中国农业科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (15): 2948-2957.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.15.010

• 土壤肥料·节水灌溉·农业生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江流域农民习惯施肥与推荐施肥的冬油菜产量与养分效率差异分析-基于大样本田间试验

朱芸,徐华丽,张洋洋,任涛,丛日环,鲁剑巍   

  1. 华中农业大学资源与环境学院/农业部长江中下游耕地保育重点实验室,武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-18 出版日期:2018-08-01 发布日期:2018-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 丛日环,E-mail:congrh@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:朱芸,E-mail:yunzhu@webmail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0200108)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2662016PY117)、国家油菜产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-12)、国家测土配方施肥技术项目

Yield and Nutrient Efficiency Differences of Winter Oilseed Rape Between Farmer’s Practice and Recommended Fertilization in Yangtze River Basin: Based on Large-Number of Field Experiments

ZHU Yun, XU HuaLi, ZHANG YangYang, REN Tao, CONG RiHuan, LU JianWei   

  1. College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation in Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture, Wuhan 430070
  • Received:2017-10-18 Online:2018-08-01 Published:2018-08-01

摘要: 【目的】合理施肥是保证和维持油菜产量的关键。面对目前集约化的种植管理模式,肥料的粗放管理和施用势必造成养分效率的下降,从而影响油菜产量。本研究通过比较长江流域冬油菜种植区域农民习惯施肥与推荐施肥的产量和养分利用效率差异,为冬油菜肥料合理施用、提高肥料利用效率提供策略。【方法】选取2005—2016年长江流域(包括四川、贵州、湖北、湖南、安徽、江苏和浙江7个省份)的535个油菜田间试验,分析不施肥(CK)、农民习惯施肥(FP)和推荐施肥(RF)处理间以及长江流域各区域间的油菜产量和产量分布特征,比较不同施肥处理的增产效果,以及氮、磷、钾肥料用量和偏生产力的差异,计算RF处理与FP处理间施肥量的差值,评估长江流域氮、磷、钾肥的减施潜力。【结果】长江流域CK处理冬油菜产量主要分布在500—1 500 kg·hm-2,FP处理主要分布在1 500—3 000 kg·hm-2,RF处理最高,集中在2 000—3 000 kg·hm-2,土壤基础地力对RF处理油菜产量的贡献率为45.1%—49.7%;3个不同处理在区域间油菜的平均产量均表现为长江下游>中游>上游。长江上、中、下游FP处理油菜产量均值分别为2 033、2 182和2 542 kg·hm-2,RF处理油菜产量较FP分别增产16.7%、16.5%和13.9%,增产点比例达77.5%—94.9%。随着地力水平的提升,各个处理油菜增产率均表现出逐渐下降的趋势,RF处理在不同地力水平下亦呈现出明显的优势。比较RF与FP处理施肥量发现,长江流域FP处理施肥量均值为162.5—239.5 kg N·hm-2、58.6—82.0 kg P2O5·hm-2和45.5—60.8 kg K2O·hm-2,而RF处理施肥量均值则为162.2—233.6 kg N·hm-2、67.2—94.1 kg P2O5·hm-2和73.6—108.5 kg K2O·hm-2,两种施肥处理氮肥用量未表现出显著的差异,FP处理磷、钾肥用量偏低。与RF处理相比,PF处理氮肥可减施的点位比例最大,长江流域45.6%的点位能够减氮,25.6%的点位可以减磷,钾肥减施点位的比例仅为13.2%。同时,需要增施氮、磷、钾肥的比例分别为37.8%、60.0%和75.9%。区域间肥料用量以长江下游适宜点位比例最大,氮、磷、钾肥适宜用量的点位比例分别为25.0%、22.8%和17.1%。长江流域FP处理的氮、磷、钾肥偏生产力均值分别为11.1—14.2、28.6—45.8和38.3—47.6 kg·kg-1。RF在FP处理的基础上提高了氮肥偏生产力12.9%—15.9%,但与其他发达国家相比仍处于较低水平;而RF处理的磷、钾偏生产力与FP相比有所下降,平均降低幅度分别为6.9%和19.6%,也表明目前推荐的施肥量仍然存在减肥的空间。【结论】与农民习惯施肥相比,推荐施肥显著增加了油菜产量,且农民习惯的肥料用量存在较大的调整空间。

