





中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (2): 398-408.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.02.014
所属专题: 专题——幼龄反刍动物培养
郑琛1,李发弟2,3,李飞2,周巨旺1,段鹏伟1,刘绘汇1,樊海苗1,朱威力1,刘婷1(
)
收稿日期:2019-06-24
接受日期:2019-08-14
出版日期:2020-01-16
发布日期:2020-02-17
联系方式:
郑琛,E-mail:zhengc@gsau.edu.cn。
基金资助:
ZHENG Chen1,LI FaDi2,3,LI Fei2,ZHOU JuWang1,DUAN PengWei1,LIU HuiHui1,FAN HaiMiao1,ZHU WeiLi1,LIU Ting1(
)
Received:2019-06-24
Accepted:2019-08-14
Published:2020-01-16
Online:2020-02-17
摘要:
【目的】探讨代乳粉中添加甘露寡糖(mannan oligosaccharides,MOS)对7—28日龄湖羊羔羊胃肠道生长发育的影响。【方法】选择同质性良好的7日龄湖羊公羔(双羔)30只,随机分为2组,每组15只,每只为1个重复,对照组羔羊饲喂不含MOS的代乳粉,试验组羔羊饲喂含0.2 % MOS的代乳粉,试验期21d。羔羊28日龄时,两个试验组各随机选择8只羔羊屠宰,取出消化道,称量各胃室和肠段包含内容物的质量和净质量,量取各肠段长度,用以计算各部位的相对质量和内容物分布,以及各肠段的相对长度。多聚甲醛固定皱胃胃底腺区及十二指肠、空肠和回肠中段的组织样品,测定组织形态和小肠上皮细胞凋亡率。采集十二指肠、空肠和回肠的黏膜样品,测定紧密连接蛋白1 (claudin 1)、闭锁小带1(zonula occludens-1,ZO-1)和闭锁蛋白(occludin)的mRNA表达量。【结果】除空肠相对长度外(%全肠长度,P=0.040),MOS对羔羊胃肠指数(%活体质量)、胃肠相对质量(%全胃质量、%全肠质量和%全胃肠质量)、肠道相对长度(%全肠长度)、内容物相对活体质量(%活体质量)、胃肠内容物相对总胃/肠内容物及总胃肠内容物相对质量(%总胃内容物、总肠内容物、总胃肠内容物)、小肠上皮细胞凋亡率和小肠黏膜claudin 1蛋白mRNA的表达量均没有产生显著影响(P>0.05),但MOS显著提高羔羊十二指肠绒毛高度和肌层厚度并显著降低绒毛宽度(P=0.033,P=0.047,P=0.015),显著上调空肠ZO-1蛋白mRNA表达量(P=0.028),此外,MOS有提高羔羊回肠绒毛高度、绒毛宽度和隐窝深度、皱胃肌层厚度及回肠occludin蛋白mRNA表达量的趋势(P=0.075,P=0.078,P=0.085,P=0.084,P=0.052)。【结论】MOS对7—28日龄湖羊羔羊胃肠道相对质量、长度和内容物分布基本无显著影响,但可改善十二指肠和回肠绒毛及肌层的组织形态,维持小肠屏障功能,有利于提高养分消化率。
郑琛,李发弟,李飞,周巨旺,段鹏伟,刘绘汇,樊海苗,朱威力,刘婷. 代乳粉添加甘露寡糖对7—28日龄湖羊羔羊胃肠道发育的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(2): 398-408.
ZHENG Chen,LI FaDi,LI Fei,ZHOU JuWang,DUAN PengWei,LIU HuiHui,FAN HaiMiao,ZHU WeiLi,LIU Ting. Effects of Adding Mannan Oligosaccharides to Milk Replacer on the Development of Gastrointestinal Tract of 7-28 Days Old Hu Lambs[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(2): 398-408.
