





中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (20): 4271-4286.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.20.015
张绩1(
),李俊杰1,万连杰1,杨江波2,郑永强1,吕强1,谢让金1,马岩岩1,邓烈1,易时来1(
)
收稿日期:2020-03-18
接受日期:2020-07-15
出版日期:2020-10-16
发布日期:2020-10-26
联系方式:
张绩,E-mail: 1432743534@qq.com。
基金资助:
ZHANG Ji1(
),LI JunJie1,WAN LianJie1,YANG JiangBo2,ZHENG YongQiang1,LÜ Qiang1,XIE RangJin1,MA YanYan1,DENG Lie1,YI ShiLai1(
)
Received:2020-03-18
Accepted:2020-07-15
Published:2020-10-16
Online:2020-10-26
摘要:
【目的】通过不同施钾水平对纽荷尔脐橙树体养分吸收、产量和品质的影响研究,提出纽荷尔脐橙适宜施钾量,为纽荷尔脐橙钾肥的科学合理施用提供理论依据。【方法】以7年生枳(壳)砧纽荷尔脐橙为试材,设置0(K0)、0.38(K1)、0.64(K2)、0.89(K3)、1.28(K4)和1.40 kg/株K2O(K5)6个施钾水平,研究施钾水平对树体枝梢干物质积累量、枝叶和果实养分吸收、果实产量和品质、土壤理化性质与环境的影响。【结果】不同施钾水平处理后,各时期叶片和枝条干物质量变化趋势相似,均表现为随着施钾量的增加呈先增加后降低的趋势。不同时期的枝叶干物质量均表现为春梢大于秋梢,叶片干物质量大于枝条。春梢的氮、磷、钾吸收量均随施钾量的增加呈显著增加趋势,其中以K2处理的吸收量最大。秋梢的氮、磷、钾吸收量变化趋势与春梢相似,但K5处理的氮、磷、钾吸收量低于K0。各处理间的果实氮、磷、钾含量差异均不显著;果实氮带走量以K3处理为最高,磷、钾养分带走量以K2处理为最高,果实带走的养分量大小顺序为氮≈钾>磷。果实产量和单果重均随着施钾量的增加呈先增加后降低的趋势,但差异不显著,K2处理产量最高,且较K0产量提高了约81%。果实果面着色以K3处理的最好,呈橙红色;随施钾量的增加,果皮厚度呈先变薄后增厚的趋势,以K2处理为最薄;维生素C含量呈先增后降的趋势,以K3处理为最高;可溶性糖含量以K3处理最高,可滴定酸含量以K1处理最低。土壤有机质和碱解氮含量随施钾量的增加呈先增后降的趋势,分别以K1和K3处理最高;土壤有效磷含量基本呈先降后增再降的趋势,以K4处理最高;土壤速效钾含量随施钾量的增加整体呈增加趋势,以K4处理最高,且速效钾大部分分布于表层土(0—20 cm),但有向深层土(60—80 cm)积累的趋势。相关性分析表明,春梢叶片钾含量与果实带走氮、钾含量以及果实硬度呈极显著正相关关系,秋梢(枝、叶)钾含量均与产量、可溶性固形物含量呈极显著正相关关系,秋梢枝条钾含量与果皮厚度呈显著负相关关系,土壤速效钾含量与果实带走氮、钾含量以及果实硬度呈极显著负相关关系。【结论】纽荷尔脐橙钾肥(以K2O计)推荐用量为每年0.64—0.89 kg/株,既可保证树体较高的产量和优良的品质,又有利于树体对养分的吸收利用,并且能维持土壤肥力在中上水平,同时降低土壤钾素积累和污染风险。
张绩,李俊杰,万连杰,杨江波,郑永强,吕强,谢让金,马岩岩,邓烈,易时来. 施钾水平对纽荷尔脐橙养分、产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(20): 4271-4286.
ZHANG Ji,LI JunJie,WAN LianJie,YANG JiangBo,ZHENG YongQiang,LÜ Qiang,XIE RangJin,MA YanYan,DENG Lie,YI ShiLai. Effects of Potassium Application Levels on Nutrient, Yield and Quality of Newhall Navel Orange[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(20): 4271-4286.
