热应激对奶牛GNAS启动子区DNA甲基化水平的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.12.013

中国农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (12): 2395-2406.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.12.013

热应激对奶牛GNAS启动子区DNA甲基化水平的影响

陈玉梅¹(), 张聪聪¹, 胡丽蓉², 房浩¹, 窦金焕³, 郭刚⁴, 王炎⁴, 刘巧香⁵, 王雅春², 徐青¹()

¹ 北京交通大学生命科学与生物工程研究院，北京100044
² 中国农业大学动物科技学院，北京100193
³ 北京农学院，北京102206
⁴ 北京首农畜牧发展有限公司，北京 100029
⁵ 北京生物种业创新联合体，北京100125

收稿日期:2022-02-09 接受日期:2022-07-28 出版日期:2023-06-16 发布日期:2023-06-27
通信作者: 徐青，Tel：13520490069；E-mail：qingxu@bjtu.edu.cn
联系方式: 陈玉梅，Tel：18813021971；E-mail：19121601@bjtu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金外国青年学者研究基金(3175011045); 财政部和农业农村部：国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-36)

Effect of Heat Stress on DNA Methylation of GNAS Promoter Region in Dairy Cows

CHEN YuMei¹(), ZHANG CongCong¹, HU LiRong², FANG Hao¹, DOU JinHuan³, GUO Gang⁴, WANG Yan⁴, LIU QiaoXiang⁵, WANG YaChun², XU Qing¹()

¹ Institute of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044
² College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193
³ Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206
⁴ Beijing Sunlon Livestock Development Company Limited, Beijing 100029
⁵ Beijing Innovation Consortium of Bio-breeding, Beijing 100125

Received:2022-02-09 Accepted:2022-07-28 Published:2023-06-16 Online:2023-06-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】热应激严重影响奶牛的生产和健康，是制约奶业持续健康发展的重要因素。DNA甲基化作为一种重要的表观遗传调控机制参与动物的热应激反应，但其在奶牛热应激过程中的作用和分子机制研究较少。研究通过检测奶牛热应激相关的DNA甲基化变化，筛选和验证DNA甲基化相关的关键基因，为奶牛热应激的表观遗传机制研究积累数据。【方法】以北京市三元绿荷金银岛牧场的24头中国荷斯坦牛(泌乳阶段及胎次相同) 为研究对象，分别于春季 (非应激期，2017年4月份) 和夏季(热应激期，2017年7月份) 采集试验个体的血液，提取DNA，共获得48份DNA样本。首先，随机选择其中15头奶牛，并随机分为3组，每组5份DNA样本混合，通过全基因组重亚硫酸盐测序法(Whole- genome bisulfite sequencing, WGBS) 检测奶牛基因组DNA的甲基化状态，筛选差异甲基化区域 (Differential methylation region, DMR; 1000 bp windows, 500 bp overlap, P<0.05) 及相关基因，利用PROMO和Methprimer软件预测基因启动子的转录因子结合位点和CpG岛区。然后，39 ℃热处理牛乳腺上皮细胞 (Bovine mammary gland epithelial cells, Mac-T)不同时间 (24 h, 48 h, 72 h)，MTT法检测细胞活力。最后，利用亚硫酸盐测序法 (Bisulfite sequencing PCR, BSP)分别对春夏季的24头奶牛及39 ℃热处理不同时间的Mac-T细胞中目的基因启动子区的甲基化状态进行分析。【结果】通过WGBS共得到49 861个DMRs，其中一个DMR注释到基因GNAS复合体基因座(GNAS complex locus, GNAS)的启动子区，其整体甲基化水平在夏季热应激期极显著上调(P<0.001)，且该区域预测到一个352 bp的CpG岛，包含Sp1、C/EBP等重要转录因子的结合区域。24头奶牛个体中GNAS启动子区31个CG位点的整体甲基化水平在热应激期显著上调(P<0.05)，与WGBS结果一致，其中，21号(-113 bp，Chr13:57532733)和27号CG (-63 bp，Chr13:57532683) 位点甲基化水平显著上调(P<0.05)。Mac-T 细胞热处理48和72 h后，细胞活力极显著下降(P<0.01)，GNAS启动子的CG 位点整体甲基化水平显著上调 (P<0.05)，21号和27号CG均为显著上调的差异甲基化位点，与个体水平结果一致。【结论】热应激会引起奶牛GNAS启动子甲基化水平增加，GNAS是奶牛热应激DNA甲基化调控的潜在靶基因。