表2
MOS对羔羊胃肠指数的影响"
| 项目Item | 对照组Control | MOS组 MOS | SEM | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胃室 Stomach | ||||
| 瘤胃 Rumen | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.02 | 0.386 |
| 网胃 Reticulum | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.555 |
| 瓣胃 Omasum | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.488 |
| 皱胃 Abomasum | 1.04 | 0.92 | 0.04 | 0.138 |
| 肠道 Intestinal tract | ||||
| 十二指肠 Duodenum | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.066 |
| 空肠Jejunum | 4.00 | 3.71 | 0.14 | 0.316 |
| 回肠 Ileum | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.697 |
| 盲肠 Cecum | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.02 | 0.201 |
| 结肠 Colon | 1.18 | 1.15 | 0.04 | 0.675 |
| 直肠 Rectum | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 0.663 |
表3
MOS对羔羊胃肠相对质量的影响"
| 项目Item | 对照组Control | MOS组 MOS | SEM | P值 P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胃室 Stomach | |||||
| 瘤胃 Rumen | %全胃质量 % the quality of total stomach | 29.70 | 30.45 | 0.58 | 0.533 |
| %全胃肠质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract | 6.71 | 6.62 | 0.27 | 0.869 | |
| 网胃 Reticulum | %全胃质量 % the quality of total stomach | 9.16 | 9.46 | 0.40 | 0.724 |
| %全胃肠质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract | 2.05 | 2.06 | 0.10 | 0.939 | |
| 瓣胃 Omasum | %全胃质量 % the quality of total stomach | 4.08 | 4.15 | 0.21 | 0.883 |
| %全胃肠质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.05 | 0.795 | |
| 皱胃 Abomasum | %全胃质量 % the quality of total stomach | 57.05 | 55.94 | 0.74 | 0.471 |
| %全胃肠质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract | 12.81 | 12.14 | 0.35 | 0.356 | |
| 肠道 Intestinal tract | |||||
| 十二指肠 Duodenum | %全肠质量 % the quality of total intestinal tract | 3.22 | 2.93 | 0.14 | 0.297 |
| %全胃肠质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract | 2.49 | 2.28 | 0.09 | 0.292 | |
| 空肠Jejunum | %全肠质量 % the quality of total intestinal tract | 64.21 | 61.69 | 1.07 | 0.254 |
| %全胃肠质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract | 49.80 | 48.36 | 1.06 | 0.517 | |
| 回肠 Ileum | %全肠质量 % the quality of total intestinal tract | 1.91 | 2.41 | 0.21 | 0.258 |
| %全胃肠质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract | 1.69 | 1.88 | 0.13 | 0.477 | |
| 盲肠 Cecum | %全肠质量 % the quality of total intestinal tract | 5.57 | 6.89 | 0.44 | 0.135 |
| %全胃肠质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract | 4.32 | 5.38 | 0.34 | 0.116 | |
| 结肠 Colon | %全肠质量 % the quality of total intestinal tract | 18.95 | 19.43 | 0.57 | 0.686 |
| %全胃肠质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract | 14.67 | 15.17 | 0.41 | 0.558 | |
| 直肠 Rectum | %全肠质量 % the quality of total intestinal tract | 6.14 | 6.65 | 0.23 | 0.275 |
| %全胃肠质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract | 4.75 | 5.19 | 0.16 | 0.162 |
表5
MOS对羔羊胃肠内容物相对活体质量的影响"
| 项目Item | 对照组Control | MOS组 MOS | SEM | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胃室内容物 Stomach content | ||||
| 瘤胃内容物 Rumen content | 1.44 | 1.67 | 0.20 | 0.587 |
| 网胃内容物 Reticulum content | 0.24 | 0.34 | 0.07 | 0.473 |
| 瓣胃内容物 Omasum content | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.946 |
| 皱胃内容物 Abomasum content | 3.43 | 3.18 | 0.24 | 0.623 |
| 肠道内容物 Intestinal tract content | ||||
| 十二指肠内容物 Duodenum content | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.868 |
| 空肠内容物Jejunum content | 1.26 | 1.35 | 0.20 | 0.833 |
| 回肠内容物 Ileum content | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.378 |