表1
施钾对纽荷尔脐橙枝梢养分吸收的影响"
| 枝梢类型 Shoot type | 处理 Treatment | 叶片 Leave (g/plant) | 枝条 Twig (g/plant) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
| 春梢 Spring shoot | K0 | 12.69±2.43e | 1.41±0.28d | 8.19±1.50d | 1.70±0.34c | 0.40±0.08d | 0.75±0.14c |
| K1 | 16.47±1.68d | 1.74±0.17c | 12.75±1.07c | 2.44±0.29b | 0.68±0.05c | 1.08±0.08b | |
| K2 | 26.32±1.30a | 2.76±0.12a | 18.18±0.66a | 3.75±0.15a | 1.00±0.02a | 1.68±0.03a | |
| K3 | 24.32±1.40ab | 2.29±0.13b | 15.99±0.77b | 3.82±0.10a | 0.95±0.05a | 1.62±0.23a | |
| K4 | 19.69±0.60c | 2.02±0.05bc | 15.06±0.12b | 2.82±0.22b | 0.79±0.09b | 1.30±0.24b | |
| K5 | 22.50±0.23b | 2.09±0.17b | 15.81±1.60b | 2.55±0.16b | 0.68±0.04c | 1.10±0.08b | |
| 秋梢 Autumn shoot | K0 | 12.48±0.23c | 2.33±0.04c | 5.35±0.16c | 1.33±0.04c | 0.31±0.00d | 0.57±0.01d |
| K1 | 14.36±1.47bc | 2.58±0.14bc | 6.91±0.09b | 1.87±0.06b | 0.41±0.01c | 0.76±0.02c | |
| K2 | 20.31±1.46a | 3.86±0.23a | 10.43±0.81a | 2.37±0.12a | 0.56±0.03a | 1.14±0.06a | |
| K3 | 16.34±1.85b | 2.86±0.28b | 7.25±0.34b | 2.19±0.16a | 0.48±0.04b | 0.87±0.10b | |
| K4 | 12.59±0.91c | 2.32±0.11c | 7.07±0.72b | 1.81±0.19b | 0.38±0.05c | 0.78±0.06bc | |
| K5 | 9.64±1.12d | 1.70±0.13d | 4.71±0.71c | 1.34±0.12c | 0.28±0.03d | 0.54±0.06d | |
表2
施钾对纽荷尔脐橙园果实大小的影响"
| 处理 Treatment | 纵径 Vertical diameter (mm) | 横径 Transverse diameter (mm) | 果形指数 Shape index |
|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 72.01±3.89a | 69.10±2.34a | 1.04±0.03a |
| K1 | 70.11±2.87a | 70.52±1.55a | 0.99±0.05b |
| K2 | 70.33±2.62a | 70.55±2.21a | 1.00±0.04ab |
| K3 | 70.46±3.78a | 69.02±2.90a | 1.02±0.02ab |
| K4 | 70.55±4.05a | 68.03±4.33a | 1.04±0.02ab |
| K5 | 70.80±2.74a | 70.38±2.13a | 1.01±0.03ab |
表4
施钾对纽荷尔脐橙果实着色的影响"
| 处理Treatment | L | a | b | a/b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 76.22±0.85b | 28.64±3.12a | 43.29±1.26b | 0.66±0.08a |
| K1 | 77.52±2.19b | 24.16±7.78ab | 45.12±2.71b | 0.54±0.20ab |
| K2 | 80.17±2.44a | 18.71±8.59b | 48.34±3.03a | 0.39±0.19b |
| K3 | 76.09±1.34b | 29.36±3.62a | 44.80±1.30b | 0.66±0.09a |
| K4 | 77.1±1.00b | 25.12±1.83ab | 44.71±1.06b | 0.56±0.05a |
| K5 | 75.37±0.36b | 29.07±2.33a | 43.54±0.37b | 0.67±0.06a |
表5
施钾对纽荷尔脐橙果实品质的影响"
| 处理 Treatment | 果皮厚度 Pericarp thickness (mm) | 果实硬度 Fruit firmness (N) | 可食率 Edible rate (%) | 出汁率 Juice productivity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 4.13±0.33a | 25.01±1.75b | 69.74±1.64a | 50.42±4.09bc |
| K1 | 4.01±0.24a | 27.65±4.10b | 71.59±1.42a | 54.74±1.50a |
| K2 | 4.06±0.11a | 35.32±3.97a | 71.80±1.60a | 51.66±2.13abc |
| K3 | 4.09±0.50a | 25.08±3.19b | 69.32±2.03a | 47.77±3.27c |
| K4 | 4.17±0.34a | 26.00±1.96b | 69.64±2.04a | 47.66±4.40c |
| K5 | 4.48±0.17a | 24.58±1.63b | 70.36±1.64a | 53.03±1.59ab |
表6
施钾对纽荷尔脐橙果实内在品质的影响"
| 处理 Treatment | 可溶性糖 TSS (%) | 可滴定酸 TA (%) | 固酸比 TSS/TA | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (%) | 维生素C Vitamin C (mg?L-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 11.68±0.50ab | 1.07±0.10ab | 10.91±0.63bc | 5.81±0.30a | 553.19±29.67a |
| K1 | 11.95±0.33ab | 0.91±0.09c | 12.59±1.88a | 5.61±0.32a | 568.87±16.12a |
