Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (8): 1550-1558.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.08.012

• STORAGE·FRESH-KEEPING·PROCESSING • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose on Adhesion Properties of Soybean Protein Isolate onto Porcine Bones

ZHANG Yi-jing, CHEN Hai-juan, Lü Yi, LIU Yong-xiang, TANG Xiao-zhi, SHEN Xin-chun   

  1. College of Food Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics/Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Grain Circulation and Safety/Key Laboratory of Grains and Oils Quality Control and Processing, Nanjing 210023
  • Received:2015-09-15 Online:2016-04-16 Published:2016-04-16

Abstract: 【Objective】The effects of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC-Na) on the adhesion properties of soybean protein isolate (SPI) onto porcine bone were investigated by studying tensile bond strength, zero shear viscosity, secondary structure, hydrophobicity and scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) images. The aim of the research was to provide a basis for utilization of SPI adhesive in biomedical fields. 【Method】SPI adhesive prepared with/without CMC-Na was used to bond porcine bones in vitro and the effect of CMC-Na on tensile bond strength of SPI adhesive was measured using a tensile strength testing machine. The influence of CMC-Na on zero shear viscosity of the SPI adhesive was measured using a rheometer. The SPI adhesive with CMC-Na secondary structure was measured using circular dichroism spectra to determine the content of α-helix, β-sheet, β-turn and random coil. The influence of CMC-Na on hydrophobicity and surface morphology of SPI adhesive was measured using ANS (1-anilino-8-naphthalene sulfonate) fluorescent probe method and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. 【Result】 The tensile bond strength of the SPI adhesive increased with the increase of its concentration and reached a peak at a SPI adhesive concentration of 10%, then began to decline. The adhesive strength of 2% SPI with addition of a trace amount of CMC-Na (at 0.01%) was increased 2.4 fold (P<0.01) in comparison with the control. There was a significant positive correlation (r=0.815, P<0.05) between adhesive strength and zero shear viscosity. The addition of trace CMC-Na influenced significantly the secondary structure of the SPI adhesive. The β-sheet and β-turn content increased from 42.2% to 49.1% and from 2.1% to 7.3%, respectively, while the α-helix and random coil content declined from 28.0% to 19.7% and from 27.7% to 23.9%, respectively. The hydrophobicity of the SPI adhesive with CMC-Na was increased significantly; even moderate hydrophobic modification of the SPI adhesive with CMC-Na benefited the increase of its adhesive strength. SEM showed that particles on the surface of the SPI adhesive with addition of CMC-Na arrayed more uniformly and compact than the control, which was beneficial for its adhering to the bones. 【Conclusion】The addition of a trace amount of CMC-Na caused significant changes in the secondary structure of the SPI adhesive, the decline in α-helix content and an increase in β-sheet content, all of which indicated the unfolding of protein molecules and the aggregation of unfolding protein molecules. The increase in the hydrophobicity and zero shear viscosity of the SPI adhesive resulted in the significant increase of bond strength of low concentration SPI adhesive onto porcine bone. Since low concentration SPI might be easier to be absorbed by bodies than at a high concentration, our results after the addition of CMC-Na suggest that SPI adhesive has a great potential to be utilized as an adhesive in medical fields.

Key words: soybean protein isolate (SPI), sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC-Na), adhesion properties