| 盲肠内容物 Cecum content | 0.43 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.422 |
| 结肠内容物 Colon content | 1.08 | 0.81 | 0.13 | 0.298 |
| 直肠内容物 Rectum content | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.03 | 0.503 |
表6
MOS对羔羊胃肠内容物相对总胃/肠内容物及总胃肠内容物相对质量的影响"
| 项目 Item | 对照组Control | MOS组 MOS | SEM | P值 P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胃室内容物 Stomach content | |||||
| 瘤胃内容物 Rumen content | %全胃内容物质量 % the quality of total stomach content | 26.96 | 33.15 | 2.56 | 0.239 |
| %全胃肠内容物质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract content | 17.30 | 21.12 | 1.80 | 0.306 | |
| 网胃内容物 Reticulum content | %全胃内容物质量 % the quality of total stomach content | 4.99 | 6.68 | 1.28 | 0.532 |
| %全胃肠内容物质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract content | 3.50 | 4.06 | 0.03 | 0.742 | |
| 瓣胃内容物 Omasum content | %全胃内容物质量 % the quality of total stomach content | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.03 | 0.988 |
| %全胃肠内容物质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract content | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.698 | |
| 皱胃内容物 Abomasum content | %全胃内容物质量 % the quality of total stomach content | 68.58 | 60.09 | 2.71 | 0.119 |
| %全胃肠内容物质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract content | 43.14 | 39.30 | 2.35 | 0.434 | |
| 肠道内容物 Intestinal tract content | |||||
| 十二指肠内容物 Duodenum content | %全肠内容物质量 % the quality of total intestinal tract content | 7.20 | 6.23 | 1.63 | 0.777 |
| %全胃肠内容物质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract content | 1.98 | 2.22 | 0.39 | 0.765 | |
| 空肠内容物 Jejunum content | %全肠内容物质量 % the quality of total intestinal tract content | 39.34 | 46.21 | 2.22 | 0.126 |
| %全胃肠内容物质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract content | 14.28 | 16.95 | 1.69 | 0.451 | |
| 回肠内容物 Ileum content | %全肠内容物质量 % the quality of total intestinal tract content | 1.75 | 1.45 | 0.31 | 0.666 |
| %全胃肠内容物质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract content | 0.80 | 0.57 | 0.20 | 0.618 | |
| 盲肠内容物 Cecum content | %全肠内容物质量 % the quality of total intestinal tract content | 12.73 | 9.88 | 1.35 | 0.312 |
| %全胃肠内容物质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract content | 4.88 | 3.51 | 0.70 | 0.345 | |
| 结肠内容物 Colon content | %全肠内容物质量 % the quality of total intestinal tract content | 33.02 | 30.57 | 2.83 | 0.681 |
| %全胃肠内容物质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract content | 12.49 | 10.25 | 1.17 | 0.356 | |
| 直肠内容物 Rectum content | %全肠内容物质量 % the quality of total intestinal tract content | 5.99 | 7.80 | 1.05 | 0.405 |
| %全胃肠内容物质量 % the quality of total gastrointestinal tract content | 2.06 | 2.77 | 0.42 | 0.414 | |
表7
MOS对羔羊皱胃和小肠组织形态的影响"
| 项目Item | 对照组Control | MOS组 MOS | SEM | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 皱胃 Abomasum | ||||
| 黏膜厚度 Mucosa thickness | 333.36 | 331.46 | 9.74 | 0.927 |
| 肌层厚度 Muscular thickness | 548.48 | 686.99 | 40.11 | 0.084 |
| 十二指肠 Duodenum | ||||
| 绒毛高度 Villus height | 361.99b | 446.39a | 20.44 | 0.033 |
| 绒毛宽度 Villus width | 80.04a | 61.96b | 3.92 | 0.015 |
| 隐窝深度 Crypt depth | 148.87 | 163.33 | 8.46 | 0.414 |
| 肌层厚度 Muscular thickness | 161.93b | 201.87a | 10.25 | 0.047 |
| 绒毛高度/隐窝深度值V/C | 2.57 | 2.82 | 0.11 | 0.258 |
| 空肠Jejunum | ||||
| 绒毛高度 Villus height | 431.59 | 445.30 | 20.29 | 0.748 |
| 绒毛宽度 Villus width | 71.13 | 68.01 | 2.04 | 0.464 |
| 隐窝深度 Crypt depth | 173.48 | 158.21 | 6.65 | 0.265 |
| 肌层厚度 Muscular thickness | 157.73 | 153.01 | 8.27 | 0.786 |
| 绒毛高度/隐窝深度值V/C | 2.59 | 2.89 | 0.09 | 0.118 |
| 回肠 Ileum | ||||