| K2 | 11.43±0.39b | 1.05±0.05ab | 10.52±1.07bc | 5.46±1.00a | 574.77±32.61a |
| K3 | 12.14±0.42a | 1.11±0.08ab | 10.99±0.44bc | 5.68±0.16a | 582.52±20.74a |
| K4 | 11.46±0.21b | 1.14±0.05a | 10.06±0.45c | 5.78±0.51a | 543.58±62.83a |
| K5 | 11.90±0.49ab | 1.01±0.10bc | 11.89±0.83ab | 6.00±0.28a | 533.47±54.31a |
表7
施钾对纽荷尔脐橙园土壤理化性质的影响"
| 处理 Treatment | pH | 容重 Bulk density (g?cm-3) | 含水量 Water content (%) | 有机质 Organic matter (g?kg-1) | 碱解氮 Available N (mg?kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P (mg?kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K (mg?kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 5.75±0.25a | 1.87±0.03a | 3.36±0.29a | 20.03±4.32ab | 129.08±15.28a | 140.41±55.55ab | 176.27±30.85c |
| K1 | 5.58±0.33a | 1.92±0.05a | 3.26±0.21ab | 21.99±2.79a | 128.6±11.40a | 96.11±39.36b | 252.03±49.36bc |
| K2 | 5.46±0.28a | 1.88±0.07a | 2.97±0.29bc | 20.02±2.40ab | 132.66±20.09a | 141.49±60.3ab | 423.71±133.09a |
| K3 | 5.73±0.16a | 1.85±0.04a | 2.76±0.17cd | 20.16±1.56ab | 135.49±15.74a | 163.56±47.25ab | 385.40±151.37ab |
| K4 | 5.93±0.46a | 1.85±0.03a | 2.93±0.35cd | 19.59±5.87ab | 125.82±27.88a | 183.8±45.17a | 527.98±79.66a |
| K5 | 5.57±0.35a | 1.82±0.05a | 2.62±0.08d | 14.88±3.74b | 127.76±45.96a | 125.28±71.84ab | 485.20±151.56a |
表8
叶片、枝条、土壤钾含量与果实养分间的相关性"
| 成分 Parameter | 果实养分含量 Nutrient content in fruit | 果实带走养分量 Nutrient removal amount of fruit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | |
| 春梢叶片钾含量 Potassium content in spring leaves | 0.205 | 0.394 | 0.561* | 0.821** | 0.566* | 0.888** |
| 春梢枝条钾含量 Potassium content in spring twigs | -0.025 | 0.397 | 0.263 | 0.580* | 0.418 | 0.691** |
| 秋梢叶片钾含量 Potassium content in autumn leaves | 0.030 | 0.170 | -0.146 | 0.253 | -0.014 | 0.462 |
| 秋梢枝条钾含量 Potassium content in autumn twigs | 0.068 | 0.156 | -0.056 | 0.356 | 0.079 | 0.540* |
| 土壤速效钾含量 Soil available potassium content | -0.043 | -0.081 | -0.524* | -0.739** | -0.373 | -0.745** |
表9
叶片、枝条、土壤钾含量与果实产量、品质间的相关性"
| 成分 Parameter | 产量 Yield | 单果重 SFW | TSS | TA | TSS/TA | Vc | 果皮厚度Thickness | 硬度Firmness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 春梢叶片钾含量 Potassium content in spring leaves | 0.449 | 0.641* | 0.228 | 0.210 | -0.015 | -0.175 | -0.033 | 0.493* |
| 春梢枝条钾含量 Potassium content in spring twigs | 0.630* | 0.815** | 0.458 | 0.144 | 0.012 | 0.090 | -0.368 | 0.292 |
| 秋梢叶片钾含量 Potassium content in autumn leaves | 0.648** | 0.631* | 0.598** | -0.011 | 0.250 | 0.373 | -0.455 | -0.048 |
| 秋梢枝条钾含量 Potassium content in autumn twigs | 0.743** | 0.693** | 0.641** | 0.100 | 0.216 | 0.382 | -0.489* | -0.048 |
| 土壤速效钾含量 Soil available potassium content | 0.059 | -0.189 | 0.002 | -0.415 | 0.099 | 0.417 | -0.199 | -0.693** |
| [1] | 梁珊珊. 我国柑橘主产区氮磷钾肥施用现状及减施潜力研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2017. |
| LIANG S S. Studies on NPK fertilization status and the potential of reducing application rate in major citrus planting regions of China[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2017. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | 孔佑涵, 苑平, 吴娟娟. 柑橘的钾营养研究进展. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2017,40(3):37-41. |
