橘小实蝇产卵抗/感非挥发性决策性状筛选及评价

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.19.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】分析桃果非挥发性性状与橘小实蝇（Bactrocera dorsalis）产卵的关系，确定受害风险最佳标志指标及抗/感范围，明确主要指标的类别相关性特征。【方法】以涵盖不同物理、绒毛、矿质元素和生理特征的13种代表性桃果品种为试材，测定4类60个非挥发性决策性状，室内开展橘小实蝇产卵试验，将不同性状与果实内平均幼虫数进行相关性、聚类分析，明确受害风险最佳标志指标及抗/感范围，评价其他主要指标抗/感表现。【结果】4种类型非挥发性决策性状与平均幼虫数相关系数绝对值平均数由大到小依次为生理指标（0.21，18种）>果实物理（0.19，18种）>绒毛指标（0.18，7种）=矿质元素（0.18，17种）。简单相关分析可知，达到低度相关水平以上的指标共17个，相关系数绝对值由大到小依次为镁（-0.57）>硬度（-0.53）>钙（-0.52）>硒（-0.48）>绒毛长短数比（-0.45）>长绒毛密度（-0.44）>背阴面-L*（0.43）>游离氨基酸（-0.41）>横径（0.38）>淀粉（0.37）>盐（-0.35）>单果重（0.33）=pH（0.33）>单宁（-0.32）=花青素（-0.32）=果实含水量（0.32）=综合-L*（0.32）。背阴面-L和镁含量分别表现正、负相关最大值，氮和蛋白质相关系数为0。镁、硬度和钙3个指标达到显著相关水平，说明中量元素和硬度对橘小实蝇产卵抗/感影响最大。综合分析认为：镁为桃果实受害风险大小的最佳标志指标。根据镁含量绝对值和果实受害情况，采用聚类分析法将≥1.50 g·kg^-1者判定为低风险受害品种，即为高抗品种；≤0.92 g·kg^-1者判定为高风险受害品种，即为易感品种；而其中间者为中性品种。【结论】桃果非挥发性性状影响橘小实蝇产卵选择性。中量元素（镁、钙）和硬度3个指标显著影响该虫产卵选择，且均呈现负相关。选定镁为桃果实受害风险大小的最佳标志指标。硒等14种低度相关决策性状对产卵选择影响存在差异性，正负各7种，正相关者除淀粉和pH外均为物理指标，负相关者为矿质元素（1种）、绒毛（2种）和生理（4种）指标。结合果实受害情况，初步将≥1.50 g·kg^-1者划归为高抗品种；≤0.92 g·kg^-1者为易感品种；而其中间者为中性品种。

关键词: 橘小实蝇, 产卵, 非挥发性, 抗/感性状, 决策性状

Abstract:

【Objective】The objective of this study is to analyze the relationship between the non-volatile traits of peach fruit and the oviposition of Bactrocera dorsalis, determine the best indicator of the risk of injury and the range of resistance and susceptibility, and to clarify the classification correlation characteristics of the main indicators.【Method】Using 13 representative peach varieties with different physical, villus, mineral elements and physiological characteristics as test materials, 60 non-volatile decision-making traits of 4 types were determined, and the selection test of the oviposition of B. dorsalis was carried out in the laboratory. The correlation and cluster analysis of the different traits and the average larval number in the fruit were carried out to determine the best indicator of the risk of injury and the range of resistance and susceptibility, and the performance of other main indicators was evaluated.【Result】The average absolute value of the correlation coefficient between the 4 types of non-volatile decision-making traits and the average number of larvae was in the order of physiological indicators (0.21, 18 species)>fruit physics (0.19, 18 species)>villus indicators (0.18, 7 species)=mineral elements (0.18, 17 species). Simple correlation analysis showed that there were 17 indicators above the low correlation level. The absolute values of the correlation coefficient from large to small were magnesium (-0.57)>hardness (-0.53)>calcium (-0.52)>selenium (-0.48)>long/short of villus (-0.45)>density of long villus (-0.44)>shady facets-L* (0.43)>free amino acid (-0.41)>transverse diameter (0.38)>amylum (0.37)>salt (-0.35)>single fruit weight (0.33) = pH (0.33)>tannin (-0.32) = anthocyanin (-0.32) = fruit water content (0.32) = Synthesis-L* (0.32). Shady facets-L and magnesium content showed the maximum positive and negative correlation, respectively, the correlation coefficient of nitrogen and protein was 0. The three indicators of magnesium, hardness and calcium reached a significant correlation level, indicating that the medium elements and hardness had the greatest impact on the oviposition resistance of B. dorsalis. The comprehensive analysis showed that magnesium was the best indicator of peach fruit damage risk. According to the absolute value of magnesium content and the degree of fruit damage, cluster analysis method was used to determine those ≥1.50 g·kg^-1as low-risk damaged varieties, that was the high-resistance variety, ≤0.92 g·kg^-1was judged as high-risk victimized varieties, that was the susceptible variety, and the middle were neutral varieties.【Conclusion】The non-volatile trait of peach fruit affects the oviposition selectivity of B. dorsalis. Medium elements (magnesium, calcium) and hardness significantly affect the oviposition selection of B. dorsalis, and all show negative correlation. Magnesium was selected as the best indicator of peach fruit damage risk. There are differences in the effects of 14 low degree related decision-making traits such as selenium on oviposition preference, with 7 positive and 7 negative. The positive correlated traits are all physical indicators except for amylum and pH, while the negative correlated traits are mineral element (1), villus (2), and physiological (4) indicators. Based on the situation of fruit damage, individuals≥1.50 g·kg^-1were preliminarily classified as high resistance varieties; ≤0.92 g·kg^-1were susceptible varieties, while the middle were neutral varieties.

Key words: Bactrocera dorsalis, oviposition, non-volatile, resistant and susceptible trait, decision-making trait

宫庆涛, 李淼, 高晓兰, 张坤鹏, 李桂祥, 董晓民, 李素红, 张安宁. 橘小实蝇产卵抗/感非挥发性决策性状筛选及评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(19): 3799-3813.

GONG QingTao, LI Miao, GAO XiaoLan, ZHANG KunPeng, LI GuiXiang, DONG XiaoMin, LI SuHong, ZHANG AnNing. Screening and Evaluation of Non-Volatile Decision-Making Traits of Oviposition Resistance and Susceptibility of Bactrocera dorsalis[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(19): 3799-3813.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.19.008

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2023/V56/I19/3799

图/表 8

图1

表1

果实物理指标与平均幼虫数相关性"