| 绒毛高度 Villus height | 373.81 | 428.38 | 15.25 | 0.075 |
| 绒毛宽度 Villus width | 68.91 | 78.87 | 2.81 | 0.078 |
| 隐窝深度 Crypt depth | 176.96 | 213.10 | 10.38 | 0.085 |
| 肌层厚度 Muscular thickness | 274.31 | 230.82 | 18.54 | 0.267 |
| 绒毛高度/隐窝深度值V/C | 2.19 | 2.15 | 0.06 | 0.775 |
表8
MOS对羔羊小肠黏膜紧密连接蛋白mRNA表达量及上皮细胞凋亡的影响"
| 项目Item | 对照组Control | MOS组 MOS | SEM | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 十二指肠 Duodenum | ||||
| Claudin 1 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.10 | 0.863 |
| ZO-1 | 0.92 | 1.05 | 0.08 | 0.403 |
| Occludin | 0.86 | 1.18 | 0.10 | 0.112 |
| 细胞凋亡 Apoptosis (%) | 11.27 | 5.04 | 2.90 | 0.302 |
| 空肠Jejunum | ||||
| Claudin 1 | 0.91 | 1.09 | 0.21 | 0.671 |
| ZO-1 | 0.80b | 1.20a | 0.10 | 0.028 |
| Occludin | 0.96 | 1.04 | 0.08 | 0.630 |
| 细胞凋亡 Apoptosis (%) | 21.09 | 18.08 | 5.40 | 0.791 |
| 回肠 Ileum | ||||
| Claudin 1 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.18 | 0.875 |
| ZO-1 | 0.92 | 1.06 | 0.07 | 0.362 |
| Occludin | 0.83 | 1.17 | 0.09 | 0.052 |
| 细胞凋亡 Apoptosis (%) | 47.29 | 37.62 | 6.54 | 0.487 |
| [1] | 郭江鹏, 潘建忠, 李发弟, 张元兴, 杨宇泽, 郝正里 . 不同早期断奶日龄对舍饲肉用羔羊胃组织形态发育变化的影响. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018,49(5):971-985. |
| GUO J P, PAN J Z, LI F D, ZHANG Y X, YANG Y Z, HAO Z L . Effect of different early weaned day on morphological development of stomach for housed lambs. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2018,49(5):971-985. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | 马俊南, 屠焰 . 固液饲料饲喂水平对犊牛生长及胃肠道发育影响的研究进展. 家畜生态学报, 2017,38(5):7-12. |
| MA J N, TU Y . Research progress on feeding patterns of different solid and liquid feed level on growth and gastrointestinal tract development in holstein calves. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 2017,38(5):7-12. (in Chinese) | |
| [3] | 马志远, 李飞, 李发弟, 李冲, 王维民, 唐德富, 刘婷, 潘香羽 . 早期断奶对湖羊羔羊生长性能及胃肠道发育的影响. 动物营养学报, 2015,27(5):1385-1393. |
| MA Z Y, LI F, LI F D, LI C, WANG W M, TANG D F, LIU T, PAN X Y . Effect of early weaning on performance and gastrointestinal tract development of Hu lambs. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2015,27(5):1385-1393. (in Chinese) | |
| [4] | 柴建民 . 断母乳日龄对羔羊生长性能与胃肠道发育的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院饲料研究所, 2015. |
| CHAI J M . Effect of weaning age on the growth performance and development of the gastrointestinal tract in lambs [D]. Beijing: Feed Research Institute, 2015. (in Chinese) | |
| [5] | 吴志强 . 不同喂奶量和不同类型开食料对哺乳期犊牛胃肠道发育的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2016. |
| WU Z Q . Effect of different milk allowances and different starter on gastrointestinal development of dairy calves[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese) | |
| [6] | 杨宏波 . 不同精粗比颗粒饲料对3~6月龄犊牛生长性能和胃肠道发育的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2015. |
| YANG H B . Effects of pellet diets with different concentrate-roughage ratio on growth performance and development of gastrointestinal tract of 3~6 monthly calves[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2015. (in Chinese) | |
| [7] | 吴兆海 . 不同牧草补饲模式对犊牛生长及胃肠道发育的影响[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2014. |
| WU Z H . Effects of different forage supplementary patterns on the growth and gastrointestinal development of holstein calves[D]. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese) | |
| [8] | 何军 . 半胱胺盐酸及代乳蛋白对山羊小肠粘膜生长发育的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2005. |
