多环境条件下大豆倒伏性相关形态性状的QTL分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.15.003

中国农业科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (15): 3029-3039.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.15.003

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇下一篇

多环境条件下大豆倒伏性相关形态性状的QTL分析

范冬梅, 杨振, 马占洲, 曾庆力, 杜翔宇, 蒋洪蔚, 刘春燕, 韩冬伟, 栾怀海, 裴宇峰, 陈庆山, 胡国华

1.东北农业大学农学院，哈尔滨 150030
2.黑龙江省农垦科研育种中心，哈尔滨 150090
3.黑龙江省农业科学院齐齐哈尔分院，黑龙江齐齐哈尔 161041
4.国家大豆工程技术研究中心，哈尔滨 150050

收稿日期:2012-02-27 出版日期:2012-08-01 发布日期:2012-04-26
通讯作者: 通信作者胡国华，Tel：0451-55199475；E-mail：hugh757@vip.163.com；通信作者陈庆山，Tel：0451-55191945；E-mail：qshchen@126.com
作者简介:范冬梅，Tel：0451-55191945；E-mail：fandongmeiqq@126.com。
基金资助:
国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金（CARS-04-02A）、农业部转基因专项（2011ZX08004-001）、“大豆新品种培育与扩繁”国家“十二五”科技支撑计划（2011BAD35B06-1）、黑龙江省普通高等学校新世纪优秀人才培养计划（1252-NCET-004）

QTL Analysis of Lodging-Resistance Related Traits in Soybean in Different Environments

FAN Dong-Mei, YANG Zhen, MA Zhan-Zhou, ZENG Qing-Li, DU Xiang-Yu, JIANG Hong-Wei, LIU Chun-Yan, HAN Dong-Wei, LUAN Huai-Hai, PEI Yu-Feng, CHEN Qing-Shan, HU Guo-Hua

1.东北农业大学农学院，哈尔滨 150030
2.黑龙江省农垦科研育种中心，哈尔滨 150090
3.黑龙江省农业科学院齐齐哈尔分院，黑龙江齐齐哈尔 161041
4.国家大豆工程技术研究中心，哈尔滨 150050

Received:2012-02-27 Online:2012-08-01 Published:2012-04-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】定位大豆倒伏性相关形态性状的QTL为培育抗倒伏性高的品种提供依据。【方法】以美国大豆品种Charleston为母本，东北农业大学大豆品系东农594为父本及其F2:16—F2:18的重组自交系的147个株系为试验材料，164个SSR引物经亲本筛选后用于群体扩增，并构建遗传图谱。在三年两个地点对大豆的主茎节数、茎粗和茎秆重性状进行调查及QTL分析。【结果】共检测到16个主茎节数QTL，分别位于A1、B1、C2、D1a、D2、F、G、H和N连锁群上；检测到10个茎粗QTL,分别位于A1、B1、C2、D1a、E和G连锁群上；检测到15个茎秆重QTL，分别位于A1、A2、C2、D1a、D1b和G连锁群上。在得到的这些QTL中，2种算法都能检测到5个主茎节数QTL，解释表型变异范围为8.6%—27.0%；1个茎粗QTL，解释表型变异范围为9.0%—11.0%；6个茎秆重QTL，解释表型变异范围为6.0%—39.0%。在2年以上能被检测到3个主茎节数QTL，解释表型变异范围为8.0%—60.2%；2个茎秆重QTL，解释表型变异范围为10.0%—23.0%；2年以上未重复检测到茎粗QTL。【结论】通过比较定位的主茎节数、茎粗和茎秆重QTL，发现这些性状之间存在较大的遗传相关性。

关键词: 大豆, 倒伏性, QTL分析

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study is to locate consensus QTLs of lodging-resistance related traits of soybean for breeding lodging-resistance varieties and increase yield of soybean, and convenience for mechanization harvest.【Method】In order to find out the steady and repeatable QTLs of these traits, a F2:16-F2:18 RIL population containing 147 lines derived from a cross between Charleston as female and Dongnong 594 as male parent were used in this experiment. A genetic linkage map was constructed with 164 SSR primers screened in two parents and amplified in 147 lines population. Nodes in main stem, stem thickness and stem weight QTLs of soybean were analyzed in two sites in three years. 【Result】 Sixteen nodes in main stem QTLs were detected in A1, B1, C2, D1a, D2, F, G, H and N linkage group, respectively. Ten stem thickness QTLs were detected in A1, B1, C2, D1a, E and G linkage group, respectively. Fifteen stem weight QTLs were detected in A1, A2, C2, D1a, D1b and G linkage group, respectively. In these QTLs, five QTLs for nodes in main stem, one QTLs for stem thickness and six QTLs for stem weight could be detected together by CIM and MIM, accounting for 8.6%-27.0%, 9.0%-11.0%, and 6.0%-39.0% of the general phenotypic variation, respectively. Three QTLs for nodes in main stem QTLs and two QTLs for stem weight could be detected together in more than two years, accounting for 8.0%-60.2% and 10.0%-23.0% of the general phenotypic variation, respectively. 【Conclusion】 Compared with QTLs mapped for nodes in main stem, stem thickness and stem weight, relatively large genetic correlation was found among lodging-resistance related traits of soybean.

