中国农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (11): 2299-2313.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.11.001

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

春小麦耐低氮种质资源的筛选与综合评价

高亚峰1,2(), 杨嘉宁1,2, 孙雪迪1, 陈佳佳1, 党志娟1,2, 汪军成1,2, 张宏1,2, 马小乐1,2, 姚立蓉1,2, 孟亚雄1,2, 司二静1,2, 李葆春2,3, 王化俊1,2()   

  1. 1 甘肃农业大学农学院, 兰州 730070
    2 省部共建干旱生境作物学国家重点实验室, 兰州 730070
    3 甘肃农业大学生命科学技术学院, 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-31 接受日期:2025-12-29 出版日期:2026-06-01 发布日期:2026-06-03
  • 通信作者:
    王化俊,E-mail:
  • 联系方式: 高亚峰,E-mail:15294486063@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省现代寒旱特色农业种业攻关项目(ZYGG-2025-3); 甘肃省现代寒旱特色农业种业攻关项目(ZYGG-2025-12-3); 甘肃农业大学SIETP项目(202501028); 甘肃农业大学SIETP项目(202501076); 甘肃省重点人才项目(2023RCXM70); 甘肃省现代寒旱特色农业麦类产业技术体系(GSARS-07); 甘肃省教育厅产业支撑计划(2021CYZC-12); 甘肃农业大学伏羲青年英才计划(Gaufx-03Y06); 甘肃农业大学伏羲青年英才计划(Gaufx-04Y011)

Screening and Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Nitrogen Tolerance Germplasm Resources in Spring Wheat

GAO YaFeng1,2(), YANG JiaNing1,2, SUN XueDi1, CHEN JiaJia1, DANG ZhiJuan1,2, WANG JunCheng1,2, ZHANG Hong1,2, MA XiaoLe1,2, YAO LiRong1,2, MENG YaXiong1,2, SI ErJing1,2, LI BaoChun2,3, WANG HuaJun1,2()   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070
    2 State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou 730070
    3 College of Life Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070
  • Received:2025-10-31 Accepted:2025-12-29 Published:2026-06-01 Online:2026-06-03

摘要:

【目的】在现代农业生产中,为实现高产目标而过度依赖氮肥施用,既提升了生产成本,又导致土壤酸化和水体富营养化等严重环境问题,筛选耐低氮小麦品种是实现土壤氮素高效利用、显著降低氮肥投入的关键技术手段,为解析春小麦耐低氮特性、基因挖掘和培育耐低氮品种提供种质资源和理论依据。【方法】以285份春小麦种质资源为试验材料,在低氮(0.05 mmol·L-1)和正常氮(5 mmol·L-1)2种浓度处理下,开展苗期种子萌发袋试验,测定苗长、根长、地上部干重、地下部干重等9种性状指标,并计算其耐低氮系数,同时,采用隶属函数法对285份春小麦苗期耐低氮特性进行综合评价,对筛选出的耐低氮材料进行田间精细筛选与耐低氮特性鉴定,最终确定耐低氮与低氮敏感材料,进一步分析这些材料在低氮胁迫下氮吸收、同化和转运相关酶活性的变化,以及籽粒品质的变化。【结果】通过主成分分析和隶属函数法进行综合评价,将苗期285份春小麦种质资源划分为五类,Ⅰ类为氮极敏感利用材料(5个),D值为0.14—0.20,分别为WN-269、WN-247、WN-244、WN-149和WN-249;Ⅱ类为氮敏感利用材料(84个),D值为0.20—0.34;Ⅲ类为氮中效利用材料(162个),D值为0.34—0.51;Ⅳ类为耐低氮利用材料(29个),D值为0.51—0.61;Ⅴ类为极耐低氮利用材料(5个),D值为0.61—0.70,分别为WN-49、WN-186、WN-237、WN-294和WN-235。选取氮极敏感型材料(5份)和极耐低氮型材料(5份)进行田间鉴定,最终筛选出一份氮敏感材料WN-269和一份耐低氮型材料WN-235;通过分析2份材料硝酸还原酶、谷氨酸合成酶和谷氨酰胺合成酶活性,发现在低氮胁迫下叶片中酶活均显著下降,且耐低氮材料中酶活性显著高于氮敏感材料。【结论】筛选出一份耐低氮小麦品种和一份氮敏感小麦品种;并得到了一套评价小麦苗期和成株期耐低氮特性的综合评价体系,确定了根表面积、根体积、地下部干重可作为耐低氮核心评价指标。