关键词: 热应激, 奶牛, WGBS, DNA甲基化, GNAS基因

Abstract:

【Objective】Heat stress has seriously impaired the production and health of dairy cows, causing the subsequent limitation in sustainable development of dairy industry. DNA methylation is an important epigenetic regulatory mechanism involved in an animal’s heat stress response, but the potential functions and molecular mechanisms of which are not clear. The current study was conducted to detect the DNA methylation related to heat stress in dairy cows and to identify target genes related to DNA methylation, so as to provide a better insight into the epigenetics mechanism of heat stress in dairy cows.【Method】In the study, 24 Chinese Holstein lactation cows (same lactation stage and same parity) in Sanyuan dairy farm were used for the blood samples collection in heat stress period (July in the summer of 2017) and non-heat stress period (April in spring 2017), respectively, followed by DNA extraction. To explore the DNA methylation differences in dairy cows from different heat stress period, 15 of 24 animals were randomly assigned to 3 groups (N=5 animals/group), 5 DNA samples in one group were mixed together to get a single pooled DNA sample, thus 6 pooled DNA samples including 3 from spring and 3 from summer were used for the DNA methylation detection by the whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), then the differential methylation region (DMR; 1000 bp windows, 500 bp overlap, P<0.05) and key gene were identified. PROMO and Methprimer software were used to predict transcription factor binding sites and CpG islands, respectively. Then, the bovine mammary gland epithelial cells (Mac-T) were treated at 39 ℃ for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, and the cell viability were detected by MTT method. Finally, using the bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP), the methylation levels of target gene promoter in 24 dairy cows in spring and summer and Mac-T cells treated in 39 ℃ were examined, respectively. 【Result】Based on the DNA methylation analysis of WGBS data, 49 861 differential methylation regions (DMRs) associated with heat stress were identified. One of DMRs was attributed to the promoter area of GNAS complex locus (GNAS), whose methylation level significantly increased in heat-stressed animals (P<0.001). Also, there was a 352 bp CpG island in the promoter of GNAS containing potential binding sites for Sp1, C/EBP and other important transcription factors. Further the methylation status of the GNAS gene promoter region in heat stressed dairy cows were verified by BSP, and the average methylation level in all cytosine of 31 CpG sites was higher in heat stress cows than that in control groups (P<0.05), which corresponding to the above WGBS results. Moreover, the 21 (-113 bp, Chr13:57532733) and 27 (-63 bp, Chr13:57532683) CpG sites showed significant differences between the spring and summer groups (P<0.05). In Mac-T cells, after 48 h and 72 h heat treatment, the cell viability decreased significantly (P<0.01), but the overall CG methylation level of 31 CpG sites in the GNAS gene promoter region increased significantly (P<0.05), and also the similar significant methylation changes appeared in the site 21 and 27 CpG in cell. 【Conclusion】 Heat stress increased the methylation levels of the promoter region of the GNAS in dairy cows as well as in cells, which indicated that GNAS was a potential target gene regulated DNA methylation in heat stress response of dairy cows.

Key words: heat stress, dairy cows, WGBS, DNA methylation, GNAS

陈玉梅, 张聪聪, 胡丽蓉, 房浩, 窦金焕, 郭刚, 王炎, 刘巧香, 王雅春, 徐青. 热应激对奶牛GNAS启动子区DNA甲基化水平的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(12): 2395-2406.