| HE J . Influence of cysteamine and milk replacer proteins on the development of small intestinal mucosa of goats[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2005. (in Chinese) | |
| [9] | BARTLETT K S, MCKEITH F K, VANDEHAAR M J, DAHL G E, DRACKLEY J K . Growth and body composition of dairy calves fed milk replacers containing different amounts of protein at two feeding rates. Journal of Animal Science, 2006,84:1454-1467. |
| [10] | GEIGER A J, PARSONS C L M, JAMES R E, AKERS R M . Growth, intake, and health of Holstein heifer calves fed an enhanced preweaning diet with or without postweaning exogenous estrogen. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016,99:3995-4004. |
| [11] | SOBERON F, VAN AMBURGH M E . Effects of preweaning nutrient intake in the developing mammary parenchymal tissue. Journal of Dairy Science, 2017,100:4996-5004. |
| [12] | ADHIKARI P, Kim W K . Overview of prebiotics and probiotics: focus on performance, gut health and immunity - a review. Annals of Animal Science, 2017,17:949-966. |
| [13] | HALAS V, NOCHTA I . Mannan oligosaccharides in nursery pig nutrition and their potential mode of action. Animals, 2012,2:261-274. |
| [14] | WESTLAND A, MARTIN R, WHITE R, MARTIN J H . Mannan oligosaccharide prepartum supplementation: effects on dairy cow colostrum quality and quantity. Animal, 2017,11:1779-1782. |
| [15] | FERNANDEZ F, HINTON M, VAN GILS B . Dietary mannan- oligosaccharides and their effect on chicken caecal microflora in relation to Salmonella Enteritidis colonization. Avian Pathology, 2002,31:49-58. |
| [16] | NAJDEGERAMI E H, TOKMACHI A, BAKHSHI F . Evaluating the effects of dietary prebiotic mixture of mannan oligosaccharide and poly-β-hydroxybutyrate on the growth performance, immunity, and survival of rainbow trout,Oncorhynchus mykiss(Walbaum 1792), fingerlings. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 2017,48(3):415-425. |
| [17] | GIANNENAS I, DOUKAS D, KARAMOUTSIOS A, TZORA A, BONOS E, SKOUFOS I, TSINAS A, CHRISTAKI E, TONTIS D, FLOROU-PANERI P . Effects of Enterococcus faecium, mannan oligosaccharide, benzoic acid and their mixture on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, intestinal morphology and blood lymphocyte subpopulations of fattening pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2016,220:159-167. |
| [18] | BOZKURT M, BINTAŞ E, KIRKAN S, AKŞIT H, KÜÇÜKYILMAZ K, ERBAŞ G, ÇABUK M, AKŞIT D, PARM U, EGE G, KOÇER B, SEYREK K, TÜZÜN A E . Comparative evaluation of dietary supplementation with mannan oligosaccharide and oregano essential oil in forced molted and fully fed laying hens between 82 and 106 weeks of age. Poultry Science, 2016,95:2576-2591. |
| [19] | ATTIA Y A, ABD AL-HAMID A E, IBRAHIM M S, AL-HARTHI M A, BOVERA F, ELNAGGAR A S . Productive performance, biochemical and hematological traits of broiler chickens supplemented with propolis, bee pollen, and mannan oligosaccharides continuously or intermittently. Livestock Science, 2014,164:87-95. |
| [20] | TORRECILLAS S, CABALLERO M J, MONTERO D, SWEETMAN J, IZQUIERDO M . Combined effects of dietary mannan oligosaccharides and total fish oil substitution by soybean oil on European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) juvenile diets. Aquaculture Nutrition, 2016,22(5):1079-1090. |
| [21] | 温若竹 . 甘露寡糖对肉仔鸡肠道形态及微生物区系的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2010. |
| WEN R Z . Effects of mannose-oligosaccharide on intestinal morphology and bacterial community in gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2010. (in Chinese) | |
