秸秆还田与花后灌溉提高春玉米产量及水氮利用效率

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.18.009

中国农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (18): 3599-3614.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.18.009

• 土壤肥料·节水灌溉·农业生态环境 • 上一篇下一篇

秸秆还田与花后灌溉提高春玉米产量及水氮利用效率

王永亮(), 胥子航, 李申, 梁哲铭, 薛晓蓉, 白炬(), 杨治平()

山西农业大学生态环境产业技术研究院/农业农村部盐碱土改良与利用重点实验室（学科群）/土壤环境与养分资源山西省重点实验室，太原 030031

收稿日期:2023-02-20 接受日期:2023-07-20 出版日期:2023-09-16 发布日期:2023-09-21
通信作者:
白炬，E-mail：baiju@sxau.edu.cn。
杨治平，E-mail：yzpsx0208@163.com
联系方式: 王永亮，E-mail：wangyongliang@sxau.edu.cn。
基金资助:
山西省科技重大专项计划(202201140601028); 山西省现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金(2023CYJSTX01-14); 山西省科技成果转化引导专项(202104021301047); 山西农业大学博士科研启动项目(2021BQ123)

Straw Returning and Post-Silking Irrigating Improve the Grain Yield and Utilization of Water and Nitrogen of Spring Maize

WANG YongLiang(), XU ZiHang, LI Shen, LIANG ZheMing, XUE XiaoRong, BAI Ju(), YANG ZhiPing()

Institute of Eco-environment and Industrial Technology, Shanxi Agricultural University/Key Laboratory for Reclamation and Utilization of Saline-alkaline Soils (Discipline Cluster), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Shanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Nutrient Resources, Taiyuan 030031

Received:2023-02-20 Accepted:2023-07-20 Published:2023-09-16 Online:2023-09-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究秸秆还田与花后灌溉量对春玉米产量及水氮利用效率的影响，探究实现黄土高原东部河谷平原区春玉米水氮可持续高效利用的有效管理措施。【方法】基于连续7年长期定位试验（2014—2020年），在2021—2022年开展田间试验，采用裂区设计，主区为秸秆还田（R）和无秸秆还田（U），副区为5个花后灌溉量0（I0）、50（I50）、100（I100）、150（I150）、200（I200） mm，分析春玉米花后干物质累积量与耗水量的关系，并研究不同处理对春玉米产量、经济效益以及水氮利用效率的影响。【结果】秸秆还田与花后灌溉量及二因素互作显著提高春玉米产量、经济效益及水氮利用效率。与无秸秆还田相比，秸秆还田后玉米增产15.1%—43.5%，经济效益提高15.9%—49.1%，水分利用效率提高16.8%—36.9%，氮素回收利用效率、农学效率与偏生产力分别显著提高15.8%—62.0%、26.5%—126.0%和15.1%—43.6%。花后干物质累积量与耗水量之间呈现二次函数关系，与无秸秆还田相比，秸秆还田处理表现出较强的花后水分生产力，同时，产量响应系数显示秸秆还田处理在受到干旱胁迫时具有更强的水分缓冲能力。秸秆还田条件下各花后灌溉量处理玉米籽粒产量、干物质累积量、氮素吸收量及水氮利用效率均以I150处理最高。此外，秸秆还田与花后灌溉均显著促进了春玉米花后根系生长，但过量灌溉（I200处理）则抑制根系生长。【结论】黄土高原东部河谷平原春玉米生产系统中，秸秆还田配合花后灌溉150 mm可实现春玉米最佳籽粒产量与水氮利用效率，因此可作为该地区春玉米水氮高效可持续利用的管理措施。

关键词: 春玉米, 秸秆还田, 花后灌溉, 水氮利用效率, 产量响应系数

Abstract:

【Objective】The irrigation system for spring maize production in the eastern Loess Plateau is unclear. In view of this, the effects of straw return and post-silking irrigation on grain yield and use efficiency of water and nitrogen of spring maize were studied in order to explore effective management measures to achieve sustainable and efficient utilization of water and nitrogen in spring maize in the region, so as to provide a theoretical basis for the high yield, high resource efficiency, and environmentally friendly agricultural sustainable development of spring maize in the region.【Method】Based on a 7-year long-term positioning experiment (2014-2020), a field experiment was carried out from 2021 to 2022. A split design was applied for the treatments, the main factors included straw returning (R) and no straw returning (U), and sub-factors included five post-silking irrigation gradients (I0, I50, I100, I150, and I200 mm). The correlation between dry matter accumulation at post-silking and evapotranspiration of spring maize was analyzed, and the effects of different treatments on grain yield, economic benefits and use efficiency of water and nitrogen were studied.【Result】The grain yield, economic benefit and use efficiency of water and nitrogen of spring maize were significantly improved by straw returning and irrigating at post-silking. Compared with conventional tillage, the grain yield, the economic benefit and the water use efficiency of straw returning treatment increased by 15.1%-43.5%, 15.9%-49.1%, and 16.8%-36.9%, respectively. The N recovery use efficiency, N agricultural efficiency, and N partial productivity of spring maize were significantly improved by 15.8%-62.0%, 26.5%-126.0%, and 15.1%-43.6%, respectively. The relationship between dry matter accumulation and evapotranspiration at post-silking was a quadratic function. Compared with conventional tillage, the straw returning treatment showed a stronger water productivity at post-silking. Though the yield response factor, the straw returning treatment had stronger water buffering capacity under water stress. Under the condition of straw returning, the grain yield and water and nitrogen use efficiency of the treatment with irrigation rate at post-silking were the highest under I150 treatment. In addition, the straw returning and irrigating at post-silking significantly promoted root growth of spring maize, but excessive irrigating (I200 treatment) inhibited root growth.【Conclusion】To sum up, in the spring maize production system in the eastern valley plain of the Loess Plateau, straw returning with the irrigating rate of 150 mm at post-silking could be used as a management measure for the efficient and sustainable use of water and nitrogen of spring maize.

Key words: spring maize, straw returning, post-silking irrigating, water and nitrogen use efficiency, yield response factor

王永亮, 胥子航, 李申, 梁哲铭, 薛晓蓉, 白炬, 杨治平. 秸秆还田与花后灌溉提高春玉米产量及水氮利用效率[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(18): 3599-3614.

WANG YongLiang, XU ZiHang, LI Shen, LIANG ZheMing, XUE XiaoRong, BAI Ju, YANG ZhiPing. Straw Returning and Post-Silking Irrigating Improve the Grain Yield and Utilization of Water and Nitrogen of Spring Maize[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(18): 3599-3614.