Key words: soybean, lodging, QTL analysis

范冬梅, 杨振, 马占洲, 曾庆力, 杜翔宇, 蒋洪蔚, 刘春燕, 韩冬伟, 栾怀海, 裴宇峰, 陈庆山, 胡国华. 多环境条件下大豆倒伏性相关形态性状的QTL分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(15): 3029-3039.

FAN Dong-Mei, YANG Zhen, MA Zhan-Zhou, ZENG Qing-Li, DU Xiang-Yu, JIANG Hong-Wei, LIU Chun-Yan, HAN Dong-Wei, LUAN Huai-Hai, PEI Yu-Feng, CHEN Qing-Shan, HU Guo-Hua. QTL Analysis of Lodging-Resistance Related Traits in Soybean in Different Environments[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(15): 3029-3039.

0
/ 收藏文章 0 / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.15.003

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2012/V45/I15/3029

参考文献

[1]Noor R B M, Caviness C E. Influence of induced lodging on pod distribution and seed yield in soybeans. Agronomy Journal, 1980, 72: 904-906.

[2]Wilcox J R, Sediyama T. Interrelationships among height, lodging and yield in determinate and indeterminate soybeans. Euphytica, 1981, 30: 323-326.

[3]Shapiro C A, Flowerday A D. Effect of simulated lodging on soybean yield. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 1987, 158: 8-16.

[4]王勇, 李朝恒. 小麦品种抗倒性的研究进展. 山东农业大学学报, 1996, 27(4): 503-508.

Wang Y, Li C H. Advances in the study of wheat lodging resistance. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 1996, 27(4): 503-508. (in Chinese)

[5]杨慧杰, 杨仁崔, 李义珍, 姜照伟, 郑景生. 水稻茎秆性状与倒伏性的关系. 福建农业科学, 2000, 15(2): 1-7.

Yang H J, Yang R C, Li Y Z, Jiang Z W, Zheng J S. Relationship between culm traits and lodging resistance of rice cultivars. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2000, 15(2): 1-7. (in Chinese)

[6]周丽华. 水稻茎秆性状与抗倒伏关系的研究综述. 中国水稻, 2006, 3: 10-11.

Zhou L H. Research of the culm trait and lodging relationship in rice. 2006, 3: 10-11. (in Chinese)

[7]张忠旭, 陈温福, 杨振玉, 华泽田, 高日玲, 高勇, 赵迎春. 水稻抗倒伏能力与茎秆物理性状的关系及其对产量的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1999, 30(2): 81-85.

Zhang Z X, Chen W F, Yang Z Y, Hua Z T, Gao R L, Gao Y, ZhaoY C. Effect of lodging resistance on yield and its relationship with stalk physical characteristics. Journal of Shengyang Agricultural University, 1999, 30(2): 81-85. (in Chinese)

[8]王勇, 李晴祺. 小麦品种抗倒性评价方法的研究. 华北农业科学, 1995, 10(3): 84-88.

Wang Y, Li Q Q. Evaluation method of stem lodging resistance in wheat. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 1995, 10(3): 84-88. (in Chinese)

[9]Lee S H, Bailey M A, Mian M A R, Carter Jr T E, Ashley D A, Hussey R S, Parrott W A, Boerma H R. Molecular markers associated with soybean plant height, lodging, and maturity across locations. Crop Science, 1996, 36: 728-735.

[10]Orf J H, Chase K, Jarvik T, Mansur L M, Cregan P B, Adler F R, Lark K G. Genetics of soybean agronomic traits: I. Comparison of three related recombinant inbred populations. Crop Science, 1999, 39: 1642-1651.

[11]Wang D, Graef G L, Procopiuk A M, Diers B W. Identification of putative QTL that underlie yield in interspecific soybean backcross populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2004, 108: 458-467.