项目 Item		果实含水量 Fruit water content (%)	横径 Transverse diameter (cm)	纵径 Vertical diameter (cm)	纵/横 Vertical/ Transverse diameter	单果重 Single fruit weight (g)	硬度 Hardness (kg·cm^-2)	向阳面 Sunny facets				背阴面 Shady facets				综合 Synthesis				平均幼虫数 Average larva number
项目 Item		果实含水量 Fruit water content (%)	横径 Transverse diameter (cm)	纵径 Vertical diameter (cm)	纵/横 Vertical/ Transverse diameter	单果重 Single fruit weight (g)	硬度 Hardness (kg·cm^-2)	L*	a*	b*	a/b	L*	a*	b*	a/b	L*	a*	b*	a/b	平均幼虫数 Average larva number
果实含水量 Fruit water content (%)		1.00
横径 Transverse diameter (cm)		0.37	1.00
纵径 Vertical diameter (cm)		0.34	0.62*	1.00
纵/横 Vertical/Transverse diameter		0.07	-0.22	0.63*	1.00
单果重 Single fruit weight (g)		0.36	0.89**	0.86**	0.20	1.00
硬度 Hardness (kg·cm^-2)		-0.49	-0.33	-0.19	0.11	-0.21	1.00
向阳面 Sunny facets	L*	-0.20	-0.21	-0.13	0.04	-0.26	0.27	1.00
	a*	0.37	0.62*	0.63*	0.16	0.67*	-0.53*	-0.77*	1.00
	b*	-0.40	-0.27	-0.39	-0.23	-0.39	0.30	0.80**	-0.75*	1.00
	a/b	0.32	0.46	0.58*	0.26	0.58*	-0.39	-0.86**	0.96**	-0.83**	1.00
背阴面 Shady facets	L*	-0.19	0.09	0.15	0.10	0.04	0.14	0.83**	-0.44	0.53*	-0.61*	1.00
	a*	0.42	0.51*	0.60*	0.23	0.60*	-0.51*	-0.74*	0.91**	-0.68*	0.93**	-0.59*	1.00
	b*	-0.40	-0.11	-0.34	-0.31	-0.29	0.28	0.74*	-0.64*	0.97**	-0.75*	0.54*	-0.62*	1.00
	a/b	0.46	0.46	0.54*	0.22	0.57*	-0.41	-0.78*	0.85**	-0.72*	0.92**	-0.70*	0.97**	-0.69*	1.00
综合 Synthesis	L*	-0.21	-0.08	-0.01	0.07	-0.13	0.22	0.97**	-0.66*	0.72*	-0.78*	0.94**	-0.70*	0.68*	-0.78*	1.00
	a*	0.40	0.58*	0.63*	0.20	0.65*	-0.53*	-0.77**	0.98**	-0.73*	0.97**	-0.52*	0.97**	-0.64*	0.93**	-0.69*	1.00
	b*	-0.40	-0.20	-0.37	-0.27	-0.34	0.29	0.78*	-0.70*	0.99**	-0.80**	0.54*	-0.65*	0.99**	-0.71*	0.71*	-0.70*	1.00
	a/b	0.40	0.48	0.58*	0.24	0.60*	-0.41	-0.83**	0.93**	-0.80**	0.98**	-0.66*	0.97**	-0.74*	0.98**	-0.79*	0.97*	-0.77*	1.00
平均幼虫数 Average larva number		0.32	0.38	0.23	-0.10	0.33	-0.53*	0.22	0.05	0.04	-0.12	0.43	-0.03	0.05	-0.10	0.32	0.01	0.05	-0.10	1.00

表1

图2

图3

表2

表3

表4

果实生理指标与平均幼虫数相关性"