图/表 10

图1

表1

图2

图3

表2

图4

图5

图6

表3

图7

参考文献 49

[1]	乔远, 杨欢, 雒金麟, 汪思娴, 梁蓝月, 陈新平, 张务帅. 西北地区玉米生产投入及生态环境风险评价. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 962-976. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.010. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.010
	QIAO Y, YANG H, LUO J L, WANG S X, LIANG L Y, CHEN X P, ZHANG W S. Inputs and ecological environment risks assessment of maize production in northwest China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 962-976. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.010. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.010
[2]	殷文, 柴强, 胡发龙, 樊志龙, 范虹, 于爱忠, 赵财. 干旱内陆灌区不同秸秆还田方式下春小麦田土壤水分利用特征. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(7): 1247-1259. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.012. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.012
	YIN W, CHAI Q, HU F L, FAN Z L, FAN H, YU A Z, ZHAO C. Characteristics of soil water utilization in spring wheat field with different straw retention approaches in dry inland irrigation areas. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(7): 1247-1259. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.012. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.012
[3]	殷文, 柴强, 于爱忠, 赵财, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 范虹, 郭瑶. 间作小麦秸秆还田对地膜覆盖玉米灌浆期冠层温度及光合生理特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(23): 4764-4776. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.23.004. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.23.004
	YIN W, CHAI Q, YU A Z, ZHAO C, FAN Z L, HU F L, FAN H, GUO Y. Effects of intercropped wheat straw retention on canopy temperature and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of intercropped maize mulched with plastic during grain filling stage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4764-4776. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.23.004. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.23.004
[4]	李敖, 张元红, 温鹏飞, 王瑞, 董朝阳, 宁芳, 李军. 耕作、施氮和密度及其互作对旱地春玉米土壤水分及产量形成的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(10): 1959-1970. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.10.004. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.10.004
	LI A, ZHANG Y H, WEN P F, WANG R, DONG Z Y, NING F, LI J. Effects of tillage, nitrogen application, planting density and their interaction on soil moisture and yield formation of spring maize in dryland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(10): 1959-1970. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.10.004. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.10.004
[5]	徐文强, 杨祁峰, 牛芬菊, 牛俊义, 熊春蓉, 张永祥. 秸秆还田与覆膜对土壤理化特性及玉米生长发育的影响. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(3): 87-93, 99.
	XU W Q, YANG Q F, NIU F J, NIU J Y, XIONG C R, ZHANG Y X. Effects of stalk returned to the field and film mulching on the soil physical and chemical characteristics and the maize growth. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2013, 21(3): 87-93, 99. (in Chinese)
[6]	马胜兰, 况福虹, 林洪羽, 崔俊芳, 唐家良, 朱波, 蒲全波. 秸秆还田量对川中丘陵冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系土壤物理特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(7): 1344-1358. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.07.012. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.07.012
	MA S L, KUANG F H, LIN H Y, CUI J F, TANG J L, ZHU B, PU Q B. Effects of straw incorporation quantity on soil physical characteristics of winter wheat-summer maize rotation system in the central hilly area of Sichuan Basin. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(7): 1344-1358. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.07.012. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.07.012
[7]	LEHTINEN T, SCHLATTER N, BAUMGARTEN A, BECHINI L, KRÜGER J, GRIGNANI C, ZAVATTARO L, COSTAMAGNA C, SPIEGEL H. Effect of crop residue incorporation on soil organic carbon and greenhouse gas emissions in European agricultural soils. Soil Use and Management, 2014, 30(4): 524-538. doi: 10.1111/sum.2014.30.issue-4
[8]	王旭敏, 雒文鹤, 刘朋召, 张琦, 王瑞, 李军. 节水减氮对夏玉米干物质和氮素积累转运及产量的调控效应. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(15): 3183-3197. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.15.004. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.15.004
	WANG X M, LUO W H, LIU P Z, ZHANG Q, WANG R, LI J. Regulation effects of water saving and nitrogen reduction on dry matter and nitrogen accumulation, transportation and yield of summer maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(15): 3183-3197. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.15.004. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.15.004
[9]	罗帅, 冯浩, 李成, 舒方瑜, 董勤各. 旱区垄膜沟灌不同灌水量对土壤水盐及春玉米产量的影响. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(4): 259-266.
	LUO S, FENG H, LI C, SHU F Y, DONG Q G. Effects of different irrigation amounts on soil water and salt and yield of spring maize under ridge with film mulching and furrow irrigation in arid area. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(4): 259-266. (in Chinese)
[10]	栗丽, 洪坚平, 王宏庭, 谢英荷, 张璐, 邓树元, 单杰, 李云刚. 施氮与灌水对夏玉米土壤硝态氮积累、氮素平衡及其利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(6): 1358-1365.
	LI L, HONG J P, WANG H T, XIE Y H, ZHANG L, DENG S Y, SHAN J, LI Y G. Effects of nitrogen application and irrigation on soil nitrate accumulation, nitrogen balance and use efficiency in summer maize. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(6): 1358-1365. (in Chinese)
[11]	刘梦洁, 梁飞, 李全胜, 田宇欣, 王国栋, 贾宏涛. 膜下滴灌与细流沟灌对玉米生长及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(8): 1515-1530. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.08.008. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.08.008
	LIU M J, LIANG F, LI Q S, TIAN Y X, WANG G D, JIA H T. Effects of drip irrigation under film and trickle furrow irrigation on maize growth and yield. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(8): 1515-1530. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.08.008. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.08.008
[12]	PAYERO J O, TARKALSON D D, IRMAK S, DAVISON D, PETERSEN J L. Effect of irrigation amounts applied with subsurface drip irrigation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency, and dry matter production in a semiarid climate. Agricultural Water Management, 2008, 95(8): 895-908. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.02.015
[13]	张经廷, 王志敏, 周顺利. 夏玉米不同施氮水平土壤硝态氮累积及对后茬冬小麦的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(6): 1182-1190. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.06.011. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.06.011
	ZHANG J T, WANG Z M, ZHOU S L. Soil nitrate N accumulation under different N-fertilizer rates in summer maize and its residual effects on subsequent winter wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(6): 1182-1190. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.06.011. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.06.011
[14]	严富来, 张富仓, 范兴科, 王英, 侯翔皓, 何琼. 基于评价模型的宁夏沙土春玉米最佳灌水施氮量研究. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(9): 258-265.
	YAN F L, ZHANG F C, FAN X K, WANG Y, HOU X H, HE Q. Optimal irrigation and nitrogen application amounts for spring maize based on evaluation model in sandy soil area in Ningxia. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(9): 258-265. (in Chinese)
[15]	刘小刚, 张富仓, 杨启良, 王金凤, 李志军. 交替隔沟灌溉条件下玉米群体水氮利用研究. 农业机械学报, 2011, 42(5): 100-105.
	LIU X G, ZHANG F C, YANG Q L, WANG J F, LI Z J. Group use of water and nitrogen on maize under alternative furrow irrigation. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2011, 42(5): 100-105. (in Chinese)
[16]	唐光木, 何红, 杨金钰, 徐万里. 灌溉定额对膜下滴灌玉米生理性状及产量的影响. 水土保持研究, 2014, 21(3): 293-297.
	TANG G M, HE H, YANG J Y, XU W L. Effect of irrigation quota on physiological characteristic and yield in drip irrigation under mulch of maize. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 21(3): 293-297. (in Chinese)
[17]	王维钰, 乔博, Kashif AKHTAR, 袁率, 任广鑫, 冯永忠. 免耕条件下秸秆还田对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作系统土壤呼吸及土壤水热状况的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(11): 2136-2152. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.11.010. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.11.010
	WANG W Y, QIAO B, AKHTAR K, YUAN S, REN G X, FENG Y Z. Effects of straw returning to field on soil respiration and soil water heat in winter wheat- summer maize rotation system under No tillage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(11): 2136-2152. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.11.010. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.11.010
[18]	杨竣皓, 骆永丽, 陈金, 金敏, 王振林, 李勇. 秸秆还田对我国主要粮食作物产量效应的整合(Meta)分析. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(21): 4415-4429. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.010. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.010
	YANG J H, LUO Y L, CHEN J, JIN M, WANG Z L, LI Y. Effects of main food yield under straw return in China: a meta-analysis. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(21): 4415-4429. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.010. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.010
[19]	姜英, 王峥宇, 廉宏利, 王美佳, 苏业涵, 田平, 隋鹏祥, 马梓淇, 王英俨, 孟广鑫, 孙悦, 李从锋, 齐华. 耕作和秸秆还田方式对东北春玉米吐丝期根系特征及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(15): 3071-3082. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.008. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.008
	JIANG Y, WANG Z Y, LIAN H L, WANG M J, SU Y H, TIAN P, SUI P X, MA Z Q, WANG Y Y, MENG G X, SUN Y, LI C F, QI H. Effects of tillage and straw incorporation method on root trait at silking stage and grain yield of spring maize in northeast China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(15): 3071-3082. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.008. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.008
[20]	路文涛, 贾志宽, 高飞, 李永平, 侯贤清. 秸秆还田对宁南旱作农田土壤水分及作物生产力的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30(1): 93-99.
	LU W T, JIA Z K, GAO F, LI Y P, HOU X Q. Effects of straw returning on soil water and crop productivity in the rainfed area of southern Ningxia, China. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2011, 30(1): 93-99. (in Chinese)
[21]	张祖光, 郝卫平, 李昊儒, 毛丽丽, 高翔. 山西省春玉米生育期干旱特征分析. 中国农业气象, 2015, 36(6): 754-761.
