乳杆菌竞争性抑制两种病原菌粘附上皮细胞的研究

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.14.023

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】研究嗜酸乳杆菌(LAB1)在体外模拟预防和治疗条件下，竞争性抑制致病性大肠杆菌(Escherichia coli,E.coli )和沙门氏菌(Salmonella choleraesuis,S.cho)对仔猪空肠上皮细胞系（IPEC-J2）的粘附作用。【方法】用LAB1预处理IPEC-J2后再用E. coli或S.cho攻毒为模拟预防实验；用E. coli或S.cho先攻毒IPEC-J2后再用LAB1处理为模拟治疗试验。提取粘附后的3种菌及IPEC-J2的DNA，使用文献记载和自行设计的引物，利用实时荧光定量PCR方法，量化检测LAB1与E. coli 、S.cho之间的竞争性粘附率。【结果】在模拟治疗试验中，在高（1.0×109 CFU）、中（1.0×108CFU）、低（1.0×107CFU）3种浓度的LAB1处理条件下，能显著抑制高、中浓度S.cho对IPEC-J2的粘附（P＜0.05）；在模拟预防试验中，相同浓度的LAB1能显著抑制相同浓度的S.cho对IPEC-J2的粘附（P＜0.05）。在模拟预防和治疗试验中，3种浓度LAB1均能显著抑制低浓度E. coli对IPEC-J2的粘附（P＜0.05），高浓度LAB1能显著抑制高、中浓度E. coli对IPEC-J2的粘附（P＜0.05）。【结论】在体外试验条件下，LAB1对E. coli及S.cho粘附IPEC-J2有竞争性抑制作用。在模拟预防和治疗试验中，LAB1对E. coli及S.cho粘附IPEC-J2的竞争性抑制作用效果有所不同。

关键词: 荧光定量PCR, 嗜酸乳杆菌, 肠道致病菌, 粘附, IPEC-J2

Abstract: 【Objective】Lactobacillus acidlophilus (separated and identified by the authors’ laboratory, tentatively named LAB1) competitive inhibition of pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella choleraesuis adhesion to jejunum epithelial cells (IPEC-J2) in the conditions of prevention and treatment in vitro was studied. 【Method】 IPEC-J2 cells were pretreated with LAB1 and then exposed to E. coli or S. choleraesuis which were used as simulated prevention trials. IPEC-J2 cells were exposed to E. coli or S. choleraesuis and then treated with LAB1 which were used as simulated treatment trials .Cells and three kinds of bacterial DNA were purified after bacteria adhesion to IPEC-J2 cells. The relative amount of bacteria attached was determined by amplification of the special gene relative to documented and self-designed primers, in the presence of SYBR Green. 【Result】In the simulated treatment experiment, three concentrations of LAB1 significantly inhibited 108CFU S.choleraesuis adherence to IPEC-J2 cells (P＜0.05). In the simulated prevention trial, the same concentrations of LAB1 significantly inhibited S.cho leraesuisadhesion of IPEC-J2 cells (P＜0.05). Simulation of the prevention and treatment trials, three concentrations of LAB1 significantly inhibited the 107CFU of E. coli adhesion to IPEC-J2 cells (P＜0.05), and 109CFU LAB1 significantly inhibited the adhesion of the 109CFU of E. coli to IPEC-J2 cells (P＜0.05). 【Conclusion】LAB1 have competitive inhibition on E. coli and S.cho adhesion to IPEC-J2 cells in vitro, the effect of LAB1 inhibition on E. coli and S.choleraesuis adhesion to IPEC-J2 cells in simulation of the prevention and treatment experiments is different.

Key words: FQ-PCR, Lactobacillus acidlophilus, enteric pathogens, adhesion, IPEC-J2

陈德龙, 许光勇, 朱宏亮, 任晓明. 乳杆菌竞争性抑制两种病原菌粘附上皮细胞的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(14): 2991-2998.

CHEN De-Long, XU Guang-Yong, ZHU Hong-Liang, REN Xiao-Ming. Study of the Lactobacillus Competitive Inhibition of Two Kinds of Pathogenic Bacteria Adhesion to Jejunum Epithelial Cells[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(14): 2991-2998.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.14.023

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2012/V45/I14/2991

参考文献

[1]陈弟诗, 郭万柱, 陈杨, 李雯. 猪沙门氏菌病与猪肉食品安全. 猪业科学, 2010, 27(2):78-81.

Chen D S, Guo W Z, Chen Y, Li W. Salmonellosis in pig and the safety of pork food. Swine Industry Science, 2010, 27(2):78-81. (in Chinese)

[2]刘峰, 张进, 刘毅. 猪大肠杆菌病防治研究进展. 湖南畜牧兽医, 2010, 6:1-3.

Liu F, Zhang J, Liu Y. Progress on Escherichia coli disease prevention. Hunan Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2010, 6:1-3.(in Chinese)

[3]Fuller R. Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Application for Bacteriol, 1989, 66(3) : 365-378.

[4]宋艳画, 胡文举, 辛鹏程. 益生菌对机体免疫调节作用研究进展. 动物医学进展, 2008, 29(12): 86-89.

Song Y H, Hu W J, Xin P C. Progress on immunoregulation mechanisms of probiotics. Progress in Veterinary Medicine, 2008, 29(12): 86-89. (in Chinese)

[5]董珂, 刘晶星, 郭晓奎. 益生菌增强机体免疫和抗肿瘤作用的分子机制. 中国微生态学杂志, 2005, 17(1):79-80.

