The project was financially supported by the Technology Office of Zhejiang Province, China (2008C22084), the 151 Program for the Talents of Zhejiang Province and from Foundation for University Key Teacher by the Ministry of Education of China.

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence SHI Chun-hai, Professor, Tel: +86-571-86971691, Fax: +86-571-86971117, E-mail: chhshi@zju.edu.cn     E-mail:  chhshi@zju.edu.cn

Cite this article: 

ZHANG Hai-zhen, SHI Chun-hai , WU Jian-guo. 2011. Analysis of Genetic Effects for Heterosis of Erucic Acid and Glucosinolate Contents in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 10(10): 1525-1531.

[1]Bell J M. 1984. Nutrients and toxicants in rapeseed meal: a review. Journal of Animal Scence, 58, 996-1009.

[2]Brandle J E, McVetty P B E. 1989. Effects of inbreeding and estimates of additive genetic variance within seven summer oilseed rape cultivars. Genome, 32, 115-119.

[3]Charpentier N, Bostyn S, Coic J P. 1998. Isolation of a rich glucosinolate fraction by liquid chromatography from an aqueous extract obtained by leaching dehulled rapeseed meal (Brassica napus L.). Industrial Crops and Products, 8, 151- 158.

[4]Friedt W, Lühs W. 1999. Breeding of rapeseed (Brassica napus) for modified seed quality - synergy of conventional and modern approaches. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress. Canberra, Australia.

[5]Fu T D. 2007. The quality improvement of rapeseed. Crop Research, 3, 159-162. (in Chinese)

[6]Guan C Y. 1980. The preliminary investigations on heterosis and early predication in heterosis selection of hybrids of rapeseed (Brassica napus). Acta Genetric Sinica, 7, 63-67. (in Chinese)

[7]Hallauer A R, Miranda J B. 1981. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Iowa State University Press, America. pp. 5-49.

[8]Heath D W, Earle E D. 1996. Resynthesis of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): A comparison of sexual versus somatic hybridization. Plant Breeding, 115, 395-401.

[9]Hutcheson D S, Downey R K, Campbell S J. 1981. Performance of a naturally occurring subspecies hybrid in Brassica campestris L. var. oleifera Metzg. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 61, 895-900.

[10]Huisman J, Tolman G H. 1992. Antinutrional factors in the plant proteins of diets for non-rumiants. In: Garnworthy P C, Haresign W, Cole D J A, eds., Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. pp. 3-31.

[11]Liu P W, Yang G S. 2004. Analyses of the genetic diversity of resynthesized Brassica napus by RAPD and SSR molecular markers. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 30, 1266-1273. (in Chinese)

[12]Miller R G. 1974. The Jackknife, a review. Biometrika, 61, 1-15.

[13]Sernyk J L, Stefansson B R. 1983. Heterosis in summer rape. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 63, 407-413.

[14]Seyis F, Friedt W, Lühs. 2006. Yield of Brassica napus L. hybrids developed using resynthesized rapeseed material sown at different locations. Field Crops Research, 96, 176-180.

[15]Shenk J S, Westerhaus M O. 1993. Monograph: Analysis of Agriculture and Food Products by Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy. Infrasoft International, Port Matilda, PA, USA.

[16]Shi C H, Zhang H Z, Wu J G, Li C T, Ren Y L. 2003. Genetic and genotype environment interaction effects analysis for erucic acid content in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Euphytica, 130, 249-254.

[17]Shull G H. 1952. Beginnings of the heterosis concept. In: Gowan J W, ed., Heterosis. Iowa State College Press, Ames. pp. 14- 48.

[18]Sodhi Y S, Mukhopadhyay A, Arumugam N, Verma J K, Gupta V, Pental D, Pradhan A K. 2002. Genetic analysis of total glucosinolate in crosses involving a high glucosinolate Indian variety and a low glucosinolate line of Brassica juncea. Plant Breeding, 121, 508-511.

[19]Wang T Q. 1992. The heredity of oil content and its heterosis in rapeseed. Journal of Guizhou Agricultureal Science, 6, 37- 40. (in Chinese)

[20]Wu J G, Shi C H, Fan L J. 2002. Calibration optimization for erucic acid and glucosinolate content of rapeseed by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS). Journal of Chinese Cereals Oils Association, 17, 59-62. (in Chinese)

[21]Yadava T P, Gupta V P. 1975. Heterosis and genetic architecture for oil content in mustard. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 35, 152-155.

[22]Zhang H Z, Shi C H, Wu J G. 2004. Genetic effects analysis of embryo, cytoplasmic and maternal plant for glucosinolates content in rapeseed. Acta Agronmica Sinica, 30, 33-37. (in Chinese)

[23]Zhao Y G, Xiao L, Lu C M. 2009. Genetic analysis of yield and its components of Brassica napus hybrids using resynthesized rapeseed lines. Agricultural Sciences in China, 8, 1286-1292.

[24]Zhou W J, Zhang G Q, Tuvesson S, Dayteg C, Gertsson B. 2006. Genetic survey of Chinese and Swedish oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) by simple sequence repeats (SSRs). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 53, 443-447. (in Chinese)

[25]Zhu J. 1993. Methods of predicting genotype value and heterosis for offspring of hybrids. Journal of Biomathematics, 8, 32- 44. (in Chinese)

[26]Zhu J. 1996. Analytic methods for seed models with genotype environment interactions. Acta Genetica Sinica, 23, 56-68. (in Chinese)

[27]Zhu J, Weir B W. 1994. Analysis of cytoplasmic and maternal effects. I. A genetic model for diploid plant seeds and animals. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 89, 153-159.