	ZHANG Z G, HAO W P, LI H R, MAO L L, GAO X. Analysis on the drought characteristics in different growth stages of spring maize in Shanxi Province. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2015, 36(6): 754-761. (in Chinese)
[22]	XU X P, HE P, PAMPOLINO M F, JOHNSTON A M, QIU S J, ZHAO S C, CHUAN L M, ZHOU W. Fertilizer recommendation for maize in China based on yield response and agronomic efficiency. Field Crops Research, 2014, 157: 27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.013
[23]	YANG H K, XIAO Y, ZHANG X, HUANG X L, FAN G Q. Maize straw mulching with uniconazole application increases the tillering capacity and grain yield of dryland winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Field Crops Research, 2022, 284: 108573. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108573
[24]	KRESOVIĆ B, TAPANAROVA A, TOMIĆ Z, ŽIVOTIĆ L, VUJOVIĆ D, SREDOJEVIĆ Z, GAJIĆ B. Grain yield and water use efficiency of maize as influenced by different irrigation regimes through sprinkler irrigation under temperate climate. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, 169: 34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.023
[25]	LIU C, LU M, CUI J, LI B, FANG C M. Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20(5): 1366-1381. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12517 pmid: 24395454
[26]	周怀平, 解文艳, 关春林, 杨振兴, 李红梅. 长期秸秆还田对旱地玉米产量、效益及水分利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2): 321-330.
	ZHOU H P, XIE W Y, GUAN C L, YANG Z X, LI H M. Effects of long-term straw-returning on corn yield, economic benefit and water use in arid farming areas. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2013, 19(2): 321-330. (in Chinese)
[27]	ZHANG S L, SADRAS V, CHEN X P, ZHANG F S. Water use efficiency of dryland maize in the Loess Plateau of China in response to crop management. Field Crops Research, 2014, 163: 55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.04.003
[28]	赵亚丽, 薛志伟, 郭海斌, 穆心愿, 李潮海. 耕作方式与秸秆还田对冬小麦-夏玉米耗水特性和水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(17): 3359-3371. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.17.004. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.17.004
	ZHAO Y L, XUE Z W, GUO H B, MU X Y, LI C H. Effects of tillage and straw returning on water consumption characteristics and water use efficiency in the winter wheat and summer maize rotation system. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(17): 3359-3371. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.17.004. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.17.004
[29]	高艳梅, 孙敏, 高志强, 崔凯, 赵红梅, 杨珍平, 郝兴宇. 不同降水年型旱地小麦覆盖对产量及水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(18): 3589-3599. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.18.003. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.18.003
	GAO Y M, SUN M, GAO Z Q, CUI K, ZHAO H M, YANG Z P, HAO X Y. Effects of mulching on grain yield and water use efficiency of dryland wheat in different rainfall years. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(18): 3589-3599. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.18.003. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.18.003
[30]	YIN W, GUO Y, HU F L, FAN Z L, FENG F X, ZHAO C, YU A Z, CHAI Q. Wheat-maize intercropping with reduced tillage and straw retention: a step towards enhancing economic and environmental benefits in arid areas. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 1328. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01328 pmid: 30369934
[31]	AYARS J E, PHENE C J, HUTMACHER R B, DAVIS K R, SCHONEMAN R A, VAIL S S, MEAD R M. Subsurface drip irrigation of row crops: a review of 15 years of research at the Water Management Research Laboratory. Agricultural Water Management, 1999, 42(1): 1-27. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00025-6
[32]	EL-HENDAWY S E, SCHMIDHALTER U. Optimal coupling combinations between irrigation frequency and rate for drip-irrigated maize grown on sandy soil. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(3): 439-448. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.11.002
[33]	ZHANG X Y, QIN W L, CHEN S Y, SHAO L W, SUN H Y. Responses of yield and WUE of winter wheat to water stress during the past three decades—a case study in the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 179: 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.05.004
[34]	邹宇锋, 蔡焕杰, 张体彬, 王云霏, 徐家屯. 河套灌区不同灌溉方式春玉米耗水特性与经济效益分析. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(9): 237-248.
	ZOU Y F, CAI H J, ZHANG T B, WANG Y F, XU J T. Water use characteristics and profit analysis of spring maize production with different irrigation methods in Hetao irrigation district. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(9): 237-248. (in Chinese)
[35]	GENÇOĞLAN C, ALTUNBEY H, GENÇOĞLAN S. Response of green bean (P. vulgaris L.) to subsurface drip irrigation and partial rootzone-drying irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 84(3): 274-280. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.02.008
[36]	ÇOLAK Y B, YAZAR A, GÖNEN E, EROĞLU E Ç. Yield and quality response of surface and subsurface drip-irrigated eggplant and comparison of net returns. Agricultural Water Management, 2018, 206: 165-175. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.05.010
[37]	薛澄, 王朝辉, 李富翠, 赵护兵, 周玲, 李小涵. 渭北旱塬不同施肥与覆盖栽培对冬小麦产量形成及土壤水分利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(21): 4395-4405. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.21.008. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.21.008
	XUE C, WANG Z H, LI F C, ZHAO H B, ZHOU L, LI X H. Effects of different fertilization and mulching cultivation methods on yield and soil water use of winter wheat on Weibei dryland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(21): 4395-4405. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.21.008. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.21.008
[38]	LYNCH J. Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiology, 1995, 109(1): 7-13. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.1.7 pmid: 12228579
[39]	FAN Y F, GAO J L, SUN J Y, LIU J A, SU Z J, WANG Z G, YU X F, HU S P. Effects of straw returning and potassium fertilizer application on root characteristics and yield of spring maize in China Inner Mongolia. Agronomy Journal, 2021, 113(5): 4369-4385. doi: 10.1002/agj2.v113.5
[40]	QUAN Z, LI S L, ZHU F F, ZHANG L M, HE J Z, WEI W X, FANG Y T. Fates of ¹⁵N-labeled fertilizer in a black soil-maize system and the response to straw incorporation in Northeast China. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018, 18(4): 1441-1452. doi: 10.1007/s11368-017-1857-3
[41]	CIAMPITTI I A, VYN T J. Physiological perspectives of changes over time in maize yield dependency on nitrogen uptake and associated nitrogen efficiencies: a review. Field Crops Research, 2012, 133: 48-67. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.008
[42]	蒋炳伸, 沈健林, 王娟, 李勇, 吴金水. 秸秆还田稻田土壤生物有效性磷及水稻磷吸收. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6): 309-317.
	JIANG B S, SHEN J L, WANG J, LI Y, WU J S. Effect of straw incorporation on biologically-based phosphorus fractions and phosphorus uptake by rice in paddy field. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(6): 309-317. (in Chinese)
[43]	ZHANG M M, SONG D P, PU X, DANG P F, QIN X L, SIDDIQUE K H M. Effect of different straw returning measures on resource use efficiency and spring maize yield under a plastic film mulch system. European Journal of Agronomy, 2022, 134: 126461. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126461
[44]	蔡红光, 袁静超, 闫孝贡, 刘剑钊, 张秀芝, 张洪喜, 魏雯雯, 任军. 不同灌溉方式对春玉米根系分布、养分累积及产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(4): 109-113.
	CAI H G, YUAN J C, YAN X G, LIU J Z, ZHANG X Z, ZHANG H X, WEI W W, REN J. Effect of irrigation on root distribution, nutrient accumulation and grain yield in spring maize. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2014, 22(4): 109-113. (in Chinese)
[45]	宫秀杰, 钱春荣, 曹旭, 于洋, 郝玉波, 李梁, 葛选良, 姜宇博. 玉米秸秆还田配施氮肥对土壤酶活、土壤养分及秸秆腐解率的影响. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(2): 151-155.
	GONG X J, QIAN C R, CAO X, YU Y, HAO Y B, LI L, GE X L, JIANG Y B. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on soil enzymatic activity, soil nutrients and decomposition rate of maize straw. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020, 28(2): 151-155. (in Chinese)
[46]	王泽林, 白炬, 李阳, 岳善超, 李世清. 氮肥施用和地膜覆盖对旱作春玉米氮素吸收及分配的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(1): 74-84.
	WANG Z L, BAI J, LI Y, YUE S C, LI S Q. Effects of nitrogen application and plastic film mulching on nitrogen uptake and allocation in dry-land spring maize. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(1): 74-84. (in Chinese)
[47]	张刚, 王德建, 俞元春, 王灿, 庄锦贵. 秸秆全量还田与氮肥用量对水稻产量、氮肥利用率及氮素损失的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(4): 877-885.
	ZHANG G, WANG D J, YU Y C, WANG C, ZHUANG J G. Effects of straw incorporation plus nitrogen fertilizer on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen loss. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(4): 877-885. (in Chinese)
[48]	魏廷邦, 柴强, 王伟民, 王军强. 水氮耦合及种植密度对绿洲灌区玉米光合作用和干物质积累特征的调控效应. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(3): 428-444. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.03.004. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.03.004
	WEI T B, CHAI Q, WANG W M, WANG J Q. Effects of coupling of irrigation and nitrogen application as well as planting density on photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation characteristics of maize in oasis irrigated areas. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(3): 428-444. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.03.004. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.03.004
[49]	于维祯, 张晓驰, 胡娟, 邵靖宜, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 任佰朝. 弱光涝渍复合胁迫对夏玉米产量及光合特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(18): 3834-3846. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.18.004. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.18.004
	YU W Z, ZHANG X C, HU J, SHAO J Y, LIU P, ZHAO B, REN B Z. Combined effects of shade and waterlogging on yield and photosynthetic characteristics of summer maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(18): 3834-3846. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.18.004. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.18.004