[12]Kabelka E A, Diers B W, Fehr W R, LeRoy A R, Baianu I C, You T. Neece D J, Nelson R L. Putative alleles for increased yield from soybean plant introductions. Crop Science Society of America, 2004, 44: 784-791.

[13]Zhang W K, Wang Y J, Luo G Z, Zhang J S, He C Y, Wu X L, Gai J Y, Chen S Y. QTL mapping of ten agronomic traits on the soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) genetic map and their association with EST markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2004, 108: 1131-1139.

[14]周蓉, 王贤智, 陈海峰, 张晓娟, 单志慧, 吴学军, 蔡淑平, 邱德珍, 周新安, 吴江生. 大豆倒伏性及其相关性状的QTL分析. 作物学报, 2009, 35(1): 57-65.

Zhou R, Wang X Z, Chen H F, Zhang X J, Shan Z H, Wu X J, Cai S P, Qiu D Z, Zhou X A, Wu J S. QTL analysis of lodging and related traits in soybean. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(1): 57-65. (in Chinese)

[15]王珍. 大豆SSR遗传图谱构建及重要农艺性状QTL分析[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2004.

Wang Z. Construction of soybean SSR based map and QTL analysis important agronomic traits [D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2004. (in Chinese)

[16]周蓉, 涂赣英, 沙爱华, 王贤智, 张小娟, 周新安. 大豆种质的倒伏性调查及其相关农艺性状分析. 大豆科学, 2007, 26(1): 41-44.

Zhou R, Tu G Y, Sha A H, Wang X Z, Zhang X J, Zhou X A. Analysis of lodging and some related agronomic characters in soybean germplasm. Soybean Science, 2007, 26(1): 41-44. (in Chinese)

[17]陈庆山, 刘春燕, 吕东, 何建勋. 大豆 DNA 提取基本原理的探讨. 东北农业大学学报, 2004, 35(2): 129-134.

Chen Q S, Liu C Y, Lü D, He J X. The basic principle of DNA extraction from soybean. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2004, 35(2): 129-134. (in Chinese)

[18]邱丽娟, 常汝镇. 大豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.

Qiu L J, Chang R Z. Descriptors and Data Standard for Soybean (Glycine spp.). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006. (in Chinese)

[19]McCouch S R, Cho Y G, Yano M, Paul E, Blinstrub M, Morishima H, Kinoshita T. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genetics Newsletters, 1997, 14: 11-13.

[20]陈庆山, 张忠臣, 刘春燕, 王伟权, 李文滨. 应用Charleston×东农594重组自交系群体构建SSR大豆遗传图谱. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(7): 1312-1316.

Chen Q S, Zhang Z C, Liu C Y, Wang W Q, Li W B. Construction and analysis of soybean genetic map using recombinant inbred line of Charleston × Dongnong 594. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005, 38(7): 1312-1316. (in Chinese)

[21]陈庆山, 张忠臣, 刘春燕, 辛大伟, 单大鹏, 邱红梅, 单彩云. 大豆主要农艺性状的QTL分析. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(1): 41-47.

Chen Q S, Zhang Z C, Liu C Y, Xin D W, Shan D P, Qiu H M, Shan C Y. QTL analysis of major agronomic traits in soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(1): 41-47. (in Chinese)

[22]单大鹏, 刘春燕, 蒋洪蔚, 董晓慧, 陈庆山, 胡国华. 两种方法定位5个地点大豆蛋白质含量QTL. 中国油料作物学报, 2011, 33(1): 9-14.

Shan D P, Liu C Y, Jiang H W, Dong X H, Chen Q S, Hu G H. QTL analysis of soybean protein content using two methods in 5 different environments. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2011, 33(1): 9-14. (in Chinese)

[23]黄中文, 赵团结, 喻德跃, 陈受宜, 盖钧镒. 大豆产量有关性状QTL的检测. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(12): 4155-4165.

Huang Z W, Zhao T J, Yu D Y, Chen S Y, Gai J Y. Detection of QTLs of yield related traits in soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(12): 4155-4165. (in Chinese)

[24]吴晓雷, 王永军, 贺超英, 陈受宜, 盖钧镒, 王学臣. 大豆重要农艺性状的QTL分析. 遗传学报, 2001, 28(10): 947-955.

Wu X L, Wang Y J, He C Y, Chen S Y, Gai J Y, Wang X C. QTL mapping of some agronomic traits of soybean. Acta Genetica Sinica, 2001, 28(10): 947-955. (in Chinese)

[25]刘春燕, 齐照明, 韩冬伟, 单大鹏, 蒋洪蔚, 陈庆山, 胡国华. 大豆产量相关性状的多年多点QTL分析. 东北农业大学学报, 2010, 41(11): 1-9.

