Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (17): 3354-3371.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.17.004

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Envirotyping and Its Applications in Crop Science

XU Yunbi   

  1. Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/CIMMYT-China, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2015-05-04 Online:2015-09-01 Published:2015-09-01

Abstract: Global climate changes have increasing impacts on worldwide environments. Crop productivity is largely determined by interaction between the genotype a crop has and the environment surrounding the crop plants. With modern biotechnologies, genotypic contribution to a phenotype can be dissected at molecular level into individual genetic components. However, the environmental factors that have significant impacts on crops have not been dissected individually, and thus their contribution to phenotype can be only inferred by their integrative effect under different types of environments, or described for the whole experimental plot by comparing pairwise major environmental factors. The author proposed a concept of environmental assay for the first time by coining a word “etyping”, which represents “envirotyping”, a more suitable word used in this article. The term “envirotype” is used to describe all internal and external environmental factors and their combinations that affect plants across growth and developmental stages. The external environmental factors include moisture, fertilizers, air, temperature, light, soil properties, cropping system and companion organisms. Envirotyping refers to dissecting and measuring all these environmental factors. Environmental information can be collected through various approaches, including multi-environmental trials with environmental data accumulated related to trial locations; geographic and soil information systems containing environmental data for climate, weather, and soil; and small weather stations that collect factors related to weather, precipitation, temperature and air. Using remote sensing and other instruments, many external environmental factors can be measured for plant canopy, plant surroundings, and even for single plots or individual plants. Environmental information will be increasingly used for environment characterization, genotype-by-environment interaction analysis, phenotype prediction, disease epidemic prediction, near iso-environment construction, understanding of the response of plants to specific environmental factors, agronomic genomics, and precision farming. In the future, envirotyping needs to be improved to zoom into specific plots and individual plants across growth and developmental stages, along with the development of integrative information system and decision support tools to bring genotypic, phenotypic and envirotypic information together. Envirotypic information will finally contribute as a third dimension to the crop research and development system involving genotype-phenotype-envirotype complex. Such efforts will help establish a high-efficient crop breeding and production system based on the concept of the three-dimensional profile.

Key words: crop production, environmental information, envirotype, envirotyping (etyping), genotype-by-environment interaction, near iso-envirotype, agronomic genomics, phenotype prediction

