Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2011, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (18): 3768-3777.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.18.008

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Land Use on Soil Enzyme Activity in Dry-Hot Valley

XUE  Sha, LI  Zhan-Bin, LI  Peng, ZHENG  Yu   

  1. 1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所
    2. 西安理工大学西北水资源与环境生态教育部重点实验室
  • Received:2010-07-05 Revised:2010-07-26 Online:2011-09-15 Published:2010-10-20

Abstract: 【Objective】 The study of soil enzyme activity on land use is of importance for exploration of the soil quality evolution and its evaluation during the revegetation in Jinsha river dry-hot valley region. 【Method】 Seven kinds of land use types with the same altitude at valleys in downstream of Jinsha river in Ningnan county, Sichuan was chosen as subject, aiming at reveal the changes in soil enzyme activity under wet/dry alternate conditions through experimental and statistical analysis. 【Result】 The results showed that different land use types significantly influenced the enzyme activity. Soil urease, saccharase, phosphatase, cellulose behaved the same change. Compared to other land use, a higher enzyme was found in Camptotheca acuminata, followed by grassland and Albizzia julibrissin, the lowest in Zanthoxylum bungeanum, Zea mays, Saccharum sinense and Morus alba. No significant change was observed in catalase activity and the lower value was found in Zea mays, Morus alba, Saccharum sinense than other land use. Different changes were observed in polyphenol oxidase from other enzymes, and the Morus alba and Albizzia julibrissin corresponded the highest value. With a exception of polyphenol oxdiase, enzymes with the same land use at wet season were higher than that in dry season. Correlation analysis showed a significant relation among saccharase, urease, phosphatase, and catalase, also related with soil fertility indicators, therefore soil enzyme could be useful for reflecting soil fertility. Soil enzyme index(SEI)can objectively and fully evaluate the change in soil enzyme, the SEI changed with an order of Camptotheca acuminata > Albizzia julibrissin >grassland> Zea mays > Zanthoxylum bungeanum > Saccharum sinense > Morus alba, and the SEI in wet season was higher than dry season. 【Conclusion】 The significant difference was observed in different land use types owing to special factors such as framing environment and species composition. In order to realize the healthy development in dry-hot valley, the soil enzyme change should be taken into conderation and the land use with rare disturbance and rich species should be chosen.

Key words:

[1]杨万勤, 宫阿都, 何毓蓉, 宋光煜. 金沙江干热河谷生态环境退化成因与治理途径探讨(以元谋段为例). 世界科技研究与发展, 2001(3): 37-39.

Yang W Q, Gong A D, He Y R, Song G Y. Preliminary investigation on degradation causes and harness approaches of eco-environment in dry and hot valley, Jinsha River— A case from Yuanmou region. World Scientific and Technological Research and Development, 2001(3): 37-39. (in Chinese)

[2]Cui P, Wei F Q, Li Y. Sediment transported by debris flow to the lower Jinsha River. International Journal of Sediment Research, 1999, 14(4): 67-71.

[3]拜得珍, 潘志贤, 纪中华, 杨艳鲜, 方海东, 廖承飞. 浅议金沙江干热河谷生态环境问题及治理措施. 国土与自然资源研究, 2006(4): 50-51.

Bai D J, Pan Z X, Ji Z H, Yang X Y, Fang H D, Liao C F. The problem and the countermeasures of ecological environment in Jinsha River dry valley. Territory and Natural Resources Study, 2006(4): 50-51. (in Chinese)

[4]关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986.

Guan S Y. Soil Enzyme. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1986. (in Chinese)

[5]周礼恺. 土壤酶学. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987: 118-159.

Zhou L K. Soil Enzymology. Beijing: Science Press, 1987: 118-159. (in Chinese)

[6]南京土壤研究所. 土壤微生物研究法. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985.

Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Methods  for Studying Soil Microbial. Beijing: Science Press, 1985. (in Chinese)

[7]张建平, 杨  忠, 张信宝, 李  勇. 元谋干热河谷早地地下地膜隔墙试验初报. 水土保持通报, 2000, 20(2): 39-40.

Zhang J P, Yang Z, Zhang X B, Li Y. Underground plastic sheet wall experiment in non-irrigated slope field in Yuanmou dry and hot Valley. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 20(2): 39-40. (in Chinese)

[8]张有富. 云南蒋家沟泥石流区干热退化山地引种拟金茅的技术与效果. 山地学报, 2000, 18(6): 563-567.

Zhang Y F. Technique and results of common eulaliopsis’ application on xerothermic degraded Mountain in Jiangjia Gou Debris Flow Gully. Journal of Mountain Science, 2000, 18(6): 563-567. (in Chinese)

[9]何毓蓉, 黄成敏, 杨  忠, 张信宝. 云南省元谋干热河谷的土壤 退化及早地农业研究. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1997, 3(1): 56-60.

