中国农业科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (24): 4780-4789.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.24.002

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于GGE双标图的长江流域国审棉花品种分类特征评价

许乃银,李健   

  1. 江苏省农业科学院经济作物研究所/农业部长江下游棉花与油菜重点实验室,南京 210014
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-19 出版日期:2014-12-16 发布日期:2014-12-16
  • 通讯作者: 许乃银,Tel:025-84390365
  • 作者简介:许乃银,Tel:025-84390365;E-mail:naiyin@jaas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家转基因生物新品种培育重大专项(2012ZX0813015)、江苏省农业科技自主创新资金(CX-12-5035)

Evaluation on the Classification Characteristics of National Registered Cotton Varieties in the Yangtze River Valley Based on GGE Biplot

XU Nai-yin, LI Jian   

  1. Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014
  • Received:2014-05-19 Online:2014-12-16 Published:2014-12-16

摘要: 【目的】采用GGE双标图方法,分析30年来长江流域棉花区域试验中通过国审的棉花品种的分类特征,从棉花品种改良的历史视角探索棉花品种类型和特征的演化趋势,为制定当前棉花品种选育目标和品种审定方法提供理论依据。【方法】依据国家棉花品种审定标准中的品种评分方法,赋予产量性状、纤维品质性状、抗病性和早熟性等指标相应的权重,构建统一的棉花品种多性状综合评价指数。采用GGE双标图的“品种-性状”功能图分析53个国审棉花品种与籽棉产量、皮棉产量、铃重、结铃数、衣分、子指、纤维长度、比强度、马克隆值、枯萎病指、黄萎病指、霜前花率、株高、果枝数和评价指数等15个性状的互作模式,并据此进行品种类型划分和特征分析。数据来源于1981—2012年长江流域国家棉花区域试验。根据对照品种的不同,将历年区域试验分为5个时期,分析各时期内审定品种类型的比例和总体评价指数的变化动态。【结果】GGE双标图的“品种-性状”功能图分析表明,棉花育种目标性状间存在着复杂的相关关系,有必要采用评价指数方法对品种进行综合评价。依据国家棉花品种审定标准中的品种评分方法构建了通用的品种评价指数公式:EI=0.400×皮棉产量+0.129×比强度+ 0.086×(纤维长度+马克隆值+黄萎病)+ 0.114×枯萎病 + 0.100×霜前花率。依据品种和性状在GGE双标图中的互作模式和品种间的空间关系,将53个国审品种划分为性状特征差异显著的4个品种类型。Ⅰ型为“高产-铃多-品质较优”类型,Ⅱ型为“高产-大铃-高马值”类型,Ⅲ型为“优质-中产-小铃”类型,而Ⅳ型为“弱势品种”类型。各品种类型依据评价指数的排序为Ⅰ型品种>Ⅱ型品种>Ⅲ型品种>Ⅳ型品种。品种类型的变化动态研究表明,Ⅳ型品种只出现在泗棉3号时期之前;Ⅲ型品种出现在泗棉3号和湘杂棉2号时期;Ⅰ型品种比例从泗棉3号时期逐年上升,到鄂杂棉10号时期比例回落;Ⅱ型品种开始于湘杂棉2号时期,其后呈上升趋势。【结论】利用GGE双标图和品种评价指数将53个国审棉花品种合理地划分为4个品种类型,各品种类型特征差异显著,充分展示了30年来长江流域棉花品种改良的成效和发展趋势。长江流域的棉花育种和品种审定中应更注重对马克隆值的改良和评价,以促进棉花丰产性和纤维品质的协调发展。

关键词: 棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L.), GGE双标图, 品种类型划分, 长江流域, 区域试验

Abstract: 【Objective】By using the GGE biplot method, the classification and characteristics analysis of national registered varieties over 30 years recommended from the candidate cotton lines in cotton regional trials in the Yangtze River Valley (YaRV) facilitated us a historical perspective of cotton variety improvement progress to explore the evolution trend of cotton varieties’ type and the corresponding characteristics, and thus to provide theoretical guidelines for current decision making of cotton breeding target characters and cotton evaluation and recommendation for the official registration before commercial release.【Method】In accordance with the cultivar scoring criteria of national cotton registration standard, the corresponding weights were allocated to certain characters of yield and fiber quality, disease resistance, earliness, etc., to build a universal cotton variety evaluation index based on multiple traits. The “genotype vs. trait” view of GGE biplot was adopted to analyze the interaction pattern of 53 national registered cotton varieties in cotton regional trials in YaRV during 1981-2012 and 15 major characters including seed cotton yield, lint cotton yield, boll weight, boll numbers, lint percentage, seed index, fiber length, fiber strength, micronaire value, Fusarirum wilt index, Verticillium wilt index, pro-frost yielding rate, plant height, fruit branch number and evaluation index, and also to implement the classification and feature comparison of registered cotton cultivars. And then the cultivar types and features were evaluated. According to the shift of check cultivars in cotton regional trials in the past, the cotton regional trial datasets since 1981 were divided into five periods. The dynamics of cultivar type’s proportion and the evaluation index scores were evaluated across the five periods. 【Result】The “genotype vs. trait” view of GGE biplot analysis showed that there existed complicated relationships among cotton breeding target traits, which made it necessary to construct evaluation indices for comprehensive evaluation of cotton varieties. On the basis of cotton recommending criteria in national variety registration standard, a variety evaluation index in common was built as: EI = 0.40×(lint cotton yield ) + 0.13×(fiber strength ) + 0.09×(fiber length + micronaire value +Verticillium wilt) + 0.11×(Fusarium wilt) + 0.10×(pre-frost yielding rate). According to the interaction pattern of varieties and characters and their spatial relationships among varieties, 53 national registered varieties were divided into four varietal types with significant special characteristics, respectively. TypeⅠcluster was constituted of certain cultivars with “high yield, more boll numbers and moderate fiber quality”; type Ⅱ was of “high yield, big boll and high micronaire value”; type Ⅲ was of “superior fiber quality, moderate yield and small boll”; while type Ⅳ was weak in major characters and was named as “weak cultivars”. The ordination of variety types sorted by evaluation index was listed as typeⅠ> typeⅡ> type Ⅲ> type Ⅳ. The dynamic of cultivar types shift indicated that type Ⅳ varieties only appeared in “Simian 3” period and the before; type Ⅲ varieties existed in “Simian 3” and “Xiangzamian 2” periods; typeⅠvarieties commenced in “Simian 3” period, and its proportion was on the rise until the decline in “Ezamian 10” period; type Ⅱ varieties were selected firstly in “Xiangzamian 2” period, and the proportion showed a continuous trend up till now.【Conclusion】On the basis of the variety evaluation index and GGE biplot analysis method, 53 national registered varieties were efficiently divided into four variety types with distinct characteristics and historical traces in each. The conclusion of cotton variety improvement effect and development trend in past 30 years in YaRV reminded as that more attention should be paid to the improvement and evaluation of micronaire trait, so as to guide the simultaneous development of high yielding and fiber quality in cotton breeding and registration procedure in YaRV.

Key words: cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), GGE biplot, cultivar type classification, the Yangtze River Valley (YaRV), crop regional trial