[28]Zhu J, Weir B W. 1996. Diallel analysis for sex-linked and maternal effects. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 92, 1-9.

[29]Zhu Z H, Zhang W Y, Zhang X K. 2009. Relationships between heterosis of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) and genetic distance based on seed storage protein. Chinese Journal of Crop Science, 4, 413-420. (in Chinese)
[1] LI Dong-qing, ZHANG Ming-xue, LÜ Xin-xin, HOU Ling-ling. Does nature-based solution sustain grassland quality? Evidence from rotational grazing practice in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2567-2576.
[2] CHEN Guang-yi, PENG Li-gong, LI Cong-mei, TU Yun-biao, LAN Yan, WU Chao-yue, DUAN Qiang, ZHANG Qiu-qiu, YANG Hong, LI Tian. Effects of the potassium application rate on lipid synthesis and eating quality of two rice cultivars[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2025-2040.
[3] SHI Shi-jie, ZHANG Gao-yu, CAO Cou-gui, JIANG Yang . Untargeted UHPLC–Q-Exactive-MS-based metabolomics reveals associations between pre- and post-cooked metabolites and the taste quality of geographical indication rice and regular rice[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2271-2281.
[4] WEI Huan-he, GE Jia-lin, ZHANG Xu-bin, ZHU Wang, DENG Fei, REN Wan-jun, CHEN Ying-long, MENG Tian-yao, DAI Qi-gen. Decreased panicle N application alleviates the negative effects of shading on rice grain yield and grain quality[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2041-2053.
[5] WANG Yan, GUO Zhen-ru, CHEN Qing, LI Yang, ZHAO Kan, WAN Yong-fang, Malcolm J. HAWKESFORD, JIANG Yun-feng, KONG Li, PU Zhi-en, DENG Mei, JIANG Qian-tao, LAN Xiu-jin, WANG Ji-rui, CHEN Guo-yue, MA Jian, ZHENG You-liang, WEI Yu-ming, QI Peng-fei. Effect of high-molecular-weight glutenin subunit Dy10 on wheat dough properties and end-use quality[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1609-1617.
[6] TAO Jian-bin, ZHANG Xin-yue, WU Qi-fan, WANG Yun. Mapping winter rapeseed in South China using Sentinel-2 data based on a novel separability index[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1645-1657.
[7] XIE Lei, QIN Jiang-tao, RAO Lin, CUI Deng-shuai, TANG Xi, XIAO Shi-jun, ZHANG Zhi-yan, HUANG Lu-sheng. Effects of carcass weight, sex and breed composition on meat cuts and carcass trait in finishing pigs[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(5): 1489-1501.
[8] LI Min, ZHU Da-wei, JIANG Ming-jin, LUO De-qiang, JIANG Xue-hai, JI Guang-mei, LI Li-jiang, ZHOU Wei-jia. Dry matter production and panicle characteristics of high yield and good taste indica hybrid rice varieties[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(5): 1338-1350.
[9] ZHAO Hai-liang, QIN Yao, XIAO Zi-yi, SUN Qin, GONG Dian-ming, QIU Fa-zhan. Revealing the process of storage protein rebalancing in high quality protein maize by proteomic and transcriptomic[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(5): 1308-1323.
[10] JIANG Yun, WANG De-li, HAO Ming, ZHANG Jie, LIU Deng-cai.

Development and characterization of wheat–Aegilops kotschyi 1Uk(1A) substitution line with positive dough quality parameters [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 999-1008.

[11] NING Ning, HU Bing, BAI Chen-yang, LI Xiao-hua, KUAI Jie, HE Han-zi, REN Yi-lin, WANG Bo, JIA Cai-hua, ZHOU Guang-sheng, ZHAO Si-ming. Influence of two-stage harvesting on the properties of cold-pressed rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) oils[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 265-278.
[12] LIU Xiao-jing, WANG Yong-li, LIU Li, LIU Lu, ZHAO Gui-ping, WEN Jie, JIA Ya-xiong, CUI Huan-xian. Potential regulation of linoleic acid and volatile organic compound contents in meat of chickens by PLCD1[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 222-234.
[13] RONG Hao, YANG Wen-jing, XIE Tao, WANG Yue, WANG Xia-qin, JIANG Jin-jin, WANG You-ping. Transcriptional profiling between yellow- and black-seeded Brassica napus reveals molecular modulations on flavonoid and fatty acid content[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(8): 2211-2226.
[14] WANG Yu-jiao, TAO Zhi-qiang, WANG De-mei, WANG Yan-jie, YANG Yu-shuang, ZHAO Guang-cai, SHI Shu-bing, CHANG Xu-hong. An economic and viable approach to improve wheat quality in Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(8): 2227-2240.
[15] DAI Shou-fen, CHEN Hai-xia, LI Hao-yuan, YANG Wan-jun, ZHAI Zhi, LIU Qian-yu, LI Jian, YAN Ze-hong. Variations in the quality parameters and gluten proteins in synthetic hexaploid wheats solely expressing the Glu-D1 locus[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 1877-1885.
No Suggested Reading articles found!