CHEN YuMei, ZHANG CongCong, HU LiRong, FANG Hao, DOU JinHuan, GUO Gang, WANG Yan, LIU QiaoXiang, WANG YaChun, XU Qing. Effect of Heat Stress on DNA Methylation of GNAS Promoter Region in Dairy Cows[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(12): 2395-2406.

图/表 8

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 48

[1]	ROSSIELLO M R, SZEMA A. Health effects of climate change- induced wildfires and heatwaves. Cureus, 2019, 11(5): e4771.
[2]	ALI M Z, CARLILE G, GIASUDDIN M. Impact of global climate change on livestock health: Bangladesh perspective. Open Veterinary Journal, 2020, 10(2): 178-188. doi: 10.4314/ovj.v10i2.7 pmid: 32821662
[3]	RANJITKAR S, BU D P, WIJK M, MA Y, MA L, ZHAO L S, SHI J M, LIU C S, XU J C. Will heat stress take its toll on milk production in China? Climatic Change, 2020, 161(4): 637-652. doi: 10.1007/s10584-020-02688-4
[4]	BAGATH M, KRISHNAN G, DEVARAJ C, RASHAMOL V P, PRAGNA P, LEES A M, SEJIAN V. The impact of heat stress on the immune system in dairy cattle: A review. Research in Veterinary Science, 2019, 126: 94-102. doi: S0034-5288(19)30282-6 pmid: 31445399
[5]	BERNABUCCI U, BIFFANI S, BUGGIOTTI L, VITALI A, LACETERA N, NARDONE A. The effects of heat stress in Italian Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, 97(1): 471-486. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6611 pmid: 24210494
[6]	胡丽蓉, 康玲, 王淑慧, 李玮, 鄢新义, 罗汉鹏, 董刚辉, 王新宇, 王雅春, 徐青. 冷热应激对北京地区荷斯坦牛产奶性能及血液生化指标的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(19): 3791-3799. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.19.015. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.19.015
	HU L R, KANG L, WANG S H, LI W, YAN X Y, LUO H P, DONG G H, WANG X Y, WANG Y C, XU Q. Effects of cold and heat stress on milk production traits and blood biochemical parameters of Holstein cows in Beijing area. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(19): 3791-3799. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.19.015. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.19.015
[7]	ABBAS Z, SAMMAD A, HU L R, FANG H, XU Q, WANG Y C. Glucose metabolism and dynamics of facilitative glucose transporters (GLUTs) under the influence of heat stress in dairy cattle. Metabolites, 2020, 10(8): 312. doi: 10.3390/metabo10080312
[8]	KHAN A, KHAN M Z, UMER S, KHAN I M, XU H T, ZHU H B, WANG Y C. Cellular and molecular adaptation of bovine granulosa cells and oocytes under heat stress. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 2020, 10(1): 110.
[9]	LIU S H, YUE T T, AHMAD M J, HU X W, ZHANG X X, DENG T X, HU Y, HE C J, ZHOU Y, YANG L G. Transcriptome analysis reveals potential regulatory genes related to heat tolerance in Holstein dairy cattle. Genes, 2020, 11(1): 68. doi: 10.3390/genes11010068
[10]	ZHAO S G, MIN L, ZHENG N, WANG J Q. Effect of heat stress on bacterial composition and metabolism in the rumen of lactating dairy cows. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 2019, 9(11): 925.
[11]	KOCH F, ALBRECHT D, GÖRS S, KUHLA B. Jejunal mucosa proteomics unravel metabolic adaptive processes to mild chronic heat stress in dairy cows. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 12484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92053-x pmid: 34127774
[12]	GAO F, LUO Y L, LI S T, LI J, LIN L, NIELSEN A L, SØRENSEN C B, VAJTA G, WANG J, ZHANG X Q, DU Y T, YANG H M, BOLUND L. Comparison of gene expression and genome-wide DNA methylation profiling between phenotypically normal cloned pigs and conventionally bred controls. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(10): e25901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025901