| [22] | 黄俊文, 林映才, 冯定远, 郑春田, 丁发源 . 纳豆菌、甘露寡糖对仔猪肠道pH、微生物区系及肠黏膜形态的影响. 畜牧兽医学报, 2005,36(10):1021-1027. |
| HUANG J W, LIN Y C, FENG D Y, ZHENG C T, DING F Y . Effect of natto and MOS on intestinal pH, colonic microflora population and intestinal membrane shape of early weaning piglet. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2005,36(10):1021-1027. (in Chinese) | |
| [23] | MOURÃO J L, PINHEIRO V, ALVES A, GUEDES C M, PINTO L, SAAVEDRA M J, SPRING P, KOCHER A . Effect of mannan oligosaccharides on the performance, intestinal morphology and cecal fermentation of fattening rabbits. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2006,126:107-120. |
| [24] | DIAZ T G, BRANCO A F, JACOVACI F A, JOBIM C C, BOLSON D C, DANIEL J L P . Inclusion of live yeast and mannan-oligosaccharides in high grain-based diets for sheep: Ruminal parameters, inflammatory response and rumen morphology. Plos One, 2018,13:e0193313. |
| [25] | ZHENG C, LI F D, HAO Z L, LIU T . Effects of adding mannan oligosaccharides on digestibility and metabolism of nutrients, ruminal fermentation parameters, immunity, and antioxidant capacity of sheep. Journal of Animal Science, 2018,96:284-292. |
| [26] | DEMIREL G, TURAN N, TANOR A, KOCABAGLI N, ALP M, HASOKSUZ M, YILMAZ H . Effects of dietary mannanoligosaccharide on performance, some blood parameters, IgG levels and antibody response of lambs to parenterally administered E. coli O157: H7. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 2007,61(2):126-134. |
| [27] | 马仲华 . 家畜解剖学及组织胚胎学.第3版. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2001. |
| MA Z H. Animal anatomy, histology and embryology.3rd edition. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2001. (in Chinese) | |
| [28] | LIU J H, XU T T, LIU Y J, ZHU W Y, MAO S Y . A high-grain diet causes massive disruption of ruminal epithelial tight junctions in goats. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 2013,305:R232-R241. |
| [29] | 任文 . 不同直/支链淀粉比对肥羔胃肠道发育及其相关基因mRNA表达量的影响[D]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2014. |
| REN W . Effects of different amylose/amylopectin ratio on the development of gastrointestinal tract and mRNA expression of related genes in fattening lamb[D]. Daqing: Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese) | |
| [30] | 刘敏雄 . 反刍动物消化生理学. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1991. |
| LIU M X. Ruminant digestive physiology. Beijing:Beijing Agricultural University Press, 1991. (in Chinese) | |
| [31] | KHAN M A, LEE H, LEE W, KIM H, KIM S, PARK S B, BAEK K S, HA J K, CHOI Y . Starch source evaluation in calf starter: II. Ruminal parameters, rumen development, nutrient digestibilities, and nitrogen utilization in Holstein calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008,91(3):1140-1149. |
| [32] | 寇占英, 李启鹏, 莫放, 张晓明 . 犊牛主要消化器官的发育规律. 中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会论文集(下), 2000: 533-536. |
| KOU Z Y, LI Q P, MO F, ZHANG X M . Studies on development of digestive organs in calves. Proceedings of 6 th National Congress & 8th Symposium of Animal Nutrition Branch of China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Society (Part Two) , 2000: 533-536. (in Chinese) | |
| [33] | 郑琛 . 外源添加甘露寡糖对绵羊养分消化代谢、瘤胃发酵、消化道食糜流通量及免疫的影响. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2012. |
| ZHENG C . Effects of adding mannan oligosaccharides on digestibility and metabolism of nutrients, ruminal parameters, digesta passage and immune of sheep. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese) | |