| KONG Y H, YUAN P, WU J J. Advances on the potassium nutrition in citrus. Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University, 2017,40(3):37-41. (in Chinese) | |
| [3] | AULAR J, CASARES M, NATALE W. Factors affecting citrus fruit quality: Emphasis on mineral nutrition. Cientifica, 2017,45(1):64-72. |
| [4] | HAMMAMI A, SALAH R, HELLALI R. Leaf nitrogen and potassium concentrations for optimum fruit production, quality and biomass tree growth in Clementine mandarin under Mediterranean climate. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 2010,2(7):161-170. |
| [5] | KHAN A S, NASEER M, MALIK A U, BASRA S M A, KHALID M S, KHALID S, AMIN M, SALEEM B A, RAJWANA I A, MOEEN-UD-DIN . Location, soil and tree nutrient status influence the quality of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2011,13:498-504. |
| [6] | 刘冬碧, 陈防, 鲁剑巍, 万运帆, 余常兵. 施钾水平与钾肥品种对幼年早熟温州蜜柑挂果数及产量的影响. 中国南方果树, 2002,31(3):13-15. |
| LIU D B, CHEN F, LU J W, WAN Y F, YU C B. Effect of potassium level and different potash on the fruit-setting and productivity of young early-mature satsumav. South China Fruits, 2002,31(3):13-15. (in Chinese) | |
| [7] | 鲁剑巍, 陈防, 王运华, 刘冬碧, 万运帆, 余常兵. 氮磷钾肥对红壤地区幼龄柑橘生长发育和果实产量及品质的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004,10(4):413-418. |
| LU J W, CHEN F, WANG Y H, LIU D B, WAN Y F, YU C B. Effect of N, P, K fertilization on young citrus tree growth, fruit yield and quality in area of red soil. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2004,10(4):413-418. (in Chinese) | |
| [8] | 鲁剑巍, 陈防, 刘冬碧, 万运帆, 余常兵, 王运华. 柑桔施用硫酸钾和氯化钾效果研究I对树体生长、产量和品质的影响. 土壤肥料, 2002(4):30-34. |
| LU J W, CHEN F, LIU D B, WAN Y F, YU C B, WANG Y H. Study of SOP and MOP application on citrus I effect of SOP and MOP on citrus tree growth, yield and quality.Soils and Fertilizers, 2002(4):30-34. (in Chinese) | |
| [9] | ALI A, SUMMERS L L, KLEIN G J, LOVATT C J. Albedo breakdown in Califormia. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 2000,2:1090-1093. |
| [10] | 李娟, 罗伟金, 陈杰忠, 姚青, 万继锋, 黄战威. 磷酸二氢钾对脐橙陷痕果发生及果皮细胞壁代谢的影响. 园艺学报, 2011,38(7):1235-1242. |
| LI J, LUO W J, CHEN J Z, YAO Q, WAN J F, HUANG Z W. Effects of spraying KH2PO4 on cell-wall metalbolism of pericarp and pitting fruit rate in Navel Orange. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2011,38(7):1235-1242. (in Chinese) | |
| [11] | 林咸永, 章永松, 蔡妙珍, 张英鹏, 李刚, 杨肖娥. 磷、钾营养对柑桔果实产量、品质和贮藏性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006,12(1):82-88. |
| LIN X Y, ZHANG Y S, CAI M Z, ZHANG Y P, LI G, YANG X E. Effects of phosphorus and potassium application on yield, quality, and storability of citrus fruits. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2006,12(1):82-88. (in Chinese) | |
| [12] | 余倩倩, 邓烈, 何绍兰, 郑永强, 谢让金, 吕强, 姚珍珍, 韦献果, 易时来. 施钾对锦橙幼树生长及钾吸收利用的影响. 中国南方果树, 2015,44(5):1-4. |
| YU Q Q, DENG L, HE S L, ZHENG Y Q, XIE R J, LU Q, YAO Z Z, WEI X G, YI S L. Effects of K fertilization on growth, potassium uptake and utilization of young Jincheng sweet orange tree (Citrus sinensis). South China fruits, 2015,44(5):1-4. (in Chinese) | |