[13]	ZHAO J G, LU Z G, WANG L, JIN B. Plant responses to heat stress: physiology, transcription, noncoding RNAs, and epigenetics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020, 22(1): 117. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010117
[14]	OUELLET V, LAPORTA J, DAHL G E. Late gestation heat stress in dairy cows: Effects on dam and daughter. Theriogenology, 2020, 150: 471-479. doi: S0093-691X(20)30177-1 pmid: 32278591
[15]	WU J, ZHANG W W, LI C H. Recent advances in genetic and epigenetic modulation of animal exposure to high temperature. Frontiers in Genetics, 2020, 11: 653. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00653 pmid: 32733534
[16]	LIVERNOIS A M, MALLARD B A, CARTWRIGHT S L, CÁNOVAS A. Heat stress and immune response phenotype affect DNA methylation in blood mononuclear cells from Holstein dairy cows. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 11371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89951-5 pmid: 34059695
[17]	KHODADADI E, FAHMIDEH L, KHODADADI E, DAO S, YOUSEFI M, TAGHIZADEH S, ASGHARZADEH M, YOUSEFI B, KAFIL H S. Current advances in DNA methylation analysis methods. BioMed Research International, 2021, 2021: 8827516.
[18]	JÜPPNER H. Molecular definition of pseudohypoparathyroidism variants. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2021, 106(6): 1541-1552. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab060
[19]	MANTOVANI G, DE SANCTIS L, BARBIERI A M, ELLI F M, BOLLATI V, VAIRA V, LABARILE P, BONDIONI S, PEVERELLI E, LANIA A G, BECK-PECCOZ P, SPADA A. Pseudohypoparathyroidism and GNAS epigenetic defects: Clinical evaluation of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy and molecular analysis in 40 patients. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2010, 95(2): 651-658. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0176
[20]	FAIAS S, DUARTE M, PEREIRA L, CHAVES P, CRAVO M, DIAS PEREIRA A, ALBUQUERQUE C. Methylation changes at the GNAS imprinted locus in pancreatic cystic neoplasms are important for the diagnosis of malignant cysts. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 2020, 12(9): 1056-1064. doi:10.4251/wjgo.v12.i9.1056. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i9.1056
[21]	MCDOWELL R E, HOOVEN N W, CAMOENS J K. Effect of climate on performance of holsteins in first lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 1976, 59(5): 965-971. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(76)84305-6
[22]	HAMMAMI H, BORMANN J, M’HAMDI N, MONTALDO H H, GENGLER N. Evaluation of heat stress effects on production traits and somatic cell score of Holsteins in a temperate environment. Journal of Dairy Science, 2013, 96(3): 1844-1855. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5947 pmid: 23313002
[23]	KOCH F, THOM U, ALBRECHT E, WEIKARD R, NOLTE W, KUHLA B, KUEHN C. Heat stress directly impairs gut integrity and recruits distinct immune cell populations into the bovine intestine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019, 116(21): 10333-10338.
[24]	TOKUHISA K, TSURUTA S, DE VRIES A, BERTRAND J K, MISZTAL I. Estimation of regional genetic parameters for mortality and 305-d milk yield of US Holsteins in the first 3 parities. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, 97(7): 4497-4502. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7697 pmid: 24792794