Liu C Y, Qi Z M, Han D W, Shan D P, Jiang H W, Chen Q S, Hu G H. QTL analysis of yield components on soybean under different environment. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2010, 41(11): 1-9. (in Chinese)

[26]Paterson A H, Damon S, Hewitt J D, Zamir D, Rabinowitch H D, Lincoln S E, Lander E S, Tanksley S D. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: Comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics, 1991, 127: 181-197.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

123

HTML			PDF

Just accepted	Online first	Issue	Just accepted	Online first	Issue
0	0	0	0	0	123

From	Others	local

Times	46	77
Rate	37%	63%

Abstract

219

Just accepted	Online first	Issue

0	0	219

From	Others	local

Times	202	17
Rate	92%	8%

Cited

Web of Science	Crossref	ScienceDirect	Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>


This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.

Shared

多环境条件下大豆倒伏性相关形态性状的QTL分析

QTL Analysis of Lodging-Resistance Related Traits in Soybean in Different Environments

PDF

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	董永鑫,卫其巍,洪浩,黄莹,赵延晓,冯明峰,窦道龙,徐毅,陶小荣. 在中国大豆品种上创建ALSV诱导的基因沉默体系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1710-1722.
[2]	李易玲,彭西红,陈平,杜青,任俊波,杨雪丽,雷鹿,雍太文,杨文钰. 减量施氮对套作玉米大豆叶片持绿、光合特性和系统产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[3]	郭世博,张方亮,张镇涛,周丽涛,赵锦,杨晓光. 全球气候变暖对中国种植制度的可能影响XIV.东北大豆高产稳产区及农业气象灾害分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1763-1780.
[4]	马小艳,杨瑜,黄冬琳,王朝辉,高亚军,李永刚,吕辉. 小麦化肥减施与不同轮作方式的周年养分平衡及经济效益分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603.
[5]	阿依木古丽·阿不都热依木,阿尔祖古丽·阿依丁,王家敏,石嘉琛,马芳芳,蔡勇,乔自林. 大豆异黄酮对牦牛卵巢颗粒细胞增殖和凋亡的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1667-1675.
[6]	王绿阳,崔雷鸿,冯江银,洪秋霞,游美敬,保浩宇,杭苏琴. 钙敏感受体和胆囊收缩素-1受体介导大豆蛋白水解物对小鼠食欲的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 807-815.
[7]	姜芬芬, 孙磊, 刘方东, 王吴彬, 邢光南, 张焦平, 张逢凯, 李宁, 李艳, 贺建波, 盖钧镒. 世界大豆生育阶段光温综合反应的地理分化和演化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(3): 451-466.
[8]	闫强,薛冬,胡亚群,周琰琰,韦雅雯,袁星星,陈新. 大豆根特异性GmPR1-9启动子的鉴定及其在根腐病抗性中的应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(20): 3885-3896.
[9]	王巧娟,何虹,李亮,张超,蔡焕杰. 基于AquaCrop模型的大豆灌溉制度优化研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(17): 3365-3379.
[10]	原程,张玉先,王孟雪,黄炳林,辛明强,尹小刚,胡国华,张明聪. 中耕时间和深度对大豆光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 2911-2926.
[11]	赵玎玲,王梦璇,孙天杰,苏伟华,赵志华,肖付明,赵青松,闫龙,张洁,王冬梅. 大豆单锌指蛋白基因GmSZFP的克隆及其在SMV与寄主互作中的功能[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(14): 2685-2695.
[12]	任俊波,杨雪丽,陈平,杜青,彭西红,郑本川,雍太文,杨文钰. 种间距离对玉米-大豆带状套作土壤理化性状及根系空间分布的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(10): 1903-1916.
[13]	刘函西,吕浩,郭广雨,刘冬旭,石岩,孙志君,张泽鑫,张艳娇,文莹楠,王洁琦,刘春燕,陈庆山,辛大伟,王锦辉. 大豆根瘤菌HH103 rhcN突变对结瘤能力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(6): 1104-1111.
[14]	李佳佳,洪慧龙,万明月,储丽,赵敬会,汪明华,徐志鹏,张阴,黄志平,张文明,王晓波,邱丽娟. 基于近红外光谱的大豆茎秆化学组分含量检测模型构建与应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(5): 887-900.
[15]	蔡倩,孙占祥,郑家明,王文斌,白伟,冯良山,杨宁,向午燕,张哲,冯晨. 辽西半干旱区玉米大豆间作模式对作物干物质积累分配、产量及土地生产力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(5): 909-920.