施磷对苜蓿叶片生理参数及抗氧化能力的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.03.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】探究连续3年施用磷肥后对紫花苜蓿叶片养分吸收量、光合色素含量、气孔开度及抗氧化系统的影响，为紫花苜蓿高效生产提供科学施肥方法。【方法】2019—2021年，以‘WL366HQ’紫花苜蓿为试验材料，在石河子大学牧草试验站连续开展为期3年的田间试验。试验设置磷肥添加量分别为0（对照，CK）、50 kg·hm^-2（低磷，LP）、100 kg·hm^-2（中磷，MP）和150 kg·hm^-2 （高磷，HP），共4个磷肥处理。于苜蓿初花期进行取样，测定干草产量、叶片氮磷含量、色素含量、气孔开度、抗氧化酶活性以及氧化物质等指标。【结果】连续施加磷肥3年后，叶片的氮磷含量、光合色素含量及气孔开度显著增加（P<0.05），其中叶片氮磷含量在中磷处理下最高，分别为54.74和2.99 g·kg^-1；叶绿素a和叶绿素b的含量均在中磷处理下最高，类胡萝卜素含量在低磷或中磷处理下最高，且均在CK最低；气孔开度在中磷处理下达到最大，且显著高于CK（P<0.05）。因此，磷肥对苜蓿叶片的形态和生理特性有不同的影响，且中磷处理显著影响苜蓿叶片的光合生理特性（P<0.05）。合理添加磷肥可以提高苜蓿叶片抗氧化酶的活性并降低氧化物质的含量，超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）、过氧化物酶（POD）和过氧化氢酶（CAT）活性均在中磷处理达到最高，分别为162.55、406.40和147.13 U·g^-1，且显著高于CK（P<0.05）；丙二醛（MDA）、过氧化氢（H₂O₂）和脯氨酸（Pro）含量均在中磷处理下最低，分别为2.38和1.04 μmol·g^-1以及56.85 μg·g^-1。根据Pearson相关性分析可知，苜蓿叶片全氮和全磷含量与叶绿素含量、类胡萝卜素含量、气孔开度、SOD和POD活性显著正相关（P<0.05），与MDA和H₂O₂含量呈显著负相关（P<0.05）。综合评价表明，施磷处理的主成分得分排序为：中磷>高磷>低磷>对照。【结论】合理施加磷肥增加苜蓿叶片的营养特性及光合生理特性，从而避免其他环境因子带来的胁迫作用，增强苜蓿的适应能力，使苜蓿更好地适应外界环境变化。综合考虑紫花苜蓿的叶片形态、光合生理特性及抗氧化酶和氧化物质等因素，本试验施磷量为100 kg·hm^-2较为适宜。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 施磷, 叶片表型, 叶片生理, 干草产量

Abstract:

【Objective】The aim of this study was to investigate the effects on nutrient uptake, photosynthetic pigment content, stomatal aperture and antioxidant system of alfalfa leaves after three consecutive years of phosphorus fertilizer application, so as to provide scientific fertilization methods for efficient production of alfalfa.【Method】Field trials were conducted at the forage experiment station of Shihezi University in Xinjiang from 2019 to 2021. ‘WL366HQ’ alfalfa was used as the test material, and four fertilizer treatments in the experiment included 0 (CK), 50 (Low P, LP), 100 (Middle P, MP), and 150 (High P, HP) kg·hm^-2. Samples were taken at the first flowering of alfalfa to determine the hay yield, nitrogen and phosphorus content, pigment content, stomatal opening, antioxidant enzyme activity, and oxidizing substances of leaves.【Result】The nitrogen and phosphorus content, photosynthetic pigment content and stomatal aperture of leaves of alfalfa increased significantly (P<0.05) after 3 years of continuous phosphorus fertilization, with the highest nitrogen and phosphorus content under MP treatment (54.74 and 2.99 g·kg^-1, respectively), the highest chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b content under MP, and the highest carotenoid content under LP or MP, and the lowest in CK. The stomatal aperture was the highest under MP and significantly higher than that under CK (P<0.05). Therefore, phosphorus fertilizer had different effects on the morphological and physiological characteristics of alfalfa leaves, and MP treatment significantly affected the photosynthetic and physiological characteristics of alfalfa leaves (P<0.05). Superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) activities were the highest under MP, with the value of 162.55, 406.40 and 147.13 U·g^-1, respectively, and were significantly higher than those under CK (P<0.05). The malondialdehyde (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and proline (Pro) content were the lowest under MP, at 2.38 and 1.04 μmol·g^-1 and 56.85 μg·g^-1, respectively. According to the Pearson correlation analysis, the total N and P contents of alfalfa leaves showed significant positive correlation (P<0.05) with chlorophyll content, carotenoid content, stomatal aperture, SOD activity and POD activity, and significant negative correlation (P<0.05) with MDA and H₂O₂ content. The overall evaluation showed that the principal component scores of phosphorus application treatments were ranked as MP>HP>LP>CK. 【Conclusion】 The reasonable application of phosphorus fertilizer increased the nutritional characteristics and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of alfalfa leaves, thus avoiding the stressful effects brought by other environmental factors, enhancing the adaptive capacity of alfalfa, and making it better adapted to external environmental changes. Considering the leaf morphology, photosynthetic physiological characteristics and antioxidant enzymes and oxidizing substances of alfalfa, the phosphorus application rate of 100 kg·hm^-2 was suitable under this experiment.