Dong K, Liu J X, Guo X K. The molecular mechanism of probiotics enhance the immune and antitumor. Chinese Journal of Microecology, 2005, 17(1):79-80.(in Chinese)

[6]Ozbas Z Y, Aytac S A. Behaviour of Yersinia enterocolitica and Aeromonas hydrophila in skim milk during fermentation by various lactobacilli . Z Lebensm Unters Forsch, 1996, 202(1):324-328.

[7]吕利军, 季海峰. 乳酸菌微胶囊及其合生素对仔猪生产性能和免疫力的影响. 畜牧与兽医, 2009, 41(2):35-37.

Lǘ L J, Ji H F. The lactobacilli microcapsule and its synbiotics affect on growth performance and immunity of pig. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2009, 41(2): 35-37. (in Chinese)

[8]Ouwehan A C, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Probiotics: An overview of beneficial effects. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2002, 82: 279-289.

[9]杨彩梅, 刘金松, 王勇飞. 抗生素的抗药性. 饲料工业, 2000, 21(9): 42-45.

Yang C M, Liu J S, Wang Y F. The resistance of antibiotic. Feed Industry, 2000, 21(9):42-45. (in Chinese)

[10]Bernet M F, Brassart D, Neeser J R, Servin A L. Adhesion of human bifidobacterial strains to cultured human intestinal epithelial cells and inhibition of enteropathogen-cell interactions. Environmental Microbiology, 1993, 59: 4121-4128.

[11]Reid G, Servin A L, Bruce A W, Busscher H J. Adhesion of three Lactobacillus strains to human urinary and intestinal epithelial cells. Microbios, 1993, 75(302): 57-65.

[12]郝小燕, 赵卫, 曹虹. 益生菌抑制大肠埃希菌k1株黏附与侵袭的实验研究. 热带医学杂志, 2010, 10(5):524-527.

Hao X Y, Zhao W, Cao H. Inhibition of the adherence and invasion of E.coli k1 by probiotics. Journal of Tropical Medicine, 2010, 10(5): 524-527. (in Chinese)

[13]倪学勤, Joshua Gong, 曾东, Hai Yu, Weido Si, 周小秋. 猪源乳酸杆菌对鼠伤寒沙门氏菌DT104在猪肠道上皮细胞IPEC-J2上粘附的影响. 微生物学通报, 2008, 35(7): 1072-1077.

Ni X Q, Gong J, Zen D, Yu H, Si W, Zhou X Q. Ability of pig Lactobacilli strains to inhibit Salmonella typhimurium DT104 adhesion and invasion on pig intestial epithelial IPEC-J2 cells. Microbiology, 2008, 35(7): 1072-1077. (in Chinese)

[14]王静. 联合益生菌抗病作用的应用基础研究[D]. 北京: 北京农学院, 2010.

Wang J. Applied basic research on resistance effects of combine probiotics[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Agriculture, 2010. (in Chinese)

[15]Trkov M, Avgustin G. An improved 16S rRNA based PCR method for the specific detection of Salmonella enterica. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2002, 80 :67-75.

[16]Wang R F, Cao W W, Cerniglia C E. PCR detection and quantification of predominant anaerobic bacteria in human and animal fecal samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1996, 62: 1242-1247.

[17]Hori K, Matsumoto S. Bacterial adhesion: From mechanism to control. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 48: 424-434.

[18]Duchman R, Kaiser I, Hemann E, Mayet W, Ewe K, Meyer Zum Büschenfelde K H. Tolerance exists towards resident intestinal flora but is broker in active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Clinical & Experimental Immunology, 1995, 102(3):448-455.

[19]王文梅, 许丽, 王秋菊. 乳酸菌对动物肠道的黏附作用研究进展. 东北农业大学学报, 2009, 40(12):120-124.

Wang W M, Xu L, Wang Q J. Progress in adhesion of lactic acid bacteria to animal intestines. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2009, 40(12):120-124. (in Chinese)

[20]张有安, 窦春香. 嗜酸乳杆菌制剂对致病性大肠杆菌抑制及控制仔猪腹泻实验. 中兽医学杂志, 2009, 4:54-55.

Zhang Y A, Dou C X. The test of Lactobacillus acidophilus preparation against pathogenic Escherichia coli suppression and control the piglet diarrhea. Chinese Journal of Traditional Veterinary Science, 2009, 4:54-55. (in Chinese)

[21]Brzuszkiewicz E, Bruggemann H, Liesegang H, Emmerth M, Ölschläger T, Nagy G, Albermann K, Wagner C, Buchrieser C, Em?dy L, Gottschalk G, Hacker J, Dobrindt U. How to become a uropathogen: comparative genomic analysis of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli strains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(34): 12879-12884.

[22]Collado M C, Gueimonde M, Hernandez M, Sanz, Y, Salminen, S. Adhesion of selected Bifidobacterium strains to human intestinal mucus and the role of adhesion in enteropathogen exclusion. Food Protect, 2005, 68: 2672-2678.

[23]Tuomola E M, Ouwehand A C, Salminen S J. The effect of probiotic bacteria on the adhesion of pathogens to human intestinal mucus. Immunology Medical Microbiology, 1999, 26: 137-142.

[24]Burkholder K M, Bhunia A K. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium adhesion and cytotoxicity during epithelial cell stress is reduced by Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Gut Pathogens, 2009,1:14.

[25]Candelaa M, Seiboldb G, Vitalia B, Lachenmaierb S, Eikmannsb B J, Brigidia P. Real-time PCR quantification of bacterial adhesion to Caco-2 cells:Competition between bifidobacteria and enteropathogens. Research in Microbiology, 2005, 156:887-895.