[25]	KIM W S, NEJAD J G, PENG D Q, JUNG U S, KIM M J, JO Y H, JO J H, LEE J S, LEE H G. Identification of heat shock protein gene expression in hair follicles as a novel indicator of heat stress in beef calves. Animal, 2020, 14(7): 1502-1509. doi: 10.1017/S1751731120000075 pmid: 32038000
[26]	HENG J H, TIAN M, ZHANG W F, CHEN F, GUAN W T, ZHANG S H. Maternal heat stress regulates the early fat deposition partly through modification of m 6 A RNA methylation in neonatal piglets. Cell Stress & Chaperones, 2019, 24(3): 635-645. doi: 10.1007/s12192-019-01002-1
[27]	WANG Y R, YANG C X, ELSHEIKH N A H, LI C M, YANG F X, WANG G L, LI L. HO-1 reduces heat stress-induced apoptosis in bovine granulosa cells by suppressing oxidative stress. Aging, 2019, 11(15): 5535-5547. doi: 10.18632/aging.v11i15
[28]	LI Q, HERMANSON P J, SPRINGER N M. Detection of DNA methylation by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N J), 2018, 1676: 185-196.
[29]	AKIKA R, AWADA Z, MOGHARBIL N, ZGHEIB N K. Region of interest methylation analysis: A comparison of MSP with MS-HRM and direct BSP. Molecular Biology Reports, 2017, 44(3): 295-305. doi: 10.1007/s11033-017-4110-7 pmid: 28676996
[30]	ZHOU Y, LIU S L, HU Y, FANG L Z, GAO Y H, XIA H, SCHROEDER S G, ROSEN B D, CONNOR E E, LI C J, BALDWIN R L, COLE J B, VAN TASSELL C P, YANG L G, MA L, LIU G E. Comparative whole genome DNA methylation profiling across cattle tissues reveals global and tissue-specific methylation patterns. BMC Biology, 2020, 18(1): 85. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00793-5 pmid: 32631327
[31]	WANG M Q, BISSONNETTE N, DUDEMAINE P L, ZHAO X, IBEAGHA-AWEMU E M. Whole genome DNA methylation variations in mammary gland tissues from Holstein cattle producing milk with various fat and protein contents. Genes, 2021, 12(11): 1727. doi: 10.3390/genes12111727
[32]	IBEAGHA-AWEMU E M, BISSONNETTE N, BHATTARAI S, WANG M Q, DUDEMAINE P L, MCKAY S, ZHAO X. Whole genome methylation analysis reveals role of DNA methylation in cow's ileal and ileal lymph node responses to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection. Frontiers in Genetics, 2021, 12: 797490. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.797490
[33]	WEBER M, SCHÜBELER D. Genomic patterns of DNA methylation: targets and function of an epigenetic mark. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2007, 19(3): 273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.04.011 pmid: 17466503
[34]	TATE P H, BIRD A P. Effects of DNA methylation on DNA-binding proteins and gene expression. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 1993, 3(2): 226-231.
[35]	KOROTKO U, CHWIAŁKOWSKA K, SAŃKO-SAWCZENKO I, KWASNIEWSKI M. DNA demethylation in response to heat stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021, 22(4): 1555. doi: 10.3390/ijms22041555
[36]	VINOTH A, THIRUNALASUNDARI T, SHANMUGAM M, UTHRAKUMAR A, SUJI S, RAJKUMAR U. Evaluation of DNA methylation and mRNA expression of heat shock proteins in thermal manipulated chicken. Cell Stress & Chaperones, 2018, 23(2): 235-252. doi: 10.1007/s12192-017-0837-2
[37]	ZHANG J, ZHANG J, XU S, ZHANG X, WANG P, WU H, XIA B, ZHANG G, LEI B, WAN L, ZHANG D, PANG D. Hypoxia-induced TPM2 methylation is associated with chemoresistance and poor prognosis in breast cancer. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, 2018, 45(2): 692-705. doi: 10.1159/000487162 pmid: 29414807