| [13] | EMBLETON T W, JONES WW, PALLARES C, PLATT R G. Effects of fertilization of citrus on fruit quality and ground water nitrate-pollution potential. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 1980, ( 1):280-285. |
| [14] | 陈杰忠, 吕雪娟, 叶自行, 姚青, 伍玲. 柑桔皱皮果与果皮及其细胞壁矿质元素关系的研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002,8(3):367-371. |
| CHEN J Z, LÜ X J, YE Z X, YAO Q, WU L. Study on the relation between mineral nutrition levels and creasing peel in mature orange. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2002,8(3):367-371. (in Chinese) | |
| [15] | 许修柱, 林瑞坤, 苏达, 许锐能, 杨文浩, 张世昌, 吴良泉. 集约化果园钾肥施用现状及钾素表观平衡状况研究—以福建省平和县琯溪蜜柚为例. 南方农业学报, 2019,50(3):533-539. |
| XU X Z, LIN R K, SU D, XU R N, YANG W H, ZHANG S C, WU L Q. Current potassium fertilizer management practice and potassium apparent balance status of intensive orchards-A case study in Guanxi honey pomelo in Pinghe County, Fujian Province. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2019,50(3):533-539. (in Chinese) | |
| [16] | 杨水芝, 杨安生, 陈旭, 罗赛男. 湖南泸溪椪柑配方施肥技术研究. 湖南农业科学, 2011(23):65-67. |
| YANG S Z, YANG A S, CHEN X, LUO S N. Technology of formulated fertilization for Ponkan in Luxi County of Hunan Province.Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2011(23):65-67. (in Chinese) | |
| [17] | 鲁剑巍, 陈防, 万运帆, 刘冬碧, 余常兵, 王耀群, 宋发安, 王运华, Rolf Hardier. 钾肥施用量对脐橙产量和品质的影响. 果树学报, 2001,18(5):272-275. |
| LU J W, CHEN F, WAN Y F, LIU D B, YU C B, WANG Y Q, SONG F A, WANG Y H. Effect of application of potassium on yield and quality of Navel orange. Journal of Fruit Science, 2001,18(5):272-275. (in Chinese) | |
| [18] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第3版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 263-270. |
| BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis (3rd ed). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 263-270. (in Chinese) | |
| [19] | WANG Y, WU W H. Potassium transport and signaling in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2013,64(4):451-476. |
| [20] | 沈兆敏, 刘焕东. 柑橘营养与施肥. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2012. |
| SHEN Z M, LIU H D. Citrus nutrition and fertilization. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2012. (in Chinese) | |
| [21] | ZHANG F S, NIU J F, ZHANG W F, CHEN X P, LI C J, YUAN L X, XIE J C. Potassium nutrition of crops under varied regimes of nitrogen supply. Plant and Soil, 2010,335(1/2):21-34. |
| [22] | 陈小琴. 铵钾在土壤中的交互作用及其对生物有效性的影响[D]. 南京: 中国科学院南京土壤研究所, 2007. |
| CHEN X Q. Interaction of ammonium and potassium in soil and its effect on bioavailability [D]. Nanjing: Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2007. (in Chinese) | |
| [23] | 董艳红, 王火焰, 周健民, 任正文. 不同土壤钾素淋溶特性的初步研究. 土壤, 2014,46(2):225-231. |
| DONG Y H, WANG H Y, ZHOU J M, REN Z W. Preliminary study on potassium leaching characteristics of different soils. Soils, 2014,46(2):225-231. (in Chinese) | |
| [24] | 杜建军, 苟春林, 崔英德, 曲东. 保水剂对氮肥氨挥发和氮磷钾养分淋溶损失的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2007,26(4):1296-1301. |