He Y R, Huang C M, Yang Z, Zhang X B. Soil degradation and dryland farming in Yuanmou dry and hot valley, Yunnan Province. Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation, 1997, 3(1): 56-60. (in Chinese)

[10]杨  忠, 庄  泽, 秦定鼓, 冉国富, 付文喜. 元谋干热河谷水保林营造技术研究. 水土保持通报, 1999, 19(1): 38-42.

Yang Z, Zhuang Z, Qin D G, Ran G F, Fu W X. Afforestation techniques for water conservation in arid-hot valleys of Yuanmou County. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 1999, 19(1): 38-42. (in Chinese)

[11]张信宝, 杨  忠, 张建平. 元谋干热河谷坡地岩土类型与植被恢复分区. 林业科学, 2003, 39(4): 16-22.

Zhang X B, Yang Z, Zhang J P. Lithologic types on hill slopes and revegetation zoninag in the Yuanmou hot and dry valley. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2003, 39(4): 16-22. (in Chinese)

[12]张信宝, 安芷生, 陈玉德. 半干早区植被恢复与岩土性质. 地理学报, 1998, 53(增刊): 134-140.

Zhang X B, An Z S, Chen Y D. Revegation and lithological composition in semiarid regions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53(Suppl.): 134-140. (in Chinese)

[13]杨  忠, 张建辉, 徐建忠, 罗  辑, 张信宝. 元谋干热河谷不同岩土组成坡地按树人工林生长特征初步研究. 水土保持学报, 2000, 14(5): 1-7.

Yang Z, Zhang J H, Xu J Z, Luo J, Zhang X B. Growth responses of eucalyptus camaldulensis dehnl artificial population to slopes in arid-hot valleys, Yuanmou, Yunnan. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 14(5): 1-7. (in Chinese)

[14]王道杰, 崔  鹏,朱  波, 王玉宽. 金沙江干热河谷植被恢复技术及生态效应. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(5): 95-98.

Wang D J, Cui P, Zhu B, Wang Y K. Vegetation rehabilitation techniques and ecological effects in dry-hot valley of Jinsha River. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2004, 18(5): 95-98. (in Chinese)

[15]杨  忠, 张信宝, 王道杰, 陈玉德. 金沙江干热河谷植被恢复技术. 山地学报, 1999, 17(2): 152-156.

Yang Z, Zhang X B, Wang D J, Chen Y D. Vegetation rehabilitation in the arid-hot valleys of Jinshajiang River. Journal of Mountain Science, 1999, 17(2): 152-156. (in Chinese)

[16]张信宝, 陈玉德. 云南元谋干热河谷区不同岩土类型荒山植被恢复研究. 应用与环境生物学报, 1997, 3 (1): 13-18.

Zhang X B, Cheng Y D, Study on vegetation rehabilitation on the slopes of the arid and hot valleys in Yuanmou, Yunnan. China Journal Applied Environment Biology, 1997, 3(1): 13-18. (in Chinese)

[17]郭玉红,郎南军,和丽萍, 郑  科, 张立新, 温绍龙, 江期川. 元谋干热河谷8种植被类型的林地土壤特性研究. 西部林业科学, 2007, 36(2): 56-64.

Guo Y H, Lang N J, He L P, Zheng K, Zhang L X, Wen S L, Jiang Q C. A study on soil characteristics of eight vegetation types in Yuanmou dry and hot valley. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2007, 36(2): 56-64. (in Chinese)

[18]李  昆, 曾觉民. 元谋干热河谷地区不同造林树种对土壤的改良作用研究. 西南林学院学报, 1999, 19(3): 161-164.

Li Kun, Zeng J M. Effects of some tree species on soil Yuanmou hot and dry valley. Journal of Southwest Forestry College, 1999, 19(3): 161-164. (in Chinese)

[19]唐国勇, 李  昆, 孙永玉, 张春华. 干热河谷不同利用方式下土壤活性有机碳含量及其分配特征. 环境科学, 2010, 31(5): 1365-1371.

Tang G Y, Li K, Sun Y Y, Zhang C H. Soil labile organic carbon contents and their allocation characteristics under different land uses at dry-hot valley. Environmental Science, 2010, 31(5): 1365-1371. (in Chinese)

[20]程圣东, 李占斌, 李  强. 干热河谷地区土壤物理特性对土壤侵蚀的影响. 水资源与水工程学报, 2008, 19(5): 38-41.