| [34] | 周怿, 刁其玉, 屠焰, 云强 . 酵母β-葡聚糖对早期断奶犊牛胃肠道发育的影响. 动物营养学报, 2009,21(6):846-852. |
| ZHOU Y, DIAO Q Y, TU Y, YUN Q . Effects of yeast β-glucan on gastrointestinal development in early-weaning calves. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2009,21(6):846-852. (in Chinese) | |
| [35] | 闫晓刚 . 酵母培养物和颗粒精料对荷斯坦犊牛生长发育的影响[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2005. |
| YAN X G . The effect of yeast culture and pellet concentrate on the growing development of Holstein calves[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2005. (in Chinese) | |
| [36] | 赵如茜 . 动物生理学..第五版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011. |
| ZHAO R Q. Animal physiology.5th Edition. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2011. (in Chinese) | |
| [37] | 王彩莲 . 0~56日龄放牧绵羊消化系统发育性变化的研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2009. |
| WANG C L . Developmental changes of digestive system in grazing sheep from birth to 56d[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2009. (in Chinese) | |
| [38] | ZHANG X, WU X, CHEN W, ZHANG Y, JIANG Y, MENG Q, ZHOU Z . Growth performance and development of internal organ, and gastrointestinal tract of calf supplementation with calcium propionate at various stages of growth period. PLoS One, 2017a,12:e0179940. |
| [39] | JIN Y M, JIANG C, ZHANG X Q, SHI L F, WANG M Z . Effect of dietary Urtica cannabina on the growth performance, apparent digestibility, rumen fermentation and gastrointestinal morphology of growing lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2018,243:1-9. |
| [40] | 袁雪 . 巴氏杀菌β-内酰胺类抗奶对犊牛生长性能、血液指标和胃肠发育的影响[D]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2016. |
| YUAN X . The effects of feeding pasteurized β-lactam antibiotic milk on holstein calves’ performance, blood indicator, gastrointestinal development[D]. Daqing: Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese) | |
| [41] | 杨全明 . 仔猪消化道酶和组织器官生长发育规律的研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 1999. |
| YANG Q M . The study on digestive enzymes and growth and development of tissues and organs of piglet[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 1999. (in Chinese) | |
| [42] | BAKARE A G, CHIMONYO M . Relationship between feed characteristics and histomorphometry of small intestines of growing pigs. South African Journal of Animal Science, 2017,47:7-14. |
| [43] | 姚浪群, 萨仁娜, 佟建明, 霍启光 . 安普霉素对仔猪肠道微生物及肠壁组织结构的影响. 畜牧兽医学报, 2003,34(3):250-257. |
| YAO L Q, SA R N, TONG J M, HUO Q G . Effect of apramycin on intestinal flora and intestinal morphology of piglets. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2003,34(3):250-257. (in Chinese) | |
| [44] | 宋恩亮, 陈耀星, 王子旭, 巢国正, 万发春, 吴乃科 . 利杂犊牛小肠各段长度与黏膜结构的发育学变化. 动物医学进展, 2006,27(5):66-70. |
| SONG E L, CHEN Y X, WANG Z X, CHAO G Z, WAN F C, WU N K . Developmental changes on the lengths of different intestinal segments and the morphological structure of small intestinal mucosa in Limisin-crossbred calf. Progress in Veterinary Medicine, 2006,27(5):66-70. (in Chinese) | |
| [45] | MCLEOD J S, CHURCH J T, YERRAMILLI P, COUGHLIN M A, PERKINS E M, RABAH R, BARTLETT R H, ROJAS-PENA A, GREENSON J K . Gastrointestinal mucosal development and injury in premature lambs supported by the artificial placenta. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2018,53:1240-1245. |
| [46] | FORSTER C . Tight junctions and the modulation of barrier function in disease. Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 2008,130(1):55-70. |