[1]    Kumar R, Choudhary V, Mishra S, Varma I R, Mattiason B. Adhesives and plastics based on soy protein products. Industrial Crops and Products, 2002, 16(3): 155-172.
[2]    Chen Y, Zhang L, Gu J, Liu J. Physical properties of microporous membranes prepared by hydrolyzing cellulose/soy protein blends. Journal of Membrane Science, 2004, 241(2): 393-402.
[3]    Silva S S, Santos M I, Coutinho O P, Mano J F, Reis R L. Physical properties and biocompatibility of chitosan/soy blended membrances. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine, 2005, 16(6): 575-579.
[4]    Cai D Z, Liang X, Meng Q G, Liu K L. Advances in research on α-cyanoacrylate medical adhesives. Military Medical Sciences, 2012, 36(3): 105-113.
[5]    Ahmed T, Giulivi A, Griffith M, Hincke M. Fibrin glues in combination with mesenchymal stem cells to develop a tissue- engineered cartilage substitute. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2011, 17(3/4): 323-335.
[6]    Hwang D S, Sim S B, Cha H J. Cell adhesion biomaterial based on mussel adhesive protein fused with RGD peptide. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(28): 4039-4046.
[7]    Benedict C V, Picciano P T. Adhesives from marine mussels. ACS Symposium Series, 1989, 385: 465-483.
[8]    Mo X Q, Cheng E, Wang D H, Sun X S. Physical properties of medium-density wheat straw particleboard using different adhesives. Industrial Crops and Products, 2003, 18(1): 47-53.
[9]    Mo X Q, Sun X Z. Soy proteins as plywood adhesives: formulation and characterization. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2012, 27(18): 2014-2026.
[10]   Mo X Q, Sun X Z, Wang D H. Thermal properties and adhesion strength of modified soybean storage proteins. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 2004, 81(4): 395-400.
[11]   Huang W, Sun X Z. Adhesive properties of soy proteins modified by urea and guanidine hydrochloride. Journal of the American Oil ChemistsSociety, 2000, 77(1): 101-104.
[12]   李娜, 谢建军, 曾念, 丁出, 冉德龙. 胶合板用SDS改性大豆分离蛋白胶粘剂的制备及性能. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(1): 88-93.
Li N, Xie J J, Zeng N, Ding C, Ran D L. Preparation and properties of plywood adhesives with soy protein isolate modified by SDS. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2012, 32(1): 88-93. (in Chinese)
[13]   Piglowski J, Kozlowski M. Adhesive behavior of the two phase system: Polyisobutylene–sodium carboxymethylcellulose. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1986, 31(2): 627-634.
[14]   Li K, Zhang J F, Li Q J. Process control and optimization of foam dyeing of cotton fabric. Journal of Textile Research, 2011, 8(3/4): 333-350.
[15]   Leung K C M, Chow T W, Woo C W, Clark R K F. Tensile, shear and cleavage bond strengths of alginate adhesive. Journal of Dentistry, 1998, 26(7): 617-622.
[16]   郑江, 陈怡, 高亚辉, 张建新. 三种胶体材料及其复合物作为骨粘合剂的粘合强度比较. 中国海洋药物, 2009, 28(1): 26-28.
Zheng J, Chen Y, Gao X Y, Zhang J X. Comparative study on adhesive strength of three colloid materials and their complexes as bone adhesives. Chinese Journal of Marine Drugs, 2009, 28(1): 26-28. (in Chinese)
[17]   Qi J R, Yang X Q, Liao J S, Xu W. Study on interfacial rheological property of soy protein-polysaccharide conjugate. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2009, 30(5): 124-127.
[18]   王海洋. 羽毛角蛋白/羧甲基纤维素钠共混薄膜的性能及应用研究[D]. 广州: 仲恺农业工程学院, 2014.
Wang H Y. Studies on properties and application of feather keratin/ sodium carboxy methyl cellulose blend film [D]. Guangzhou: Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, 2014. (in Chinese)
[19]   陈振家, 郝利平. 山西不同品种大豆贮藏蛋白提取及亚基分析. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 27(1): 76-78.
Chen Z J, Hao L P. The extraction and subunit analysis of storage protein of different soybean cultivars in shanxi province. Shanxi Agriculture University(Natural Science Edition), 2007, 27(1): 76-78. (in Chinese)