年份 Year	灌溉量 Irrigation rate	产量 Grain yield (t·hm^-2)			穗粒数 Kernels per ear		百粒重 100-grain weight (g,DW)		经济效益 Economic income (×10³ yuan/hm²)
年份 Year	灌溉量 Irrigation rate	R		U	R	U	R	U	R	U
2021	I0	10.46±0.32c		8.19±0.20d	527.33±15.33b	456.00±43.27b	27.56±0.21d	25.31±0.42c	20.66±0.54c	15.82±0.45d
	I50	13.23±0.36b		9.75±0.29c	621.33±9.62a	616.00±11.14a	30.89±0.23c	26.11±0.22c	27.83±0.83b	19.11±0.67c
	I100	15.12±0.42a		12.98±0.11a	630.00±13.33a	638.60±30.70a	31.86±0.21ab	29.33±0.47a	30.69±0.97ab	26.18±0.24a
	I150	16.08±0.58a		13.24±0.43a	634.60±31.18a	664.00±32.33a	32.99±0.08a	29.43±0.68a	32.05±0.84a	26.44±0.98a
	I200	13.96±0.33b		11.61±0.07b	629.00±10.07a	618.00±21.36a	31.32±0.50b	27.38±0.15b	26.39±0.77b	22.34±0.17b
2022	I0	11.77±0.22c		8.20±0.07c	492.78±20.68b	492.22±27.73b	30.56±0.77b	25.13±0.52c	23.69±0.51d	15.89±0.02d
	I50	13.47±0.32b		9.92±0.11b	621.44±25.92a	620.22±20.24a	31.78±0.47b	27.77±0.17b	27.25±0.74c	19.51±0.26c
	I100	14.42±0.06a		11.63±0.17a	638.57±12.48a	629.33±16.43a	32.56±0.25a	29.06±0.32a	29.08±0.14a	22.71±0.39b
	I150	14.45±0.08a		12.55±0.28a	669.00±24.61a	653.14±20.91a	32.64±0.55a	29.17±0.28a	28.80±0.17ab	24.85±0.64a
	I200	14.04±0.20ab		11.99±0.31a	632.14±39.90a	624.75±11.40a	32.27±0.62a	29.07±0.29a	27.49±0.46bc	23.20±0.71b
变异来源 Source of variation
秸秆还田 Straw returning (R)			***		ns		***		***
灌溉量 Irrigation rate (I)		***			***		***		***
年份 Year (Y)		ns			***		ns		ns
R×I		**			ns		**		**
R×Y		ns			ns		**		ns
I×Y		**			*		**		***
R×I×Y		ns			ns		*		ns