项目 Item		可溶性固形物 Soluble solid (%)	可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (%)	可滴定酸 Titratable acid (%)	糖/酸 Sugar/ acid	盐 Salt (%)	淀粉 Amylum (%)	游离氨基酸 Free amino acid (mg·g^-1)	蛋白质 Protein (%)	脂肪 Lipid (%)	Vc (mg·100 g^-1)	单宁 Tannin (g·kg^-1)	pH	脂溶性色素 Fat-soluble pigment				水溶性色素Water-soluble pigment		平均幼虫数Average larva number
项目 Item		可溶性固形物 Soluble solid (%)	可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (%)	可滴定酸 Titratable acid (%)	糖/酸 Sugar/ acid	盐 Salt (%)	淀粉 Amylum (%)	游离氨基酸 Free amino acid (mg·g^-1)	蛋白质 Protein (%)	脂肪 Lipid (%)	Vc (mg·100 g^-1)	单宁 Tannin (g·kg^-1)	pH	胡萝卜Carotene (mg·kg^-1)	叶黄素Lutein (mg·kg^-1)	叶绿素a Chlorophyll a (mg·kg^-1)	叶绿素b Chlorophyll b (mg·kg^-1)	类黄酮Flavonoid (mg·g^-1)	花青素Anthocyanin (nmol·g^-1)	平均幼虫数Average larva number
可溶性固形物 Soluble solid (%)		1.00
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (%)		0.18	1.00
可滴定酸 Titratable acid (%)		0.17	-0.61	1.00
糖/酸Sugar/acid		0.15	0.91	-0.83	1.00
盐Salt (%)		0.47	-0.54	0.46	-0.50	1.00
淀粉Amylum (%)		0.03	0.30	-0.20	0.16	-0.06	1.00
游离氨基酸 Free amino acid (mg·g^-1)		0.29	-0.22	0.48	-0.34	0.58	-0.01	1.00
蛋白质Protein (%)		0.09	-0.51	0.61	-0.69	0.45	0.34	0.46	1.00
脂肪Lipid (%)		0.12	0.01	0.28	-0.16	0.36	0.06	0.50	0.40	1.00
Vc (mg·100 g^-1)		-0.05	-0.17	0.32	-0.25	0.19	-0.13	0.17	0.08	0.50	1.00
单宁Tannin (g·kg^-1)		0.59	-0.44	0.60	-0.41	0.78	-0.25	0.65	0.29	0.24	0.16	1.00
pH		-0.17	-0.04	-0.57	0.17	0.04	0.36	-0.28	0.17	-0.24	-0.44	-0.30	1.00
脂溶性色素 Fat- soluble pigment	胡萝卜素 Carotene (mg·kg^-1)	0.02	-0.16	0.31	-0.26	0.15	-0.11	0.33	0.46	0.28	0.51	0.05	-0.06	1.00
	叶黄素 Lutein (mg·kg^-1)	0.08	-0.18	0.29	-0.26	0.23	-0.04	0.35	0.50	0.32	0.48	0.09	0.01	0.99	1.00
	叶绿素a Chlorophyll a (mg·kg^-1)	0.16	-0.47	0.35	-0.42	0.53	-0.43	0.38	0.45	0.23	-0.04	0.55	0.21	0.25	0.25	1.00
	叶绿素b Chlorophyll b (mg·kg^-1)	-0.39	0.09	-0.30	0.13	-0.32	-0.21	-0.33	-0.60	-0.38	0	-0.49	-0.20	-0.32	-0.37	-0.54	1.00
水溶性色素 Water- soluble pigment	类黄酮 Flavonoid (mg·g^-1)	0.37	-0.50	0.41	-0.42	0.76	-0.20	0.52	0.49	0.38	0.15	0.81	0.14	0.23	0.29	0.82	-0.70	1.00
水溶性色素 Water- soluble pigment	花青素 Anthocyanin (nmol·g^-1)	0.24	-0.56	0.63	-0.58	0.67	-0.37	0.58	0.49	0.21	0.38	0.67	-0.14	0.67	0.67	0.70	-0.41	0.73	1.00
平均幼虫数 Average larva number		-0.25	-0.03	-0.29	0.05	-0.35	0.37	-0.41	0	-0.23	0.21	-0.32	0.33	-0.12	-0.16	-0.18	-0.01	-0.18	-0.32	1.00