[38]	CORBETT R J, LUTTMAN A M, WURTZ K E, SIEGFORD J M, RANEY N E, FORD L M, ERNST C W. Weaning induces stress-dependent DNA methylation and transcriptional changes in piglet PBMCs. Frontiers in Genetics, 2021, 12: 633564. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.633564
[39]	ZHANG X Y, HUANG Z B, XIE Z A, CHEN Y L, ZHENG Z Y, WEI X A, HUANG B, SHAN Z, LIU J H, FAN S W, CHEN J, ZHAO F D. Homocysteine induces oxidative stress and ferroptosis of nucleus pulposus via enhancing methylation of GPX4. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 2020, 160: 552-565. doi: S0891-5849(20)31236-3 pmid: 32896601
[40]	PAVANI K C, ROCHA A, BARON E, LOURENÇO J, FAHEEM M, DA SILVA F M. The effect of kinetic heat shock on bovine oocyte maturation and subsequent gene expression of targeted genes. Zygote (Cambridge, England), 2017, 25(3): 383-389. doi: 10.1017/S0967199417000223
[41]	MIOZZO F, ARNOULD H, DE THONEL A, SCHANG A L, SABÉRAN-DJONEIDI D, BAUDRY A, SCHNEIDER B, MEZGER V. Alcohol exposure promotes DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A upregulation through reactive oxygen species-dependent mechanisms. Cell Stress & Chaperones, 2018, 23(1): 115-126. doi: 10.1007/s12192-017-0829-2
[42]	LI Q N, LI A, SUN S M, LIU W B, MENG T G, GUO X P, SCHATTEN H, SUN Q Y, OU X H. The methylation status in GNAS clusters May Be an epigenetic marker for oocyte quality. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2020, 533(3): 586-591. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.09.055
[43]	刘明哲, 郭华林, 冯彦, 李建国, 李鹏飞, 高彩荣, 郭相杰. 过敏者外周血DNA甲基化差异. 法医学杂志, 2021, 37(2): 211-214. doi: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2019.490414
	LIU M Z, GUO H L, FENG Y, LI J G, LI P F, GAO C R, GUO X J. DNA methylation differences in peripheral blood of patients with anaphylaxis. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2021, 37(2): 211-214. (in Chinese)
[44]	POIRIER M, TESFAYE D, HAILAY T, SALILEW-WONDIM D, GEBREMEDHN S, RINGS F, NEUHOFF C, SCHELLANDER K, HOELKER M. Metabolism-associated genome-wide epigenetic changes in bovine oocytes during early lactation. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 2345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59410-8 pmid: 32047242
[45]	ZEMACH A, MCDANIEL I E, SILVA P, ZILBERMAN D. Genome- wide evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic DNA methylation. Science, 2010, 328(5980): 916-919. doi: 10.1126/science.1186366
[46]	TIAN H P, LUN S M, HUANG H J, HE R, KONG P Z, WANG Q S, LI X Q, FENG Y M. DNA methylation affects the SP1-regulated transcription of FOXF₂ in breast cancer cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2015, 290(31): 19173-19183. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.636126
[47]	GUO D, WU B, YAN J H, LI X S, SUN H M, ZHOU D S. A possible gene silencing mechanism: Hypermethylation of the Keap1 promoter abrogates binding of the transcription factor Sp1 in lung cancer cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2012, 428(1): 80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.10.010 pmid: 23047008
[48]	SHEN L, QU X, MA Y, ZHENG J, CHU D, LIU B, LI X, WANG M, XU C, LIU N, YAO L, ZHANG J. Tumor suppressor NDRG2 tips the balance of oncogenic TGF-β via EMT inhibition in colorectal cancer. Oncogenesis, 2014, 3(2): e86. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2013.48