Key words: alfalfa, phosphorus fertilizer, leaf phenotype, leaf physiology, hay yield

赵建涛, 杨开鑫, 王旭哲, 马春晖, 张前兵. 施磷对苜蓿叶片生理参数及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(3): 453-465.

ZHAO JianTao, YANG KaiXin, WANG XuZhe, MA ChunHui, ZHANG QianBing. Effect of Phosphorus Application on Physiological Parameters and Antioxidant Capacity in Alfalfa Leaves[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(3): 453-465.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.03.005

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2023/V56/I3/453

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 37

[1]	SCASTA J D, TROSTLE C L, FOSTER M A. Evaluating alfalfa (medicago sativa L.) cultivars for salt tolerance using laboratory, greenhouse and field methods. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2012, 4(6): 90-103.
[2]	CHEN Y H, HAN W X, TANG L Y, TANG Z Y, FANG J Y. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of woody plants differ in responses to climate, soil and plant growth form. Ecography, 2013, 36(2): 178-184. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06833.x
[3]	RUSSELL R S, RICKSON J B, ADAMS S N. Istopic equilibria between phosphates in soil and their significance in the assessment of fertility by tracer methods. European Journal of Soil Science, 1954, 5(1): 85-105.
[4]	刘俊英, 回金峰, 孙梦瑶, 刘选帅, 鲁为华, 马春晖, 张前兵. 施磷水平和接种AMF与解磷细菌对苜蓿产量及磷素利用效率的影响. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(19): 142-149.
	LIU J Y, HUI J F, SUN M Y, LIU X S, LU W H, MA C H, ZHANG Q B. Effects of phosphorus application and inoculation arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria on dry matter yield and phosphorus use efficiency of alfalfa. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(19): 142-149. (in Chinese)
[5]	毕银丽, 孙江涛, YPYSZHAN Z, 解文武, 于淼. 不同施磷水平下接种菌根玉米营养状况及光谱特征分析. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(5): 1227-1235.
	BI Y L, SUN J T, YPYSZHAN Z, XIE W W, YU M. Hyperspectral characterization and nutrition condition of maize inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhiza in different phosphorus levels. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(5): 1227-1235. (in Chinese)
[6]	DOS SANTOS E F, ZANCHIM B J, DE CAMPOS A G, GARRONE R F, LAVRES J. Photosynthesis rate, chlorophyll content and initial development of physic nut without micronutrient fertilization. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 2013, 37(5): 1334-1342. doi: 10.1590/S0100-06832013000500022
[7]	任立飞, 张文浩, 李衍素. 低磷胁迫对黄花苜蓿生理特性的影响. 草业学报, 2012, 21(3): 242-249.
	REN L F, ZHANG W H, LI Y S. Effect of phosphorus deficiency on physiological properties of Medicago falcata. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(3): 242-249. (in Chinese)
[8]	SYNAN F A, SUZANNE M C, JEFFREY J V. Phosphate nutrition and defoliation effects on growth and root physiology of alfalfa. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2006, 29(8): 1387-1403. doi: 10.1080/01904160600830191
[9]	齐敏兴, 刘晓静, 张晓磊, 刘艳楠. 不同磷水平对紫花苜蓿光合作用和根瘤固氮特性的影响. 草地学报, 2013, 21(3): 512-516. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.03.016
	QI M X, LIU X J, ZHANG X L, LIU Y N. Effects of different phosphorus levels on photosynthesis and root nodule nitrogen-fixing characteristic of alfalfa. Acta Agrectir Sinica, 2013, 21(3): 512-516. (in Chinese)
[10]	BOYCE R L, LARSON J R, SANFORD R L. Phosphorus and nitrogen limitations to photosynthesis in Rocky Mountain bristlecone pine (Pinas aristata) in Colorado. Tree Physiology, 2006, 26(11): 1477-1486. doi: 10.1093/treephys/26.11.1477
[11]	ZHANG W, CHEN X X, LIU Y M, LIU D Y, DU Y F, CHEN X P, ZOU C Q. The role of phosphorus supply in maximizing the leaf area, photosynthetic rate, coordinated to grain yield of summer maize. Field Crops Research, 2018, 219: 113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.031
[12]	ASHRAF M, HARRIS P J C. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica, 2013, 51(2): 163-190. doi: 10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6
[13]	ZHAO W S, SUN Y L, KJELGREN R, LIU X P. Response of stomatal density and bound gas exchange in leaves of maize to soil water deficit. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2015, 37: 1074.
[14]	LAWSON T, BLATT M R. Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency. Plant Physiology, 2014, 164(4): 1556-1570. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.237107 pmid: 24578506
[15]	WOLZ K J, WERTIN T M, ABORDO M, WANG D, LEAKEY A D. Diversity in stomatal function is integral to modelling plant carbon and water fluxes. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 2017, 1(9): 1292-1298. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0238-z pmid: 29046531
[16]	CAI Q, JI C J, YAN Z B, JIANG X X, FANG J Y. Anatomical responses of leaf and stem of Arabidopsis thaliana to nitrogen and phosphorus addition. Journal of Plant Research, 2017, 13(6): 1035-1045.
[17]	高宏云. 棉花冠层“铃—叶系统”光合生理特性及其对滴灌量的响应[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2020.
	GAO H Y. Photosynthetic physiological characteristics of cotton canopy “boll-leaf system” and the response to drip irrigation amount[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[18]	张燕, 王红兰, 蒋舜媛, 孙辉, 杨萍, 杜玖珍, 孙洪兵, 周毅. 不同氮浓度对羌活幼苗生长及抗氧化酶系统的效应. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2018, 24(7): 38-44.