| DU J J, GOU C L, CUI Y D, QU D. Effects of water retaining agent on ammonia volatilization and nutrient leaching loss from N, P and K fertilizers. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2007,26(4):1296-1301. (in Chinese) | |
| [25] | 张庆玉, 雷建容, 张冀, 杨玉敏, 阳路芳, 罗付香, 庞良玉, 涂仕华, 陈春秀, 张奇, 林超文. 钾在四川省4种典型土壤中的淋失特征. 西南农业学报, 2015,28(6):2616-2623. |
| ZHANG Q Y, LEI J R, ZHANG Y, YANG Y M, YANG L F, LUO F X, PANG L Y, TU S H, CHEN C X, ZHANG Q, LIN C W. Leaching characteristic of potassium on four typical soil types in Sichuan Province. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015,28(6):2616-2623. (in Chinese) | |
| [26] | 刘飞, 张民, 诸葛玉平, 李倩, 刘东雪, 王建. 马铃薯玉米套作下控释肥对土壤养分垂直分布及养分利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011,17(6):1351-1358. |
| LIU F, ZHANG M, ZHUGE Y P, LI Q, LIU D X, WANG J. Effects of controlled-release fertilizer on vertical distribution of soil nutrients and nutrient use efficiencies under potato and maize relay cropping system. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2011,17(6):1351-1358. (in Chinese) | |
| [27] | 温明霞, 聂振朋, 林媚, 冯先桔, 平新亮, 蔡文, 王燕斌. 柑橘的节钾施肥技术初探. 中国果菜, 2008(5):38-39. |
| WEN M X, LIE Z M, LIN M, FENG X J, PING X L, CAI W, WANG Y B. A preliminary study on the technology of potassium saving and fertilization in Citrus.China Fruit and Vegetable, 2008(5):38-39. (in Chinese) | |
| [28] | 徐新翔, 侯昕, 贾志航, 王芬, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂. 适量稳定供钾促进苹果矮化砧M9T337幼苗生长和氮素吸收利用. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020,26(3):552-560. |
| XU X X, HOU X, JIA Z H, WANG F, GE S F, JIANG Y M. Continuous and constant supply of potassium in suitable level stimulates the growth and absorption and utilization of nitrogen in M9T337 dwarf rootstocks seedlings. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2020,26(3):552-560. (in Chinese) | |
| [29] | 李文涛, 杨江波, 余倩倩, 田旺海, 普金安, 陈磊, 邓烈, 何绍兰, 易时来. 柑橘施肥养分推荐方法研究进展. 安徽农业科学, 2017,45(28):7-10. |
| LI W T, YANG J B, YU Q Q, TIAN W H, PU J A, CHEN L, DENG L, HE S L, YI S L. Research progress on methods of nutrient recommendation for fertilization in citrus. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2017,45(28):7-10. (in Chinese) | |
| [30] | 肖依玲, 王胜男. 钾对果树品质影响研究进展. 种子科技, 2019,37(10):129-130. |
| XIAO Y L, WANG S N. Research progress on the effect of potassium on fruit quality. Seed Science and Technology, 2019,37(10):129-130. (in Chinese) | |
| [31] | QUAGGIO J A, JUNIOR D M, BOARETTO R M. Sources and rates of potassium for sweet orange production. Scientia Agricola, 2011,68(3):369-375. |
| [32] | HAMZA A, BAMOUH A, GUILLI M E, BOUABID R. Response of clementine citrus var. Cadoux to foliar potassium fertilization: Effects on fruit production and quality. International Potash Institute, 2012,31:8-15. |
| [33] | QUAGGIO J A, MATTOS JUNIOR D, CANTARELLA H. Fruit yield and quality of sweet oranges affected by nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization in tropical soils. Fruits, 2006,61(5):293-302. |
