反枝苋对棉花的密度竞争作用

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.02.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】反枝苋是世界性恶性杂草之一，为安徽省沿江棉区主要杂草，而棉花对杂草竞争十分敏感。论文旨在明确反枝苋对棉花的密度竞争影响，为棉田杂草反枝苋的综合防治提供理论依据。【方法】2013—2015年在安徽省安庆市试验地，采用添加系列试验方法，棉花密度保持不变，设置8个反枝苋密度（0、0.125、0.25、0.5、1、2、4、8株/m）与棉花全生育期竞争，研究不同反枝苋密度竞争对棉花生长、子棉产量及其构成因素、纤维品质的影响。【结果】随着反枝苋密度增加，反枝苋株高、茎直径逐渐减小；相对于0.125株/m的反枝苋，反枝苋茎直径分别于1株/m（2013年和2014年）、0.5株/m（2015年）显著降低12.0%—18.6%；反枝苋株高则在2015年于0.5株/m显著减少24.2%。3年数据平均，单位面积反枝苋生物量由1 156.9 kg·hm^-2（0.125株/m）逐渐增加到7 524.0 kg·hm^-2(8株/m)，较高密度反枝苋种内竞争明显。随着反枝苋与棉花竞争时间的延长，反枝苋株高于52—83 DAE（出苗后天数，days after emergence）逐渐超过棉花的，茎直径于18—70 DAE逐渐大于棉花的。在棉花成熟期，反枝苋株高比棉花高35.6—128.2 cm，反枝苋茎直径比棉花粗9.9—24.8 mm。反枝苋在株高和生物量上对棉花具明显优势。随着反枝苋密度增加，棉花株高变化不明显，茎直径明显减小；棉花单株铃数、果枝数和单铃重显著减少，衣分也有一定程度减小。1株/m的杂草密度导致棉花单株果枝数减少4.63%—69.18%，铃数减少20.81%—84.98%，单铃重减少3.04%—20.36%，衣分减少1.54%左右。引起子棉产量显著减产的反枝苋密度分别是0.125株/m（2013年）和0.25株/m（2014年和2015年），导致子棉减产14.0%—33.7%；子棉产量损失率与反枝苋密度符合双曲线模型，据此可预测子棉减产50%的反枝苋密度为0.2—2.8株/m。在反枝苋与棉花竞争91 DAE，0.125—0.5株/m反枝苋可显著减少棉花单株果枝数和铃数。在部分年份，棉纤维的上半部平均长度、马克隆值及断裂比强度随反枝苋密度增加有减小的趋势，且差异显著。【结论】在安徽省沿江棉区，当反枝苋与棉花全生育期竞争时，对反枝苋及棉花的株高影响不明显，对两者的茎直径产生显著影响；随着竞争时间的延长，反枝苋的株高和茎直径逐渐大于棉花的；因而反枝苋在株高和生物量上对棉花具有竞争优势。反枝苋苗期是其防治关键期。当反枝苋密度逐渐增加时，其种内竞争逐渐增强。反枝苋生物量易受环境条件影响，随着反枝苋密度增加，单位面积反枝苋生物量增加，对棉花生长和产量的抑制作用明显增强。反枝苋竞争主要通过影响棉花单株铃数和单铃重而减少棉花产量。推测本地区导致子棉减产5%的反枝苋密度为0.011—0.090株/m。