Cheng S D, Li Z B, Li Q. Effect of soil physical properties to     soil erosion in dry and hot valley of Jinshajiang River. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2008, 19(5): 38-41. (in Chinese)

[21]陈奇伯, 王克勤, 李艳梅, 王建英, 王平里, 达  琼. 金沙江干热河谷不同类型植被改良土壤效应研究. 水土保持学报, 2003, 17(2): 67-70, 113.

Chen Q B, Wang K Q, Li Y M, Wang J Y, Wang P L, Da Q. Effect of different vegetation types on soil amelioration in dry-hot valley of Jinshajiang river basin. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2003, 17(2): 67-70, 113. (in Chinese)

[22]刘方炎, 朱 华, 施济普, 陈晓鸣. 元江干热河谷植物群落特征及土壤肥力研究. 应用与环境生物学报, 2007, 13(6): 782-787.

Liu F Y, Zhu H, She J P, Chen X M. Characteristics of plant communities and their soil fertilities in dry-hot valley of Yuanjiang County Yunnan, China. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2007, 13(6): 782-787. (in Chinese)

[23]杨艳鲜, 方海东, 潘志贤, 冯光恒, 沙毓沧, 纪中华, 杜 波, 和寿甲. 云南元谋干热河谷区旱坡地不同生态农业模式土壤水分差异性分析. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(2): 248-252.

Yang Y X, Fang H D, Pan Z X, Feng G H, Sha Y C, Ji Z H, Du B, He S J. Variability in moisture under four eco-agricultural models on dry slope land in Yuanmou dry-hot valley. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2009, 27(2): 248-252. (in Chinese)

[24]Mariotte C A, Hudson G, Hamilton D, Neilson R, Boag B, Handley L L, Wishart J. Spatial variability of soil total C and N and their stable isotopes in upland scottish grassland. Plant and Soil, 1997, 196: 151-162.

[25]鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999: 13-169.

Lu R K. The Analysis Method of Soil Agrochemistry. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1999: 13-169. (in Chinese)

[26]郑  郁, 李占斌, 李  鹏, 穆  军. 金沙江干热河谷区不同土地利用方式下的土壤特性分异特征. 水土保持研究, 2010, 17(1): 174-177, 251.

Zheng Y, Li Z B, Li P, Mu J. Features of land use type on soil properties in the dry-hot valley of Jinsha river. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 17(1): 174-177, 251. (in Chinese)

[27]王  兵, 刘国彬, 薛  萐, 李占斌, 李  鹏, 刘  娴. 黄土丘陵区撂荒对土壤酶活性的影响. 草地学报, 2009, 17(3): 282-287.

Wang B, Liu G B, Xue S, Li Z B, Li P, Liu X. Effect of farmland abandonment on soil enzyme activities in loess region. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2009, 17(3): 282-287. (in Chinese)

[28]李 昆, 张昌顺, 马姜明, 郑志新. 元谋干热河谷不同人工林土壤肥力比较研究. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19(5): 574-579.

Li K, Zhang C S, Ma J M, Zheng Z X. Comparative research on soil fertility of different artificial plantations in Yuanmou dry-hot valley, Yunnan Province. Forest Research, 2006, 19(5): 574-579. (in Chinese)

[29]薛  立, 邝立刚, 陈红跃, 谭绍满. 不同林分土壤养分、微生物与酶活性的研究. 土壤学报, 2003, 40(2): 280 - 285.

Xue L, Kuang L G, Chen H Y, Tan S M. Soil nutrients, microorganisms and enzyme activities of different stands. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2003, 40(2): 280-285. (in Chinese)

[30]Mondini C, Contin M, Leita L, De Nobili M. Response of microbial biomass to air-drying and rewetting in soils and compost. Geoderma, 2002,10: 111-124.

[31]Wu J, Brookes P C. The proportional mineralisation of microbial biomass and organic matter caused by air-drying and rewetting of a grassland soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2005, 37: 507-515.

[32]Zhang B, Peng X H, Zhao Q G, Hallett P D. Eluviation of dissolved organic carbon under wetting and drying and its influence on water infiltration in degraded soils restored with vegetation. European Journal of Soil Science, 2004, 55: 725 -737.

[33]李晨华, 唐立松, 李  彦. 干湿处理对灰漠土土壤理化性质及微生物活性的影响. 土壤学报, 2007, 44(2): 364-367.

Li C H, Tang L S, Li Y. Effects of air-drying and rewetting on physico-chemical properties and microbial activity of desert grey soil. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2007, 44(2): 364-367. (in Chinese)

[34]Hamer U, Unger M, Makeschin F. Impact of air-drying and rewetting on PLFA profiles of soil microbial communities. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2007, 170: 259-264.

[35]Iovieno P, Bååth E. Effect of drying and rewetting on bacterial growth rates in soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2008, 65: 400-407.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!