| [47] | PUTHENEDAM M, WILLIAMS P H, LAKSHMI B S, BALAKRISHNAN A . Modulation of tight junction barrier function by outer membrane proteins of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: Role of F-actin and junctional adhesion molecule-1. Cell Biology International, 2007,31(8):836-844. |
| [48] | 杨俊, 张中伟, 秦环龙 . 乳酸菌对肠上皮细胞侵袭性大肠杆菌损伤的保护作用. 世界华人消化杂志, 2008,16(30):3394-3399. |
| YANG J, ZHANG Z W, QIN H L . Protective role of Lactobacillus plantarun in regulating intestinal epithelial cells response to pathogenic bacteria. World Chinese Journal of Digestology, 2008,16(30):3394-3399. (in Chinese) | |
| [49] | 王远孝 . IUGR猪的生长与肠道发育及L-精氨酸和大豆卵磷脂的营养调控研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011. |
| WANG Y X . Effect of IUGR on the growth and the intestinal development in postnatal pigs and the nutrition regulation by L-arginine and soya lecithine[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011. (in Chinese) | |
| [50] | 尚沁沁, 李雅丽, 史艳云, 付爱坤, 李卫芬, 余东游 . 益生菌对动物肠上皮细胞免疫功能的研究进展. 中国畜牧杂志, 2014,50(13):87-90. |
| SHANG Q Q, LI Y L, SHI Y Y, FU A K, LI W F, YU D Y . Research progress on probiotics for the immune function of intestinal epithelial cells in animal. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2014,50(13):87-90. (in Chinese) | |
| [51] | YAN F, POLK D B . Probiotic bacterium prevents cytokine-induced apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2002,277(52):50959-50965. |
| [1] | 潘丽媛, 王永军, 李海军, 侯富, 李菁, 李丽丽, 孙苏阳. 基于转录组和WGCNA筛选小麦籽粒蛋白质累积相关调控基因[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(6): 1065-1082. |
| [2] | 许朵朵, 杜倩倩, 赵理想, 栗燕, 黄淦, 李永华, 逯久幸. 牡丹AP2/ERF转录因子的全基因组分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(23): 5031-5045. |
| [3] | 吴东明, 徐靖, 袁佳美, 王珂璇, 李玉义, 何萍, 张建峰, 宋大利, 高淼, 周卫. 一株根际促生菌Myroides odoratimimus PJ-3的分离、鉴定及其耐盐碱和玉米促生性能评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(20): 4131-4143. |
| [4] | 张鑫瑶, 王萍, 刘亚龙, 汪景宽. 不同植稻年限土壤酶活性及其化学计量特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(13): 2604-2613. |
| [5] | 王慧玲, 张莹莹, 闫爱玲, 王晓玥, 刘振华, 任建成, 徐海英, 孙磊. 多组学联合解析红色玫瑰香型葡萄品种转色过程中单萜和花色苷积累规律[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(13): 2645-2662. |
| [6] | 周旗, 张亮, 潘雨, 涂志, 王峥, 刘航航, 鲜凌瑾, 夏运红, 潘红梅, 龙熙. 环黄芪醇对猪供体成纤维细胞衰老、细胞骨架与核移植胚胎早期发育的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(12): 2453-2474. |
| [7] | 张余周, 王一钊, 高茹茜, 刘逸凡. 小麦根系构型及抗旱性研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(9): 1633-1645. |
| [8] | 张必东, 林泓, 朱思颖, 李忠成, 庄慧, 李云峰. 水稻颖壳异常突变体ah1的鉴定与候选基因分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(3): 429-441. |
| [9] | 池润清, 韩海银, 王鹏, 李凯扬, 储明星, 刘玉芳. 雌激素介导circZNF423作为ceRNA调控oar-miR-541-3p/CALM3通路促进绵羊成肌细胞增殖[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(3): 597-612. |
| [10] | 曾祥翠, 杨永念, 李如月, 蒋学乾, 蒋旭, 徐嫣然, 刘忠宽, 龙瑞才, 康俊梅, 杨青川, 李明娜. 紫花苜蓿MsCEP基因家族的鉴定及其调控根系生长发育功能的分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(24): 4839-4853. |
| [11] | 徐乐, 张德权, 古明辉, 杨琦, 李少博, 陈鹏羽, 李欣, 陈丽. 中式烹饪羊肉气味指纹差异解析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(24): 4964-4977. |
| [12] | 张荣, 刘淋茹, 付凯霞, 武紫君, 宋一凡, 王璐媛, 侯阁阁, 贺利, 冯伟, 段剑钊, 王永华, 郭天财. 干旱胁迫下外源褪黑素对冬小麦小花发育及碳营养代谢的调控[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(23): 4644-4657. |
| [13] | 钟梓春, 吴洪鑫, 张杰, 郭玉静, 何柳燕, 许小霞, 金丰良, 庞锐. 三种稻飞虱Toll受体基因家族比较分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(20): 4007-4021. |
| [14] | 姜亚楠, 亓方剑, 李维维, 陈巨莲, 谭晓玲. 温度升高通过小麦根际微生物加快禾谷缢管蚜和麦长管蚜的种群增长[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(20): 4045-4056. |
| [15] | 何军敏, 毛静艺, 魏晨, 任一帆, 张果平, 田可川, 刘桂芬. 基于miRNA测序数据解析苏博美利奴羊毛囊发育分子机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(19): 3917-3935. |
|
||