关键词: 竞争, 反枝苋, 棉花产量, 纤维品质, 杂草生物量

Abstract: 【Objective】Amaranthus retroflexus is one of the worst agricultural weeds in the world, and it is a major weed in cotton belt along Changjiang River in Anhui Province. Cotton is very sensitive to the competition of weeds. The objective of this study is to clarify the interference impact of A. retroflexus in cotton field, and to provide useful information for weed control programs. 【Method】Field additive series experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of 8 A. retroflexus densities on growth, yields and yield components, fiber properties of cotton with full-season interference of A. retroflexus during 2013-2015 in Anqing test plot of Anhui Province, with cotton density no changing. The weed densities employed were 0 (the check), 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 plants/m of row. 【Result】With the increase of weed density, plant height and stem diameter of A. retroflexus gradually decreased, and the plant stem diameter reduced obviously by 12.0%-18.6% at the density of 1 plant/m of row (2013 and 2014) and 0.5 plant/m of row (2015) than that at the density of 0.125 plant/m of row, respectively. The plant height reduced significantly by 24.2% at the density of 0.5 plant/m of row than that at the density of 0.125 plant/m only in 2015. The per unit area biomass of A. retroflexus increased from 1 156.9 kg·hm^-2 at density of 0.125 plant/m of row to 7 524.0 kg·hm^-2 at the density of 8 plants/m of row over the average of three years. Intraspecific competition among A. retroflexus plants was observed at the higher weed densities. With the increasing interference between A. retroflexus and cotton, A. retroflexus remained taller and thicker than cotton after 52-83 DAE and 18-70 DAE, respectively. At the maturity stage of cotton, the plant stem height of A. retroflexus was 35.6-128.2 cm higher than that of cotton, and the plant stem diameter of A. retroflexus was 9.9-24.8 mm thicker than that of cotton. A. retroflexus had more obvious advantages than cotton in plant height and biomass. The interference of A. retroflexus density had no significant influence on cotton height, but cotton stem diameter reduced obviously at higher weed densities. With the increasing of weed density, per plant bolls, fruit-branch numbers, single boll weight of cotton reduced significantly; and lint percentage of cotton also decreased to some extent. Bolls, fruit-branch number per plant and single boll weight reduced by 20.81%-84.98%, 4.63%-69.18% and 3.04%-20.36% at the density of 1 plant/m of row, respectively; and lint percentage reduced by about 1.54% at this density. The interference of A. retroflexus affected significantly on seed cotton yield at the density of 0.125 plant/m of row (2013) and 0.25 plant/m of row (2014 and 2015), respectively, and the seed cotton yield reduced by 14.0%-33.7% at these densities. The relationship between cotton yield loss rate and the density of A. retroflexus was described by the hyperbolic regression model, which estimated that a density of 0.2-2.8 weed plant/m of row would result in 50% seed cotton yield loss from the maximum yield. Boll and fruit-branch numbers per plant of cotton were reduced obviously at the density of 0.125-0.5 plant/m of row of A. retroflexus after 91 DAE. In some year, the fiber length, Micronaire and fiber strength of cotton fiber significantly decreased with increase of weedy densities.【Conclusion】 The full-season interference of A. retroflexus had no significant influences on plant height, and obvious impacts on plant stem diameter of cotton and A. retroflexus in cotton belt along Changjiang River in Anhui Province. With the increase of interference time between A. retroflexus and cotton, A. retroflexus surpassed cotton in plant height and stem diameter. It was concluded that A. retroflexus had competitive advantages over cotton in plant height and biomass and A. retroflexus should be controlled at its seedling stage critically. Intraspecific competition among A. retroflexus plants was enhanced with increasing weedy density. The biomass of A. retroflexus is easily affected by environmental conditions. The per unit area biomass of A. retroflexus increased with increase of weed density, and the impact on cotton development and yields were enhanced obviously. The cotton yields were reduced by the interference of A. retroflexus through decreasing boll numbers per plant and single boll weight of cotton. It was inferred that a density of 0.011-0.090 plant/m of row of A. retroflexus would result in a 5% seed cotton yield loss from the maximum yield.

Key words: interference, redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), cotton yield, fiber quality, weed biomass

李淑英，朱加保，路献勇，叶泗洪，马艳，马小艳，程福如. 反枝苋对棉花的密度竞争作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(2): 286-298.

LI ShuYing, ZHU JiaBao, LU XianYong, YE SiHong, MA Yan, MA XiaoYan, CHENG FuRu. The Influence of Redroot Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) Density on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(2): 286-298.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.02.008

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2017/V50/I2/286

参考文献

[1] Horak M J, Loughin T M. Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Science, 2000, 48: 347-355.

[2] Knezevic S Z, Horak M J. Influence of emergence time and density on redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retrofexus). Weed Science, 1998, 46(6): 665-672.

[3] Burnside O C, Wilson R G, Weisberg S, Hubbard K G. Seed longevity of 41 weed species buried 17 years in eastern and western Nebraska. Weed Science, 1996, 44(1): 74-86.

[4] Telewski F W, JAN Zeevaart A D. The 120-yr period for Dr. Beal’s seed viability experiment. American Journal of Botany, 2002, 89(8): 1285-1288.

[5] Karimmojeni H, Bazrafshan A H, Majidi M M, Torabian S, Rashidi B. Effect of maternal nitrogen and drought stress on seed dormancy and germinability of Amaranthus retroflexus. Plant Species Biology, 2014, 29: e1-e8.

[6] Agha A M, Rahimian H, Modares S S A M, Tahmasbi S Z A A. Effects of light intensity and light quality on the rate of development and dry matter distribution of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.). Agricultural Sciences and Technology, 2001, 15(2): 173-183.

[7] Tenhunen J D. The diurnal course of leaf gas exchange of the C₄ species Amaranthus retroflexus under field conditions in a cool climate: Comparison with the C₃ species Glycine max and Chenopodium album. Oecologia, 1982, 53(3): 310-316.

[8] EDALAT M, GHADIRI H, ZAND-PARSA S. Corn crop water stress index under different redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) densities and irrigation regimes. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2010, 56(3): 285-293.