表4

图4

参考文献 45

[1]	宫庆涛, 李素红, 张坤鹏, 贾厚振, 姜莉莉, 武海斌, 商明清, 张可欣, 孙瑞红. 橘小实蝇发生与环境关系研究进展. 植物检疫, 2022, 36(5): 17-26.
	GONG Q T, LI S H, ZHANG K P, JIA H Z, JIANG L L, WU H B, SHANG M Q, ZHANG K X, SUN R H. Research advances on relationship between occurrence of Bactrocera dorsalis and environment. Plant Quarantine, 2022, 36(5): 17-26. (in Chinese)
[2]	郭予元. 中国农作物病虫害(第二册). 3 版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2015: 1145-1149.
	GUO Y Y. Crop Diseases and Insect Pests in China. (Vol.Ⅱ). 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2015: 1145-1149. (in Chinese)
[3]	WANG Y H, FANG G Q, XU P H, GAO B L, LIU X J, QI X W, ZHANG G J, CAO S, LI Z H, REN X M, WANG H R, CAO Y H, PEREIRA R, HUANG Y P, NIU C Y, ZHAN S. Behavioral and genomic divergence between a generalist and a specialist fly. Cell Reports, 2022, 41: 111654. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111654
[4]	PIETERSE W, MANRAKHAN A, TERBLANCHE J S, ADDISON P. Comparative demography of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on deciduous fruit. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 2020, 110(2): 185-194. doi: 10.1017/S0007485319000592
[5]	张淑颖, 肖春, 孙阳. 实蝇类害虫对寄主的选择. 江西农业学报, 2006, 18(5): 92-95, 101.
	ZHANG S Y, XIAO C, SUN Y. Host selection of insect pests in Trypetidae. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2006, 18(5): 92-95, 101. (in Chinese)
[6]	黄慧欣, 李媛, 黄爱玲, 王小云, 郑霞林, 陆温. 橘小实蝇对5个品种火龙果果实的产卵选择. 果树学报, 2021, 38(3): 394-402.
	HUANG H X, LI Y, HUANG A L, WANG X Y, ZHENG X L, LU W. Oviposition preference of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) to five varieties of pitaya. Journal of Fruit Science, 2021, 38(3): 394-402. (in Chinese)
[7]	KRODER S, MESSING R H. A new parasitoid from Kenya, Fopius ceratitivorus, complements the extant parasitoid guild attacking Mediterranean fruit fly in Hawaii. Biological Control, 2010, 53(2): 223-229. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.01.003
[8]	SILVA R, CLARKE A R. The “sequential cues hypothesis”: A conceptual model to explain host location and ranking by polyphagous herbivores. Insect Science, 2020, 27(6): 1136-1147. doi: 10.1111/ins.v27.6
[9]	郭腾达, 宫庆涛, 孙瑞红, 武海斌, 姜莉莉. 橘小实蝇对桃果实的产卵选择. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(4): 92-98. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0266
	GUO T D, GONG Q T, SUN R H, WU H B, JIANG L L. Oviposition preference of Bactrocera dorsalis on peach. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 92-98. (in Chinese)
[10]	郭腾达, 姜莉莉, 孙瑞红, 宫庆涛, 叶保华. 橘小实蝇危害3种苹果的风险评估. 果树学报, 2021, 38(2): 231-241.
	GUO T D, JIANG L L, SUN R H, GONG Q T, YE B H. Risk evaluation of three apple cultivars affected by Bactrocera dorsalis. Journal of Fruit Science, 2021, 38(2): 231-241. (in Chinese)
[11]	蔡子坚, 胡菡青, 韦晓霞, 陈瑾, 林雄杰, 范国成, 吴如健. 杨桃果实性状与橘小实蝇危害严重度的关系. 福建农业学报, 2012, 27(12): 1298-1302.
	CAI Z J, HU H Q, WEI X X, CHEN J, LIN X J, FAN G C, WU R J. Traits and damage of carambola fruit by Bactrocera dorsalis. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 27(12): 1298-1302. (in Chinese)
[12]	RATTANAPUN W, AMORNSAK W, CLARKE A R. Is a mango just a mango? Testing within-fruit oviposition site choice and larval performance of a highly polyphagous fruit fly. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 2010, 4: 35-44. doi: 10.1007/s11829-009-9083-6