[20]   宋鹏, 魏安池, 周瑞宝, 盖钧镒. 不同工艺条件对大豆分离蛋白提取率的影响. 中国油脂, 2011, 36(2): 16-19.
Song P, Wei A C, Zhou R B, Gai J Y. Effects of different process on the yield of soybean protein isolate. China Oids and Fats, 2011, 36(2): 16-19. (in Chinese)
[21]   张建新, 高亚辉, 潘壮壮, 蔡真真, 林宇洋. 海藻酸钠为主体胶黏合骨碎块的体外实验. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2010, 14(38): 7037-7040.
Zhang J X, Gao Y H, Pan Z Z, Cai Z Z, Lin Y Y. In vitro study of bone adhesive mainly composed of sodium alginate. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research, 2010, 14(38): 7037-7040. (in Chinese)
[22]   Qi G Y, Li N B, Wang D H, Sun X Z. Physicochemical properties of soy protein adhesives obtained by in situ sodium bisulfite modification during acid precipitation. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 2012, 89(2): 301-312.
[23]   Shen X C, Mo X Q, Moore R, Frazier S J, Lwamoto T, Tomich J M, Sun X Z. Adhesion and structure properties of protein nanomaterials containing hydrophobic and charged amino acids. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2006, 6(3): 837-844.
[24]   Cardamone M, Puri N K. Spectrofluorimetric assessment of the surface hydrophobicity of proteins. Biochemical Journal, 1992, 282(2): 589-593.
[25]   肖媛, 刘伟, 汪艳, 左艳霞, 胡锐, 李婷婷, 崔宗斌. 生物样品的扫描电镜制样干燥方法. 实验室研究与探索, 2013, 32(5): 45-53.
Xiao Y, Liu W, Wang Y, Zuo Y X, Hu R, Li T T, Cui Z B. Drying methods of biological sample preparation for scanning electron microscope. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 2013, 32(5): 45-53. (in Chinese)
[26]   Yang X H, Zhu W L. Viscosity properties of sodium carboxymethylcellulose solutions. Cellulose, 2007, 14(5): 409-417.
[27]   Zhang J T, Yang X Q, Huang L X. Changes of viscosity during preparation of soy protein isolate adhesives and their adhesive properties. China Oils and Fats, 2005, 30(7): 68-70.
[28]   黄汉昌, 姜招峰, 朱宏吉. 紫外圆二色光谱预测蛋白质结构的研究方法. 化学通报, 2007(7): 501-506.
Huang H C, Jiang Z F, Zhu H J. The methods of protein conformation predicted by UV-Circular dichroism. Chemistry, 2007(7): 501-506. (in Chinese) 
[29]   Johnson O. Adhesive: US, 146075[P]. 1923-07-03.
[30]   Sun X Z, Bian K. Shear strength and water resistance of modified soy protein adhesives. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 1999, 76(8): 977-980.
[31]   Huang J, Li K C. A new soy flour-based adhesive for making interior type II plywood. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 2008, 85(1): 63-70.
[32]   Choi W Y, Lee C M, Park H J. Development of biodegradable hot-melt adhesive based on poly-ε-caprolactone and soy protein isolate for food packaging system. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2006, 39: 591-597.
[33]   蒋臻, 刘加鹏, 金利华, 张其清. 翡翠贻贝足蛋白作为生物黏合剂的提取及应用. 生物医学工程学杂志, 2010(6): 1266-1273.
Jiang Z, Liu J P, Jin L H, Zhang Q Q. Extraction and application of pernaviridis foot protein as bioadhesive. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2010(6): 1266-1273. (in Chinese)
[34]   陈云, 王念贵. 大豆蛋白质科学与材料. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2014.
Chen Y, Wang N G. Science and Materials of Soy Protein. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2014. (in Chinese)
[35]   易翠平, 姚惠源. 酸法脱酰胺对大米蛋白分子间作用力和二级结构的影响. 中国粮油学报, 2007, 22(3): 1-4.
Yi C P, Yao H Y. Intermolecular forces and secondary structure of acid-deamidated rice protein. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oil Association, 2007, 22(3): 1-4. (in Chinese)
[36]   周小泉. 干热处理对油菜籽蛋白分子结构及功能特性的影响研究[D]. 郑州: 河南工业大学, 2013.
Zhou X Q. The studies of the molecular structure and functional properties of rapeseed protein treated by dry-heating [D]. Zhengzhou: Henan University of Technology, 2013. (in Chinese)
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!