年份 Year	灌溉量 Irrigation rate	收获期土壤贮水量 Soil water storage of R6 (mm)		耗水量 Evapotranspiration (mm)		水分利用效率 water use efficiency (kg·hm^-2·mm^-1)
年份 Year	灌溉量 Irrigation rate	R	U	R	U	R	U
2021	I0	210.15±9.10b	197.31±6.54bc	513.72±5.41d	508.89±18.03c	20.37±0.65b	16.15±0.91b
	I50	226.79±7.89ab	215.80±5.04a	546.04±4.81c	540.29±17.47c	24.74±0.51a	18.07±0.57ab
	I100	222.76±12.78ab	195.40±4.74c	604.31±7.25b	610.80±16.67b	25.02±0.40a	20.76±0.49a
	I150	242.05±4.91a	214.14±3.01ab	628.21±3.19b	642.06±12.51ab	25.60±0.45a	20.98±0.22a
	I200	233.41±11.00ab	222.44±6.61a	673.21±19.96a	686.88±19.44a	20.15±0.36b	16.94±0.56b
2022	I0	157.79±4.06d	184.43±5.99b	429.61±4.49c	394.34±2.60d	27.40±0.42b	20.79±0.15b
	I50	187.43±1.06c	215.93±9.60a	464.86±1.33bc	412.84±5.44d	28.99±0.68ab	24.04±0.05a
	I100	213.13±3.32b	222.59±7.97a	488.36±3.32b	456.18±3.37c	29.38±0.25ab	25.15±0.45a
	I150	261.45±0.68a	240.49±2.43a	479.32±5.11ab	488.29±2.46b	30.16±0.28a	25.71±0.61a
	I200	279.79±17.34a	232.30±10.89a	527.27±27.78a	546.47±15.58a	26.82±1.84ab	21.97±0.78b
变异来源 Source of variation
秸秆还田Straw returning (R)		***		*		***
灌溉量Irrigation rate (I)		**		**		***
年份 Year (Y)		**		***		***
R×I		ns		ns		*
R×Y		*		**		**
I×Y		*		**		**
R×I×Y		ns		**		*