[13]	梁丹辉, 陈冉, 周琼. 桔小实蝇成虫对不同颜色和气味物质的趋性反应. 生命科学研究, 2016, 20(1): 36-39, 62.
	LIANG D H, CHEN R, ZHOU Q. Responsiveness of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) adult to different colours and odorants. Life Science Research, 2016, 20(1): 36-39, 62. (in Chinese)
[14]	陈海燕, 林珠凤, 秦双, 王海洪, 潘飞, 吉训聪. 不同颜色粘板及4种实蝇类害虫粘板诱捕桔小实蝇成虫效果的评价. 中国热带农业, 2018(1): 43-44, 48.
	CHEN H Y, LIN Z F, QIN S, WANG H H, PAN F, JI X C. Evaluation of trapping effect of different color sticky cards and four kinds of sticky cards of fruit fly pests on adults of Bactrocera dorsalis. China Tropical Agriculture, 2018(1): 43-44, 48. (in Chinese)
[15]	龚碧涯, 刘慧, 向敏, 杨水芝, 肖伏莲, 刘娟, 李先信. 三种果园中实蝇粘虫板对橘小实蝇及天敌的诱杀作用. 植物保护学报, 2021, 48(4): 839-847.
	GONG B Y, LIU H, XIANG M, YANG S Z, XIAO F L, LIU J, LI X X. Effectiveness of sticky traps in trapping oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis and the natural enemies in three kinds of orchards. Journal of Plant Protection, 2021, 48(4): 839-847. (in Chinese)
[16]	杨琴, 罗德诚, 杨毅娟, 李云国, 张锐, 石安宪, 肖春. 不同颜色实蝇粘虫板对桔小实蝇及天敌昆虫的诱捕效果. 应用昆虫学报, 2021, 58(5): 1176-1182.
	YANG Q, LUO D C, YANG Y J, LI Y G, ZHANG R, SHI A X, XIAO C. Relative numbers of the fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis, and natural enemies of insect pests, trapped on different colored sticky boards. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2021, 58(5): 1176-1182. (in Chinese)
[17]	黄爱玲, 王小云, 陆温, 郑霞林. 橘小实蝇对不同寄主果实的产卵偏好及其与寄主果实理化性质的相关性. 植物保护学报, 2022, 49(2): 595-602.
	HUANG A L, WANG X Y, LU W, ZHENG X L. Ovipositional preference of oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis to different host fruits and its correlation with physical and chemical properties of host fruits. Journal of Plant Protection, 2022, 49(2): 595-602. (in Chinese)
[18]	梁薇, 麻亚辉, 陈丽慧, 魏洪义. 寄主植物对植食性昆虫选择行为影响的研究进展. 生物灾害科学, 2022, 45(3): 299-304.
	LIANG W, MA Y H, CHEN L H, WEI H Y. Research progress in the influence of host plants on the selection behaviors of herbivorous insects. Biological Disaster Science, 2022, 45(3): 299-304. (in Chinese)
[19]	YU J X, HUI Y M, XUE J A, QU J B, LING S Q, WANG W, ZENG X N, LIU J L. Formation characteristics of long-term memory in Bactrocera dorsalis. Insect Science, 2023, 30(3): 829-843. doi: 10.1111/ins.v30.3
[20]	陈凯歌, 邱雪兰, 杜虎斌, 曾鑫年. 番石榴果肉挥发物化学组成及对桔小实蝇产卵行为的影响. 环境昆虫学报, 2012, 34(4): 425-431.
	CHEN K G, QIU X L, DU H B, ZENG X N. Chemical constituents of guava fruit flesh volatiles and their effect on oviposition behavior of oriental fruit fly. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2012, 34(4): 425-431. (in Chinese)
[21]	张国娜, 王进军. 桔小实蝇对几种寄主挥发物的触角电位反应. 环境昆虫学报, 2016, 38(1): 126-131.
	ZHANG G N, WANG J J. Electrophysiological responses of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis to host-plant related volatiles. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2016, 38(1): 126-131. (in Chinese)
[22]	申建梅, 姚鑫, 陆永跃, 郭晓洁, 胡黎明. 香梨对桔小实蝇的引诱作用及挥发物成分的GC-MS分析. 广东农业科学, 2017, 44(9): 94-99.
	SHEN J M, YAO X, LU Y Y, GUO X J, HU L M. Attractive effect to Bactrocera dorsalis and the GC-MS analysis of volatiles components from Pyrus brestschneideri Rehd. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 44(9): 94-99. (in Chinese)
[23]	高俊山, 蔡永萍. 植物生理学实验指导. 2 版. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2018: 3-4.
