中国农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (16): 3164-3177.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.16.002

• 专题:稻油轮作周年养分管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

长期化肥和有机物料投入对稻油轮作作物产量和养分利用的影响

方娅婷1(), 赵剑1, 盛倩男1, 李凯旭2, 王祥华3, 张洋洋1, 朱俊1, 丛日环1, 陆志峰1, 李小坤1, 任涛1,*(), 鲁剑巍1   

  1. 1 华中农业大学资源与环境学院/农业农村部长江中下游耕地保育重点实验室/华中农业大学微量元素研究中心,武汉 430070
    2 湖北省沙洋县农业技术推广中心,湖北荆门 448000
    3 湖北省沙洋县曾集镇农技服务中心,湖北荆门 448000
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-14 接受日期:2025-06-25 出版日期:2025-08-11 发布日期:2025-08-11
  • 通信作者:
    任涛,E-mail:
  • 联系方式: 方娅婷,E-mail:fangyating@mail.hzau.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2023YFD1901100); 国家油菜产业技术体系(CARS-12); 中央高校基本科研业务费(2662024PY017)

Effects of Long-Term Chemical Fertilizer and Organic Material Application on Crop Yield and Nutrient Utilization in Rice-Rapeseed Rotation System

FANG YaTing1(), ZHAO Jian1, SHENG QianNan1, LI KaiXu2, WANG XiangHua3, ZHANG YangYang1, ZHU Jun1, CONG RiHuan1, LU ZhiFeng1, LI XiaoKun1, REN Tao1,*(), LU JianWei1   

  1. 1 College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation (Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Microelement Research Center, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070
    2 Shayang County Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Jingmen 448000, Hubei
    3 Zengji Town Agricultural Technology Service Center, Jingmen 448000, Hubei
  • Received:2025-04-14 Accepted:2025-06-25 Published:2025-08-11 Online:2025-08-11

摘要:

【目的】化肥和有机物料投入是农业生产中的重要增产措施,水稻-油菜复种轮作是我国长江流域主要水旱轮作模式。明确化肥和有机物料投入对稻油轮作周年作物产量和养分吸收利用的影响及其差异,为保障粮油安全和实现农业绿色可持续发展提供科学依据。【方法】于2016—2022年在湖北省沙洋县华中农业大学沙洋实验站开展田间定位试验,设置不施肥(CK)、单施化肥(NPK)、化肥+秸秆(NPK+S)、化肥+秸秆+有机肥(NPK+S+M)4个处理,分析油菜和水稻产量及氮磷钾养分吸收情况,并对养分利用效率、养分表观平衡及其与产量的关系进行评估。【结果】6年试验的平均结果表明,与不施肥相比,化肥和有机物料投入能够显著提高油菜(493.5%—758.8%)和水稻产量(94.3%—106.4%),显著提高作物产量稳定性(24.6%—72.1%)和可持续性(17.2%—85.0%)。与NPK处理相比,NPK+S处理的油菜产量增加6.3%,产量稳定性和可持续性降低;水稻产量降低0.8%,产量稳定性和可持续性提高。NPK+S+M处理的油菜和水稻分别增产44.7%和5.4%,产量可持续性均提高。在轮作周年内,所有处理的油菜季养分吸收占比均低于水稻季。有机物料投入显著促进油菜和水稻的养分吸收,与NPK处理相比,NPK+S+M处理的作物养分平均吸收量和趋势吸收量分别增加5.1%—91.2%和12.2%—100.4%。NPK+S处理的作物养分平均吸收量与NPK处理无显著差异,趋势吸收量比NPK处理高7.7%—25.4%。有机物料投入降低了作物养分生理利用率,与NPK处理相比,NPK+S+M处理的油菜和水稻氮素生理利用率分别降低3.0和3.7个百分点,磷素生理利用率分别降低19.3和25.5个百分点。进一步分析发现,有机物料的投入带来更高的养分表观盈余,且养分表观盈余累积量与产量累积量呈显著正相关。【结论】化肥和有机物料投入显著提高稻油轮作作物产量和养分吸收,其作用效果受作物类别和养分种类的共同影响。在化肥配施秸秆的基础上,增施有机肥能够进一步提高作物产量和培肥土壤,但仍需提高作物的养分生理利用率,以充分发挥有机物料的培肥增产潜力从而实现粮油兼丰。

关键词: 稻油轮作, 化肥, 秸秆, 有机肥, 产量, 养分生理利用率

Abstract:

【Objective】The application of chemical fertilizers and organic materials is a crucial measure for increasing agricultural production. Rice-rapeseed rotation system is a primary paddy-upland crop rotation pattern in the Yangtze River basin of China. Clarifying the impact of chemical fertilizers and organic material inputs on the annual crop yield and nutrient utilization in rice-rapeseed rotation could provide a scientific basis for ensuring food and oil security and achieving green and sustainable agricultural development. 【Method】From 2017 to 2022, a continuous field experiment was conducted at the Huazhong Agricultural University's Shayang Experimental Station in Shayang County, Hubei Province. Four treatments were established: no fertilizer (CK), chemical fertilizer only (NPK), chemical fertilizer with straw return (NPK+S), and chemical fertilizer with straw return plus organic fertilizer (NPK+S+M). The crop yields, nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) nutrient absorption of rapeseed and rice were analyzed. The nutrient use efficiency, apparent nutrient balances, and their relationships with yield were also assessed.【Result】The average results over 6 years showed that compared with no fertilization, the application of chemical fertilizers and organic materials significantly increased the yield of rapeseed (493.5%-758.8%) and rice (94.3%-106.4%), and enhanced crop yield stability (24.6%-72.1%) and sustainability (17.2%-85.0%). Compared with the NPK treatment, the NPK+S treatment increased the yield of rapeseed by 6.3%, but decreased yield stability and sustainability; it decreased the yield of rice by 0.8%, but increased yield stability and sustainability. The NPK+S+M treatment increased the yield of rapeseed and rice by 44.7% and 5.4%, respectively, and improved the sustainability of yield. Throughout the rotation cycle, nutrient uptake by rapeseed was consistently lower than that by rice across all treatments. The addition of organic materials significantly enhanced nutrient uptake in both rapeseed and rice. Relative to the NPK treatment, the NPK+S+M treatment resulted in increases of 5.1%-91.2% in average nutrient uptake and 12.2%-100.4% in trend nutrient uptake. The NPK+S treatment did not significantly differ from the NPK treatment in average nutrient uptake but exhibited a 7.7%-25.4% higher trend nutrient uptake. The input of organic materials decreased the physiological nutrient use efficiency of rapeseed and rice. Compared with the NPK treatment, the physiological N use efficiency of rapeseed and rice in the NPK+S+M treatment decreased by 3.0 and 3.7 percentage points, respectively, and the physiological P use efficiency decreased by 19.3 and 25.5 percentage points, respectively. Further analysis revealed that the application of organic materials led to higher apparent nutrient surpluses, which caused the annual increase in the cumulative yield of crops in the rice-rapeseed rotation. The cumulative apparent nutrient surplus was significantly positively correlated with the cumulative crop yield. 【Conclusion】The application of chemical fertilizers and organic materials significantly increased crop yields and nutrient use efficiency, and its effects were jointly influenced by crop and nutrient type. Increasing organic fertilization along with chemical fertilizers and straw application could further enhance soil fertility and increase crop yield; however, efforts should focus on improving the physiological nutrient use efficiency to fully realize the potential of organic amendments for sustainable grain and oil production.

Key words: rice-rapeseed rotation, chemical fertilizer, straw, organic fertilizer, yield, nutrient physiological utilization efficiency