[9] Blackshaw R E, Brandt R N. Nitrogen fertilizer rate effects on weed competitiveness is species dependent. Weed Science, 2008, 56(5): 743-747.

[10] Jalali M, Motlagh B P, Salari K. Allelopathic effects of aqueous extract of shoot and root of licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.) and pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) on germination characteristic and seedling growth of corn and chickpea. International Journal of Agriculture: Research & Review, 2012, 2(4): 357-363.

[11] Knezevic S Z, Horak M J, Vanderlip R L. Relative time of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) emergence is critical in pigweed sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] competition. Weed Science, 1997, 45(4): 502-508.

[12] Rezaie F, Yarnia M. Allelopathic effects of Chenopodium album, Amaranthus retroflexus and Cynodon dactylon on germination and growth of safflower. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 2009, 7(2): 516-521.

[13] Heap I. International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Online [2016-12-21]. http://weedscience.org/.

[14] 杨浩娜, 柏连阳. 棉田反枝苋和马齿苋对草甘膦的抗药性. 棉花学报, 2014, 26(6): 492-498.

Yang H N, Bai L Y. Resistance of Amaranthus retroflexus and Portulaca oleracea to glyphosate in cotton fields. Cotton Science, 2014, 26(6): 492-498. (in Chinese)

[15] Buchanan G A, Burns E R. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Science, 1970, 18(1): 149-154.

[16] Papamichail D, Eleftherohorinus I, Froud-Williams R, Gravanis F. Critical periods of weed competition in cotton in Greece. Phytoparasitica, 2002, 30(1): 105-111.

[17] Knezevic S Z, Weise S F, Swanton C J. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Science, 1994, 42(4): 568-573.

[18] Bensch C N, Horak M J, Peterson D. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis) in Soybean. Weed Science, 2003, 51(1): 37-43.

[19] Stebbing J A, Wilson R G, Martin A R, Smith J A. Row spacing, redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retoflexus) density, and sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) cultivar effects on sugarbeet development. Journal of Sugar Beet Research, 2000, 37(2): 11-31.

[20] Haj S H M R, Ghorban N, Mahdi N M, Hamid R, Eskandar Z. Competitive effects of redroot pigweed and lambsquarter on potato yield. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 13(2): 451-464.

[21] Ma X Y, Wu H W, Jiang W L, Ma Y J, Ma Y. Interference between redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): growth analysis. Pl 2015, 10(6): e0130475.os One,

[22] Buchanan G A, Crowley R H, McLaughlin R D. Competition of Prickly Sida with cotton. Weed Science, 1977, 25(2): 106-110.

[23] Mercer K L, Murray D S, Verhalen L M. Interference of unicorn-plant (Proboscidea louisianica) with cotton (Gossypium birsutum). Weed Science, 1987, 35(6): 807-812.

[24] Crowley R H, Buchanan G A. Competition of four morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) species with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Science, 1978, 26(5): 484-488.

[25] Bridges D C, Chandler J M. Influence of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) density and period of competition on cotton yield. Weed Science, 1987, 35(1): 63-67.

[26] Wood M L, Murray D S, Banks J C, Verhalen L M, Westerman R B, Anderson K B. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) density effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) harvest and economic value. Weed Technology, 2002, 16(3): 495-501.

[27] Buchanan G A, Burns E R. Weed competition in cotton. II. Cocklebur and redroot pigweed. Weed Science, 1971, 19(5): 580-582.

[28] Rushing D W, Murray D S, Verhalen L M. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). II. Tumble pigweed (Amaranthus albus). Weed Science, 1985, 33(6): 815-818.

[29] Smith D T, Baker R V, Steele G L. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) impacts on yield, harvesting, and ginning in dryland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technology, 2000, 14(1): 122-126.

[30] Morgan G D, Baumann P A, Chandler J M. Competitive impact of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield. Weed Technology, 2001, 15(3): 408-412.

[31] MacRae A W, Webster T M, Sosnoskie L M, Culpepper A S, Kichler J M. Cotton yield loss potential in response to length of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference. Journal of Cotton Science, 2013, 17(3): 227-232.

[32] Ayyadurai P, Poonguzhalan R, Gokila J. Effect of crop-weed competition in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)-a review. Agricultural Reviews, 2013, 34(2): 157-161.

[33] Askew S D, Wilcut J W. Ladysthumb interference and seed production in cotton. Weed Science, 2002, 50(3): 326-332.

[34] Askew S D, Wilcut J W. Pennsylvania smartweed interference and achene production in cotton. Weed Science, 2002, 50(3): 350-356.

[35] Askew S D, Wilcut J W. Pale smartweed interference and achene production in cotton. Weed Science, 2002, 50(3): 357-363.