	GAO J S, CAI Y P. Experimental Guidance of Plant Physiology. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2018: 3-4. (in Chinese)
[24]	刘萍, 李明军. 植物生理学实验. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 95-96.
	LIU P, LI M J. Plant Physiology Experiment. 2nd ed. Beijing: Science Press, 2016: 95-96. (in Chinese)
[25]	白东海. 欧李果实类黄酮物质提取、组分鉴定及抗氧化能力研究[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2015.
	BAI D H. Extraction, component identification, and antioxidant ability of flavonoids from fruits of Chinese dwarf cherry (Cerasus humilis (Bge) Sok)[D]. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[26]	BURRACK H J, ZALOM F G. Olive fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) ovipositional preference and larval performance in several commercially important olive varieties in California. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2008, 101(3): 750-758. pmid: 18613575
[27]	EKESI S, NDERITU P W, CHANG C L. Adaptation to and small-scale rearing of invasive fruit fly Bactrocera invadens (Diptera Tephritidae) on artificial diet. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2007, 100(4): 562-567. doi: 10.1603/0013-8746(2007)100[562:ATASRO]2.0.CO;2
[28]	钦俊德. 昆虫与植物的关系. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987: 22-29.
	QIN J D. The Relationship Between Insects and Plants. Beijing: Science Press, 1987: 22-29. (in Chinese)
[29]	JAENIKE J. On optimal oviposition behaviour in phytophagous insects. Theoretical Population Biology, 1978, 14: 350-356. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90012-6
[30]	胡陇生, 朱银飞, 齐长江, 任玲, 田呈明. 枣实蝇产卵选择习性研究. 植物保护, 2012, 38(6): 65-71.
	HU L S, ZHU Y F, QI C J, REN L, TIAN C M. Oviposition preference of ber fruit fly. Plant Protection, 2012, 38(6): 65-71. (in Chinese)
[31]	张璐. 四种不同产卵方式昆虫的产卵器感器比较研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2015.
	ZHANG L. Comparative study on ovipositor sensilla of insects with four types of different oviposition strategies[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[32]	王雨, 王舰, 吴问其, 赵惠燕, 胡想顺, 张改生. 扫描电镜下的小麦叶毛性状与麦长管蚜生物学参数相关性分析. 植物保护学报, 2014, 41(4): 474-481.
	WANG Y, WANG J, WU W Q, ZHAO H Y, HU X S, ZHANG G S. Correlations between physical characters of wheat leaf hairs in SEM and the biological parameters of grain aphid Stiobion avenae. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2014, 41(4): 474-481. (in Chinese)
[33]	张晓明, 杨念婉, 万方浩. 田间不同植物上烟粉虱种群密度. 生态学报, 2014, 34(16): 4652-4661.
	ZHANG X M, YANG N W, WAN F H. Population density of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on different plants in the field. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(16): 4652-4661. (in Chinese)
[34]	张慧英, 杨雪梅. 棉花叶片茸毛分布及其与棉铃虫产卵的关系. 植物保护学报, 1994, 21(4): 296, 304.
	ZHANG H Y, YANG X M. Observations on the distribution of cotton leaf pubescence as related to the oviposition of cotton bollworm. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 1994, 21(4): 296, 304. (in Chinese)
[35]	庞保平, 鲍祖胜, 周晓榕, 程家安. 寄主挥发物、叶色和表皮毛在美洲斑潜蝇寄主选择中的作用. 生态学报, 2004, 24(3): 547-551.
	PANG B P, BAO Z S, ZHOU X R, CHENG J A. Effects of host volatiles, leaf color, and cuticular trichomes on host selection by Liriomyza sativae Blanchard. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(3): 547-551. (in Chinese)