年份 Year	灌水量 Irrigation rate	氮素回收利用率 N recycling use efficiency (%)		氮素农学效率 N agronomic efficiency (kg·kg^-1)		氮素偏生产力 N partial productivity (kg·kg^-1)
年份 Year	灌水量 Irrigation rate	R	U	R	U	R	U
2021	I0	45.33±1.60d	36.10±0.34d	22.57±1.03c	12.49±0.87d	46.47±1.03c	36.39±0.87d
	I50	64.49±0.15c	47.13±2.42c	37.10±1.61b	19.44±1.30c	61.00±1.61b	43.34±1.30c
	I100	76.80±0.92b	61.80±1.37ab	43.31±1.87a	33.78±0.47a	67.21±1.87a	57.68±0.47a
	I150	82.65±1.48a	64.74±1.96a	46.61±2.56a	34.95±1.90a	70.52±2.56a	58.85±1.90a
	I200	66.70±1.29c	57.59±1.62b	36.36±1.49b	27.70±0.32b	60.26±1.49b	51.61±0.32b
2022	I0	50.58±2.00c	31.23±1.84c	28.48±1.10c	12.60±1.23d	52.33±0.99c	36.44±0.03d
	I50	57.46±3.06b	43.54±3.13b	36.04±1.39b	20.26±0.78c	59.89±1.42b	44.11±0.50c
	I100	66.22±0.87a	48.43±2.79ab	40.26±1.16a	27.14±1.64b	64.11±0.26a	50.98±0.75b
	I150	70.94±0.51a	53.96±2.13a	40.39±1.47a	31.94±1.55a	64.23±0.34a	55.79±1.25a
	I200	66.06±1.34a	53.62±1.45a	38.55±0.35ab	29.44±1.70ab	62.39±0.89ab	53.28±1.37ab
变异来源 Source of variation
秸秆还田Straw returning (R)		***		***		***
灌溉量Irrigation rate (I)		***		***		***
年份 Year (Y)		***		ns		ns
R×I		*		**		**
R×Y		ns		ns		ns
I×Y		***		***		***
R×I×Y		ns		ns		ns