[36] Buchanan G A, Mclaughlin R D. Influence of nitrogen on weed competition in cotton. Weed Science, 1975, 23(4): 324-328.

[37] Snipes C E, Buchanan G A, Street J E, Mcguire J A. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Science, 1982, 30(5): 553-556.

[38] Chandler J M. Competition of spurred anoda, velvetleaf, prickly sida, and venice mallow in cotton. Weed Science, 1977, 25(2): 151-158.

[39] Barnett K A, Steckel L E. Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) competition in cotton. Weed Science, 2013, 61(4): 543-548.

[40] Buchanan G A, Burns E R. Weed competition in cotton.Ⅰ. sicklepod and tall morningglory. Weed Science, 1971, 19(5): 576-580.

[41] 朱加保, 李淑英, 马艳, 程福如, 郑曙峰, 张兵. 安徽省沿江棉区两种栽培方式下棉田杂草发生与危害研究. 安徽农业大学学报, 2011, 38(4): 617-622.

Zhu J B, LI S Y, Ma Y, Cheng F R, Zheng S F, Zhang B. Analysis of weed infestation and its harmfulness to cotton in two cultivation patterns of cotton-fields along Changjiang River, Anhui Province. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2011, 38(4): 617-622. (in Chinese)

[42] 李淑英, 朱加保, 马艳, 马小艳, 程福如, 路献勇. 皖西南直播棉田杂草群落出苗模式. 植物保护学报, 2015, 42(3): 460-466.

Li S Y, Zhu J B, Ma Y, Ma X Y, Cheng F R, Lu X Y. Emergence pattern of weed seedling community in direct-seeding cotton fields in the southwest of Anhui Province. Journal of Plant Protection, 2015, 42(3): 460-466. (in Chinese)

[43] 朱文达, 张朝贤, 魏守辉, 崔海兰, 张宏军, 张佳, 李林. 野燕麦对油菜生长的影响及其经济阈值. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31(2): 233-238.

Zhu W D, Zhang C X, Wei S H, Cui H L, Zhang H J, Zhang J, Li L. Influence of Avena fatua on growth of oilseed rape and its economic threshold. Chinese journal of oil crop sciences, 2009, 31(2): 233-238. (in Chinese)

[44] 张朝贤, 胡祥恩, 钱益新. 杂草密度与作物产量损失的预测模型. 植物保护, 1997, 23(2): 6-10.

Zhang C X, Hu X E, Qian Y X. A practicable model for predicting crop yield loss duo to weed competition. Plant Protection, 1997, 23(2): 6-10. (in Chinese)

[45] Bailey W A, Askew S D, Dorai-Raj S, Wilcut J W. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference and seed production dynamics in cotton. Weed Science, 2003, 51(1): 94-101.

[46] Evetts L L, Burnside O C. Early root and shoot development of nine plant species. Weed Science, 1973, 21(4): 289-291.

[47] Légère A, Schreiber M M. Competition and canopy architecture as affected by soybean (Glycine max) row width and density of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Science, 1989, 37(1): 84-92.

[48] Siriwardana G D, Zimdahl R L. Competition between barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Science, 1984, 32(2): 218-222.

[49] Jr Byrd J D, Coble H D. Interference of selected weeds in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technology, 1991, 5(2): 263-269.

[50] Rowland M W, Murray D S, Verhalen L M. Full season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Science, 1999, 47(3): 305-309.

[51] Ma X Y, Wu H W, Jiang W L, Ma Y J, Ma Y. Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) density effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(9): 1778-1785.

[52] Castner E P, Murray D S, Hackett N M, Verhalen L M, Weeks D L, Stone J F. Interference of hogpotato (Hoffmanseggia glauca) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Science, 1989, 37(5): 688-694.

[53] Tingle C H, Steele G L. Competition and control of smellmelon (Cucumis melo var. dudaim Naud.) in cotton. Weed Science, 2003, 51(4): 586-591.

[54] Wu J X, Jenkins J N, Jr. McCarty J C, Zhu J. Genetic association of yield with its component traits in a recombinant inbred line population of cotton. Euphytica, 2004, 140(3): 171-179.

[55] Rushing D W, Murray D S, Verhalen L M. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). I. buffalobur (Solanum rostratum). Weed Science, 1985, 33(6): 810-814.

[56] 张新新, 陈吉, 刘敬然, 吕丰娟, 马伊娜, 王友华, 周治国, 陈兵林. 温光互作对棉花不同空间部位纤维品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(5): 861-871.

Zhang X X, Chen J, Liu J R, Lü F J, Ma Y N, Wang Y H, Zhou Z g, Chen B L. Effects of temperature-light factor on cotton fiber qualities at different spatial fruiting branch positions. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(5): 861-871. (in Chinese)