| [34] | MOHAPATRA P K, OHKURA K, KANAI S, ADU-GYAMFI J J, SANEOKA H, NGUYEN N T, FUJITA K. Depression of sink activity precedes the inhibition of biomass production in tomato plants subjected to potassium deficiency stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2007,58(11):2917-2928. |
| [35] | 沙建川, 陈倩, 王芬, 徐新翔, 朱占玲, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂. 钾水平对富士苹果果实膨大期13C同化物向果实转运的影响 . 应用生态学报, 2020,31(6):1859-1866. |
| SHA J C, CHEN Q, WANG F, XU X X, ZHU Z L, GE S F, JIANG Y M. Effects of potassium levels on translocation of 13C- photoassimilates to fruit in ‘Fuji’ apple during fruit expanding period . Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020,31(6):1859-1866. (in Chinese) | |
| [36] | 王宇斐. 苹果果实糖代谢对不同施钾水平的响应及与SnRK1的关系[D]. 西安: 西北农林科技大学, 2018. |
| WANG Y F. Response of sugar metabolism in apple fruit to different potassium levels and its relationship with SnRK1[D]. Xi’an: Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, 2018. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | 李永娟, 张悦彤, 王艺博, 赵长江, 宋洁, 陈雪丽, 姚钦. 生物炭施用对大豆轮连作系统土壤固氮微生物nifH基因丰度及群落组成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285. |
| [2] | 岳丽昕, 王清华, 王振宝, 尼玛琼吉, 刘泽洲, 孔素萍, 张立峰, 高莉敏. 基于广靶代谢组学分析藏葱和细香葱营养品质及黄酮类代谢产物差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 1070-1086. |
| [3] | 张利东, 郭一聪, 黄洪宇, 聂静, 王兵, 李梦雨, 李加旺, 眭晓蕾, 李愚鹤. 基于感官评价结合营养品质特征与风味物质特性关联分析黄瓜果实品质[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 1087-1100. |
| [4] | 王少华, 范秋丽, 杨锦昌, 孙煜杰, 余纽, 蒋守群. 米老排叶片饲喂水平对黄羽肉鸡生长性能、免疫功能、抗氧化能力、胴体品质和肉品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 1111-1127. |
| [5] | 董金龙, 赵莹, 余海兵, 吕建晔, 秦佳琦, 梁晨, 明博, 李少昆. 多模型解析玉米籽粒容重的营养品质贡献度与区域异质性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 985-995. |
| [6] | 郝琨, 陈洪德, 张威, 钟韵, 党美荣, 朱士江, 黄志坤, 金英. 基于柑橘产量、品质及水氮利用的涌泉根灌水氮综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 862-873. |
| [7] | 张梦博, 谭鸿冰, 沈甜, 徐美隆, 周新明, 房玉林, 鞠延仑. 不同灌溉量与抗蒸腾剂处理对葡萄酒品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(2): 413-426. |
| [8] | 吕旭东, 孙世媛, 李亚楠, 刘玉龙, 王艳群, 付鑫, 张佳英, 宁鹏, 彭正萍. 智能机械化分层施肥对麦田根-土养分分布和小麦产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(1): 129-146. |
| [9] | 季圣阳, 陆柏益, 李培武. 关于现代农产品品质学的若干思考[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(9): 1830-1844. |
| [10] | 刘劲松, 伍龙梅, 包晓哲, 刘志霞, 张彬, 杨陶陶. 短期减施氮肥对华南地区早晚兼用型水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(8): 1508-1520. |
| [11] | 韦文华, 李盼, 邵冠贵, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 范虹, 何蔚, 柴强, 殷文, 赵连豪. 西北灌区青贮玉米产量及品质对减量灌水与有机无机肥配施的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(8): 1521-1534. |
| [12] | 薛钰琦, 赵继玉, 孙旺胜, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 不同氮素形态对夏玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(8): 1535-1549. |
| [13] | 张亚封, 董伟进, 李启云, 路杨, 张正坤, 隋丽. 球孢白僵菌与钾元素互作对番茄果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(6): 1131-1144. |
| [14] | 杨永庆, 胡朋举, 宋亚辉, 金欣欣, 苏俏, 王瑾. 超高油花生种质SW9721-3品质性状的QTL定位[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(4): 635-646. |
| [15] | 吴立东, 林淑婷, 邱胤晖, 刘亚婷, 张锐, 李永清, 尚伟, 钟柳青. 不同干燥方式辣椒品质的差异性分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(3): 582-599. |
|
||