关键词: 冬油菜产量, 农民习惯施肥, 推荐施肥, 养分利用效率, 长江流域

Abstract: 【Objective】Reasonable fertilization is critical for improving winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) yield. Rough management of fertilization would cause the nutrient efficiency decline under current intensive planting management mode, thus affecting rapeseed yield. To provide an optimizing management strategy for the rational fertilizer utilization to enhance nutrient use efficiency, yield and nutrient efficiency differences were compared between farmer’s practice (FP) and recommended fertilization (RF) for winter oilseed rapes in the Yangtze River Basin (YRB) in this study. 【Method】Total of 535 field experiments were selected in the YRB during 2005-2016, including Sichuan, Guizhou, Hubei, Hunan, Anhui, Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces, China. Three fertilization treatments, i.e., no-fertilizer (CK), farmer’s practice (FP) and recommended fertilization (RF), were designed. The differences in yield and its distribution characteristics, as well as differences of yield increase rate, fertilization rates, and partial factor productivity, were compared among the treatments and regions. The differences of fertilizer amounts between RF and FP treatments were calculated, and the reduction space of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer in Yangtze River Basin was evaluated.【Result】The range of winter oilseed rape yield for the CK, FP and RF treatments were 500-1 500 kg·hm-2, 1 500-3 000 kg·hm-2 and 2 000-3 000 kg·hm-2, respectively. For the RF treatment, the contribution rate of the soil indigenous fertility supply was only 45.1%-49.7%. Rapeseed yield showed highest in the lower reach, then the middle reach, and lowest in the upper reach. The average rapeseed yield of FP management in the upper, middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze were 2 033 kg·hm-2, 2 182 kg·hm-2 and 2 542 kg·hm-2, respectively, and the RF management produced more rapeseed (16.7%, 16.5% and 13.9% averagely) than the FP in 77.5%-94.9% of the 535 trails. With the increasing level of soil indigenous fertility supply, yield increase rate showed a decline trend, and RF treatment showed a higher increase rate than FP at different levels. Averaged fertilizer rates of FP were 162.5-239.5 kg N·hm-2, 58.6-82.0 kg P2O5·hm-2 and 45.5-60.8 kg K2O·hm-2, and the values were 162.2-233.6 kg N·hm-2, 67.2-94.1 kg P2O5·hm-2 and 73.6-108.5 kg K2O·hm-2 of RF treatment. There was no significant difference in the amount of N fertilizer used under the two treatments, and the amounts of P and K fertilizer were lower under the FP treatment than the RF treatment. Compared with RF, 45.6% and 25.6% of the 535 experiments could reduce N and P fertilizer rates, respectively. However, only 13.2% of the experiments could lower K fertilizer rates. Meanwhile, 37.8%, 60.0% and 75.9% of the trails needed more N, P and K fertilizers input in the YRB, respectively. Fertilization rates were more appropriate in the lower reaches as compared with the other two regions, in which optimum N, P, and K rates were accounted 25.0%, 22.8%, and 17.1% of the 535 trails, respectively. The average partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN), phosphorus (PFPP) and potassium (PFPK) for FP was 11.1-14.2 kg·kg-1, 28.6-45.8 kg·kg-1 and 38.3-47.6 kg·kg-1, respectively. Although PFPN in the RF treatment were 12.9%-15.9% higher than that in the FP treatment across the regions, the values were still lower as compared with other developed countries. Meanwhile, the PFPP and PFPK of RF were respectively 6.9% and 19.6% lower than the FP treatments, indicating that current recommended fertilization rate also had a potential for fertilizer reducing. 【Conclusion】Recommended fertilizations management could significantly improve rapeseed yield as compared with farmer’s practice, and the fertilizer rates of FP had a larger adjustment space.

Key words: winter rapeseed yield, farmer’s practice, recommended fertilization, nutrient efficiency, the Yangtze River Basin