关键词: 春小麦, 低氮胁迫, 聚类分析, 综合评价, 硝酸还原酶, 谷氨酸合成酶, 谷氨酰胺合成酶

Abstract:

【Objective】Excessive dependence on nitrogen (N) fertilizer to achieve high crop yields in modern agricultural production has increased production costs and caused serious environmental problems, such as soil acidification and water eutrophication. Screening low-nitrogen-tolerant wheat cultivars is a key approach to improving nitrogen use efficiency and significantly reducing nitrogen fertilizer input. This study aimed to elucidate the low-nitrogen tolerance characteristics of spring wheat, provide germplasm resources, and establish a theoretical basis for gene mining and breeding of low-nitrogen-tolerant wheat varieties.【Method】A total of 285 spring wheat accessions were used as experimental materials. Seedling-stage germination bag experiments were conducted under low nitrogen (0.05 mmol·L-1) and normal nitrogen (5 mmol·L-1) treatments. Nine traits, including seedling length, root length, shoot dry weight, and root dry weight, were measured, and the low-nitrogen tolerance coefficient for each trait was calculated. A comprehensive evaluation of seedling-stage low-nitrogen tolerance was performed using principal component analysis and the membership function method. Selected materials were further subjected to precise field screening and identification. Representative low-nitrogen-tolerant and nitrogen-sensitive materials were used to analyze changes in nitrogen uptake, assimilation, and transport-related enzyme activities under low-nitrogen stress, as well as grain quality traits. 【Result】Based on comprehensive evaluation using principal component analysis and the membership function method, the 285 spring wheat accessions were classified into five groups. Group Ⅰ consisted of extremely nitrogen-sensitive materials (5 accessions) with D values ranging from 0.14 to 0.20, including WN-269, WN-247, WN-244, WN-149, and WN-249. Group Ⅱ included nitrogen-sensitive materials (84 accessions) with D values of 0.20 to 0.34. Group Ⅲ comprised moderately nitrogen-efficient materials (162 accessions) with D values of 0.34 to 0.51. Group Ⅳ consisted of low-nitrogen-tolerant materials (29 accessions) with D values of 0.51 to 0.61. Group Ⅴ included extremely low-nitrogen-tolerant materials (5 accessions) with D values of 0.61 to 0.70, namely WN-49, WN-186, WN-237, WN-294, and WN-235. Five extremely nitrogen-sensitive and five extremely low-nitrogen-tolerant accessions were selected for field identification, resulting in the final identification of one nitrogen-sensitive accession (WN-269) and one low-nitrogen-tolerant accession (WN-235). Analysis of nitrate reductase, glutamate synthase, and glutamine synthetase activities showed that enzyme activities in leaves significantly decreased under low-nitrogen stress, while enzyme activities in the low-nitrogen-tolerant material were significantly higher than those in the nitrogen-sensitive material.【Conclusion】One low-nitrogen-tolerant wheat accession and one nitrogen-sensitive accession were successfully identified. A comprehensive evaluation system for low-nitrogen tolerance at both seedling and adult stages in wheat was established, and root surface area, root volume, and root dry weight were identified as core indicators for evaluating low-nitrogen tolerance.

Key words: spring wheat, nitrogen deficiency stress, cluster analysis, integrated evaluation, nitrate reductase, glutamate synthase, glutamine synthetase