引物名称 Primer name	引物序列 Primer sequence	产物长度 The length of product (bp)
外侧引物 Outer primer	F：5′-GTTTGAGATTATTTTTTTTTAATTATAAT-3′	676
外侧引物 Outer primer	R：5′-AAAAACACCTACCTTCCTAACCACTCAACT-3′	676
内侧引物 Inner primer	F：5′-AGTTTTTGGAAAATGTTTTGGATTGGAT-3′	598
内侧引物 Inner primer	R：5′-CCTCTACTTACCACTCTAAACAT-3′	598

热应激对奶牛GNAS启动子区DNA甲基化水平的影响

Effect of Heat Stress on DNA Methylation of GNAS Promoter Region in Dairy Cows

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 48

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	杨国昌, 郑月, 包向男, 代迎春, 王金刚, 白雪峰, 孙伟, 李喜和, 张淑君. 中红外光谱分析技术在奶牛甲烷排放预测中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(9): 1856-1866.
[2]	王薇, 罗春海, 贾红豆, 刘佳金, 李丹阳, 付世新. 谷氨酰胺对氧化应激状态下胎衣不下奶牛内质网应激的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(7): 1451-1462.
[3]	赵真坚, 王凯, 陈栋, 申琦, 余杨, 崔晟頔, 王俊戈, 陈子旸, 禹世欣, 陈佳苗, 王翔枫, 唐国庆. 基因组和DNA甲基化组联合分析筛选猪肉质性状关键基因[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(7): 1394-1406.
[4]	高晨曦, 郝陆洋, 胡悦, 李永祥, 张登峰, 李春辉, 宋燕春, 石云素, 王天宇, 黎裕, 刘旭洋. 干旱条件下玉米转座子插入关联的表观调控分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(6): 1034-1048.
[5]	刘卓琳, 刘红云. 基于网络药理学和分子对接探究芹菜素缓解奶牛热应激及低氧应激的潜力与机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(5): 1010-1022.
[6]	苏小雨, 谭政委, 李春明, 李磊, 鲁丹丹, 余永亮, 董薇, 安素妨, 杨青, 孙瑶, 许兰杰, 杨红旗, 梁慧珍. 高温胁迫下芝麻全基因组甲基化差异及关联基因表达分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(24): 4825-4838.
[7]	刘炳琦, 罗春海, 姚伟佳, 王薇, 刘佳金, 李丹阳, 付世新. miRNA-424-5p靶向VEGFA对胎衣不下奶牛胎盘胶原蛋白降解的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(15): 3083-3092.
[8]	王晋鹏, 罗仍卓么, 李彦霞, 冯芬, 王正兴, 潘传英, 蓝贤勇, 王兴平. lncRNA RRAS2-AS1在LPS诱导奶牛乳腺上皮细胞炎症中的功能[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(14): 2874-2888.
[9]	李慧, 张雨峰, 李晓刚, 王中华, 蔺经, 常有宏. 全基因组DNA甲基化和转录组联合分析鉴定杜梨耐盐相关转录因子[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(7): 1377-1390.
[10]	郭咏梅, 刘阳, 武汭, 闫素梅, 赵艳丽, 郭晓宇. 维生素A和乙酸交互作用对奶牛乳腺上皮细胞中乳成分合成相关基因表达的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(21): 4344-4358.
[11]	唐玉林, 张博, 任曼, 张瑞雪, 秦俊杰, 朱浩, 郭延生. UPLC-MS/MS代谢组学评价归芪益母口服液对产后奶牛瘤胃的调节作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 368-378.
[12]	任义方,杨章平,零丰华,肖良文. 江苏奶牛热应激风险区划及其受气候变化的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(22): 4513-4525.
[13]	王雪洁,邢爽,赵少猛,周莹,厉秀梅,柳清秀,马丹丹,张敏红,冯京海. 热应激对肉鸡回肠菌群的影响因素研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(17): 3450-3460.
[14]	姜春晖,孙旭东,唐燕,罗胜缤,徐闯,陈媛媛. 姜黄素通过Nrf2信号通路对H₂O₂诱导奶牛乳腺上皮细胞氧化应激的缓解[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(8): 1787-1794.
[15]	陈志,张逸,路钦越,郭佳禾,梁艳,张明怡星,杨章平. 茶树油对LPS诱导的奶牛乳腺炎的作用及其机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(14): 3124-3133.