	ZHANG Y, WANG H L, JIANG S Y, SUN H, YANG P, DU J Z, SUN H B, ZHOU Y. Effect of different nitrogen concentrations on growth and antioxidant enzymes activity in Notopterygium incisum seedling in cultivation matrix. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae, 2018, 24(7): 38-44. (in Chinese)
[19]	魏婧, 徐畅, 李可欣, 贺洪军, 徐启江. 超氧化物歧化酶的研究进展与植物抗逆性. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(12): 2571-2584.
	WEI J, XU C, LI K X, HE H J, XU Q J. Progress on superoxide dismutase and plant stress resistance. Plant Physiology Journal, 2020, 56(12): 2571-2584. (in Chinese)
[20]	SU B Q, WANG L F, SHANGGUAN Z P. Morphological and physiological responses and plasticity in Robinia pseudoacacia to the coupling of water, nitrogen and phosphorus. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2021, 184(2): 271-281. doi: 10.1002/jpln.202000465
[21]	杨妮, 万绮雯, 李逸民, 韩妙华, 腾瑞敏, 刘洁霞, 庄静. 外源亚精胺对盐胁迫下茶树光合特性及关键酶基因表达的影响. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(2): 378-394.
	YANG N, WAN Q W, LI Y M, HAN M H, TENG R M, LIU J X, ZHUANG J. Effects of exogenous spermidine on photosynthetic characteristics and gene expression of key enzymes under salt stress in tea plant. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(2): 378-394. (in Chinese)
[22]	ZHANG M, LIU W, LI C H, SHAO T T, JIANG X, ZHAO H Z, AI W T. Postharvest hot water dipping and hot water forced convection treatments alleviate chilling injury for zucchini fruit during cold storage. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 249: 219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.01.058
[23]	AERTS R, CHAPIN F S. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research, 2000, 30: 1-67.
[24]	THOMPSON J B, SLOT M, DALLING J W, WINTER K, TURNER B L, ZALAMEA P C. Species-specific effects of phosphorus addition on tropical tree seedling response to elevated CO₂. Functional Ecology, 2019, 33(10): 1871-1881. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13421
[25]	陈婷婷, 符卫蒙, 余景, 奉保化, 李光彦, 符冠富, 陶龙兴. 彩色稻叶片光合特征及其与抗氧化酶活性、花青素含量的关系. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(3): 467-478.
	CHEN T T, FU W M, YU J, FENG B H, LI G Y, FU G F, TAO L X. The photosynthesis characteristics of colored rice leaves and its relation with antioxidant capacity and anthocyanin content. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 467-478. (in Chinese)
[26]	SERGI M B, TANA J M, LEONOR A. Enhanced photo- and antioxidative protection, and hydrogen peroxide accumulation in drought-stressed Cistus clusii and Cistus albidus plants. Tree Physiology, 2003, 23: 1-12. doi: 10.1093/treephys/23.1.1
[27]	陆雯芸, 房克, 边红武, 朱睦元. 气孔发育及其调控因素的研究进展. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52(6): 782-788.
	LU W Y, FANG K, BIAN H W, ZHU M Y. Advances in stomatal development and its regulation factors. Plant Physiology Journal, 2016, 52(6): 782-788. (in Chinese)
[28]	RODRIGUEZ D, SANTA MARIA G E, POMAR M C. Phosphorus deficiency affects the early development of wheat plants. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 1994, 173(1): 69-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.1994.tb00575.x
[29]	王宏亮, 郭思义, 王棚涛, 宋纯鹏. 植物气孔发育机制研究进展. 植物学报, 2018, 53(2): 164-174. doi: 10.11983/CBB17033
	WANG H L, GUO S Y, WANG P T, SONG C P. Research progress in stomatal development mechanism. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2018, 53(2): 164-174. (in Chinese)
[30]	CORNIC G. Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture-not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends in Plant Science, 2000, 5(5): 187-188. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01625-3
[31]	XU Z Z, ZHOU G S. Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2008, 59(12): 3317-3325. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern185 pmid: 18648104
[32]	郑云普, 常志杰, 范晓懂, 张运鑫, 刘亮, 陈文娜, 刘媛媛, 郝立华. CO₂浓度升高和磷素亏缺对黑麦草气孔特征及气体交换参数的影响. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(18): 82-89.
	ZHENG Y P, CHANG Z J, FAN X D, ZHANG Y X, LIU L, CHEN W N, LIU Y Y, HAO L H. Effects of CO₂ concentration increase and phosphorus deficiency on the stomatal traits and leaf gas exchange parameters of ryegrass. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(18): 82-89. (in Chinese)
[33]	ZHAO W S, SUN Y L, KJELGREN R, LIU X P. Response of stomatal density and bound gas exchange in leaves of maize to soil water deficit. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2015, 37(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11738-014-1746-y
[34]	ULLAH A, SUN H, YANG X Y, ZHANG X L. Drought coping strategies in cotton: Increased crop per drop. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017, 15(3): 271-284. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12688 pmid: 28055133
[35]	YU Q, RENGEL Z. Drought and salinity differentially influence activities of superoxide dismutase in narrow-leafed lupins. Plant Science, 1999, 142: 1-11. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00246-5
[36]	ISRAR D, MUSTAFA G, KHAN K S, SHAHZAD M, AHMAD N, MASOOD S. Interactive effects of phosphorus and Pseudomonas putida on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) growth, nutrient uptake, antioxidant enzymes and organic acids exudation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2016, 108: 304-312. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.07.023
[37]	SONG Y Z, KONG F F, XUE Y, QIN B Q. Responses of chlorophyll and MDA of Vallisneria natans to nitrogen and phosphorus availability and epiphytic algae. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 2015, 30(1): 85-97. doi: 10.1080/02705060.2014.989554