[1]    Tilman D, Cassman K G, Matson P A, Naylor R, Polasky S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 2002, 418: 671-677.
[2]    Chaudhary R C. Strategies for bridging the yield gap in rice: A regional perspective for Asia. International Rice Commission Newsletter, 2000, 49: 22-31.
[3]    Xu Y. Environmental assaying or e-typing as a key component for integrated plant breeding platform, Marker-Assisted Selection Workshop, 6th International Crop Science Congress, August 6-10, 2012, Bento Goncalves, RS, Brazil.
[4]    Xu Y, Lu Y, Xie C, Gao S, Wan J, Prasanna B M. Whole-genome strategies for marker-assisted plant breeding. Molecular Breeding, 2012, 29: 833-854.
[5]    http://www.dilikexue.cn/geog/show.aspx?id=2234&cid=35.
[6]    史学正, 于东升, 高鹏, 王洪杰, 孙维侠, 赵永存, 龚子同. 中国土壤信息系统(SISChina)及其应用基础研究. 土壤, 2007, 39(3): 329-333.
Shi X Z, Yu D S, Gao P, Wang H J, Sun W X, Zhao Y C, Gong Z T. Soil information system of china (SISChina) and its application. Soils, 2007, 39(3): 329-333. (in Chinese)
[7]    http://www.issas.ac.cn/ztwz/200910/t20091015_2551708.html.
[8]    Shi X Z, Yu D S, Warner E D, Pan X Z, Petersen G W, Gong Z G, Weindorf D C. Soil Database of 1:1,000,000 digital soil survey and reference system of the Chinese genetic soil classification system. Soil Survey Horizons, 2004, 45(4): 129-136.
[9]    http://www.issas.ac.cn/ztwz/200910/t20091015_2551708.html.
[10]   Smith P, Furse C, Gunther J. Analysis of spread spectrum time domain reflectometry for wire fault location. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2005, 5: 1469-1478.
[11]   Fahlgren N, Gehan M A, Baxter I. Lights, camera, action: High-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2015, 24: 93-99.
[12]   Pound M P, French A P, Murchie E H, Pridmore T P. Automated recovery of three-dimensional models of plant shoots from multiple color images. Plant Physiology, 2014, 166: 1688-1698.
[13]   Li Y, Fan X, Mitra N J, Chamovitz D, Cohen-Or D, Chen B. Analyzing growing plants from 4D point cloud data. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2013, 32: 1-10.
[14]   Paulus S, Dupuis J, Mahlein A K, Kuhlmann H. Surface feature based classification of plant organs from 3D laser scanned point clouds for plant phenotyping. BMC Bioinformatics, 2013, 14: 238.
[15]   Chéné Y, Rousseau D, Lucidarme P, Bertheloot J, Caffier V, Morel P, Belin É, Chapeau-Blondeau F. On the use of depth camera for 3D phenotyping of entire plants. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2012, 82: 122-127.
[16]   Des Marais D L, Hernandez K M, Juenger T E. Genotype-by- environment interaction and plasticity: exploring genomic responses of plants to the abiotic environment. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 2013, 44: 5-29.
[17]   Paterson A H, Damon S, Hewitt J D, Zamir D, Rabinowitch H D, Lincoln S E, Lander E S, Tanksley S D. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: Comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics, 1991, 127: 181-197.
[18]   Hammond J P, Mayes S, Bowen H C, Graham N S, Hayden R M, Love C G, Spracklen, W P, Wang J, Welham S J, White P J, King G J, Broadley M R. Regulatory hotspots are associated with plant gene expression under varying soil phosphorus supply in Brassica rapa. Plant Physiology, 2011, 156: 1230-1241.
[19]   Grishkevich V, Yanai I. The genomic determinants of genotype× environment interactions in gene expression. Trends in Genetics, 2013, 29: 479-487.
[20]   Kim D H, Doyle M R, Sung S, Amasino R M. Vernalization: Winter and the timing of flowering in plants. Annual Review of Cell and Development Biology, 2009, 25: 277-299.
[21]   Lee W S, Alchanatis V, Yang C, Hirafuji M, Moshou D, Li C. Sensing technologies for precision specialty crop production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2010, 74: 2-33.
[22]   Araus J L, Cairns J E. Field high-throughput phenotyping: The new crop breeding frontier. Trends in Plant Science, 2014, 19: 52-61.
[23]   Bänziger M, Setimela P S, Hodson D, Vivek B. Breeding for improved abiotic stress tolerance in maize adapted to southern Africa. Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 80: 212-224.
[24]   http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.
[25]   Prasanna B M, Cairns J, Xu Y. Genomic tools and strategies for breeding climate resilient cereals// Kole C. Genomics and Breeding for Climate-Resilient Crops. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-VerlagPress, 2013: 213-239.