秸秆还田与花后灌溉提高春玉米产量及水氮利用效率

Straw Returning and Post-Silking Irrigating Improve the Grain Yield and Utilization of Water and Nitrogen of Spring Maize

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 49

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	许杨浩峻, 陈丽明, 杨世奇, 唐奕凡, 谭雪明, 曾勇军, 潘晓华, 曾研华. 长期秸秆还田对双季稻田不同土层有机碳、养分和团聚体的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1492-1506.
[2]	郝琨, 陈洪德, 张威, 钟韵, 党美荣, 朱士江, 黄志坤, 金英. 基于柑橘产量、品质及水氮利用的涌泉根灌水氮综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[3]	刘梦阳, 刘洁, 陈翔, 王擎运, 罗来超, 齐永波, 田达, 李金才, 柴如山. 长期秸秆还田对砂姜黑土团聚体结构及磷组分分布的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(3): 575-588.
[4]	张昊鑫, 于晟玥, 雷秋良, 杜新忠, 张继宗, 安妙颖, 樊秉乾, 罗加法, 刘宏斌. 基于RothC模型的东北旱地和稻田土壤有机碳动态变化模拟研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(8): 1564-1578.
[5]	赵耀, 程前, 徐田军, 刘正, 王荣焕, 赵久然, 陆大雷, 李从锋. 高密度条件下株型改良对春玉米根-冠特征及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(7): 1296-1310.
[6]	田磊, 邵鑫, 周一民, 苗秀珍, 纪楠, 王浩, 石明帅, 张悦忠. 多因素管理下大兴安岭南麓玉米种植密度及耐密抗倒品种选择[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(24): 5143-5155.
[7]	霍润霞, 方娅婷, 张艳科, 吴海亚, 刘桂生, 李小坤, 任涛, 陆志峰, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 长期秸秆还田条件下化肥减量对稻稻油轮作系统作物产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(16): 3267-3279.
[8]	王安心, 方娅婷, 顿谦, 伍永清, 廖世鹏, 李小坤, 任涛, 陆志峰, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 秸秆直接还田与炭化还田对稻油轮作作物产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(16): 3280-3292.
[9]	熊志豪, 刘君权, 叶琳, 朱丹丹, 侯素素, 方娅婷, 丛日环, 任涛, 李小坤, 鲁剑巍. 稻油轮作系统秸秆直接还田与焚烧还田的作物产量和养分表观平衡特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(16): 3293-3303.
[10]	李晓红, 王克如, 张国强, 明博, 薛军, 方梁, 张婷婷, 叶建全, 李少昆. 增密和株行距优化提高西辽河平原沙地滴灌玉米的产量与水氮利用效率[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(14): 2766-2781.
[11]	宣泽鹏, 冯慧瑶, 陈美淇, 徐基胜, 刘梦璇, 赵炳梓, 张佳宝. 秸秆还田配施化肥对土壤生态系统多功能性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(14): 2821-2837.
[12]	马玉洁, 李旭, 翟英芳, 李敬宇, 付鑫, 彭正萍. 秸秆还田方式和施氮量对土壤有机碳组分及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(12): 2397-2410.
[13]	张旸, 高燕, 张延, 黄丹丹, 陈学文, 张士秀, 梁爱珍. 秸秆还田方式对东北黑土氮素矿化和氮循环功能基因的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(10): 1958-1968.
[14]	高尚洁, 刘杏认, 李迎春, 柳晓婉. 施用生物炭和秸秆还田对农田温室气体排放及增温潜势的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(5): 935-949.
[15]	曹文茁, 于振文, 张永丽, 张振, 石玉, 王永军. 不同施氮量下黑土地春玉米籽粒淀粉积累动态及产量形成差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(22): 4431-4443.