茬次 Stubble time	处理 Treatment	气孔数 Stomatal number	气孔长度 Stomatal longitudinal diameter (μm)	气孔宽度 Stomatal transverse diameter (μm)	气孔开度 Stomatal aperture (μm²)
第1茬 First cut	CK	17.5±0.77a	29.43±0.76b	10.00±0.44b	230.97±11.31b
	LP	18.3±0.77a	29.51±0.70b	11.15±0.35a	248.78±6.56b
	MP	19.4±1.25a	32.80±0.79a	11.29±0.30a	290.58±9.81a
	HP	17.6±0.75a	29.54±0.50b	9.77±0.34b	225.93±6.46b
第2茬 Second cut	CK	15.3±0.49b	28.38±0.50b	6.98±0.18b	155.87±5.59b
	LP	19.7±0.99a	30.25±0.47a	8.52±0.16a	202.50±4.88a
	MP	19.8±0.79a	30.49±0.26a	8.54±0.14a	204.46±6.75a
	HP	15.0±0.52b	28.36±0.38b	7.05±0.24b	156.62±4.30b
第3茬 Third cut	CK	16.9±0.77a	30.93±0.69bc	10.14±0.35a	246.23±11.80a
	LP	19.1±0.77a	31.21±0.61b	10.30±0.34a	251.53±6.98a
	MP	19.6±1.25a	33.30±0.78a	10.43±0.23a	272.60±9.58a
	HP	18.5±0.74a	29.04±0.50c	9.41±0.34a	213.95±6.36b
第4茬 Fourth cut	CK	19.7±2.04ab	28.83±1.15a	6.27±0.34bc	141.08±7.72c
	LP	20.7±0.40ab	30.69±0.50a	7.06±0.21b	170.04±5.79b
	MP	22.7±1.18a	30.52±0.67a	8.33±0.40a	201.03±13.86a
	HP	17.8±0.83b	29.65±0.51a	6.00±0.26c	139.43±5.50c