[36]	成卫宁, 仵均祥, 李修炼, 李建军. 美洲斑潜蝇寄主抗虫性与寄主叶片化学物质和物理结构的关系. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 45(5): 71-75.
	CHENG W N, WU J X, LI X L, LI J J. Influence of chemicals and physical structure characteristics of host plant leaves on resistance to Liriomyza sativae Blanchard. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 2006, 45(5): 71-75. (in Chinese)
[37]	杜迎刚, 季清娥, 陈家骅, 赖钟雄. 蛋白质对橘小实蝇生殖的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(4): 73-75.
	DU Y G, JI Q E, CHEN J H, LAI Z X. Effect of protein on the reproduction of Bactrocera dorsalis. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(4): 73-75. (in Chinese)
[38]	丁红建, 郭予元. 小麦籽粒内含物及组织学结构与抗吸浆虫关系的研究. 中国农业科学, 1993, 26(1): 56-62.
	DING H J, GUO Y Y. Studies on the relationship between the components and the structure of wheat kernel and the resistance mechanism to wheat midge. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1993, 26(1): 56-62. (in Chinese)
[39]	李会平, 王志刚, 杨敏生, 张彦广, 黄大庄, 张世红. 杨树单宁与酚类物质种类及含量与光肩星天牛危害之间关系的研究. 河北农业大学学报, 2003, 26(1): 36-39.
	LI H P, WANG Z G, YANG M S, ZHANG Y G, HUANG D Z, ZHANG S H. The relation between tannin and phenol constituents and resistance to Anoplophora glabripennis of various poplar tree species. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2003, 26(1): 36-39. (in Chinese)
[40]	杨宇晖, 张青文, 刘小侠. 棉花营养物质和单宁含量与其对绿盲蝽抗性的关系. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(22): 4688-4697. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.22.006.
	YANG Y H, ZHANG Q W, LIU X X. The relationship between the contents of nutrients and tannins in different cotton varieties and their resistance to Apolygus lucorum. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(22): 4688-4697. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.22.006. (in Chinese)
[41]	李科明, 舒海燕, 常胜合, 詹儒林. 香蕉叶柄和假茎单宁含量与抗假茎象甲关系研究. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(2): 157-159.
	LI K M, SHU H Y, CHANG S H, ZHAN R L. Correlation between tannin content in petiole and pseudostem of banana and its resistance to Odoiporus longicollis (Oliver). Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(2): 157-159. (in Chinese)
[42]	孙守慧, 李威, 金鑫, 杜亚英, 吕长利. 杨树单宁对青杨天牛的抗虫性. 东北林业大学学报, 2009, 37(5): 102-104.
	SUN S H, LI W, JIN X, DU Y Y, LÜ C L. Relationship between resistance of poplar to Saperda populnea and tannin content. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2009, 37(5): 102-104. (in Chinese)
[43]	赵玉辉, 郭印山, 李作轩. 果实花青素研究进展. 北方园艺, 2006(3): 46-47.
	ZHAO Y H, GUO Y S, LI Z X. Research progress of fruit anthocyanins. Northern Horticulture, 2006(3): 46-47. (in Chinese)
[44]	雒珺瑜, 崔金杰, 王春义, 辛惠江, 张帅, 吕丽敏. 棉花叶片蛋白质、可溶性糖和花青素含量及其与绿盲蝽抗性的关系. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(8): 75-80, 89.
	LUO J Y, CUI J J, WANG C Y, XIN H J, ZHANG S, LÜ L M. Relationship between the contents of protein, soluble sugar and anthocyanidins in cotton leaf and their resistance to Apolygus lucorum Meyer-Dür. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 39(8): 75-80, 89. (in Chinese)
[45]	胡菡青, 韦晓霞, 蔡子坚, 吴如健. 桔小实蝇寄主选择性的研究与应用. 江西农业学报, 2007, 19(2): 68-71.
	HU H Q, WEI X X, CAI Z J, WU R J. Research and application of host selection of oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2007, 19(2): 68-71. (in Chinese)