[26]   Xu Y. Global view of QTL: Rice as a model//Kang M S. Quantitative Genetics, Genomics and Plant Breeding. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, 2002: 109-134.
[27]   Singh R P, Hodson D P, Jin Y, Huerta-Espino J, Kinyua M G, Wanyera R. Current status, likely migration and strategies to mitigate the threat to wheat production from race Ug99 (TTKS) of stem rust pathogen. CAB Reviews, 2006, 54: 1-13.
[28]   Nagano A J, Sato Y, Mihara M, Antonio B A, Motoyama R, Itoh H, Nagamura Y, Izawa T. Deciphering and prediction of transcriptome dynamics under fluctuating field conditions. Cell, 2012, 151: 1358-1369.
[29]   Izawa T. Deciphering and prediction of plant dynamics under field conditions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2015, 24: 87-92.
[30]   Mickelbart M V, Hasegawa P M, Bailey-Serres J. Genetic mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance that translate to crop yield stability. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2015, 16: 237-251.
[31]   邱丽娟, 郭勇, 黎裕, 王晓波, 周国安, 刘章雄, 周时荣, 李新海, 马有志, 王建康, 万建民. 中国作物新基因发掘: 现状、挑战与展望. 作物学报, 2011, 37(1): 1-17.
Qiu L J, Guo Y, Li Y, Wang X B, Zhou G A, Liu Z X, Zhou S R, Li X H, Ma Y Z, Wang J K, Wan J M. Novel gene discovery of crops in China: status, challenging, and perspective. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(1): 1-17. (in Chinese)
[32]   http://www.agrogene.cn/info-1949.shtml.
[33]   Houle D, Govindaraju D R, Omholt S. Phenomics: The next challenge. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2010, 11: 855-866.
[34]   Jansen M, Gilmer F, Biskup B, Nagel K A, Rascher U, Fischbach A, Briem S, Dreissen G, Tittmann S, Braun S, De Jaeger I, Metzlaff M, Schurr U, Scharr H, Walter A. Simultaneous phenotyping of leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence via GROWSCREEN FLUORO allows detection of stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and other rosette plants. Functional Plant Biology, 2009, 11: 902-914.
[35]   Massonnet C, Vile D, Fabre J, Hannah M A, Caldana C, Lisec J, Beemster G T S, Meyer R C, Messerli G, Gronlund J T, Perkovic J, Wigmore E, May S, Bevan M W, Meyer C, Rubio-Díaz S, Weigel D, Micol J L, Buchanan-Wollaston V, Fiorani F, Walsh S, Rinn B, Gruissem W, Hilson P, Hennig L, Willmitzer L, Granier C. Probing the reproducibility of leaf growth and molecular phenotypes: A comparison of three Arabidopsis accessions cultivated in ten laboratories. Plant Physiology, 2010, 152: 2142-2157.
[36]   Bergelson J, Roux F. Towards identifying genes underlying ecologically relevant traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2010, 11: 867-879.
[37]   Atwell S, Huang Y S, Vilhjálmsson B J, Willems G, Horton M, Li Y, Meng D, Platt A, Tarone A M, Hu T T, Jiang R, Muliyati N W, Zhang X, Amer M A, Baxter I, Brachi B, Chory J, Dean C, Debieu M, de Meaux J, Ecker J R, Faure N, Kniskern J M, Jones J D, Michael T, Nemri A, Roux F, Salt D E, Tang C, Todesco M, Traw M B, Weigel D, Marjoram P, Borevitz J O, Bergelson J, Nordborg M. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature, 2010, 465: 627-631.
[38]   Xu Y. Molecular Plant Breeding, Wallingford. UK: CAB International. 2010: 734pp.
[39]   Shi X Z, Yu D S, Warner E D, Sun W X, Petersen G W, Gong Z T. Cross-reference system for translating between genetic soil classification of china and soil taxonomy. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2006, 70: 78-83.
[1] ZHAO HaiXuan,ZHANG YiTao,LI WenChao,MA WenQi,ZHAI LiMei,JU XueHai,CHEN HanTing,KANG Rui,SUN ZhiMei,XI Bin,LIU HongBin. Spatial Characteristic and Its Factors of Nitrogen Surplus of Crop and Livestock Production in the Core Area of the Baiyangdian Basin [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 118-128.
[2] WANG Liang,LIU YuanYuan,QIAN Xin,ZHANG Hui,DAI HongCui,LIU KaiChang,GAO YingBo,FANG ZhiJun,LIU ShuTang,LI ZongXin. The Single Season Wheat Straw Returning to Promote the Synergistic Improvement of Carbon Efficiency and Economic Benefit in Wheat- Maize Double Cropping System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 350-364.
[3] WANG Zhan-biao, WANG Meng, CHEN Fu. Carbon Footprint Analysis of Crop Production in North China Plain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(1): 83-92.
[4] DAI Jian-Guo, WANG Ke-Ru, LI Shao-Kun, LI Shuan-Ming, WANG Qiong. Designing and Implementation of Crop Production Management Information System Based on State-Operated Farm [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(11): 2159-2167.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!